the bible was written by god

soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
edited December 2009 in A Moving Train
http://conservapedia.com/Conservative_Bible_Project

we just have to tweak it a bit to make sure it fits our political agenda.

"This improperly encourages the "social justice" movement among Christians"

God forbid Christians support social justice... when did Jesus promote helping the poor at the expense of the rich? He was a free market capitalist for God's sakes! Don't you remember the scene where he found the moneylenders in the temple and helped them get their 401k's in order?
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • catefrancescatefrances Posts: 29,003
    jesus was a socialist
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • __ Posts: 6,651
    jesus was a socialist

    Amen!
  • SmellymanSmellyman Asia Posts: 4,524
    The freaking Bible is too damn liberal.
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    that was the biggest crock i have ever read. it says not to dumb it down, but it already seems kinda dumb to me. the poster above said it well, the bible is too liberal??? :shock: lol.....
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • keeponrockinkeeponrockin Posts: 7,446
    "Everyone knows reality has a strong liberal bias"
    - Stephen Colbert.
    Believe me, when I was growin up, I thought the worst thing you could turn out to be was normal, So I say freaks in the most complementary way. Here's a song by a fellow freak - E.V
  • VINNY GOOMBAVINNY GOOMBA Posts: 1,818
    scb wrote:
    jesus was a socialist

    Amen!

    From what I can tell, I don't think Jesus advocated government coercion in order to achieve social justice. If there is law, it is only natural law as put forth by God. He wants us all to be better people by loving each other, and being charitable completely voluntarily.

    According to Webster's online:

    so⋅cial⋅ism  /ˈsoʊʃəˌlɪzəm/ Spelled Pronunciation [soh-shuh-liz-uhm]
    –noun 1. a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole.
    2. procedure or practice in accordance with this theory.
    3. (in Marxist theory) the stage following capitalism in the transition of a society to communism, characterized by the imperfect implementation of collectivist principles.

    #1 makes no specific mention of government, unless you count "social organization" as government. It does mention "community."
    #2 does not apply.
    #3 mentions a transition to communism. Where some people believe true capitalism can exist with no government, and socialsim to be the bridge between this no-government and total government in communism:

    Also according to Webster,

    com⋅mu⋅nism  /ˈkɒmyəˌnɪzəm/ Spelled Pronunciation [kom-yuh-niz-uhm]
    –noun 1. a theory or system of social organization based on the holding of all property in common, actual ownership being ascribed to the community as a whole or to the state.
    2. (often initial capital letter) a system of social organization in which all economic and social activity is controlled by a totalitarian state dominated by a single and self-perpetuating political party.
    3. (initial capital letter) the principles and practices of the Communist party.
    4. communalism.

    Then socialism, by definition must include some government involvement if it is the transition from zero government to state control.

    So, the first definition of "socialist" does fit with Jesus if "social organization" doesn't equate to be government.

    I like to think of HIM as The Libertarian with the biggest heart :D

    You wonder why there's so much fuss over this word, SOCIALISM these days? It has two official definitions that are really quite different from each other. But notice how close the first definition of communism and the first definition of socialism are? Identical, if it wasn't for communism being "the community as a whole OR TO THE STATE."

    You can see how it's not hard to equate those two words, either. People ought to underscore these words with which definition they're talking about when we use them, and maybe we wouldn't all get so angry with each other :)
  • I like to think of HIM (Jesus) as The Libertarian with the biggest heart :D

    Funny... I call myself a "sympathetic libertarian" so I guess me and Jesus are kinda similar in a lot of ways. :D
    Everything not forbidden is compulsory and eveything not compulsory is forbidden. You are free... free to do what the government says you can do.
  • VINNY GOOMBAVINNY GOOMBA Posts: 1,818
    I like to think of HIM (Jesus) as The Libertarian with the biggest heart :D

    Funny... I call myself a "sympathetic libertarian" so I guess me and Jesus are kinda similar in a lot of ways. :D

    Most Libertarians I know fit this same description. We are very "DIY" (Do it yourself). In the absence of many forms of government (not all of them), there is a universal need to step it up as individuals to contribute to society through charity, service, etc... to help things run smoothly. The reasons for doing so are very community-oriented as well as pragmatic. It's the force of government that brings resentment, and what's worse is when our wages and property are taken from us forcefully, and used inefficiently, if not STOLEN. Then you have REAL resentment towards government.
  • JeanwahJeanwah Posts: 6,363
    I'd say Jesus was a Communist in the true meaning of the word, the definition describing communalism.
    com⋅mu⋅nism  /ˈkɒmyəˌnɪzəm/ Spelled Pronunciation [kom-yuh-niz-uhm]
    –noun 1. a theory or system of social organization based on the holding of all property in common, actual ownership being ascribed to the community as a whole or to the state.

    In many parts of the world, communalism is a modern term that describes a broad range of social movements and social theories which are in some way centered upon the community.

    He was more Communal than Socialist or Lib. Most Libs are not communal by nature.
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    it is easier for a camel to walk through the eye of a needle than it is for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven.

    yeah, the liberal bias was added by us. clearly, this is a conservative, capitalist text.
  • You're all wrong... Jesus was an ANARCHIST! :D
    Everything not forbidden is compulsory and eveything not compulsory is forbidden. You are free... free to do what the government says you can do.
  • gabersgabers Posts: 2,787
  • ledveddermanledvedderman Posts: 7,761
    I think this pretty much settles it...
    (takes a while to load)

    http://74.125.47.132/search?hl=en&safe= ... f&oq=&aqi=
  • Drowned OutDrowned Out Posts: 6,056
    Don't you remember the scene where he found the moneylenders in the temple and helped them get their 401k's in order?
    :lol::lol: ....good stuff.
    That page is funny, but this really stood out:

    Accept the Logic of Hell: applying logic with its full force and effect, as in not denying or downplaying the very real existence of Hell or the Devil.

    I think I may have to make my sig 'Accept the logic of Hell'....talk about an oxymoron.
  • Heatherj43Heatherj43 Posts: 1,254
    it is easier for a camel to walk through the eye of a needle than it is for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven.

    yeah, the liberal bias was added by us. clearly, this is a conservative, capitalist text.
    Yeah, that's what I was thinking.
    Save room for dessert!
  • know1know1 Posts: 6,794
    Some people have the most asinine, childish, ignorant, close-minded views on religion. I'm just saying.
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    know1 wrote:
    Some people have the most asinine, childish, ignorant, close-minded views on religion. I'm just saying.

    So you see nothing wrong with this group explicitly devoting itself to attempting to spin the bible to better align with their politics? Isn't that kinda backwards, from a Christian perspective?
  • Drowned OutDrowned Out Posts: 6,056
    know1 wrote:
    Some people have the most asinine, childish, ignorant, close-minded views on religion. I'm just saying.
    Are you referencing something/someone in this thread? Or in the OP's link?
  • know1know1 Posts: 6,794
    know1 wrote:
    Some people have the most asinine, childish, ignorant, close-minded views on religion. I'm just saying.

    So you see nothing wrong with this group explicitly devoting itself to attempting to spin the bible to better align with their politics? Isn't that kinda backwards, from a Christian perspective?

    I didn't even look at it. But from the sounds of it, they are definitely a part of the problem. The issue - as has been stated over and over and over - is that people look at these wacko groups and then generalize to all religion.

    Not sure about the whole rich/poor/socialist/capitalist thing, but I do know that my church is partnering this month to prepare, pack and ship 1 million meals in association with an organization called "Feed my Starving Children". We are pushing for 5000 volunteers to make this happen.

    It's just hard to be a part of things like that and hear people just totally - and ignorantly - trash you for things they have no clue.
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
  • know1know1 Posts: 6,794
    know1 wrote:
    Some people have the most asinine, childish, ignorant, close-minded views on religion. I'm just saying.
    Are you referencing something/someone in this thread? Or in the OP's link?

    I'm referencing a lot of things from the link, to this thread, to lots of other threads.
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
  • ledveddermanledvedderman Posts: 7,761
    This might have got looked over on the first page, but does anyone see anything wrong with Jefferson, Franklin, and Adams appearing in a painting like this? Were they or were they not critics of Christianity?

    http://74.125.47.132/search?hl=en&safe= ... f&oq=&aqi=
  • scb wrote:
    jesus was a socialist

    Amen!
    hallelujah 8-)
    "...Dimitri...He talks to me...'.."The Ghost of Greece..".
    "..That's One Happy Fuckin Ghost.."
    “..That came up on the Pillow Case...This is for the Greek, With Our Apologies.....”
  • u all can call me with my first name..Dimitris..u are all friends...God call me the people who they dont know me.. :lol:
    "...Dimitri...He talks to me...'.."The Ghost of Greece..".
    "..That's One Happy Fuckin Ghost.."
    “..That came up on the Pillow Case...This is for the Greek, With Our Apologies.....”
  • This might have got looked over on the first page, but does anyone see anything wrong with Jefferson, Franklin, and Adams appearing in a painting like this? Were they or were they not critics of Christianity?

    http://74.125.47.132/search?hl=en&safe= ... f&oq=&aqi=

    That is such sickening, whorish, ignorant propaganda. Ugh.

    The argument of the founding fathers beliefs (Deism seems the best label, certainly not christian) is so tired...
    Everything not forbidden is compulsory and eveything not compulsory is forbidden. You are free... free to do what the government says you can do.
  • decides2dreamdecides2dream Posts: 14,977
    "Everyone knows reality has a strong liberal bias"
    - Stephen Colbert.

    hahahahaha...that is awesome.
    Stay with me...
    Let's just breathe...


    I am myself like you somehow


  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    This might have got looked over on the first page, but does anyone see anything wrong with Jefferson, Franklin, and Adams appearing in a painting like this? Were they or were they not critics of Christianity?

    http://74.125.47.132/search?hl=en&safe= ... f&oq=&aqi=
    that is pretty scary. contrary to peoples' beliefs, we do not have an official religion. i am sure a good number of those people would be offended if they were alive today and saw how they were portrayed in that painting. surprised the right is not clammoring for this to be hung in public schools....
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    know1 wrote:
    know1 wrote:
    Some people have the most asinine, childish, ignorant, close-minded views on religion. I'm just saying.

    So you see nothing wrong with this group explicitly devoting itself to attempting to spin the bible to better align with their politics? Isn't that kinda backwards, from a Christian perspective?

    I didn't even look at it. But from the sounds of it, they are definitely a part of the problem. The issue - as has been stated over and over and over - is that people look at these wacko groups and then generalize to all religion.

    Not sure about the whole rich/poor/socialist/capitalist thing, but I do know that my church is partnering this month to prepare, pack and ship 1 million meals in association with an organization called "Feed my Starving Children". We are pushing for 5000 volunteers to make this happen.

    It's just hard to be a part of things like that and hear people just totally - and ignorantly - trash you for things they have no clue.
    ...
    Just curious... are you one of the 5,000?
    If so, are you driven by your church, your religion or your heart?
    Thanx.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • kenny olavkenny olav Posts: 3,319
    Can we please stop giving any merit to an unfounded and incoherent set of texts written in the desert thousands of years ago? No one has ever made sense of it all, because it's not possible to do so. It's all a giant mess. Today, you have all of the different sects of Christianity, and the separate religions that formed out of Christianity, like Islam and Mormonism, but even in the early days, there were many different sects: the Ebionites, the Arians, the Gnostics, the Marcionists. Some were trinitarians, some were unitarians. Christianity, like any other religion, is one giant mess, just like humanity, it's creator. There's no proof that Jesus even existed simply as a man.

    That said, there's plenty of evidence that the earliest Christians lived as commies.

    Acts, Chapter 2, Verses 44 & 45:

    44 And all that believed were together, and had all things in common; 45 And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need.

    So if you're going to be a Christian, be a commie.

    Or go to hell. :twisted:
  • Kenny Olav wrote:
    Can we please stop giving any merit to an unfounded and incoherent set of texts written in the desert thousands of years ago? No one has ever made sense of it all, because it's not possible to do so. It's all a giant mess. Today, you have all of the different sects of Christianity, and the separate religions that formed out of Christianity, like Islam and Mormonism, but even in the early days, there were many different sects: the Ebionites, the Arians, the Gnostics, the Marcionists. Some were trinitarians, some were unitarians. Christianity, like any other religion, is one giant mess, just like humanity, it's creator. There's no proof that Jesus even existed simply as a man.

    That said, there's plenty of evidence that the earliest Christians lived as commies.

    Acts, Chapter 2, Verses 44 & 45:

    44 And all that believed were together, and had all things in common; 45 And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need.

    So if you're going to be a Christian, be a commie.

    Or go to hell. :twisted:
    :mrgreen:
    we need some of those little clapping smilies in here
  • Pepe SilviaPepe Silvia Posts: 3,758
    Kenny Olav wrote:
    Can we please stop giving any merit to an unfounded and incoherent set of texts written in the desert thousands of years ago? No one has ever made sense of it all, because it's not possible to do so. It's all a giant mess. Today, you have all of the different sects of Christianity, and the separate religions that formed out of Christianity, like Islam and Mormonism, but even in the early days, there were many different sects: the Ebionites, the Arians, the Gnostics, the Marcionists. Some were trinitarians, some were unitarians. Christianity, like any other religion, is one giant mess, just like humanity, it's creator. There's no proof that Jesus even existed simply as a man.

    That said, there's plenty of evidence that the earliest Christians lived as commies.

    Acts, Chapter 2, Verses 44 & 45:

    44 And all that believed were together, and had all things in common; 45 And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need.

    So if you're going to be a Christian, be a commie.

    Or go to hell. :twisted:
    :mrgreen:
    we need some of those little clapping smilies in here


    :clap::clap::clap::clap::clap:
    don't compete; coexist

    what are you but my reflection? who am i to judge or strike you down?

    "I will promise you this, that if we have not gotten our troops out by the time I am president, it is the first thing I will do. I will get our troops home. We will bring an end to this war. You can take that to the bank." - Barack Obama

    when you told me 'if you can't beat 'em, join 'em'
    i was thinkin 'death before dishonor'
Sign In or Register to comment.