$221,190

arthurdentarthurdent Posts: 969
edited August 2009 in A Moving Train
USDA RELEASES ANNUAL STUDY WHICH NOTES THAT CHILD BORN IN 2008 WILL COST $221,190 TO RAISE

WASHINGTON, Aug. 4, 2009 - The U.S. Department of Agriculture today released a new report, Expenditures on Children by Families, finding that a middle-income family with a child born in 2008 can expect to spend about $221,190 ($291,570 when adjusted for inflation) for food, shelter, and other necessities to raise that child over the next seventeen years.

Issued by USDA each year since 1960, the report is a valuable resource to courts and state governments in determining child support guidelines and foster care payments. For the year 2008, annual child-rearing expenses for a middle-income, two-parent family ranges from $11,610 to $13,480, depending on the age of the child.

The report by USDA's Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion notes that family income affects child rearing costs. A family earning less than $56,870 per year can expect to spend a total of $159,870 (in 2008 dollars) on a child from birth through high school. Similarly, parents with an income between $56,870 and $98,470 can expect to spend $221,190; and a family earning more than $98,470 can expect to spend $366,660. In 1960, a middle-income family could have expected to spend $25,230 ($183,509 in 2008 dollars) to raise a child through age seventeen.

Housing costs are the single largest expenditure on a child, averaging $69,660 or 32 percent of the total cost over seventeen years. Food and child care/education (for those with the expense) were the next two largest expenses, each averaging 16 percent of the total expenditure. The estimates do not include the cost of childbearing or the cost of a college education. In addition, some current-day costs, such as child care, were negligible in 1960.

The report notes geographic variations in the cost of raising a child, with expenses the highest for families living in the urban Northeast, followed by the urban West and urban Midwest. Families living in the urban South and rural areas have the lowest child-rearing expenses.

USDA also plans to soon release an update of the Cost of Raising a Child Calculator, an online, interactive version of its annual report on Expenditures on Children by Families, which makes the figures more easily accessible to the public. To use the Calculator, people can enter the age(s) and number of children they have, whether the household consists of a married couple or a single parent, region of residence, and overall household income. The Calculator will then compute the average dollar amount the family is estimated to spend on their child or children and compare it to the national average cost of raising a child.

The full report, Expenditures on Children by Families, is available on the web at www.cnpp.usda.gov .
Rock me Jesus, roll me Lord...
Wash me in the blood of Rock & Roll
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • cincybearcatcincybearcat Posts: 16,500
    arthurdent wrote:
    For the year 2008, annual child-rearing expenses for a middle-income, two-parent family ranges from $11,610 to $13,480, depending on the age of the child.


    Wow...seems kinda low...child care costs $12,000/year alone in some cases (and more in the northeast and california I bet).
    hippiemom = goodness
  • decides2dreamdecides2dream Posts: 14,977
    this is interesting as well:

    "Housing costs are the single largest expenditure on a child, averaging $69,660 or 32 percent of the total cost over seventeen years"


    housing costs?
    i mean, really?
    do people actually spend that much MORE on housing simply b/c they have children? would most people live in one bedroom apartments, or townhomes, small houses....if they didn't have children? i find that hard to believe.

    i agree with cincy, for most i'd think childcare would be the biggie....and then of course, food/clothing....since college isn't figured in at all.
    Stay with me...
    Let's just breathe...


    I am myself like you somehow


  • this is interesting as well:

    "Housing costs are the single largest expenditure on a child, averaging $69,660 or 32 percent of the total cost over seventeen years"


    housing costs?
    i mean, really?
    do people actually spend that much MORE on housing simply b/c they have children? would most people live in one bedroom apartments, or townhomes, small houses....if they didn't have children? i find that hard to believe.

    Yeah... that part made me sort of disregard this article/study altogether. I understand people buy bigger houses if they have kids, but I don't think that they spend anymore housing money than they would have anyway.

    I mean, my wife and I bought a house last year... We had a budget, and bought a 3 bedroom house (because we have a kid and are probably going to have another one). But even if we didn't have plans to have any kids, we would still have the same housing budget (hell maybe even a higher one knowing we wouldn't have the expense of kids).
    My whole life
    was like a picture
    of a sunny day
    “We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
    ― Abraham Lincoln
  • pandorapandora Posts: 21,855
    They don't know my kids
    that seems way low
  • slightofjeffslightofjeff Posts: 7,762
    Shit. I don't have that kind of money.
    everybody wants the most they can possibly get
    for the least they could possibly do
Sign In or Register to comment.