Pheonix Coyotes
MrMerkinball
Posts: 1,978
I haven't seen a thread about this story at all.
Is anyone following the Pheonix Coyotes fiasco?
For those who are out of the loop:
-Pheonix Coyotes (NHL team) file for bankruptcy
-CEO of RIM (blackberry) is a Canadian and has always wanted to buy a team and bring it to Southern Ontario.
-Commisoner hates this guy and refuses to allow him buy a NHL team
-CEO of RIM offers to buy bankrupt team and cover all creditors. Offer is 250 Million - only catch - he relocates team to Hamilton (40 kms from Toronto)
-NHL holds a vote and blocks him as an owner, but he is the only offer
-NHL itself tries to buy team for $150 million
- Bankruptcy judge now has to decide.....whose offer is worthy, RIM is offering way more money to cover all creditors, or the NHL who can't cover the creditors, but they have said RIM is not a worthy owner based on character. What takes precedence: NHL constitution or Bankruptcy law
I find this interesting and just Curious to hear other perspectives vs. just the Toronto media.
Is anyone following the Pheonix Coyotes fiasco?
For those who are out of the loop:
-Pheonix Coyotes (NHL team) file for bankruptcy
-CEO of RIM (blackberry) is a Canadian and has always wanted to buy a team and bring it to Southern Ontario.
-Commisoner hates this guy and refuses to allow him buy a NHL team
-CEO of RIM offers to buy bankrupt team and cover all creditors. Offer is 250 Million - only catch - he relocates team to Hamilton (40 kms from Toronto)
-NHL holds a vote and blocks him as an owner, but he is the only offer
-NHL itself tries to buy team for $150 million
- Bankruptcy judge now has to decide.....whose offer is worthy, RIM is offering way more money to cover all creditors, or the NHL who can't cover the creditors, but they have said RIM is not a worthy owner based on character. What takes precedence: NHL constitution or Bankruptcy law
I find this interesting and just Curious to hear other perspectives vs. just the Toronto media.
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
The only reason, IMO, that Bettman wants him stopped is because if Pheonix moves to Canada it serves as confirmation that Bettman's stupid idea to expand into terrible hockey markets is a total failure.
....also Bettman has to figure that a second team in the Toronto Area is the last great market for him to expand into. An expansion team in that area could go for $400-500 mil......but with this scenario the NHl loses that opportunity and gets dick all
yeah the fact that the NHL looses there biggest cash cow (the expansion fee for anyone who wants to expand in Southern Ontario if that ever happens) is huge, but the NHL's actions are ludicrous
someone please get Bettman out the fucking door
2003 ~ Toronto
2005 ~ London, Toronto
2006 ~ Toronto
2008 ~ Hartford, Mansfied I,
2009 ~ Toronto, Chicago I, Chicago II
2010 ~ Cleveland, Buffalo
2011 ~ Toronto I, Toronto II, Ottawa, Hamilton
2013 - London, Pittsburgh, Buffalo
I dont like Balsielle either. He seems like he has quite the ego and plays dirty. I can see him as an NHL owner trying to find loopholes, throwing out offer sheets, driving salaries up even more, and not caring about buying players out. Any more of that behavior is going to ruin the NHL. Owners have to be acting in a manner that keeps salaries down. Players want to be paid like NFL, MLB, or NBA players. Right now there are only about 5-8 teams out of 30 who can afford to do so.
Also, when TV rights are signed and negotiated, the NHL's presence in the Phoenix market is promised.
As said above, I also believe the NHL is Fixin on putting a team in N Toronto. This will be done properly and by the book with expansion fees and rights fees to the Leafs.
With that said, I have always wanted to see more teams up North and in Canada.... mainly Seattle (ripe for the pickins since the Sonics left), Winnipeg, and Quebec City. On the other hand, I dont really want to see an existing team moved. I almost lost the Sabres in 2002, and it was such a shitty feeling. there arent as many fans in Miami, Nashville, or Phoenix.... but there would be heartbroken people. The NHL put these teams there and should try to protect their existance in each city.
Unfortunately, I think the NHL is still going to try Kansas City (if the NBA doesnt land there first), Oklahoma City, and maybe Houston. Soon we will hit a wall with the NHL's great southern expansion though. IT wont survive to long in Phoenix without a winner.... Nashville is going to hit a wall, and Atlanta is the new Phoenix. Tampa Bay, and the Panthers seem like impending disasters. Bettman will be gone, and commissioner Brian Burke will grow the NHL within its niche marketand the NHL will be healthier than ever.
2003 ~ Toronto
2005 ~ London, Toronto
2006 ~ Toronto
2008 ~ Hartford, Mansfied I,
2009 ~ Toronto, Chicago I, Chicago II
2010 ~ Cleveland, Buffalo
2011 ~ Toronto I, Toronto II, Ottawa, Hamilton
2013 - London, Pittsburgh, Buffalo
i hope these southern market teams do fail. they failed once before and they will fail again.
Sammi: Wanna just break up?
Bettman and Balsillie are both douchebags.
work = work + 1;
sleep = sleep - work * 10;}
else if (work >= 0) {
reality.equals(false);
work = work +1;
}system("pause");
return 0;}
Seriously, this is my dream, haha. How someone so patently bad at his job can keep it is beyond me.
I'm also on the Brian Burke bandwagon. He'd be awesome for the league.
I agree too, not the most brilliat idea to have hockey teams in these southern market. Even though in Florida Tampa Bay Lightening has won a cup. The Florida Panthers draw big crowds when teams from the east coast teams come to town and appear to have a good following. The weidest feeling after leaving games in January and February and I'm sweating bigtime.
My contention has always been that there should be more teams in Canada and less in the US or NOT at all, just too many teams.
Peace
*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti
*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)