Interesting New Tax Information

IndifferenceIndifference Posts: 2,728
edited August 2009 in A Moving Train
The trend isn't what you hear in the media:

http://www.taxfoundation.org/blog/show/24944.html

SHOW COUNT: (164) 1990's=3, 2000's=53, 2010/20's=108, US=118, CAN=15, Europe=20 ,New Zealand=4, Australia=5
Mexico=1, Colombia=1 



Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • OffHeGoes29OffHeGoes29 Posts: 1,240
    Interesting....thank you for posting that
    BRING BACK THE WHALE
  • This trend is a result of the distribution of wealth that has changed over the last 20 years. This trend will inevitably continue if wealth of the united states is further transferred into the hands of fewer people. As the middle class shrinks it leaves the top tier making proportionately more taxable transactions.
  • decides2dreamdecides2dream Posts: 14,977
    perhaps i am missing something but....

    top 1% tax burden = 40.4%
    bottom 95% tax burden = 39.4%

    so.....1% difference in 'burden'....and yet i imagine that 'burden' feels a lot heavier on the lower incomes than that extra 1% for the top 1% actually feels.
    Stay with me...
    Let's just breathe...


    I am myself like you somehow


  • IndifferenceIndifference Posts: 2,728
    perhaps i am missing something but....

    top 1% tax burden = 40.4%
    bottom 95% tax burden = 39.4%

    so.....1% difference in 'burden'....and yet i imagine that 'burden' feels a lot heavier on the lower incomes than that extra 1% for the top 1% actually feels.

    You have the facts accurate - just that there are 95 times as many people in one of the groups.

    SHOW COUNT: (164) 1990's=3, 2000's=53, 2010/20's=108, US=118, CAN=15, Europe=20 ,New Zealand=4, Australia=5
    Mexico=1, Colombia=1 



  • You have the facts accurate - just that there are 95 times as many people in one of the groups.

    And the other group owns 38% of the wealth in the united states.
Sign In or Register to comment.