---President Elect Musk and Convicted Felon Donald J Trump---

1371372374376377427

Comments

  • GC31608 said:

    GC31608 said:

    Wish this sentiment holds steady. But there will undoubtedly be forthcoming protests in all the hot spots by those just looking for an excuse to smash a window.
    What kind of lame gaslighting is this?
    Super lame since that's not what gaslighting is.
    It is exactly that.

    >>>Not following how any of the above would fit the definition of gaslighting.

    There absolutely would’ve been window smashing and all kinds of violent protesting if trump had lost.

    >>>Agreed and never made a statement saying there wouldn't have been.

    Haven’t seen that from the other side after an election.

    >>>Move to Seattle/Olympia/Portland. There are people who make careers out of it.

    Yeah no, never seen it happen. But you keep on trucking along lil buddy.
    Will do, have a great day tiger.
  • Go Beavers
    Go Beavers Posts: 9,553

    GC31608 said:

    Wish this sentiment holds steady. But there will undoubtedly be forthcoming protests in all the hot spots by those just looking for an excuse to smash a window.
    What kind of lame gaslighting is this?
    Super lame since that's not what gaslighting is.
    It is exactly that.

    >>>Not following how any of the above would fit the definition of gaslighting.

    There absolutely would’ve been window smashing and all kinds of violent protesting if trump had lost.

    >>>Agreed and never made a statement saying there wouldn't have been.

    Haven’t seen that from the other side after an election.

    >>>Move to Seattle/Olympia/Portland. There are people who make careers out of it.

    People in Portland busting shit aren’t Biden/Harris supporters. It’s not the same thing. 
  • GC31608 said:

    GC31608 said:

    Wish this sentiment holds steady. But there will undoubtedly be forthcoming protests in all the hot spots by those just looking for an excuse to smash a window.
    What kind of lame gaslighting is this?
    Super lame since that's not what gaslighting is.
    It is exactly that.

    >>>Not following how any of the above would fit the definition of gaslighting.

    There absolutely would’ve been window smashing and all kinds of violent protesting if trump had lost.

    >>>Agreed and never made a statement saying there wouldn't have been.

    Haven’t seen that from the other side after an election.

    >>>Move to Seattle/Olympia/Portland. There are people who make careers out of it.

    Yeah no, never seen it happen. But you keep on trucking along lil buddy.
    Will do, have a great day tiger.

    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • GC31608
    GC31608 GA Posts: 244

    GC31608 said:

    Wish this sentiment holds steady. But there will undoubtedly be forthcoming protests in all the hot spots by those just looking for an excuse to smash a window.
    What kind of lame gaslighting is this?
    Super lame since that's not what gaslighting is.
    It is exactly that.

    >>>Not following how any of the above would fit the definition of gaslighting.

    There absolutely would’ve been window smashing and all kinds of violent protesting if trump had lost.

    >>>Agreed and never made a statement saying there wouldn't have been.

    Haven’t seen that from the other side after an election.

    >>>Move to Seattle/Olympia/Portland. There are people who make careers out of it.

    People in Portland busting shit aren’t Biden/Harris supporters. It’s not the same thing. 
    He knows that, and then plays dumb about it.
  • Tell me more so I can understand better.
  • I believe true moderates saw this coming. I noticed that there were way less signs out than there usually are around here(Northern New England). I told my wife there is a lot more support for Trump this time around. Typically most people around the towns surrounding mine have some sort of sign up supporting or criticism a candidate.

    I believe a lot of moderates didn't want to admit who they were voting for due to Trump being a horrible (in my opinion) person. Hopefully the Democratic party pulls away from the far left and makes a comeback next time around. 

    Hopefully the Republicans will resist the temptation to enact far right policies while they control, the House, Senate and presidency. 
  • BF25394
    BF25394 Posts: 4,940
    smile6680 said:
    I believe true moderates saw this coming. I noticed that there were way less signs out than there usually are around here(Northern New England). I told my wife there is a lot more support for Trump this time around. Typically most people around the towns surrounding mine have some sort of sign up supporting or criticism a candidate.

    I believe a lot of moderates didn't want to admit who they were voting for due to Trump being a horrible (in my opinion) person. Hopefully the Democratic party pulls away from the far left and makes a comeback next time around. 

    Hopefully the Republicans will resist the temptation to enact far right policies while they control, the House, Senate and presidency. 
    As an independent, I don't understand this point of view. The Republican party consists almost entirely of radicals. Most of the moderates have left the party since Trump. Most of the elected moderates have been primaried by more radical MAGA types. The Democrats are not beholden to the far left to the extent that the Republicans are beholden to the far right. Two of the key factions in the Biden coalition that won the 2020 election were socially conservative black church ladies and moderate suburban women. Look at it this way. Far-right voters voted for Trump enthusiastically. Nothing he does can dissuade them from supporting him. Far-left voters (the pro-Hamas people, the defund-the-police people) either held their nose while voting for Harris or didn't vote at all, because she's not actually as radical as they are.

    One of the comical thing about our politics is how the Republicans successfully paint Democrats as radicals when their party is the one that wants to fire the civil servants, overturn the long-enshrined right to abortion, abandon NATO, destroy the administrative state, and overturn elections. The Republicans get an amazing amount of mileage out of fringe issues like transgender rights. (I don't mean to sound dismissive of transgender rights, but the fact is that a very small number of voters are making voting decisions based on where the parties stand on that issue. Many Democrats are ambivalent about trans rights, and even among the majority of Democrats who support trans rights, it is not high on their list of top issues. But Republicans manage to convince people that an overwhelming majority of Democrats want to turn your little boy into a little girl. It says a lot about the influence of Republican media that hammers home these wedge issues all day every day.)
    I gather speed from you fucking with me.
  • OnWis97
    OnWis97 St. Paul, MN Posts: 5,610
    The field
    BF25394 said:
    smile6680 said:
    I believe true moderates saw this coming. I noticed that there were way less signs out than there usually are around here(Northern New England). I told my wife there is a lot more support for Trump this time around. Typically most people around the towns surrounding mine have some sort of sign up supporting or criticism a candidate.

    I believe a lot of moderates didn't want to admit who they were voting for due to Trump being a horrible (in my opinion) person. Hopefully the Democratic party pulls away from the far left and makes a comeback next time around. 

    Hopefully the Republicans will resist the temptation to enact far right policies while they control, the House, Senate and presidency. 
    As an independent, I don't understand this point of view. The Republican party consists almost entirely of radicals. Most of the moderates have left the party since Trump. Most of the elected moderates have been primaried by more radical MAGA types. The Democrats are not beholden to the far left to the extent that the Republicans are beholden to the far right. Two of the key factions in the Biden coalition that won the 2020 election were socially conservative black church ladies and moderate suburban women. Look at it this way. Far-right voters voted for Trump enthusiastically. Nothing he does can dissuade them from supporting him. Far-left voters (the pro-Hamas people, the defund-the-police people) either held their nose while voting for Harris or didn't vote at all, because she's not actually as radical as they are.

    One of the comical thing about our politics is how the Republicans successfully paint Democrats as radicals when their party is the one that wants to fire the civil servants, overturn the long-enshrined right to abortion, abandon NATO, destroy the administrative state, and overturn elections. The Republicans get an amazing amount of mileage out of fringe issues like transgender rights. (I don't mean to sound dismissive of transgender rights, but the fact is that a very small number of voters are making voting decisions based on where the parties stand on that issue. Many Democrats are ambivalent about trans rights, and even among the majority of Democrats who support trans rights, it is not high on their list of top issues. But Republicans manage to convince people that an overwhelming majority of Democrats want to turn your little boy into a little girl. It says a lot about the influence of Republican media that hammers home these wedge issues all day every day.)
    While the second sentence is true, I'm not sure the first is...at least in terms of how people vote. If the moderates were not voting MAGA, MAGA would be toast.

    The first sentence of the second paragraph is spot-on, though I don't know that it's the candidates...more podcasters, AM radio, and all the other echo-chambers and fringe-mainstream sources that spend 23.5 hours per day spewing fear, shock, and outrage.
    1995 Milwaukee     1998 Alpine, Alpine     2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston     2004 Boston, Boston     2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty)     2011 Alpine, Alpine     
    2013 Wrigley     2014 St. Paul     2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley     2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley     2021 Asbury Park     2022 St Louis     2023 Austin, Austin
    2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley
  • BF25394 said:
    smile6680 said:
    I believe true moderates saw this coming. I noticed that there were way less signs out than there usually are around here(Northern New England). I told my wife there is a lot more support for Trump this time around. Typically most people around the towns surrounding mine have some sort of sign up supporting or criticism a candidate.

    I believe a lot of moderates didn't want to admit who they were voting for due to Trump being a horrible (in my opinion) person. Hopefully the Democratic party pulls away from the far left and makes a comeback next time around. 

    Hopefully the Republicans will resist the temptation to enact far right policies while they control, the House, Senate and presidency. 
    As an independent, I don't understand this point of view. The Republican party consists almost entirely of radicals. Most of the moderates have left the party since Trump. Most of the elected moderates have been primaried by more radical MAGA types. The Democrats are not beholden to the far left to the extent that the Republicans are beholden to the far right. Two of the key factions in the Biden coalition that won the 2020 election were socially conservative black church ladies and moderate suburban women. Look at it this way. Far-right voters voted for Trump enthusiastically. Nothing he does can dissuade them from supporting him. Far-left voters (the pro-Hamas people, the defund-the-police people) either held their nose while voting for Harris or didn't vote at all, because she's not actually as radical as they are.

    One of the comical thing about our politics is how the Republicans successfully paint Democrats as radicals when their party is the one that wants to fire the civil servants, overturn the long-enshrined right to abortion, abandon NATO, destroy the administrative state, and overturn elections. The Republicans get an amazing amount of mileage out of fringe issues like transgender rights. (I don't mean to sound dismissive of transgender rights, but the fact is that a very small number of voters are making voting decisions based on where the parties stand on that issue. Many Democrats are ambivalent about trans rights, and even among the majority of Democrats who support trans rights, it is not high on their list of top issues. But Republicans manage to convince people that an overwhelming majority of Democrats want to turn your little boy into a little girl. It says a lot about the influence of Republican media that hammers home these wedge issues all day every day.)
    It was just an observation and feeling I had the last couple weeks. I can only speak to the area in which I live in. 

    I appreciate your response. it was both civil and had decent points. 
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,594
    2023


    https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2024-11-06/trump-s-first-broken-promise-will-be-3-mortgage-rates-election-2024

    Trump’s First Broken Promise Will Be 3% Mortgage Rates

    A cost-of-living backlash shaped the presidential election. But voters will be disappointed when they find out interest rates on home loans and big-ticket items won’t be coming down.

    November 6, 2024 at 11:31 AM EST
    Jonathan Levin is a columnist focused on US markets and economics. Previously, he worked as a Bloomberg journalist in the US, Brazil and Mexico. He is a CFA charterholder.
    Inflation has been a crucial issue for voters

    Inflation has been a crucial issue for voters.

    Photographer: Adam Gray/Getty Images North America
    Save
    Translate

    Listen

    4:25

    In many ways, Donald Trump was elected to a second presidency as part of a cost-of-living backlash, and unaffordable housing was at the center of Americans’ frustration. High home prices and the highest mortgage rates since the financial crisis meant that as much as a third of the country was effectively locked out of the homeownership dream. That, in turn, helped explain why Americans gave the economy such low marks in consumer sentiment surveys and political polls even as official inflation statistics cooled and the stock market boomed alongside gross domestic product.

    The early signs from mortgage and bond markets aren’t encouraging on that front. Trump will have to dramatically moderate his agenda if he’s going to meet voters’ expectations and, even then, his promise to drive mortgage rates down to 3% or lower seems well out of reach in the absence of a sharp economic downturn.

    At the time of writing, the yield on 10-year Treasury notes, a key reference for 30-year mortgages, was up 18 basis points to 4.45% and hovering near the highest since July (with even more dramatic superlatives not far off). Even before his victory was sealed, mortgage rates had surged toward 7% from close to 6% partly on his improving prospects, and home-loan applications had been declining.

    The reasons behind the moves weren’t particularly surprising. Throughout the campaign, Trump spooked most mainstream economists with his comments about 60% tariffs on Chinese imports and duties of as much as 20% on all others. He also promised mass deportation of undocumented immigrants, which could dramatically curb labor supply in key fields such as construction and child care, in addition to the toll it would take on families. Add to that the eye-popping deficit math of actually implementing Trump’s various tax promises (expanding the 2017 tax cuts, no tax on tips, etc.) and you can understand why inflation concerns have resurfaced and fixed-income traders have demanded a premium for the emerging risk.

    Trump is very good at finding scapegoats for America’s problems, and I have little doubt that he’ll try that again.

    In his first presidency, he famously berated Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell on Twitter for not lowering interest rates amid his trade war with China. “My only question is, who is our bigger enemy,” he said, Powell or China’s President Xi Jinping. Trump may well train his threats on Powell once again if borrowing costs remain elevated, but I don’t think it will help. After all, mortgage rates aren’t set at the Fed. The central bank’s half-percentage-point interest rate cut in September was met with a run-up in borrowing costs, as markets weighed both an improving US economy and the prospect of a second Trump presidency. And Trump will find it hard to bully the invisible bond vigilantes driving yields higher.

    It’s possible, of course, that bond markets are overreacting. On the issue of tariffs, for instance, Trump’s apologists argue that the attention-getting numbers that Trump has bandied about in the campaign were really just threats to gain leverage in negotiations with America’s trade partners. Under this theory, the bond yields — and mortgage rates — should come down once everyone figures out what the president-elect is up to. Maybe so, but that’s inconsistent with the words out of Trump’s own mouth.

    Get the Morning & Evening Briefing Americas newsletters.
    Start every morning with what you need to know followed by context and analysis on news of the day each evening. Plus, the Weekend Edition.
     Sign Up

    By continuing, I agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

    In an interview with Bloomberg News Editor-in-Chief John Micklethwait last month, Trump said: “To me, the most beautiful word in the dictionary is tariff, and it’s my favorite word.” And even if it really is gamesmanship, the ploy comes at the expense of first-time homebuyers who have been waiting patiently on the sidelines for years for an opportunity to enter the market. If Trump draws out the uncertainty or follows though with his threats, those buyers could be waiting for months or years more.

    Mortgages may be the biggest household borrowing cost at stake, but they’re not the only one. His policy stance may also be reflected in auto loans and credit card rates, among others. Already, auto and credit card delinquencies are on the rise, especially among those ages 18-39. It is far from clear what the Fed itself would do about all of this, but it stands to reason that policymakers will at least slow the pace of cuts on its target rate while it awaits clearer signals, adding another weight on bond markets.

    If Trump wants to fulfil the promises he made on the campaign trail, he’ll have to start by making peace with fixed-income markets. The sooner he does so, the better.

    www.myspace.com
  • BF25394
    BF25394 Posts: 4,940
    OnWis97 said:
    BF25394 said:
    smile6680 said:
    I believe true moderates saw this coming. I noticed that there were way less signs out than there usually are around here(Northern New England). I told my wife there is a lot more support for Trump this time around. Typically most people around the towns surrounding mine have some sort of sign up supporting or criticism a candidate.

    I believe a lot of moderates didn't want to admit who they were voting for due to Trump being a horrible (in my opinion) person. Hopefully the Democratic party pulls away from the far left and makes a comeback next time around. 

    Hopefully the Republicans will resist the temptation to enact far right policies while they control, the House, Senate and presidency. 
    As an independent, I don't understand this point of view. The Republican party consists almost entirely of radicals. Most of the moderates have left the party since Trump. Most of the elected moderates have been primaried by more radical MAGA types. The Democrats are not beholden to the far left to the extent that the Republicans are beholden to the far right. Two of the key factions in the Biden coalition that won the 2020 election were socially conservative black church ladies and moderate suburban women. Look at it this way. Far-right voters voted for Trump enthusiastically. Nothing he does can dissuade them from supporting him. Far-left voters (the pro-Hamas people, the defund-the-police people) either held their nose while voting for Harris or didn't vote at all, because she's not actually as radical as they are.

    One of the comical thing about our politics is how the Republicans successfully paint Democrats as radicals when their party is the one that wants to fire the civil servants, overturn the long-enshrined right to abortion, abandon NATO, destroy the administrative state, and overturn elections. The Republicans get an amazing amount of mileage out of fringe issues like transgender rights. (I don't mean to sound dismissive of transgender rights, but the fact is that a very small number of voters are making voting decisions based on where the parties stand on that issue. Many Democrats are ambivalent about trans rights, and even among the majority of Democrats who support trans rights, it is not high on their list of top issues. But Republicans manage to convince people that an overwhelming majority of Democrats want to turn your little boy into a little girl. It says a lot about the influence of Republican media that hammers home these wedge issues all day every day.)
    While the second sentence is true, I'm not sure the first is...at least in terms of how people vote. If the moderates were not voting MAGA, MAGA would be toast.

    The first sentence of the second paragraph is spot-on, though I don't know that it's the candidates...more podcasters, AM radio, and all the other echo-chambers and fringe-mainstream sources that spend 23.5 hours per day spewing fear, shock, and outrage.
    The point you're making in your last sentence is what I was getting at in my last sentence.
    I gather speed from you fucking with me.
  • eddiec
    eddiec Posts: 3,959
    I thought the peaceful transfer of power was a bedrock of our constitutional republic.
    I guess for the majority of voters it is not.

  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,604
    2025
    eddiec said:
    I thought the peaceful transfer of power was a bedrock of our constitutional republic.
    I guess for the majority of voters it is not.

    It’s not it started with fuck face refusing to accept the 2020 outcome not even showing up at inauguration but it’s always the democrats that have to show good faith! 
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • eeriepadave
    eeriepadave West Chester, PA Posts: 43,193
    edited November 2024
    Hypothetically what would happen if Trump is involved of tampering with the election results? I wouldn't put it past him if that happens. Pearl-Jam-Smileys
    8/28/98- Camden, NJ
    10/31/09- Philly
    5/21/10- NYC
    9/2/12- Philly, PA
    7/19/13- Wrigley
    10/19/13- Brooklyn, NY
    10/21/13- Philly, PA
    10/22/13- Philly, PA
    10/27/13- Baltimore, MD
    4/28/16- Philly, PA
    4/29/16- Philly, PA
    5/1/16- NYC
    5/2/16- NYC
    9/2/18- Boston, MA
    9/4/18- Boston, MA
    9/14/22- Camden, NJ
    9/7/24- Philly, PA
    9/9/24- Philly, PA
    Tres Mts.- 3/23/11- Philly. PA
    Eddie Vedder- 6/25/11- Philly, PA
    RNDM- 3/9/16- Philly, PA
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,604
    2025
    Hypothetically what would happen if Trump is involved of tampering with the election results? I wouldn't put it past him if that happens. Pearl-Jam-Smileys
    At this point zero nada zilch! He def could shoot someone or grab a woman by her privates in front of cameras and he would get applause from his deplorable supporters 
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 44,408
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,594
    2023


    https://www.inquirer.com/politics/election/donald-trump-voters-pennsylvania-economy-fascism-20241111.html

    “It’s not hard to understand why voters reject the premise,” Pennsylvania GOP consultant Brock McCleary said. “The fair-minded voter looks at Trump’s first term and concludes that he’s either really bad at instituting fascism, or it’s just another empty moniker from Trump’s powerful enemies.”

    In Scranton on Wednesday, Matt Wolfson, a 45-year-old former construction worker, looked around at poverty in the Rust Belt city and thought the nation needed a change in leadership.

    Wolfson said he didn’t love the dictatorial aspect of Trump’s personality, but thought it could help keep the country out of wars and maybe bring peace to some other conflicts, including in Ukraine.

    “He’s good and bad. People say he’s a dictator. I believe that. I consider him like Hitler,” Wolfson said. “But I voted for the man.”

    www.myspace.com
  • Lerxst1992
    Lerxst1992 Posts: 7,870
    mickeyrat said:

    I need to thank you because I haven’t cranked FI in awhile and wifey just left to drive kiddo somewhere, so it’s a good time for me to CRANK some Tool, but why are we posting Tempest here?
  • BF25394
    BF25394 Posts: 4,940
    mickeyrat said:

    I need to thank you because I haven’t cranked FI in awhile and wifey just left to drive kiddo somewhere, so it’s a good time for me to CRANK some Tool, but why are we posting Tempest here?
    You mean "7empest"?
    I gather speed from you fucking with me.
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,604
    2025
    https://apnews.com/article/e67e18f310101b2f1c894ca1b550a3eb
    Secret document leaker gets 15 years! Secret documents thief gets elected president 🙄
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
This discussion has been closed.