Drowned Out wrote:From the comments below the article:
Had you written this 15 years ago you'd have been skinned alive and forced to eat yourself, but you are right - Nirvana were a good rock band, no more no less. As someone who lived and breathed grunge in those halcyon days, it always puzzled me that Pearl Jam were constantly on the receiving end of this sort of criticism (especially in the NME) at the time, where as Nirvana were always given a free pass. I can't say I've listened to Nevermind all the way through for years, where as I still regularly dig out "Ten" and other grunge era classics like "Siamese Dream" - funny how things works out really.
I agree! Nevermind was always kinda bland to me....and time has not been kind to it imo.
jr19 wrote:anyone listen to this album even remotely on a regular basis?? i have to admit that "nevermind"hardly ever makes my rotation when it comes to nirvana. love "in utero" way more.
goldrush wrote:I can't listen to Nevermind anymore because it sounds so dated. It was a great album when it came out but it really hasn't aged well in my opinion. Compared to the PJ, Screaming Trees, Mudhoney, Soundgarden etc albums that were released at around the same time (and still sound fresh) it sounds really poor now.

dcfaithful wrote:jr19 wrote:anyone listen to this album even remotely on a regular basis?? i have to admit that "nevermind"hardly ever makes my rotation when it comes to nirvana. love "in utero" way more.
Nirvana never usually makes my rotation, but if I had to listen to an album I think I'd choose Bleach.
musicismylife78 wrote:Nirvana given a free pass? Were you alive during the early 90's? The music was continually critiqued, and a huge part of the adult population just didnt get it. Rolling stone or Spin or whoever was giving them good reviews, was probably doing so because it became clear the youth were embracing this music. 40 year olds and 50 year olds were having this music. It was just noise to them. And they certainly didnt understand why Nirvana and Kurt meant so much to Gen X.
musicismylife78 wrote:Secondly, press about Nirvana and Kurt was continually harping on his drug use, and near the end, Courtney and her drug use. Press is press, but I dont think talking about and speculating if Courtney used heroin while pregnant with Frances Bean, was fair, or was a free pass that you seem to hallucinate about.
It wasnt the press or record labels who recognized Kurt and Nirvana as doing something special and voicing the feelings of a generation, that was rather, the average fan, and the movement as a whole/
musicismylife78 wrote:
its stupid to post opinions about nirvana on this board. Every time, people act holier than thou, and bash nirvana, based on some silly non-fued kurt and ed had nearly 2 decades ago.
On this board, many people whether they admit it or not, loathe nirvana and kurt not because they dislike the music, but rather because, no matter how you cut it, nirvana will always be the 1 band and kurt the one guy, remembered from the early 90's. Nirvana will always be remembered as being that revolutionary band that changed everything. And while Pearl Jam deserves credit, I highly doubt they will ever receive said credit. /
musicismylife78 wrote:We can talk all we want about overrated or underrated, but the fact remains, Nevermind changed things. Its hard to describe how it felt as a 7 year old kid, hearing those songs for the first time. Seeing Kurt with the hair in his face for the Teen Spirit video, and just the overall energy of the music. I was 7, 8, 9, and obviously my knowledge of musical history, or any history for that matter, was obviously limited. But even then, I knew, this band was doing something special. /
musicismylife78 wrote:I think these days, the idea of teen angst is mocked. The reviews for Where the Wild Things continually suggested Max was some spoiled brat. But I think contained in Nevermind, was some sort of remedy and elixir, that I dont know, and no one does really know, the ingrediants of.
There was something almost primal, and basic about the music. Kurt wasnt doing metaphors and intense wordplay. He wasnt dylan. But when he screamed himself hoarse in Stay Away, or when he refered to "something in the way" in the song of the same name, when he repeated over and over again the line "a denial", it was clear this wasnt your average dumbed down for the masses music. /
musicismylife78 wrote:Its clear to me this album, and many others like it Ten, Siamese Dream, helped alot of kids put into words the stuff they were feeling. Any album that does something like that, isnt overrated, its underrated.
Seems to me, all great art comes from pain and suffering. And it also seems fair to say, that Nevermind, was born out of pain and suffering.
Nevermind, will remain, one of my favorite albums of all time, until I die for these reasons. /
Drowned Out wrote:I admit that yes, I’m agreeing with the comparison of Nirvana’s press treatment to the treatment of PJ back in the day. PJ were always referred to as derivative classic rock, while Nirvana were given some kind of street punk cred that they never deserved. The press portrayed Kurt as an anti-rock god. EV was portrayed as a whiny bitch that didn’t appreciate what he had. Nirvana was a good rock band. I like their music, and love a couple of their albums.
HeavyHands wrote:Haven't listened to any of their stuff in years. Intentionally.
The best thing they put out was that cover of "Jesus Don't Want Me For A Sunbeam" on Unplugged.
That is a scientific fact!
goldrush wrote:I can't listen to Nevermind anymore because it sounds so dated. It was a great album when it came out but it really hasn't aged well in my opinion. Compared to the PJ, Screaming Trees, Mudhoney, Soundgarden etc albums that were released at around the same time (and still sound fresh) it sounds really poor now.
Users browsing this Ten Club Community forum: pretext and 4 guests
ICON LEGEND:
Announcement |
Sticky |
Unread posts |
No unread posts |
Locked |
Moved |
Popular