The National Football League
Comments
-
If they make any kind of sliding motion the play should be over. Ridiculous.Spectrum 10/27/09; New Orleans JazzFest 5/1/10; Made in America 9/2/12; Phila, PA 10/21/13; Phila, PA 10/22/13; Baltimore Arena 10/27/13; Phila, PA 4/28/16; Phila, PA 4/29/16; Fenway Park 8/7/16; Fenway Park 9/2/18; Asbury Park 9/18/21; Camden 9/14/22; Las Vegas 5/16/24; Las Vegas 5/18/24; Phila, PA 9/7/24; Phila, PA 9/9/24; Baltimore Arena 9/12/24; Pittsburgh 5/16/25; Pittsburgh 5/18/25
Tres Mtns - TLA 3/23/11; EV - Tower Theatre 6/25/11; Temple of the Dog - Tower Theatre 11/5/160 -
Yeah, that wasnt a sliding motion. It was making a move when he saw a hole.
Fake slide is a reach invented by Miami and Kansas City fans.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUbSmCiyyF0
Post edited by MayDay10 on0 -
Hard disagree, he motioned as if he was giving up the play.MayDay10 said:Yeah, that wasnt a sliding motion. It was making a move when he saw a hole.
Fake slide is a reach invented by Miami and Kansas City fans.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUbSmCiyyF0
That's like Mahomes pretending to juke out of bounds on the sideline than going for another yard or two. These QBs can't have it both ways.0 -
Absolutely that was a fake slide motion. Not a natural fake or deek at all. Let's try to control our bias a little bit.Spectrum 10/27/09; New Orleans JazzFest 5/1/10; Made in America 9/2/12; Phila, PA 10/21/13; Phila, PA 10/22/13; Baltimore Arena 10/27/13; Phila, PA 4/28/16; Phila, PA 4/29/16; Fenway Park 8/7/16; Fenway Park 9/2/18; Asbury Park 9/18/21; Camden 9/14/22; Las Vegas 5/16/24; Las Vegas 5/18/24; Phila, PA 9/7/24; Phila, PA 9/9/24; Baltimore Arena 9/12/24; Pittsburgh 5/16/25; Pittsburgh 5/18/25
Tres Mtns - TLA 3/23/11; EV - Tower Theatre 6/25/11; Temple of the Dog - Tower Theatre 11/5/160 -
nvmPost edited by Merkin Baller on0
-
Look up how Cam Newton and RGiii faired with that thinking.Ledbetterman10 said:They should do away with the QB protection "slide" rule. If a QB wants to run, that's fine, but now they're a running back. Josh Allen can run over people, so they need to come flying at him, but if he decides to slide at the last minute and a defensive guy makes contact, he throws a tantrum and here comes the flag.
Below is Allen being a shyster as usual, faking a slide and thus "faking out" the Steelers' defender. Also featured is later in the game where he does decide to slide, takes a soft hit, and gets the flag. I say defenders should just fucking smash him no matter what, 15-yard penalty be damned.
https://x.com/TonyCMKE/status/1747051510611976339?s=200 -
He protected the ball as if he was going to be hit. No way that was a fake slide...Johnny Abruzzo said:Absolutely that was a fake slide motion. Not a natural fake or deek at all. Let's try to control our bias a little bit.
0 -
Twitter Link
I dont know. You can make the case that it was the beginning of a slide process. You can also say it was a white boy juke on a slippery field. Either way, you cant tell what was going on in his head.
is this Mahomes one much different?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qUCD3IuKSs
THIS is what a fake slide looks like
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_9ThuP9olU
Post edited by MayDay10 on0 -
In the end it only highlights what a lousy position the defenders are in. Does it make Allen a dirty player? Not in my eyes, but when the defenders have only fractions of a second to make their decisions…. Idk, I think the rules should be a bit different for QBs in motion if they’re going to get extra protection from the officials.0
-
yeah if you go beyond the line of scrimmage you're a running back...same as a goalie in hockey leaving the creaseMerkin Baller said:In the end it only highlights what a lousy position the defenders are in. Does it make Allen a dirty player? Not in my eyes, but when the defenders have only fractions of a second to make their decisions…. Idk, I think the rules should be a bit different for QBs in motion if they’re going to get extra protection from the officials.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
The league wants to protect its assets and have high scores. Seems to me this is working perfectly.Merkin Baller said:In the end it only highlights what a lousy position the defenders are in. Does it make Allen a dirty player? Not in my eyes, but when the defenders have only fractions of a second to make their decisions…. Idk, I think the rules should be a bit different for QBs in motion if they’re going to get extra protection from the officials.0 -
This is what I think as well. 💯, protect the QBs. However, when they turn into running backs they need to be running backs.Gern Blansten said:
yeah if you go beyond the line of scrimmage you're a running back...same as a goalie in hockey leaving the creaseMerkin Baller said:In the end it only highlights what a lousy position the defenders are in. Does it make Allen a dirty player? Not in my eyes, but when the defenders have only fractions of a second to make their decisions…. Idk, I think the rules should be a bit different for QBs in motion if they’re going to get extra protection from the officials.The love he receives is the love that is saved0 -
I understand and agree…. It’s what the league wants. Protecting the assets is understandable, & the high scoring games are great for fantasy football, but I don’t see how tweaking the rules to influence higher scores (for the benefit of FF) is good for the game itself… IMO it takes away from it. I don’t like seeing guys get wrecked, but I don’t like seeing defenders afraid to make a tackle either.mrussel1 said:
The league wants to protect its assets and have high scores. Seems to me this is working perfectly.Merkin Baller said:In the end it only highlights what a lousy position the defenders are in. Does it make Allen a dirty player? Not in my eyes, but when the defenders have only fractions of a second to make their decisions…. Idk, I think the rules should be a bit different for QBs in motion if they’re going to get extra protection from the officials.0 -
Then don't run past the line of scrimmage. Or get your ass out of bounds if you do.tempo_n_groove said:
Look up how Cam Newton and RGiii faired with that thinking.Ledbetterman10 said:They should do away with the QB protection "slide" rule. If a QB wants to run, that's fine, but now they're a running back. Josh Allen can run over people, so they need to come flying at him, but if he decides to slide at the last minute and a defensive guy makes contact, he throws a tantrum and here comes the flag.
Below is Allen being a shyster as usual, faking a slide and thus "faking out" the Steelers' defender. Also featured is later in the game where he does decide to slide, takes a soft hit, and gets the flag. I say defenders should just fucking smash him no matter what, 15-yard penalty be damned.
https://x.com/TonyCMKE/status/1747051510611976339?s=20
2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024: Philly 2, 2025: Pittsburgh 1
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com0 -
I'd put Allen's move right in the middle of those 2.MayDay10 said:Twitter Link
I dont know. You can make the case that it was the beginning of a slide process. You can also say it was a white boy juke on a slippery field. Either way, you cant tell what was going on in his head.
is this Mahomes one much different?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qUCD3IuKSs
THIS is what a fake slide looks like
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_9ThuP9olU
The Pickett one should be outlawed. Play should be dead right where he starts to fake slide.
Allen was borderline. I think he was thinking about sliding then saw an opening and changed his mind, not an intentional fake out like Pickett.This weekend we rock Portland0 -
I didn't say it was for FF. I think the league likes high scoring games because people enjoy those. Remember the Alabama-LSU national championship? Worst football game of all time. The league is consistently tweaking the rules to give the offense an advantage on the defense. Sometimes they dial it back if it goes too far, but in general it wants the offense a step ahead of the defense. Better entertainment.Merkin Baller said:
I understand and agree…. It’s what the league wants. Protecting the assets is understandable, & the high scoring games are great for fantasy football, but I don’t see how tweaking the rules to influence higher scores (for the benefit of FF) is good for the game itself… IMO it takes away from it. I don’t like seeing guys get wrecked, but I don’t like seeing defenders afraid to make a tackle either.mrussel1 said:
The league wants to protect its assets and have high scores. Seems to me this is working perfectly.Merkin Baller said:In the end it only highlights what a lousy position the defenders are in. Does it make Allen a dirty player? Not in my eyes, but when the defenders have only fractions of a second to make their decisions…. Idk, I think the rules should be a bit different for QBs in motion if they’re going to get extra protection from the officials.
That said...fake slides are kind of bullshit. They should consider calling it unsportsmanlike conduct. That would kill that problem in a minute.0 -
mrussel1 said:
I didn't say it was for FF. I think the league likes high scoring games because people enjoy those. Remember the Alabama-LSU national championship? Worst football game of all time. The league is consistently tweaking the rules to give the offense an advantage on the defense. Sometimes they dial it back if it goes too far, but in general it wants the offense a step ahead of the defense. Better entertainment.Merkin Baller said:
I understand and agree…. It’s what the league wants. Protecting the assets is understandable, & the high scoring games are great for fantasy football, but I don’t see how tweaking the rules to influence higher scores (for the benefit of FF) is good for the game itself… IMO it takes away from it. I don’t like seeing guys get wrecked, but I don’t like seeing defenders afraid to make a tackle either.mrussel1 said:
The league wants to protect its assets and have high scores. Seems to me this is working perfectly.Merkin Baller said:In the end it only highlights what a lousy position the defenders are in. Does it make Allen a dirty player? Not in my eyes, but when the defenders have only fractions of a second to make their decisions…. Idk, I think the rules should be a bit different for QBs in motion if they’re going to get extra protection from the officials.
That said...fake slides are kind of bullshit. They should consider calling it unsportsmanlike conduct. That would kill that problem in a minute.I wasn't trying to put words in your mouth… I agree they want high scoring games, and I think fantasy has as much to do with it as anything else, if not more. The league has a financial interest in fantasy football, and I don’t think the increasing profitability in fantasy and the increase in rules favoring offenses and protecting the QB over the last 20 years are entirely unrelated.
I agree w/ the last point & might take it a step further… if the QB is going to get extra protection as a runner, his options as to what he can do once he leaves the pocket should be limited.
I get your point... “chicks dig the long ball” applies to football too. Most of the viewing public don’t want to see a 7-3 defensive slog in the NFL… they want to see 80-yard TD bombs… it makes perfect sense. But when it gets to the point that teams can’t play defense anymore, I think that waters down / takes away from the game.
0 -
I don't know man.. the older I get, the longer my balls get. That doesn't seem to be helping all that much.Merkin Baller said:mrussel1 said:
I didn't say it was for FF. I think the league likes high scoring games because people enjoy those. Remember the Alabama-LSU national championship? Worst football game of all time. The league is consistently tweaking the rules to give the offense an advantage on the defense. Sometimes they dial it back if it goes too far, but in general it wants the offense a step ahead of the defense. Better entertainment.Merkin Baller said:
I understand and agree…. It’s what the league wants. Protecting the assets is understandable, & the high scoring games are great for fantasy football, but I don’t see how tweaking the rules to influence higher scores (for the benefit of FF) is good for the game itself… IMO it takes away from it. I don’t like seeing guys get wrecked, but I don’t like seeing defenders afraid to make a tackle either.mrussel1 said:
The league wants to protect its assets and have high scores. Seems to me this is working perfectly.Merkin Baller said:In the end it only highlights what a lousy position the defenders are in. Does it make Allen a dirty player? Not in my eyes, but when the defenders have only fractions of a second to make their decisions…. Idk, I think the rules should be a bit different for QBs in motion if they’re going to get extra protection from the officials.
That said...fake slides are kind of bullshit. They should consider calling it unsportsmanlike conduct. That would kill that problem in a minute.I wasn't trying to put words in your mouth… I agree they want high scoring games, and I think fantasy has as much to do with it as anything else, if not more. The league has a financial interest in fantasy football, and I don’t think the increasing profitability in fantasy and the increase in rules favoring offenses and protecting the QB over the last 20 years are entirely unrelated.
I agree w/ the last point & might take it a step further… if the QB is going to get extra protection as a runner, his options as to what he can do once he leaves the pocket should be limited.
I get your point... “chicks dig the long ball” applies to football too. Most of the viewing public don’t want to see a 7-3 defensive slog in the NFL… they want to see 80-yard TD bombs… it makes perfect sense. But when it gets to the point that teams can’t play defense anymore, I think that waters down / takes away from the game.
IN hockey you have embellishing and that's a 2 minute. Basketball has dives. You definitely could get rid of the fake slide. Although does it really happen all that often? I would think it would be more.Post edited by mrussel1 on0 -
I didn’t look at the Josh Allen slide/no slide thing with Zapruder like detail but it looks to me like Josh just juked the guy. Still, no doubt defenders are at a disadvantage when it comes to deciding what to do with a running QB.If I had known then what I know now...
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14Philly I & II, 16Denver 22
Missoula 240 -
Yeah I think his was more of a juke but you're right about the defenders being hesitant. If he slides and you tackle him you get penalized...if he jukes or fakes a slide and you don't tackle him to avoid a penalty then he's 15 yards further down the field.Wobbie said:I didn’t look at the Josh Allen slide/no slide thing with Zapruder like detail but it looks to me like Josh just juked the guy. Still, no doubt defenders are at a disadvantage when it comes to deciding what to do with a running QB.
I do like the idea of a penalty for embellishing the slide...maybe that's the best answer.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.2K The Porch
- 279 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.3K Flea Market
- 39.3K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help








