Options

FOR THOSE OF YOU CONCERNED ABOUT EDDIE'S VOICE

staz17staz17 Posts: 88
edited June 2009 in The Porch
Since the premier of the tonight show there have been a lot of eyebrows raised about the current condition and future of Eddie's voice. Now I know for a lot of us die-hards it can be a sensitive topic but I have no fear. Like I said, a lot of this commotion has come after the tonight show performance. I have watched Leno and Conan for years and have seen some great bands. I remember an episode of Leno where his musical guest (can't remember who it was, not a big name) explained how the tonight show studio works for musical performances. As I remember, it went something like this.

-band and crew arrives at the studio at roughly 9am where setup begins, introductions, greetings etc
-soundcheck takes place early, often right after setup (assume it takes them 2 hours to set up - that means soundcheck at about 11am)
-after that, in the directors eyes, the band is ready to go and the only job left is to keep them happy, fed and entertained until the recording
-The tonight show is FILMED AT 4PM
- Once cameras are rolling, the bands warmup nearly stops. I imagine its because their cant be crazy noise coming from backstage.

So put yourself in eddies shoes-
-chances are, they arrived in LA the day/night before
-he was probably up by 8am
-he had to do soundcheck at around 11am
-he then had 5 hours of "hanging out" maybe warming up?
-sure eddie can do whatever voice exercises he wants while the show is recording, but the band cant actually warm up at that time.
-boom, 4pm and its time to rock everyones socks off. No warming up with crazy mary, nothingman or man of the hour. Its one shot, show the world thew new stuff and play with the intention of making everyone fall in love with it.

What I'm really getting at is that the tonight show is not exactly a prime environment for live musical performances. The acoustics are terrible, and the studio size pales in comparison to the average pj venue, and probably the biggest kicker is the mess of a day the band has to go through before performing. However from a business perspective, its a great way to get your stuff out there.

I'll be in Toronto August 21st and I'm not one bit nervous..

I know Eddie and this band will live up to their reputation as one of the greatest bands ever to rock the stage.

Keep on Rockin,
Staz
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • Options
    LikeAnOceanLikeAnOcean Posts: 7,718
    Anyone remember how bad and raspy his voice was in '04 for Masters of War on Letterman? He was near squealing like he was going to loose it..

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hG443N7lo4Q

    Listen to him sing "you play with our world, like it was your little toy.".. He cant hit anything high at all.

    and that was an EASY song to sing. He did just fine on the '05, '06 and '08 tours..
  • Options
    demetriosdemetrios Canada Posts: 87,936
    staz17 wrote:
    I'll be in Toronto August 21st and I'm not one bit nervous.

    see you in toronto! :mrgreen:
  • Options
    asher7asher7 Posts: 85
    Thanks for this, quite interesting.

    I definitely thought that the acoustics in genearl for Get Some were pretty terrible, at first I thought this was because I saw it on the computer but it was equally bad in the UK CNBC re-run.

    Also, in the second song they did, rockin' in the free world, his voice was noticeably better - perhaps he was more warmed up or perhaps he was just more comfortable with the song.

    I'm not worried about his voice one bit! Looking forward to 18th of august at the o2!!!
  • Options
    staz17staz17 Posts: 88
    asher7 wrote:
    Thanks for this, quite interesting.

    I definitely thought that the acoustics in genearl for Get Some were pretty terrible, at first I thought this was because I saw it on the computer but it was equally bad in the UK CNBC re-run.

    Also, in the second song they did, rockin' in the free world, his voice was noticeably better - perhaps he was more warmed up or perhaps he was just more comfortable with the song.

    I'm not worried about his voice one bit! Looking forward to 18th of august at the o2!!!

    the same can pretty much be said for any talk-show studio. in any given episode people talk for 55 minutes and the band plays for 5. What do you think they will tune their sound for?

    I guess thats why they're called talk shows
  • Options
    asher7asher7 Posts: 85
    staz17 wrote:
    asher7 wrote:
    Thanks for this, quite interesting.

    I definitely thought that the acoustics in genearl for Get Some were pretty terrible, at first I thought this was because I saw it on the computer but it was equally bad in the UK CNBC re-run.

    Also, in the second song they did, rockin' in the free world, his voice was noticeably better - perhaps he was more warmed up or perhaps he was just more comfortable with the song.

    I'm not worried about his voice one bit! Looking forward to 18th of august at the o2!!!

    the same can pretty much be said for any talk-show studio. in any given episode people talk for 55 minutes and the band plays for 5. What do you think they will tune their sound for?

    I guess thats why they're called talk shows

    fair enough - just saying its not a fair reflection of the song is all -the guitars even seemed quite muddy which is something that would never be allowed to happen in a studio album.
  • Options
    UpSideDownUpSideDown Posts: 1,966
    I have a great amount of faith in Ed, but now have to consider myself one of the concerned people. I think his voice is still going to be there for the upcoming shows, but I am worried about the wear/tear on it for the next full tour.

    In 2008 the band sounded fantastic, but it sounded like his voice could have gone at any moment. This is what really raised my eyebrows at this issue (solo shows are a different pace/style of singing). I wonder if the other band members have ever approached him about the current path/future of his voice?

    I think it is such a sensitive issue around here because so many people are emotionally invested in his voice, myself included.
  • Options
    staz17staz17 Posts: 88
    asher7 wrote:
    staz17 wrote:
    asher7 wrote:
    Thanks for this, quite interesting.

    I definitely thought that the acoustics in genearl for Get Some were pretty terrible, at first I thought this was because I saw it on the computer but it was equally bad in the UK CNBC re-run.

    Also, in the second song they did, rockin' in the free world, his voice was noticeably better - perhaps he was more warmed up or perhaps he was just more comfortable with the song.

    I'm not worried about his voice one bit! Looking forward to 18th of august at the o2!!!

    the same can pretty much be said for any talk-show studio. in any given episode people talk for 55 minutes and the band plays for 5. What do you think they will tune their sound for?

    I guess thats why they're called talk shows

    fair enough - just saying its not a fair reflection of the song is all -the guitars even seemed quite muddy which is something that would never be allowed to happen in a studio album.


    Sorry if my last post came across as snappy, I was just furthering my previous point. but ya i totally agree with what you're saying. I'm super pumped to hear the studio version...whenever its released
  • Options
    staz17staz17 Posts: 88
    UpSideDown wrote:
    I think it is such a sensitive issue around here because so many people are emotionally invested in his voice, myself included.


    +1
  • Options
    slightofjeffslightofjeff Posts: 7,758
    UpSideDown wrote:
    I have a great amount of faith in Ed, but now have to consider myself one of the concerned people. I think his voice is still going to be there for the upcoming shows, but I am worried about the wear/tear on it for the next full tour.

    In 2008 the band sounded fantastic, but it sounded like his voice could have gone at any moment. This is what really raised my eyebrows at this issue (solo shows are a different pace/style of singing). I wonder if the other band members have ever approached him about the current path/future of his voice?

    I think it is such a sensitive issue around here because so many people are emotionally invested in his voice, myself included.

    And this is my point. His voice sounded fine in 2008. It did not sound "like it could go at any minute," not any more so than on previous tours.

    I would have been more concerned about "the future of Ed's voice" back in 1995 when he was blowing it out every night. Since then, he's learned to control it, harness it and save it better.

    Fact is, he's not going to sing "Evenflow" like you remember it in 1992. He's just not. He's going to actually sing it, instead of growl it. I think what some people are mistaking for "Ed losing his voice" is actually "Ed learning how to fucking sing."
    everybody wants the most they can possibly get
    for the least they could possibly do
  • Options
    Vedder_Girl77Vedder_Girl77 Posts: 4,335
    [quote="slightofjeff And this is my point. His voice sounded fine in 2008. It did not sound "like it could go at any minute," not any more so than on previous tours.

    I would have been more concerned about "the future of Ed's voice" back in 1995 when he was blowing it out every night. Since then, he's learned to control it, harness it and save it better.

    Fact is, he's not going to sing "Evenflow" like you remember it in 1992. He's just not. He's going to actually sing it, instead of growl it. I think what some people are mistaking for "Ed losing his voice" is actually "Ed learning how to fucking sing."[/quote]

    AMEN!
    8/29/00, 7/3/03, 5/24/06,6/28/08 & 6/30/08, 10/9/09,10/28/09, 10/30/09 & 10/31/09, 5/15/10, 5/17/10, 5/18/10, 5/20/10 & 5/21/10, 10/23/10 & 10/24/10, 9/3/11, 9/4/11, 9/11/11, 9/12/11, 9/23/11, 9/22/12, 9/30/12, 7/16/13, 7/19/13
  • Options
    i think people need to go listen to those boots from 2008 again.his voice was average at best.he had alot of problems with alot of songs.i'm pretty sure they changed the key of evacuation for this reason.it's not the end of the world.it's just time to realize he's going roger daultrey on us.
    looking to hear of the earth
  • Options
    staz17staz17 Posts: 88
    I think what some people are mistaking for "Ed losing his voice" is actually "Ed learning how to fucking sing."

    Couldn't agree more
  • Options
    slightofjeffslightofjeff Posts: 7,758
    i think people need to go listen to those boots from 2008 again.his voice was average at best.he had alot of problems with alot of songs.i'm pretty sure they changed the key of evacuation for this reason.it's not the end of the world.it's just time to realize he's going roger daultrey on us.

    Ed could never sing Evacuation consistently. It's a fucking hard song to sing. That's why they never play it.

    My God. Ed at the VH1 Rock Honors was one of the best performances I've ever heard from any singer at any time. That was less than 12 months ago. I find it hard to believe his voice is shot all of a sudden.

    I've been listening to my 2008 boots constantly of late. I don't need to listen to them again. He sounds fine.

    Average at best? What does that even mean? I'd like to hear who you believe to be an "average" singer. Because there are a shitload of people Ed sounds better than with one vocal chord ripped out.
    everybody wants the most they can possibly get
    for the least they could possibly do
  • Options
    average for ed.he is one of the best singers ever, and my favorite.he's just not as good as he use to be, in any aspect of singing.i'm just giving my opinion.i love this band more than anyone.
    looking to hear of the earth
  • Options
    I think this is getting blown out of proportion. The sound sucked, that was obvious (vocals too low in the mix) but I don't think Ed sounded bad at all. I think its just a tough song to sing (since its so fast) as a first song without a proper warm up.
  • Options
    staz17staz17 Posts: 88
    I think this is getting blown out of proportion. The sound sucked, that was obvious (vocals too low in the mix) but I don't think Ed sounded bad at all. I think its just a tough song to sing (since its so fast) as a first song without a proper warm up.


    my point exactly...we just got a taste, there's plenty more to come
  • Options
    SawyerSawyer Posts: 2,411
    However, on recent bootlegs he sounds pretty atrocious at times....when I'm there I could care less, but when listening on cd sometimes, it unfortunately can be painful.
  • Options
    SmellymanSmellyman Asia Posts: 4,520
    yes the same "concern" for eds' vocie has been going on for over 15 years.
  • Options
    knikknik Posts: 94
    I am not very concerned about Ed's voice, but more about his ability to keep up with fast paced songs. He sounds great on slower songs, but seems out of breath more often these days on the faster ones.
  • Options
    Out.Of.My.MindOut.Of.My.Mind Posts: 125
    edited June 2009
    Anyone remember how bad and raspy his voice was in '04 for Masters of War on Letterman? He was near squealing like he was going to loose it..

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hG443N7lo4Q

    Listen to him sing "you play with our world, like it was your little toy.".. He cant hit anything high at all.

    and that was an EASY song to sing. He did just fine on the '05, '06 and '08 tours..

    This is probably the best performance of Master's Of War. The band was so god damn into it and Ed sang with such conviction and fervence. Straight from his gut and out of his mouth came the vocals that were equivalent to the despair and graveness of this song. Ed sang this song brilliantly.
    There are no bad voice days for Ed Vedder.
    I think you need to shut the fuck up about your so called concerns.
    Ed can sing.
    Peace,
    Camdenjuly
    Post edited by Out.Of.My.Mind on
    I'm alive

    Phila. 03. Camden nights 1&2 03. Hershey 03. Boston 04. Reading 04. St Louis 04. Montreal 05. Ottawa 05. AC 05. Phila. 05. NY Letterman Show 06. E Rutherford nights 1&2 06. Camden nights 1&2 06. Denver nights 1&2 06. Hawaii 06. Grant Park, Chicago 07. Van Couver 08.(EV Solo) Camden nights 1&2 08. NY nights 1&2 08. Hartford 08. Mansfield 08. Newark 08.(EV Solo) Phila. nights 1&2 09.(EV Solo) Baltimore nights 1&2 09.(EV Solo) Honolulu night 2 09.(EV Solo) Salt Lake City 09. Phila Spectrum 10/27 10/28 & 10/31/09. Newark, NJ 05.18.10
  • Options
    demetriosdemetrios Canada Posts: 87,936
    Ed need's some of these for his soar throat! Instead of wine & smokes, this solo tour, he will be drinking these down, 6 pack style! :P

    41M90SNR7VL._SL500_AA280_PIbundle-6,TopRight,0,0_AA280_SH20_.jpg
  • Options
    dimitrispearljamdimitrispearljam NINUNINOPRO Posts: 139,158
    13-8-09....eddie in rotterdam will kiss some ass.
    "...Dimitri...He talks to me...'.."The Ghost of Greece..".
    "..That's One Happy Fuckin Ghost.."
    “..That came up on the Pillow Case...This is for the Greek, With Our Apologies.....”
  • Options
    SoonForgotten2SoonForgotten2 Posts: 2,245
    13-8-09....eddie in rotterdam will kiss some ass.

    Uhhhh... what exactly have I bought tickets to?
    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jmgphotos/sets/72157600802942672/">My Pearl Jam Photos</a>

    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jmgphotos/4731512142/&quot; title="PJ Banner2 by Mister J Photography, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1135/4731512142_258f2d6ab4_b.jpg&quot; width="630" height="112" alt="PJ Banner2" /></a>
  • Options
    Niko80Niko80 Posts: 1,563

    Fact is, he's not going to sing "Evenflow" like you remember it in 1992. He's just not. He's going to actually sing it, instead of growl it. I think what some people are mistaking for "Ed losing his voice" is actually "Ed learning how to fucking sing."

    Hmm, Eddie is certainly not losing his voice but come on, he certainly didnt 'learn' how to sing even flow in the later years. Dude sounds flat and all the soul he once put into the song is lost. Eddie is still soulful, but most often this is on the slower songs where he can slow down and use his lower registers. Eddie was a fine singer back in 1992 and he is a fine singer now. He has just adapted his delivery to what his voice allows him to do.

    Sometimes he does surprise me though.. That VH1 rock honors the who had a Eddie is rare form! Would love to see more delivery like that from Eddie. Signature pj!
    I will swallow poison
  • Options
    slightofjeffslightofjeff Posts: 7,758
    Sawyer wrote:
    However, on recent bootlegs he sounds pretty atrocious at times....when I'm there I could care less, but when listening on cd sometimes, it unfortunately can be painful.

    Do you have any examples?

    As someone mentioned earlier, go listen to some shows from '95, even the legendary ones like Soldier Field. THAT was painful.
    everybody wants the most they can possibly get
    for the least they could possibly do
  • Options
    slightofjeffslightofjeff Posts: 7,758
    Niko80 wrote:

    Fact is, he's not going to sing "Evenflow" like you remember it in 1992. He's just not. He's going to actually sing it, instead of growl it. I think what some people are mistaking for "Ed losing his voice" is actually "Ed learning how to fucking sing."

    Hmm, Eddie is certainly not losing his voice but come on, he certainly didnt 'learn' how to sing even flow in the later years. Dude sounds flat and all the soul he once put into the song is lost. Eddie is still soulful, but most often this is on the slower songs where he can slow down and use his lower registers. Eddie was a fine singer back in 1992 and he is a fine singer now. He has just adapted his delivery to what his voice allows him to do.

    Evenflow might be a bad example. But the '90-'95 Ed was all growls and screams. Which was fine for the time. But it isn't singing per se. When I was a kid growing up, I thought it was cool that you didn't have to know how to sing to be the biggest rock star in the world. It fit with the "grunge" ethos.

    But 2008 Ed sings that guy under the table.
    everybody wants the most they can possibly get
    for the least they could possibly do
  • Options
    staz17staz17 Posts: 88
    listen to alive from immagine in cornice and hear the note he hits on the beginning "wowohhaaa" vocal part during mikes solo. that sounds like 1992
  • Options
    josevolutionjosevolution Posts: 28,314
    i think people need to go listen to those boots from 2008 again.his voice was average at best.he had alot of problems with alot of songs.i'm pretty sure they changed the key of evacuation for this reason.it's not the end of the world.it's just time to realize he's going roger daultrey on us.

    Ed could never sing Evacuation consistently. It's a fucking hard song to sing. That's why they never play it.

    My God. Ed at the VH1 Rock Honors was one of the best performances I've ever heard from any singer at any time. That was less than 12 months ago. I find it hard to believe his voice is shot all of a sudden.

    I've been listening to my 2008 boots constantly of late. I don't need to listen to them again. He sounds fine.

    Average at best? What does that even mean? I'd like to hear who you believe to be an "average" singer. Because there are a shitload of people Ed sounds better than with one vocal chord ripped out.

    totally agree and did they play Evacuation in 08 ? what show and everytime you hear mike or anyother memeber talk about ed they couldn't be happier with the way he sings these days i don't get this paranoia i just don't :roll: ...
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • Options
    slightofjeffslightofjeff Posts: 7,758
    i think people need to go listen to those boots from 2008 again.his voice was average at best.he had alot of problems with alot of songs.i'm pretty sure they changed the key of evacuation for this reason.it's not the end of the world.it's just time to realize he's going roger daultrey on us.

    Ed could never sing Evacuation consistently. It's a fucking hard song to sing. That's why they never play it.

    My God. Ed at the VH1 Rock Honors was one of the best performances I've ever heard from any singer at any time. That was less than 12 months ago. I find it hard to believe his voice is shot all of a sudden.

    I've been listening to my 2008 boots constantly of late. I don't need to listen to them again. He sounds fine.

    Average at best? What does that even mean? I'd like to hear who you believe to be an "average" singer. Because there are a shitload of people Ed sounds better than with one vocal chord ripped out.

    totally agree and did they play Evacuation in 08 ? what show and everytime you hear mike or anyother memeber talk about ed they couldn't be happier with the way he sings these days i don't get this paranoia i just don't :roll: ...

    They did play Evacuation a couple times in '08. I know once it was aborted because either Mike or Stone couldn't remember the guitar parts. Ed made a joke about "evacuating" the song.
    everybody wants the most they can possibly get
    for the least they could possibly do
Sign In or Register to comment.