RIAA, Trent Reznor, downloading music, and more.

SanctusoriumSanctusorium Posts: 10
edited July 2009 in A Moving Train
I was wondering what everyone's views on this issue are. We all know that some bands are testing a "Pay $5, download MP3s" or flat out just giving albums. Is this the future of how the industry? Is this going to work, or is it going to be something that just comes and goes? What about music subscription services like the Zune Pass?

As a pure consumer, and as a unbeliveable poor college student, I like the idea of being able to legally obtain an album that I love for around $5... And skip all the packing. I love the idea of if I really want the CD, go to the store and buy that version, but having the option of accessing just the music that night legally for chump change... And either way, I'm going to have it that night whether is paid for or not.

Future of the industry? I hope so. Will it catch on? Dunno. I am just a consumer. However, the idea of subscription services like the Zunepass makes me happy too. Unlimted LEGAL music for $15/mo? And every 5 months you get five songs to keep for good? I'd do it. (I still need to look into other things though.)

I don't think that the physical album will ever die.. But will it become less prominate? And, is this the right way to go?

Whats everyone's thoughts?

*Edit*

Also, is Trent going to be known as the architect in this new model? And the IRAA... Oh the IRAA... Their advancement should be interesting.
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • musicismylife78musicismylife78 Posts: 6,116
    there is no question Trent Reznor is the guy who i would look to to come up with the future model for how music will be distributed. He is heaps and loads smarten and more with it, than any one else, as far as CEO's and record label head honchos and the like.

    Ultimately I think the RIAA is fighting a losing battle. Its absurd to think now that file sharing is the way most people get music, that they think that somehow, fining and jailing mothers of four, who download twenty songs.

    The RIAA and anti-downloaders dont get it. I even wonder if Pearl jam gets it. I am going to see them both seattle shows, but I wonder why they didnt do a digital release/radiohead type thing for backspacer.

    No one buys cd's anymore. We can moan and groan and say, "I wish it was the old days", but those days are long gone. Few people pay for cd's anymore.

    I think RIAA will continue to fine and jail people, and the record industry will continue to demonize those who download music. Its sad really. How could people be so out of the loop?
  • AnonAnon Posts: 11,175
    Downloading is one thing, downloading and not paying is another. If you use those free file sharing networks to download you are committing theft IMO. Pay the $.99 a song.
  • Pepe SilviaPepe Silvia Posts: 3,758
    before Radiohead released 'In Rainbows' officially they allowed everyone to download it and pay whatever they felt it was worth....despite a lot of people not paying anything they still made more money than they would've received from a contract and selling that many physical albums. i also love that they have no record contract, they use XL Records (or recordings) to distribute their albums but they are under no contract with any label, hopefully more bands will follow
    don't compete; coexist

    what are you but my reflection? who am i to judge or strike you down?

    "I will promise you this, that if we have not gotten our troops out by the time I am president, it is the first thing I will do. I will get our troops home. We will bring an end to this war. You can take that to the bank." - Barack Obama

    when you told me 'if you can't beat 'em, join 'em'
    i was thinkin 'death before dishonor'
  • decides2dreamdecides2dream Posts: 14,977
    i think it's a great idea. the music industry/artists definitely need to come up with ways to combat illegal DLing if they want to remain profitable, and this seems just one way to start to do so. i do think most people do want to do things the right way, but it's just so damn easy/tempting to DL for free, it's easy to rationalize i imagine.....so this may well help. make it easy and very affordable and perhaps more will do so legally.


    i still love, love, love physical CDs, probably always will. i grew up on vinyl, then cassettes :oops: ....hahaha.....so i am just too accustomed to getting a physical product, and i LIKE the full package. so you bet, i will continue to support artists i truly like by buying their CDS but i do also buy from itunes as well. my husband buys a LOT of music thru itunes, so i definitely see how that instantaneous purchase will be the way to go in the future. i forsee a lot of options, which hopefully will benefit artist and consumer alike.
    Stay with me...
    Let's just breathe...


    I am myself like you somehow


  • Drowned OutDrowned Out Posts: 6,056
    JB811 wrote:
    Downloading is one thing, downloading and not paying is another. If you use those free file sharing networks to download you are committing theft IMO. Pay the $.99 a song.

    Why would I pay $.99 a song and get nothing tangible in return?

    Retail CD (full album) = +/- $15

    12 songs @ $.99/song = $11.88
    + CDR cost; say $1
    + Labels; ink...say $1 (assuming you get album art w/dl...)
    + your time to burn and print it all....

    You end up with a more expensive, inferior product, and a lot of wasted time...
    $1/song is a total scam. theft, almost ;)
    This breakdown shows just how greedy and inflexible the recording industry is being...what is the overhead costs when supplying digital files? They saw it as another opportunity to fuck their customers and increase margins, rather than try to save face and right a sinking ship.
  • mustbechrismustbechris Posts: 228
    No, it's not the "future" (unfortunately), and here's why:

    Doing the digital thing like Radiohead and Nine Inch Nails is really only an option that band that have REALLY made it can exercise. The young bands are still at the mercy of record companies because they don't have the means to circulate and promote their music on their own. They sign with a record company, and IF they end up being successful (i.e. their record sells enough for the record company to decide the band is worth raping of money on a second album), they're locked in to the contract for a long time. You're talking about a band that has at least a good 8-10 years under its belt and a good amount of money if you're talking about the whole digital download thing.

    Basically, I think it's a good option for bands like Radiohead and NIN that really want to go out of their way to be fair to their fans. But for the most part, it takes a certain amount of fame and fortune to get to that point, which is why the CD and the $0.99 digital download aren't going away any time soon. For every Trent Reznor, there are 10 record company CEOs that will find other bands to feast on.
    ---
    And as far as the comment made by someone about Pearl Jam "getting it", my assessment is they don't. For as much as I love the band, their albums can be fairly expensive, they still release their albums on vinyl (it might be a novelty, but it still is what it is), and they went to war with Ticketmaster only to have their ticket prices at almost $80 a ticket just 15 years later, which can hardly be blamed on Ticketmaster. Again, I love the band, but at some point between then and now it just feels like they lost touch with their original message and methods. People are still gonna buy the albums and go to the concerts obviously, but especially in a time when NOBODY has money, it'd be nice if they could make themselves a bit more accessible to the kids and whatnot. I'm a college kid in Philadelphia; $77 for a concert ticket isn't really in the budget when I need to pay for housing and food and books and everything else. I'll find a way to pay for it, but it really shouldn't be that way.
    Speaking as a child of the 90's
  • JeanwahJeanwah Posts: 6,363
    No, it's not the "future" (unfortunately), and here's why:

    Doing the digital thing like Radiohead and Nine Inch Nails is really only an option that band that have REALLY made it can exercise. The young bands are still at the mercy of record companies because they don't have the means to circulate and promote their music on their own. They sign with a record company, and IF they end up being successful (i.e. their record sells enough for the record company to decide the band is worth raping of money on a second album), they're locked in to the contract for a long time. You're talking about a band that has at least a good 8-10 years under its belt and a good amount of money if you're talking about the whole digital download thing.

    Basically, I think it's a good option for bands like Radiohead and NIN that really want to go out of their way to be fair to their fans. But for the most part, it takes a certain amount of fame and fortune to get to that point, which is why the CD and the $0.99 digital download aren't going away any time soon. For every Trent Reznor, there are 10 record company CEOs that will find other bands to feast on.
    ---
    And as far as the comment made by someone about Pearl Jam "getting it", my assessment is they don't. For as much as I love the band, their albums can be fairly expensive, they still release their albums on vinyl (it might be a novelty, but it still is what it is), and they went to war with Ticketmaster only to have their ticket prices at almost $80 a ticket just 15 years later, which can hardly be blamed on Ticketmaster. Again, I love the band, but at some point between then and now it just feels like they lost touch with their original message and methods. People are still gonna buy the albums and go to the concerts obviously, but especially in a time when NOBODY has money, it'd be nice if they could make themselves a bit more accessible to the kids and whatnot. I'm a college kid in Philadelphia; $77 for a concert ticket isn't really in the budget when I need to pay for housing and food and books and everything else. I'll find a way to pay for it, but it really shouldn't be that way.

    Let's face it; the music industry is a dirty business. Like you said, less experienced bands and artists are at the mercy of their labels and only the successful ones can do what Radiohead and Reznor are doing. I think the future belongs to these two in particular, as they've shown innovative potential to branch out on their own and try things differently. Only the innovative ones will be successful in determining the future. They predict it all, basically by risking everything. Record companies won't risk the chance of losing money, therefore, they boringly play it safe.

    PJ is showing that they're relying on their management to handle things, which is showing us that they're playing it safe, and not showing any innovation at all towards distribution of music and their fans (which is fine, I suppose, for most fans). I agree what you've mentioned, that they've lost their ideals that they once stood for, in keeping tix prices low and it all being about the music. PJ management is showing us that they're controlling the reigns, or perhaps, the band has just grown old and is conforming. Who knows. But I know that I'd love to see the guys rally up to the likes of Radiohead and Reznor in molding the future of how we get our music. I know they can do it.
  • JaneNYJaneNY Posts: 4,438
    No, it's not the "future" (unfortunately), and here's why:

    Doing the digital thing like Radiohead and Nine Inch Nails is really only an option that band that have REALLY made it can exercise. The young bands are still at the mercy of record companies because they don't have the means to circulate and promote their music on their own. They sign with a record company, and IF they end up being successful (i.e. their record sells enough for the record company to decide the band is worth raping of money on a second album), they're locked in to the contract for a long time. You're talking about a band that has at least a good 8-10 years under its belt and a good amount of money if you're talking about the whole digital download thing.

    Here's more from Trent, from this thread on nin.com regarding the issue of new artists and surviving.
    I posted a message on Twitter yesterday stating I thought The Beastie Boys and TopSpin Media "got it right" regarding how to sell music in this day and age. Here's a link to their store:

    [illcommunication.beastieboys.com]

    Shortly thereafter, I got some responses from people stating the usual "yeah, if you're an established artist - what if you're just trying to get heard?" argument. In an interview I did recently this topic came up and I'll reiterate what I said here.

    If you are an unknown / lesser-known artist trying to get noticed / established:

    * Establish your goals. What are you trying to do / accomplish? If you are looking for mainstream super-success (think Lady GaGa, Coldplay, U2, Justin Timberlake) - your best bet in my opinion is to look at major labels and prepare to share all revenue streams / creative control / music ownership. To reach that kind of critical mass these days your need old-school marketing muscle and that only comes from major labels. Good luck with that one.

    If you're forging your own path, read on.

    * Forget thinking you are going to make any real money from record sales. Make your record cheaply (but great) and GIVE IT AWAY. As an artist you want as many people as possible to hear your work. Word of mouth is the only true marketing that matters.
    To clarify:
    Parter with a TopSpin or similar or build your own website, but what you NEED to do is this - give your music away as high-quality DRM-free MP3s. Collect people's email info in exchange (which means having the infrastructure to do so) and start building your database of potential customers. Then, offer a variety of premium packages for sale and make them limited editions / scarce goods. Base the price and amount available on what you think you can sell. Make the packages special - make them by hand, sign them, make them unique, make them something YOU would want to have as a fan. Make a premium download available that includes high-resolution versions (for sale at a reasonable price) and include the download as something immediately available with any physical purchase. Sell T-shirts. Sell buttons, posters... whatever.

    Don't have a TopSpin as a partner? Use Amazon for your transactions and fulfillment. [www.amazon.com]

    Use TuneCore to get your music everywhere. [www.tunecore.com]

    Have a realistic idea of what you can expect to make from these and budget your recording appropriately.
    The point is this: music IS free whether you want to believe that or not. Every piece of music you can think of is available free right now a click away. This is a fact - it sucks as the musician BUT THAT'S THE WAY IT IS (for now). So... have the public get what they want FROM YOU instead of a torrent site and garner good will in the process (plus build your database).

    The Beastie Boys' site offers everything you could possibly want in the formats you would want it in - available right from them, right now. The prices they are charging are more than you should be charging - they are established and you are not. Think this through.

    The database you are amassing should not be abused, but used to inform people that are interested in what you do when you have something going on - like a few shows, or a tour, or a new record, or a webcast, etc.
    Have your MySpace page, but get a site outside MySpace - it's dying and reads as cheap / generic. Remove all Flash from your website. Remove all stupid intros and load-times. MAKE IT SIMPLE TO NAVIGATE AND EASY TO FIND AND HEAR MUSIC (but don't autoplay). Constantly update your site with content - pictures, blogs, whatever. Give people a reason to return to your site all the time. Put up a bulletin board and start a community. Engage your fans (with caution!) Make cheap videos. Film yourself talking. Play shows. Make interesting things. Get a Twitter account. Be interesting. Be real. Submit your music to blogs that may be interested. NEVER CHASE TRENDS. Utilize the multitude of tools available to you for very little cost of any - Flickr / YouTube / Vimeo / SoundCloud / Twitter etc.

    If you don't know anything about new media or how people communicate these days, none of this will work. The role of an independent musician these days requires a mastery of first hand use of these tools. If you don't get it - find someone who does to do this for you. If you are waiting around for the phone to ring or that A & R guy to show up at your gig - good luck, you're going to be waiting a while.

    Hope this helps, and I'll scour responses for intelligent comments I can respond to.

    TR

    TopSpin Media info:
    [topspinmedia.com]

    There's more and he goes on to update the post based on some questions/comments of people. Definitely worth reading.
    R.i.p. Rigoberto Alpizar.
    R.i.p. My Dad - May 28, 2007
    R.i.p. Black Tail (cat) - Sept. 20, 2008
Sign In or Register to comment.