yes! when murray cammick ran it and it had music in it that didn't suck. then they changed it to a "proper" magazine. scott kara did an okay job but i was friends with someone back in the day who interviewed REM at glastonbury and scott promised the cover to that interview but replaced it with britney spears because she's hotter than stipe and i was like "....pfft."
lotta pj content and a nice review of backspacer (though..really unnecessary information to include all the stuff about target... who fucking cares? we don't HAVE targets. it doesn't matter! fill the space with talk about the album)
surprised to see a guide to pj music that tells us to get ten, vs and vitalogy - wild card riot act.. but to avoid yield because it sucks.
uh.
ok.
jerks.
rip it up still sucks though - vedder doesn't look like he had TOO much to do with this issue
i read the article. it's not very good at all. you know what half an article about 2009 era pearl jam should be about? the story we've all already heard about the first 5-10 years.
Comments
it used to be so good.... then it got soooooooo bad. is that bomber arsehole still editor?
P.S. No he's not...
P.P.S. I liked it better when it was newsprint...
how about that then eh? might nip down to the supermarket later and get a copy.
surprised to see a guide to pj music that tells us to get ten, vs and vitalogy - wild card riot act.. but to avoid yield because it sucks.
uh.
ok.
jerks.
rip it up still sucks though - vedder doesn't look like he had TOO much to do with this issue
It's an opinion. Let people have them.
And btw, Riot Act > Yield
yield is my fave album.
plus i'm pretty sure the same magazine sucked up its arse when it came out. plus, ten, vs and vitalogy? that's redonkulous.
ED-itor..hoho