News and What's New in AI

12345679»

Comments

  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,997
    Ledbetterman10 said:
    I caught Grok AI lying to me, in a very malicious and deceptive manner. I was watching The Shining and couldn’t remember if the corpse woman kisses Jack in the book like she does in the movie. Grok said she did. I hadn’t read the book in years, but I was skeptical of this answer. I asked Grok to give me the line and it proceeded to spit out 12 paragraphs, all of which were fake, and attributed to Stephen King. I went and grabbed the book to confirm. I took 40 screenshots of the “conversation” because it was so outrageous. Here’s a sample….



    i guess it is best to not ask ai things about literature since it can't get basic facts straight. political discourse, on the other hand, is a okay.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,997
    i told you guys about that co-worker of mine that had ai do some work for him that shared completely incorrect and debunked "facts" and stats, right? he got shit canned.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • Lerxst1992
    Lerxst1992 Posts: 8,554
    Ledbetterman10 said:
    I caught Grok AI lying to me, in a very malicious and deceptive manner. I was watching The Shining and couldn’t remember if the corpse woman kisses Jack in the book like she does in the movie. Grok said she did. I hadn’t read the book in years, but I was skeptical of this answer. I asked Grok to give me the line and it proceeded to spit out 12 paragraphs, all of which were fake, and attributed to Stephen King. I went and grabbed the book to confirm. I took 40 screenshots of the “conversation” because it was so outrageous. Here’s a sample….





    At least it’s doing something we rarely see from humans, especially on political forums, admit inaccuracies in the face of evidence presented. Curious, which ai program, and was it basic free or premium?
  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 45,376
    In an extreme stress test, Antropic’s AI models resorted to blackmail to avoid being shut down. Research scientist Joshua Batson shows Anderson Cooper how it happened and what they learned from it. https://cbsn.ws/3JDgcHx
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • mace1229
    mace1229 Posts: 10,073
    Crispon Glover sued Back to the Future when he declined to appear in #2, so they faked his voice, dressed up a look-alike and put him in that upside down thing to hide the differences. I'm pretty sure he won. So if he won that 30 years ago, these lawsuits against AI for copying a voice should be an easy legal battle. 
  • Ledbetterman10
    Ledbetterman10 Posts: 17,018
    Lerxst1992 said:
    Ledbetterman10 said:
    I caught Grok AI lying to me, in a very malicious and deceptive manner. I was watching The Shining and couldn’t remember if the corpse woman kisses Jack in the book like she does in the movie. Grok said she did. I hadn’t read the book in years, but I was skeptical of this answer. I asked Grok to give me the line and it proceeded to spit out 12 paragraphs, all of which were fake, and attributed to Stephen King. I went and grabbed the book to confirm. I took 40 screenshots of the “conversation” because it was so outrageous. Here’s a sample….





    At least it’s doing something we rarely see from humans, especially on political forums, admit inaccuracies in the face of evidence presented. Curious, which ai program, and was it basic free or premium?
    Free
    2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024: Philly 2, 2025: Pittsburgh 1

    Pearl Jam bootlegs:
    http://wegotshit.blogspot.com
  • tempo_n_groove
    tempo_n_groove Posts: 42,023
    mickeyrat said:
    In an extreme stress test, Antropic’s AI models resorted to blackmail to avoid being shut down. Research scientist Joshua Batson shows Anderson Cooper how it happened and what they learned from it. https://cbsn.ws/3JDgcHx
    This was a 60 minutes episode everyone should watch.
  • tempo_n_groove
    tempo_n_groove Posts: 42,023
    mace1229 said:
    Crispon Glover sued Back to the Future when he declined to appear in #2, so they faked his voice, dressed up a look-alike and put him in that upside down thing to hide the differences. I'm pretty sure he won. So if he won that 30 years ago, these lawsuits against AI for copying a voice should be an easy legal battle. 
    They replace actors all the time.  Not sure how that even won a case actually.  They replaced Martys GF too, she didn't sue.
  • mace1229
    mace1229 Posts: 10,073
    edited November 18
    tempo_n_groove said:
    mace1229 said:
    Crispon Glover sued Back to the Future when he declined to appear in #2, so they faked his voice, dressed up a look-alike and put him in that upside down thing to hide the differences. I'm pretty sure he won. So if he won that 30 years ago, these lawsuits against AI for copying a voice should be an easy legal battle. 
    They replace actors all the time.  Not sure how that even won a case actually.  They replaced Martys GF too, she didn't sue.
    They didn't just replace him, they copied his voice and appearance, and dressed him up and went to other lengths to specifically trick the audience to think that it was the same actor. 
    Thats different than just recasting. They didn't do that with the girlfriend. Or the 500 characters that got recast in game of thrones. 
    That would be like if they did a Kill Bill 3, and Uma Therman declined to do it, they hire a look-alike to impersonate her to make the audience think it was Uma who is paying the role. There's a difference between recasting and impersonating. Whereas everyone knew the girlfriend was a new actor in the sequels. 
    Post edited by mace1229 on

Categories