Man Caught Trying to Feed Kitten to Snake

Heatherj43

catefrances wrote:

Heatherj43 wrote:

No to both. If in your opinion its arbitrary as to what we feed ourselves and other animals then why forfeit the kitten, who could care less if the snake gets fed, and feed a part of yourself, to which is an animal, if it is you who cares that the snake eats.
And none of this takes brains period. You don't feed a kitten to a snake.

Oh and insults are not necessary.

no. what i said is it is abritrary what animals we in the west consider appropriate to be pets and what we consider appropriate to be sacrificed for our dinner tables. i did not say it was arbitrary what we feed other species. and clearly i dont care what the snakes eats and therfore if it eats kittens as opposed to rats or mice i dont have a problem with that. the problem you and others are having is an emotional one where you see kittens as pets which is fair enough. i see them as pets as well... but i dont preclude them from being fed to snakes. i just dont have a problem with it.

and who is talking about the brains, or lack of brains it takes to feed a kitten or not to a snake??


i didnt insult you... if i had i wouldve called you an idiot which i didnt. all i said was clearly you werent using your brain with the comment you made so why not feed it to a snake. and this was after you suggested that i feed one of my limbs to the snake. so lets all calm down and not get so emotional.

Pets are an emotional attachment. I get that we are in the west and we may have different ideas of what a pet is, however that is just it, WE ARE IN THE WEST, or at least I am. Now you go on and say you see kittens as pets, yet do not have a problem with them being fed to snakes. OMG! I just cannot understand how anyone can not have emotional feelings about what they see as a pet being eaten by a snake.
And okay, that is you. I don't think MOST people would be okay for something they see as a pet being fed to a snake.
The arm thing I have less problems with. At least you could still live. I care more about kittens than your arm. That is MY truth. I would give my arm to save a kitten. Many people have. I have read and heard many stories of people putting themselves in the middle of what they consider a pet type animal and another animal fighting to save the pet type animal. The human often ends up badly injured, yet would do it again, as I would.

catefrances

Heatherj43 wrote:

catefrances wrote:

Heatherj43 wrote:

No to both. If in your opinion its arbitrary as to what we feed ourselves and other animals then why forfeit the kitten, who could care less if the snake gets fed, and feed a part of yourself, to which is an animal, if it is you who cares that the snake eats.
And none of this takes brains period. You don't feed a kitten to a snake.

Oh and insults are not necessary.

no. what i said is it is abritrary what animals we in the west consider appropriate to be pets and what we consider appropriate to be sacrificed for our dinner tables. i did not say it was arbitrary what we feed other species. and clearly i dont care what the snakes eats and therfore if it eats kittens as opposed to rats or mice i dont have a problem with that. the problem you and others are having is an emotional one where you see kittens as pets which is fair enough. i see them as pets as well... but i dont preclude them from being fed to snakes. i just dont have a problem with it.

and who is talking about the brains, or lack of brains it takes to feed a kitten or not to a snake??


i didnt insult you... if i had i wouldve called you an idiot which i didnt. all i said was clearly you werent using your brain with the comment you made so why not feed it to a snake. and this was after you suggested that i feed one of my limbs to the snake. so lets all calm down and not get so emotional.

Pets are an emotional attachment. I get that we are in the west and we may have different ideas of what a pet is, however that is just it, WE ARE IN THE WEST, or at least I am. Now you go on and say you see kittens as pets, yet do not have a problem with them being fed to snakes. OMG! I just cannot understand how anyone can not have emotional feelings about what they see as a pet being eaten by a snake. And okay, that is you. I don't think MOST people would be okay for something they see as a pet being fed to a snake.
The arm thing I have less problems with. At least you could still live. I care more about kittens than your arm. That is MY truth. I would give my arm to save a kitten. Many people have. I have read and heard many stories of people putting themselves in the middle of what they consider a pet type animal and another animal fighting to save the pet type animal. The human often ends up badly injured, yet would do it again, as I would.

i dont see this kitten as a pet cause to me clearly this man didnt see it as one... otherwise, according to your logic,emotional though it might be, he wouldnt have tried to feed it to the snake.

not once have i ever said that i would feed a pet of mine or anyone elses to another animal.

CJMST3K

catefrances wrote:

i dont see this kitten as a pet cause to me clearly this man didnt see it as one... otherwise, according to your logic,emotional though it might be, he wouldnt have tried to feed it to the snake.

So, just to confirm, it's ok to kill a kitten that no one has an emotional attachment to. It's just not ok to hurt the kitten (like kicking he/she) without killing him. You can only harm it if you're gonna finish it off with the intent for consumption by some other animal. Correct?

catefrances

CJMST3K wrote:

catefrances wrote:

i dont see this kitten as a pet cause to me clearly this man didnt see it as one... otherwise, according to your logic,emotional though it might be, he wouldnt have tried to feed it to the snake.

So, just to confirm, it's ok to kill a kitten that no one has an emotional attachment to. It's just not ok to hurt the kitten (like kicking he/she) without killing him with the intent for consumption by some other animal. Correct?

did i say that???

what i said was i dont have a problem with snakes eating kittens. torturing an animal, any animal for ones own sick pleasure(which i believe this incident to be) is wrong. this man would have tortured that kitten regardless of whether the snake was there for the endgame or not. but lets be straight here i am talking about a snake eating a kitten not a snake eating my(or anyone elses) pet kitten... much the same as a snake eating a rat as opposed to someones pet rat. the emotional attachment would be there, no? and it would be no less devastating to the rats owner than to a kittens owner.

jlew24asu

this is a very odd thread

justam

I really resent having images like this put into my memory because I've read some headline or paragraph!!

Heatherj43

jlew24asu wrote:

this is a very odd thread

YA think? I know this, in the US animals have rights. A long time ago, they had more rights than kids. We have people in the US that torture animals. If I listen to the BS spewed here, it would be okay for these psychopaths to hurt/kill cats and/or dogs here 'cuz the perpetrator sees them different than I. That's a crock. It is usually the prelude to serial killings.
I cannot see how this is not sick behavior. I wouold love to hear in what area of the world this practice of feeding a kitten to a snake is acceptable.

Heatherj43

catefrances wrote:

CJMST3K wrote:

catefrances wrote:

i dont see this kitten as a pet cause to me clearly this man didnt see it as one... otherwise, according to your logic,emotional though it might be, he wouldnt have tried to feed it to the snake.

So, just to confirm, it's ok to kill a kitten that no one has an emotional attachment to. It's just not ok to hurt the kitten (like kicking he/she) without killing him with the intent for consumption by some other animal. Correct?

did i say that???

what i said was i dont have a problem with snakes eating kittens. torturing an animal, any animal for ones own sick pleasure(which i believe this incident to be) is wrong. this man would have tortured that kitten regardless of whether the snake was there for the endgame or not. but lets be straight here i am talking about a snake eating a kitten not a snake eating my(or anyone elses) pet kitten... much the same as a snake eating a rat as opposed to someones pet rat. the emotional attachment would be there, no? and it would be no less devastating to the rats owner than to a kittens owner.

People who own rats know they are also eaten by snakes. I want to know just where in this world cats are seen as edible.

catefrances

Heatherj43 wrote:

catefrances wrote:

CJMST3K wrote:

So, just to confirm, it's ok to kill a kitten that no one has an emotional attachment to. It's just not ok to hurt the kitten (like kicking he/she) without killing him with the intent for consumption by some other animal. Correct?

did i say that???

what i said was i dont have a problem with snakes eating kittens. torturing an animal, any animal for ones own sick pleasure(which i believe this incident to be) is wrong. this man would have tortured that kitten regardless of whether the snake was there for the endgame or not. but lets be straight here i am talking about a snake eating a kitten not a snake eating my(or anyone elses) pet kitten... much the same as a snake eating a rat as opposed to someones pet rat. the emotional attachment would be there, no? and it would be no less devastating to the rats owner than to a kittens owner.

People who own rats know they are also eaten by snakes. I want to know just where in this world cats are seen as edible.

everythings edible to something somewhere... its called the food chain.

if a snake came across a kitten in the bush it would have no problem eating it. it certainly wouldnt be thinking hmm is this little kitty someones pet??? itd be going mmmm food... a little furry but still yummy. it wouldnt even know what it was eating was a kitten.

ive never advocated feeding kittens to snakes. what i said was i have no problem with snakes eating kittens. see the difference???

my problem has always been with this mans actions.

Sludge Factory

catefrances wrote:

ive never advocated feeding kittens to snakes. what i said was i have no problem with snakes eating kittens. see the difference???

my problem has always been with this mans actions.

I see the difference, but this sounds like advocating to me:

catefrances wrote:

i dont understand the problem you people are having with this. so what... the man fed a kitten to a snake.. or tried to... maybe the damn thing was hungry.

Heatherj43

Sludge Factory wrote:

catefrances wrote:

ive never advocated feeding kittens to snakes. what i said was i have no problem with snakes eating kittens. see the difference???

my problem has always been with this mans actions.

I see the difference, but this sounds like advocating to me:

catefrances wrote:

i dont understand the problem you people are having with this. so what... the man fed a kitten to a snake.. or tried to... maybe the damn thing was hungry.

Yeah, big difference btw. the two. Thanks for pointing the variance out.

catefrances

Heatherj43 wrote:

Sludge Factory wrote:

catefrances wrote:

ive never advocated feeding kittens to snakes. what i said was i have no problem with snakes eating kittens. see the difference???

my problem has always been with this mans actions.

I see the difference, but this sounds like advocating to me:

catefrances wrote:

i dont understand the problem you people are having with this. so what... the man fed a kitten to a snake.. or tried to... maybe the damn thing was hungry.

Yeah, big difference btw. the two. Thanks for pointing the variance out.

of course theres a difference. i wont go around saying people should feed kittens to snakes, which would be advocating such an action. but i have no problem with it.

if youd like to get into a semantic pissing contest with me feel free to continue cause it already appears thats what youre doing.

Byrnzie

catefrances wrote:

of course theres a difference. i wont go around saying people should feed kittens to snakes, which would be advocating such an action. but i have no problem with it.

if youd like to get into a semantic pissing contest with me feel free to continue cause it already appears thats what youre doing.

Announcing that you have no problem with people feeding kittens to snakes on a public message board really isn't any different from advocating it. If you see no problem with it then you tacitly support it. Why pretend otherwise?

catefrances wrote:

i cant see the moral objection here.

Where's the semantic pissing contest here? Seems like you've taken a firm stand on the matter to me.

catefrances

Byrnzie wrote:

catefrances wrote:

of course theres a difference. i wont go around saying people should feed kittens to snakes, which would be advocating such an action. but i have no problem with it.

if youd like to get into a semantic pissing contest with me feel free to continue cause it already appears thats what youre doing.

Announcing that you have no problem with people feeding kittens to snakes on a public message board really isn't any different from advocating it. If you see no problem with it then you tacitly support it. Why pretend otherwise?

im prochoice does that mean i advocate abortion steve?

Byrnzie

catefrances wrote:

im prochoice does that mean i advocate abortion steve?

Yes, it means you support those who choose to have abortions, just as you support those who choose to feed kittens to snakes.

Advocate:
'a person who speaks or writes in support or defense of a person, cause, etc.'

catefrances

Byrnzie wrote:

catefrances wrote:

im prochoice does that mean i advocate abortion steve?

Yes, it means you support those who choose to have abortions, just as you support those who choose to feed kittens to snakes.

Advocate:
'a person who speaks or writes in support or defense of a person, cause, etc.'

i dont support people feeding kittens to snakes i just dont give a rats arse. thats why i dont have a problem with it. tis not like im shouting from the rooftops that people should feed kittens to snakes. sure the thought of snakes being fed kittens is abhorrent to our(meaning western societies) delicate sensibilities, its a cringe worthy moment but im over it. but in the end animals are animals they eat other animals or get eaten by other animals.

Byrnzie

catefrances wrote:

i dont support people feeding kittens to snakes i just dont give a rats arse. thats why i dont have a problem with it. tis not like im shouting from the rooftops that people should feed kittens to snakes. sure the thought of snakes being fed kittens is abhorrent to our(meaning western societies) delicate sensibilities, its a cringe worthy moment but im over it. but in the end animals are animals they eat other animals or get eaten by other animals.

This thread was never about animals needing to eat other animals. This thread was about a sick cunt trying to force feed a kitten to a snake. The snake wasn't in the wild needing to eat something. The owner wasn't trying to feed his snake because the snake was hungry. He was trying to torture a kitten to satisfy his twisted mind. This is why he then kicked it to death when the snake refused to play ball.

Still, at least you've managed to get your point across that you don't give a shit about animals.

catefrances

Byrnzie wrote:

catefrances wrote:

i dont support people feeding kittens to snakes i just dont give a rats arse. thats why i dont have a problem with it. tis not like im shouting from the rooftops that people should feed kittens to snakes. sure the thought of snakes being fed kittens is abhorrent to our(meaning western societies) delicate sensibilities, its a cringe worthy moment but im over it. but in the end animals are animals they eat other animals or get eaten by other animals.

This thread was never about animals needing to eat other animals. This thread was about a sick cunt trying to force feed a kitten to a snake. The snake wasn't in the wild needing to eat something. The owner wasn't trying to feed his snake because the snake was hungry. He was trying to torture a kitten to satisfy his twisted mind. This is why he then kicked it death when things didn't go his way.

Still, at least you've managed to get your point across that you don't give a shit about animals.

do not put words in my mouth steve.

if you read back through my posts you will see more than once ive stated torture is not something im kosher with nor am i ok with this guys actions in the way he repeatedly abused the kitten.

Byrnzie

catefrances wrote:

do not put words in my mouth steve.

You said "i just dont give a rats arse. thats why i dont have a problem with it."

I said 'You don't give a shit about animals'.


So what words did I put in your mouth?

catefrances

Byrnzie wrote:

catefrances wrote:

do not put words in my mouth steve.

You said "i just dont give a rats arse. thats why i dont have a problem with it."

I said 'You don't give a shit about animals'.


So what words did I put in your mouth?

i dont give a rats arse that a snake was fed a kitten. simple enough for you? that does not equate to me not giving a shit about animals. you are the one insinuating it to be so.