Late Show with Stephen Colbert canceled...Possible Political Reasons
Options
Comments
-
bootlegger10 said:I still scratch my head for the level of vitriol Stephen is spewing to a company that paid him $15-25M a year for 10 years. Add to that, he knew that the company was considering canceling the show and Stephen went through and publicly tweeted that his employer was bribing the president. Sounds ungrateful, entitled, etc.... to me. I dare any of you to go on X and blast your company repeatedly and see how long you keep your job.
These celebrities are in love with themselves, and have no idea what it takes to keep a large company like CBS on the right track. Many large companies have been mismanaged into oblivion. It's fun to make fun of management, but the amount of hatred that spews from Letterman and Colbert makes me think they aren't so innocent or kind. They think they are replaceable.Conan is the only one that has the right to go after NBC. Conan was the best of all of them, even though the masses liked Leno more.P.S. It could have been a bribe. I would love to be paid $125m and fired though."You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
Lerxst1992 said:mickeyrat said:Since its première, in 1997, “South Park” has managed to offend nearly every political group, pop-culture fandom, and religious denomination. Now the show has pissed off Donald Trump like never before—to the point where the White House has issued a statement condemning the new season première. In the episode, Trump is portrayed as a deeply insecure leader (endowed with a micropenis) who literally gets into bed with Satan, his apparent lover. The ensuing gags often come back to his anatomy, or his penchant for memes. But the show’s creators, Trey Parker and Matt Stone, have solved the conundrum that has plagued comedians since Trump’s first term: He’s an endless wellspring of material, but what he says and does is inevitably more absurd than any satire could be.
Although “South Park” has declined both in quality and in popularity over the years, it’s still valuable enough that Paramount recently paid $1.5 billion for exclusive streaming rights to the series, and for the show’s creators, Trey Parker and Matt Stone, to make another 50 episodes. The studio has long been in the process of merging with Skydance Media—a deal that was in a holding pattern for about a year, until Paramount agreed to pay $16 million to settle a lawsuit that Trump filed against its subsidiary, CBS’s “60 Minutes.” A few days before the F.C.C. finally approved the merger, Stephen Colbert, the host of “The Late Show,” on CBS, called the settlement a “big fat bribe”—and then his show was cancelled, ostensibly for financial reasons. All of these are crucial plot points in the latest “South Park” episode, “Sermon on the ’Mount,” which is now available on Paramount+.
Is the episode too much? “Probably,” Tyler Foggatt writes. “Yet there’s an age-old tradition of political vulgarity, of which Trump himself is a practitioner—it’s the crux of his appeal.”
Read more: https://newyorkermag.visitlink.me/HiNS2u$1.5 Billion you say? Billion with a B? You sure? Paramount did that???
but but but Colbert???
Thats 300 million a year for streaming and new material for 5 years.. They think SP is worth 3 times what Colbert is. That might be true.One thing not mentioned that I thought of the other day, ad value has got to be pretty low. When’s the last time you watched a commercial on a regularly scheduled show like that? I can’t remember when I have. I always DVR it and skip commercials. The only commercials I watch are live events like sports, and when streaming and you can’t skip the commercial. 2 million viewers now probably isn’t worth what 2 million viewers was 10 years ago. It’s not surprising they look at the future and realize there isn’t money in late night tv anymore.0 -
-
It’s amazing to see the “news” diet of posters.0
-
However this Colbert thing went down doesn’t really matter. It’s certainly worth mentioning in a broader context that this admin is against free speech
0 -
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
Tim Simmons said:However this Colbert thing went down doesn’t really matter. It’s certainly worth mentioning in a broader context that this admin is against free speech
now do Fox News next!0 -
mace1229 said:Lerxst1992 said:mickeyrat said:Since its première, in 1997, “South Park” has managed to offend nearly every political group, pop-culture fandom, and religious denomination. Now the show has pissed off Donald Trump like never before—to the point where the White House has issued a statement condemning the new season première. In the episode, Trump is portrayed as a deeply insecure leader (endowed with a micropenis) who literally gets into bed with Satan, his apparent lover. The ensuing gags often come back to his anatomy, or his penchant for memes. But the show’s creators, Trey Parker and Matt Stone, have solved the conundrum that has plagued comedians since Trump’s first term: He’s an endless wellspring of material, but what he says and does is inevitably more absurd than any satire could be.
Although “South Park” has declined both in quality and in popularity over the years, it’s still valuable enough that Paramount recently paid $1.5 billion for exclusive streaming rights to the series, and for the show’s creators, Trey Parker and Matt Stone, to make another 50 episodes. The studio has long been in the process of merging with Skydance Media—a deal that was in a holding pattern for about a year, until Paramount agreed to pay $16 million to settle a lawsuit that Trump filed against its subsidiary, CBS’s “60 Minutes.” A few days before the F.C.C. finally approved the merger, Stephen Colbert, the host of “The Late Show,” on CBS, called the settlement a “big fat bribe”—and then his show was cancelled, ostensibly for financial reasons. All of these are crucial plot points in the latest “South Park” episode, “Sermon on the ’Mount,” which is now available on Paramount+.
Is the episode too much? “Probably,” Tyler Foggatt writes. “Yet there’s an age-old tradition of political vulgarity, of which Trump himself is a practitioner—it’s the crux of his appeal.”
Read more: https://newyorkermag.visitlink.me/HiNS2u$1.5 Billion you say? Billion with a B? You sure? Paramount did that???
but but but Colbert???
Thats 300 million a year for streaming and new material for 5 years.. They think SP is worth 3 times what Colbert is. That might be true.One thing not mentioned that I thought of the other day, ad value has got to be pretty low. When’s the last time you watched a commercial on a regularly scheduled show like that? I can’t remember when I have. I always DVR it and skip commercials. The only commercials I watch are live events like sports, and when streaming and you can’t skip the commercial. 2 million viewers now probably isn’t worth what 2 million viewers was 10 years ago. It’s not surprising they look at the future and realize there isn’t money in late night tv anymore.Well, that’s the entire point. That the Colbert show is not that valuable and paramount is willing to spend big money despite the political troubles that South Park causes.
but that doesn’t fit into the liberal narrative so they pretend it doesn’t exist.0 -
shecky said:a major American national network should expect its audience to be a representation of the country.Fun fact, about half the country voted for Trump. Willingly. And Vance is polling just as good or even better than Democrats.There’s absolutely zero wrong with what Leno is saying here. Only the liberals are scoffing at this0
-
Lerxst1992 said:There’s absolutely zero wrong with what Leno is saying here. Only the liberals are scoffing at this0
-
Lerxst1992 said:shecky said:a major American national network should expect its audience to be a representation of the country.Fun fact, about half the country voted for Trump. Willingly. And Vance is polling just as good or even better than Democrats.There’s absolutely zero wrong with what Leno is saying here. Only the liberals are scoffing at thisjesus greets me looks just like me ....0
-
Have the nation is racist. Fuck em.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
josevolution said:Lerxst1992 said:shecky said:a major American national network should expect its audience to be a representation of the country.Fun fact, about half the country voted for Trump. Willingly. And Vance is polling just as good or even better than Democrats.There’s absolutely zero wrong with what Leno is saying here. Only the liberals are scoffing at this0
-
mace1229 said:josevolution said:Lerxst1992 said:shecky said:a major American national network should expect its audience to be a representation of the country.Fun fact, about half the country voted for Trump. Willingly. And Vance is polling just as good or even better than Democrats.There’s absolutely zero wrong with what Leno is saying here. Only the liberals are scoffing at thisjesus greets me looks just like me ....0
-
Lerxst1992 said:shecky said:a major American national network should expect its audience to be a representation of the country.Fun fact, about half the country voted for Trump. Willingly. And Vance is polling just as good or even better than Democrats.There’s absolutely zero wrong with what Leno is saying here. Only the liberals are scoffing at this
with Monika Lewinsky jokes in the 90s.
:jerkoff: motion. The format hasn’t changed except the jokes are sharper and better0 -
Trump has better lawyers than any network or government agency. Truth. And why he gets away with what he does. All of his trade and immigration policies are well counseled as to the powers of the executive office. More brazen in this term. Shoot first ask questions later. That is what is happening.0
-
The guy who had Rudy Guillani as his lawyer?Post edited by Tim Simmons on0
-
IMO he doesn't have better lawyers. He has the bully pulpit and now more power thanks to the Supreme Court and no one wants to cross the most powerful, vindictive, and spiteful man in the world. So by proxy he’s got powerful lawyers. But historically, self respecting lawyers stay far away from his grift auraPost edited by Tim Simmons on0
-
Also, don’t media companies famously have the best lawyers?Like, Disney employs ‘Fuck You’ lawyers. I imagine the other media companies do too.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 273 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help