GOP

1291292294296297445

Comments

  • Maybe, just maybe, they’ve had enough of Lorena Bobbitt?

    https://www.instagram.com/reel/CxY2ct9xgtd/?igshid=MWZjMTM2ODFkZg==
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,066
    mickeyrat said:
    schmitt is former mo attorney general that i played baseball with in high school. fuck that guy.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,066
    Maybe, just maybe, they’ve had enough of Lorena Bobbitt?

    https://www.instagram.com/reel/CxY2ct9xgtd/?igshid=MWZjMTM2ODFkZg==
    but what are they gonna do about it, besides re-elect her?
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 44,386
    edited September 2023
    nobody told him Jack falls under essential services? He does. shut down doesnt stop shit.. not Jack. Not the Courts, NOT THE PRISONS.

    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 44,386
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • mickeyrat said:
    Do these senators have any justification for voting no... besides trying to cause chaos while Biden is in office, that is? 

    Honest question, because from all appearances the GOP seems intent on running the country into the ground. 
  • mickeyrat said:
    Do these senators have any justification for voting no... besides trying to cause chaos while Biden is in office, that is? 

    Honest question, because from all appearances the GOP seems intent on running the country into the ground. 
    Half of the ‘Murican voting populace is intent on running ‘Murica into the ground.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,066
    mickeyrat said:
    Do these senators have any justification for voting no... besides trying to cause chaos while Biden is in office, that is? 

    Honest question, because from all appearances the GOP seems intent on running the country into the ground. 
    hawley and schmitt are firebrand prolifers, so of course they are going to support tuberville and maga no matter what.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • Merkin Baller
    Merkin Baller Posts: 12,773
    edited September 2023
    mickeyrat said:
    Do these senators have any justification for voting no... besides trying to cause chaos while Biden is in office, that is? 

    Honest question, because from all appearances the GOP seems intent on running the country into the ground. 
    hawley and schmitt are firebrand prolifers, so of course they are going to support tuberville and maga no matter what.
    I wonder if someone from the 'both sides' crowd could explain to me how this is just politics as usual. 
  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 44,386
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,473
    mickeyrat said:
    Do these senators have any justification for voting no... besides trying to cause chaos while Biden is in office, that is? 

    Honest question, because from all appearances the GOP seems intent on running the country into the ground. 
    hawley and schmitt are firebrand prolifers, so of course they are going to support tuberville and maga no matter what.
    I wonder if someone from the 'both sides' crowd could explain to me how this is just politics as usual. 
    I don't think there's anything wrong with simply asking "did (whichever "team") stuff the bill with other items that (the other "team") legitimately don't believe in?". But in this case, I can't see any justification for voting no. 
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • mickeyrat said:
    Do these senators have any justification for voting no... besides trying to cause chaos while Biden is in office, that is? 

    Honest question, because from all appearances the GOP seems intent on running the country into the ground. 
    hawley and schmitt are firebrand prolifers, so of course they are going to support tuberville and maga no matter what.
    I wonder if someone from the 'both sides' crowd could explain to me how this is just politics as usual. 
    I don't think there's anything wrong with simply asking "did (whichever "team") stuff the bill with other items that (the other "team") legitimately don't believe in?". But in this case, I can't see any justification for voting no. 
    No, there's nothing wrong with asking it, but having said that... how much more do we need to see out of the modern day GOP before we accept that they've become a party of extremists? 

    How much more do we need to see before people wake up and realize this isn't politics as normal, and no... both sides are not the same? 
  • mickeyrat said:
    Do these senators have any justification for voting no... besides trying to cause chaos while Biden is in office, that is? 

    Honest question, because from all appearances the GOP seems intent on running the country into the ground. 
    hawley and schmitt are firebrand prolifers, so of course they are going to support tuberville and maga no matter what.
    I wonder if someone from the 'both sides' crowd could explain to me how this is just politics as usual. 
    I don't think there's anything wrong with simply asking "did (whichever "team") stuff the bill with other items that (the other "team") legitimately don't believe in?". But in this case, I can't see any justification for voting no. 
    It’s a confirmation vote. There’s nothing to “stuff” in there.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,473
    mickeyrat said:
    Do these senators have any justification for voting no... besides trying to cause chaos while Biden is in office, that is? 

    Honest question, because from all appearances the GOP seems intent on running the country into the ground. 
    hawley and schmitt are firebrand prolifers, so of course they are going to support tuberville and maga no matter what.
    I wonder if someone from the 'both sides' crowd could explain to me how this is just politics as usual. 
    I don't think there's anything wrong with simply asking "did (whichever "team") stuff the bill with other items that (the other "team") legitimately don't believe in?". But in this case, I can't see any justification for voting no. 
    It’s a confirmation vote. There’s nothing to “stuff” in there.
    I'm aware of that, but I was answering Merkin as to what I believed he was referring to. And that's why I said it was pretty plain to see that this situation doesn't apply. 
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • mickeyrat said:
    Do these senators have any justification for voting no... besides trying to cause chaos while Biden is in office, that is? 

    Honest question, because from all appearances the GOP seems intent on running the country into the ground. 
    hawley and schmitt are firebrand prolifers, so of course they are going to support tuberville and maga no matter what.
    I wonder if someone from the 'both sides' crowd could explain to me how this is just politics as usual. 
    I don't think there's anything wrong with simply asking "did (whichever "team") stuff the bill with other items that (the other "team") legitimately don't believe in?". But in this case, I can't see any justification for voting no. 
    It’s a confirmation vote. There’s nothing to “stuff” in there.
    I'm aware of that, but I was answering Merkin as to what I believed he was referring to. And that's why I said it was pretty plain to see that this situation doesn't apply. 
    C'mon, if it seems like you're against anything they attack you.  Par for the course here.
  • mickeyrat said:
    Do these senators have any justification for voting no... besides trying to cause chaos while Biden is in office, that is? 

    Honest question, because from all appearances the GOP seems intent on running the country into the ground. 
    hawley and schmitt are firebrand prolifers, so of course they are going to support tuberville and maga no matter what.
    I wonder if someone from the 'both sides' crowd could explain to me how this is just politics as usual. 
    I don't think there's anything wrong with simply asking "did (whichever "team") stuff the bill with other items that (the other "team") legitimately don't believe in?". But in this case, I can't see any justification for voting no. 
    It’s a confirmation vote. There’s nothing to “stuff” in there.
    I'm aware of that, but I was answering Merkin as to what I believed he was referring to. And that's why I said it was pretty plain to see that this situation doesn't apply. 
    C'mon, if it seems like you're against anything they attack you.  Par for the course here.
    Any thoughts on why those senators would have voted no? 
  • mickeyrat said:
    Do these senators have any justification for voting no... besides trying to cause chaos while Biden is in office, that is? 

    Honest question, because from all appearances the GOP seems intent on running the country into the ground. 
    hawley and schmitt are firebrand prolifers, so of course they are going to support tuberville and maga no matter what.
    I wonder if someone from the 'both sides' crowd could explain to me how this is just politics as usual. 
    I don't think there's anything wrong with simply asking "did (whichever "team") stuff the bill with other items that (the other "team") legitimately don't believe in?". But in this case, I can't see any justification for voting no. 
    It’s a confirmation vote. There’s nothing to “stuff” in there.
    I'm aware of that, but I was answering Merkin as to what I believed he was referring to. And that's why I said it was pretty plain to see that this situation doesn't apply. 
    C'mon, if it seems like you're against anything they attack you.  Par for the course here.
    My post was an “attack?” ‘C’mon, man! 

    The appropriate place to reference “stuffing” things in a bill would be a discussion about appropriations and not regarding a confirmation vote. They are not the same processes and, IMHO, to do so makes it appear that with confirmation votes, “both sides are the same.” Context and subtly matter.

    How’s this for an “attack?” Sheesh. Hey, but you do you.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,473
    I do know what a confirmation hearing entails. However, I took Merkin's post to mean the "both sidesing" of stuffing bills, because I've personally never come across a "both sidesing" of confirmation hearings. I think it was a simple case of crossed wires. 
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • I do know what a confirmation hearing entails. However, I took Merkin's post to mean the "both sidesing" of stuffing bills, because I've personally never come across a "both sidesing" of confirmation hearings. I think it was a simple case of crossed wires. 
    No crossed wires at all... People jump to the defense of the GOP in the face of bad behavior / decisions / votes by crying 'both sides' on a regular basis, and I was genuinely curious if someone who thinks both sides are the same wanted to explain the 'no' votes on this confirmation hearing. 
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,473
    I knew I should have said crossed wires "on my part". lol
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




This discussion has been closed.