Pearl Jam's new album ”Dark Matter” ! Single out!

I do hope we get a theatrical release like they were going to do with Gigaton.

bigbiggzy said:

STONE…. WHERE. IS. THE. NEW. SINGLE??

STONE?!?!?!?  

strilo said:

igotid88 said:

RiotAct10 said:

I believe the Stones new album was released after the cut-off date, so it won't be eligible until next year, but the single was released before the cut-off date, so it was eligible. If Pearl Jam's album is any good (which I expect it to be, just saying) then next year I could see Watt being nominated for Producer of the Year with the Stones record and PJs records both counting for next year, along with whatever else is put out with his production (Paul McCartney perhaps?)

Pearl Jam won't get nominated unfortunately

I agree with Jeff and Ed. Grammys are fucking stupid and meaningless.

If you think Ed believes that today, you're kidding yourself.

Tim Simmons said:

demetrios said:

igotid88 said:

I do hope we get a theatrical release like they were going to do with Gigaton.

Me too. Not sure why they haven't released it yet on Blu-ray. 

NO UPSCALE!

Yes, no upscale please.

BF25394 said:

Tim Simmons said:

BF25394 said:

strilo said:

igotid88 said:

RiotAct10 said:

I believe the Stones new album was released after the cut-off date, so it won't be eligible until next year, but the single was released before the cut-off date, so it was eligible. If Pearl Jam's album is any good (which I expect it to be, just saying) then next year I could see Watt being nominated for Producer of the Year with the Stones record and PJs records both counting for next year, along with whatever else is put out with his production (Paul McCartney perhaps?)

Pearl Jam won't get nominated unfortunately

I agree with Jeff and Ed. Grammys are fucking stupid and meaningless.

If you think Ed believes that today, you're kidding yourself.

go on.

Nowadays, Ed seems to be very comfortable with the Hollywood-entertainment-industrial complex of which the Grammys are a part.

You can be both comfortable and not care if you win or not. I don't see them actively campaigning. Not like Taylor Swift who's main mission is to get Grammys.

strilo said:

igotid88 said:

RiotAct10 said:

I believe the Stones new album was released after the cut-off date, so it won't be eligible until next year, but the single was released before the cut-off date, so it was eligible. If Pearl Jam's album is any good (which I expect it to be, just saying) then next year I could see Watt being nominated for Producer of the Year with the Stones record and PJs records both counting for next year, along with whatever else is put out with his production (Paul McCartney perhaps?)

Pearl Jam won't get nominated unfortunately

I agree with Jeff and Ed. Grammys are fucking stupid and meaningless.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tf9V0hwJ6qk

Tease a riff or something

lets go

Tim Simmons said:

BF25394 said:

Tim Simmons said:

BF25394 said:

strilo said:

igotid88 said:

RiotAct10 said:

I believe the Stones new album was released after the cut-off date, so it won't be eligible until next year, but the single was released before the cut-off date, so it was eligible. If Pearl Jam's album is any good (which I expect it to be, just saying) then next year I could see Watt being nominated for Producer of the Year with the Stones record and PJs records both counting for next year, along with whatever else is put out with his production (Paul McCartney perhaps?)

Pearl Jam won't get nominated unfortunately

I agree with Jeff and Ed. Grammys are fucking stupid and meaningless.

If you think Ed believes that today, you're kidding yourself.

go on.

Nowadays, Ed seems to be very comfortable with the Hollywood-entertainment-industrial complex of which the Grammys are a part.

I guess we’ll see. While I agree Ed is more comfortable with where he is, he hasn’t shown otherwise with the Grammys. 

Pearl Jam hasn't been nominated for a Grammy in over a decade, and hasn't been nominated for a high-profile Grammy in over a quarter-century, so there hasn't really been much opportunity for him to weigh in on the topic lately. 21st-century Ed does seem to believe that the Oscars are meaningful. I just think that, if he were to express a similar opinion to the one he expressed on the telecast back when he had a very different public demeanor, he would potentially offend a lot of his pals in the celebrity-industrial complex and that doesn't seem to be something he'd want to do.