GOP
Comments
-
mrussel1 said:Gern Blansten said:OnWis97 said:cincybearcat said:Halifax2TheMax said:tempo_n_groove said:mickeyrat said:
I often wonder where we would be today if he had been able to beat Obama...would he have had 8 years....and then would Obama have ever been president...would the republicans not have abandoned their principles...
Nominating McCain and Romney and losing both times gave the crazies of the part a larger voice to try something different. It did not end well.
Of course, I've heard it argued that McCain choosing Sarah Palin as his running mate was a key step in the crazification of the party. And I get this. I don't specifically blame McCain or think that this was a turning point. But it was probably a sign, i.e., there were already Republicans that just could not deal with the kind of candidate that worked across the aisle and was complimentary at times of his Democratic opponent. And, yeah, back then, Palin seemed off the wall. Now? She's not even on the top-25 deranged list.
I generally appreciated McCain and I toyed with voting 3rd* before he announced his running mate. And I think choosing her was probably an misstep. But he chose her to appease a group of people that was just about to explode in terms of numbers and influence. And now, choosing someone like her would be met with unimpressed shrugs and accusations of choosing a RINO to appease the establishment.
*I am sure I would have voted for Obama either way; I only ever followed through on 3rd once and it was not for president. But she ended my entertainment of that abruptly.
In hind sight he didn't have much of a choice at the time. He trailed Obama by a large margin and needed a spark.
If you haven't seen "Game Change" with Woody Harrelson you should watch it. It's a great look into all of those decisions and how much of a mistake the McCain campaign knew they had made.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
mrussel1 said:Gern Blansten said:OnWis97 said:cincybearcat said:Halifax2TheMax said:tempo_n_groove said:mickeyrat said:
I often wonder where we would be today if he had been able to beat Obama...would he have had 8 years....and then would Obama have ever been president...would the republicans not have abandoned their principles...
Nominating McCain and Romney and losing both times gave the crazies of the part a larger voice to try something different. It did not end well.
Of course, I've heard it argued that McCain choosing Sarah Palin as his running mate was a key step in the crazification of the party. And I get this. I don't specifically blame McCain or think that this was a turning point. But it was probably a sign, i.e., there were already Republicans that just could not deal with the kind of candidate that worked across the aisle and was complimentary at times of his Democratic opponent. And, yeah, back then, Palin seemed off the wall. Now? She's not even on the top-25 deranged list.
I generally appreciated McCain and I toyed with voting 3rd* before he announced his running mate. And I think choosing her was probably an misstep. But he chose her to appease a group of people that was just about to explode in terms of numbers and influence. And now, choosing someone like her would be met with unimpressed shrugs and accusations of choosing a RINO to appease the establishment.
*I am sure I would have voted for Obama either way; I only ever followed through on 3rd once and it was not for president. But she ended my entertainment of that abruptly.
In hind sight he didn't have much of a choice at the time. He trailed Obama by a large margin and needed a spark.
If you haven't seen "Game Change" with Woody Harrelson you should watch it. It's a great look into all of those decisions and how much of a mistake the McCain campaign knew they had made.But Palin galvanized the extremists, those willing to believe outrageous lies to further political power. It can be argued she had bigger influence than anyone else in that era, including Obama, leading directly to trump and his Kenya lies, that started his powerful political movement. We’ll be dealing with the result of this movement for decades, as a direct result of how trump changed politicking with scotus in mind.0 -
Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:Gern Blansten said:OnWis97 said:cincybearcat said:Halifax2TheMax said:tempo_n_groove said:mickeyrat said:
I often wonder where we would be today if he had been able to beat Obama...would he have had 8 years....and then would Obama have ever been president...would the republicans not have abandoned their principles...
Nominating McCain and Romney and losing both times gave the crazies of the part a larger voice to try something different. It did not end well.
Of course, I've heard it argued that McCain choosing Sarah Palin as his running mate was a key step in the crazification of the party. And I get this. I don't specifically blame McCain or think that this was a turning point. But it was probably a sign, i.e., there were already Republicans that just could not deal with the kind of candidate that worked across the aisle and was complimentary at times of his Democratic opponent. And, yeah, back then, Palin seemed off the wall. Now? She's not even on the top-25 deranged list.
I generally appreciated McCain and I toyed with voting 3rd* before he announced his running mate. And I think choosing her was probably an misstep. But he chose her to appease a group of people that was just about to explode in terms of numbers and influence. And now, choosing someone like her would be met with unimpressed shrugs and accusations of choosing a RINO to appease the establishment.
*I am sure I would have voted for Obama either way; I only ever followed through on 3rd once and it was not for president. But she ended my entertainment of that abruptly.
In hind sight he didn't have much of a choice at the time. He trailed Obama by a large margin and needed a spark.
If you haven't seen "Game Change" with Woody Harrelson you should watch it. It's a great look into all of those decisions and how much of a mistake the McCain campaign knew they had made.But Palin galvanized the extremists, those willing to believe outrageous lies to further political power. It can be argued she had bigger influence than anyone else in that era, including Obama, leading directly to trump and his Kenya lies, that started his powerful political movement. We’ll be dealing with the result of this movement for decades, as a direct result of how trump changed politicking with scotus in mind.
I don't recall her doing anything to stir up conspiracy theories?0 -
Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:Gern Blansten said:OnWis97 said:cincybearcat said:Halifax2TheMax said:tempo_n_groove said:mickeyrat said:
I often wonder where we would be today if he had been able to beat Obama...would he have had 8 years....and then would Obama have ever been president...would the republicans not have abandoned their principles...
Nominating McCain and Romney and losing both times gave the crazies of the part a larger voice to try something different. It did not end well.
Of course, I've heard it argued that McCain choosing Sarah Palin as his running mate was a key step in the crazification of the party. And I get this. I don't specifically blame McCain or think that this was a turning point. But it was probably a sign, i.e., there were already Republicans that just could not deal with the kind of candidate that worked across the aisle and was complimentary at times of his Democratic opponent. And, yeah, back then, Palin seemed off the wall. Now? She's not even on the top-25 deranged list.
I generally appreciated McCain and I toyed with voting 3rd* before he announced his running mate. And I think choosing her was probably an misstep. But he chose her to appease a group of people that was just about to explode in terms of numbers and influence. And now, choosing someone like her would be met with unimpressed shrugs and accusations of choosing a RINO to appease the establishment.
*I am sure I would have voted for Obama either way; I only ever followed through on 3rd once and it was not for president. But she ended my entertainment of that abruptly.
In hind sight he didn't have much of a choice at the time. He trailed Obama by a large margin and needed a spark.
If you haven't seen "Game Change" with Woody Harrelson you should watch it. It's a great look into all of those decisions and how much of a mistake the McCain campaign knew they had made.But Palin galvanized the extremists, those willing to believe outrageous lies to further political power. It can be argued she had bigger influence than anyone else in that era, including Obama, leading directly to trump and his Kenya lies, that started his powerful political movement. We’ll be dealing with the result of this movement for decades, as a direct result of how trump changed politicking with scotus in mind.
0 -
tempo_n_groove said:Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:Gern Blansten said:OnWis97 said:cincybearcat said:Halifax2TheMax said:tempo_n_groove said:mickeyrat said:
I often wonder where we would be today if he had been able to beat Obama...would he have had 8 years....and then would Obama have ever been president...would the republicans not have abandoned their principles...
Nominating McCain and Romney and losing both times gave the crazies of the part a larger voice to try something different. It did not end well.
Of course, I've heard it argued that McCain choosing Sarah Palin as his running mate was a key step in the crazification of the party. And I get this. I don't specifically blame McCain or think that this was a turning point. But it was probably a sign, i.e., there were already Republicans that just could not deal with the kind of candidate that worked across the aisle and was complimentary at times of his Democratic opponent. And, yeah, back then, Palin seemed off the wall. Now? She's not even on the top-25 deranged list.
I generally appreciated McCain and I toyed with voting 3rd* before he announced his running mate. And I think choosing her was probably an misstep. But he chose her to appease a group of people that was just about to explode in terms of numbers and influence. And now, choosing someone like her would be met with unimpressed shrugs and accusations of choosing a RINO to appease the establishment.
*I am sure I would have voted for Obama either way; I only ever followed through on 3rd once and it was not for president. But she ended my entertainment of that abruptly.
In hind sight he didn't have much of a choice at the time. He trailed Obama by a large margin and needed a spark.
If you haven't seen "Game Change" with Woody Harrelson you should watch it. It's a great look into all of those decisions and how much of a mistake the McCain campaign knew they had made.But Palin galvanized the extremists, those willing to believe outrageous lies to further political power. It can be argued she had bigger influence than anyone else in that era, including Obama, leading directly to trump and his Kenya lies, that started his powerful political movement. We’ll be dealing with the result of this movement for decades, as a direct result of how trump changed politicking with scotus in mind.
I don't recall her doing anything to stir up conspiracy theories?
death panels......
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
tempo_n_groove said:Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:Gern Blansten said:OnWis97 said:cincybearcat said:Halifax2TheMax said:tempo_n_groove said:mickeyrat said:
I often wonder where we would be today if he had been able to beat Obama...would he have had 8 years....and then would Obama have ever been president...would the republicans not have abandoned their principles...
Nominating McCain and Romney and losing both times gave the crazies of the part a larger voice to try something different. It did not end well.
Of course, I've heard it argued that McCain choosing Sarah Palin as his running mate was a key step in the crazification of the party. And I get this. I don't specifically blame McCain or think that this was a turning point. But it was probably a sign, i.e., there were already Republicans that just could not deal with the kind of candidate that worked across the aisle and was complimentary at times of his Democratic opponent. And, yeah, back then, Palin seemed off the wall. Now? She's not even on the top-25 deranged list.
I generally appreciated McCain and I toyed with voting 3rd* before he announced his running mate. And I think choosing her was probably an misstep. But he chose her to appease a group of people that was just about to explode in terms of numbers and influence. And now, choosing someone like her would be met with unimpressed shrugs and accusations of choosing a RINO to appease the establishment.
*I am sure I would have voted for Obama either way; I only ever followed through on 3rd once and it was not for president. But she ended my entertainment of that abruptly.
In hind sight he didn't have much of a choice at the time. He trailed Obama by a large margin and needed a spark.
If you haven't seen "Game Change" with Woody Harrelson you should watch it. It's a great look into all of those decisions and how much of a mistake the McCain campaign knew they had made.But Palin galvanized the extremists, those willing to believe outrageous lies to further political power. It can be argued she had bigger influence than anyone else in that era, including Obama, leading directly to trump and his Kenya lies, that started his powerful political movement. We’ll be dealing with the result of this movement for decades, as a direct result of how trump changed politicking with scotus in mind.
I don't recall her doing anything to stir up conspiracy theories?Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
mickeyrat said:tempo_n_groove said:Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:Gern Blansten said:OnWis97 said:cincybearcat said:Halifax2TheMax said:tempo_n_groove said:mickeyrat said:
I often wonder where we would be today if he had been able to beat Obama...would he have had 8 years....and then would Obama have ever been president...would the republicans not have abandoned their principles...
Nominating McCain and Romney and losing both times gave the crazies of the part a larger voice to try something different. It did not end well.
Of course, I've heard it argued that McCain choosing Sarah Palin as his running mate was a key step in the crazification of the party. And I get this. I don't specifically blame McCain or think that this was a turning point. But it was probably a sign, i.e., there were already Republicans that just could not deal with the kind of candidate that worked across the aisle and was complimentary at times of his Democratic opponent. And, yeah, back then, Palin seemed off the wall. Now? She's not even on the top-25 deranged list.
I generally appreciated McCain and I toyed with voting 3rd* before he announced his running mate. And I think choosing her was probably an misstep. But he chose her to appease a group of people that was just about to explode in terms of numbers and influence. And now, choosing someone like her would be met with unimpressed shrugs and accusations of choosing a RINO to appease the establishment.
*I am sure I would have voted for Obama either way; I only ever followed through on 3rd once and it was not for president. But she ended my entertainment of that abruptly.
In hind sight he didn't have much of a choice at the time. He trailed Obama by a large margin and needed a spark.
If you haven't seen "Game Change" with Woody Harrelson you should watch it. It's a great look into all of those decisions and how much of a mistake the McCain campaign knew they had made.But Palin galvanized the extremists, those willing to believe outrageous lies to further political power. It can be argued she had bigger influence than anyone else in that era, including Obama, leading directly to trump and his Kenya lies, that started his powerful political movement. We’ll be dealing with the result of this movement for decades, as a direct result of how trump changed politicking with scotus in mind.
I don't recall her doing anything to stir up conspiracy theories?
death panels......0 -
Gern Blansten said:tempo_n_groove said:Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:Gern Blansten said:OnWis97 said:cincybearcat said:Halifax2TheMax said:tempo_n_groove said:mickeyrat said:
I often wonder where we would be today if he had been able to beat Obama...would he have had 8 years....and then would Obama have ever been president...would the republicans not have abandoned their principles...
Nominating McCain and Romney and losing both times gave the crazies of the part a larger voice to try something different. It did not end well.
Of course, I've heard it argued that McCain choosing Sarah Palin as his running mate was a key step in the crazification of the party. And I get this. I don't specifically blame McCain or think that this was a turning point. But it was probably a sign, i.e., there were already Republicans that just could not deal with the kind of candidate that worked across the aisle and was complimentary at times of his Democratic opponent. And, yeah, back then, Palin seemed off the wall. Now? She's not even on the top-25 deranged list.
I generally appreciated McCain and I toyed with voting 3rd* before he announced his running mate. And I think choosing her was probably an misstep. But he chose her to appease a group of people that was just about to explode in terms of numbers and influence. And now, choosing someone like her would be met with unimpressed shrugs and accusations of choosing a RINO to appease the establishment.
*I am sure I would have voted for Obama either way; I only ever followed through on 3rd once and it was not for president. But she ended my entertainment of that abruptly.
In hind sight he didn't have much of a choice at the time. He trailed Obama by a large margin and needed a spark.
If you haven't seen "Game Change" with Woody Harrelson you should watch it. It's a great look into all of those decisions and how much of a mistake the McCain campaign knew they had made.But Palin galvanized the extremists, those willing to believe outrageous lies to further political power. It can be argued she had bigger influence than anyone else in that era, including Obama, leading directly to trump and his Kenya lies, that started his powerful political movement. We’ll be dealing with the result of this movement for decades, as a direct result of how trump changed politicking with scotus in mind.
I don't recall her doing anything to stir up conspiracy theories?0 -
tempo_n_groove said:Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:Gern Blansten said:OnWis97 said:cincybearcat said:Halifax2TheMax said:tempo_n_groove said:mickeyrat said:
I often wonder where we would be today if he had been able to beat Obama...would he have had 8 years....and then would Obama have ever been president...would the republicans not have abandoned their principles...
Nominating McCain and Romney and losing both times gave the crazies of the part a larger voice to try something different. It did not end well.
Of course, I've heard it argued that McCain choosing Sarah Palin as his running mate was a key step in the crazification of the party. And I get this. I don't specifically blame McCain or think that this was a turning point. But it was probably a sign, i.e., there were already Republicans that just could not deal with the kind of candidate that worked across the aisle and was complimentary at times of his Democratic opponent. And, yeah, back then, Palin seemed off the wall. Now? She's not even on the top-25 deranged list.
I generally appreciated McCain and I toyed with voting 3rd* before he announced his running mate. And I think choosing her was probably an misstep. But he chose her to appease a group of people that was just about to explode in terms of numbers and influence. And now, choosing someone like her would be met with unimpressed shrugs and accusations of choosing a RINO to appease the establishment.
*I am sure I would have voted for Obama either way; I only ever followed through on 3rd once and it was not for president. But she ended my entertainment of that abruptly.
In hind sight he didn't have much of a choice at the time. He trailed Obama by a large margin and needed a spark.
If you haven't seen "Game Change" with Woody Harrelson you should watch it. It's a great look into all of those decisions and how much of a mistake the McCain campaign knew they had made.But Palin galvanized the extremists, those willing to believe outrageous lies to further political power. It can be argued she had bigger influence than anyone else in that era, including Obama, leading directly to trump and his Kenya lies, that started his powerful political movement. We’ll be dealing with the result of this movement for decades, as a direct result of how trump changed politicking with scotus in mind.
I don't recall her doing anything to stir up conspiracy theories?mrussel1 said:Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:Gern Blansten said:OnWis97 said:cincybearcat said:Halifax2TheMax said:tempo_n_groove said:mickeyrat said:
I often wonder where we would be today if he had been able to beat Obama...would he have had 8 years....and then would Obama have ever been president...would the republicans not have abandoned their principles...
Nominating McCain and Romney and losing both times gave the crazies of the part a larger voice to try something different. It did not end well.
Of course, I've heard it argued that McCain choosing Sarah Palin as his running mate was a key step in the crazification of the party. And I get this. I don't specifically blame McCain or think that this was a turning point. But it was probably a sign, i.e., there were already Republicans that just could not deal with the kind of candidate that worked across the aisle and was complimentary at times of his Democratic opponent. And, yeah, back then, Palin seemed off the wall. Now? She's not even on the top-25 deranged list.
I generally appreciated McCain and I toyed with voting 3rd* before he announced his running mate. And I think choosing her was probably an misstep. But he chose her to appease a group of people that was just about to explode in terms of numbers and influence. And now, choosing someone like her would be met with unimpressed shrugs and accusations of choosing a RINO to appease the establishment.
*I am sure I would have voted for Obama either way; I only ever followed through on 3rd once and it was not for president. But she ended my entertainment of that abruptly.
In hind sight he didn't have much of a choice at the time. He trailed Obama by a large margin and needed a spark.
If you haven't seen "Game Change" with Woody Harrelson you should watch it. It's a great look into all of those decisions and how much of a mistake the McCain campaign knew they had made.But Palin galvanized the extremists, those willing to believe outrageous lies to further political power. It can be argued she had bigger influence than anyone else in that era, including Obama, leading directly to trump and his Kenya lies, that started his powerful political movement. We’ll be dealing with the result of this movement for decades, as a direct result of how trump changed politicking with scotus in mind.Doesn’t matter that she was an idiot. She trumped before trump. She got them engaged just in time for the Kenya lies. She revolutionized the use of social media to spew lies and conspiracy theories.I’ll defer to Steve Schmidt,“She is the first of a generation of politicians who live in a post-truth environment. She was, and there’s no polite way to say it, but a serial liar,” Steve Schmidt, who helped lead John McCain’s 2008 presidential campaign and pushed him to choose Palin as his running mate, tells FRONTLINEin the documentary America’s Great Divide: From Obama to Trump.
“She would say things that are simply not true, or things that were picked up from the Internet,” the former GOP operative, who had also worked as a campaign adviser to President George W. Bush, continues. “And this obliteration of fact from fiction, of truth from lie, has become now endemic in American politics. But it started then.”
Schmidt and Palin have clashed in the years after the campaign ended, each accusing the other of mischaracterizations.
Palin’s role in exploiting America’s divisions (including on social media) and paving the way for the rise of President Donald Trump is explored as part of America’s Great Divide — a two-night, four-hour special premiering Jan. 13 and 14 on air and online that shows how the country’s increasingly divisive politics over the past decade have led to this moment.
0 -
I agree Russ that her political dreams were crushed and she was not able to turn her lying BS into political wins like trump can. Leaving her governorship before her term was over was the ultimate in stupidity. But she laid the groundwork of lying to lie to protect the lies, and using social media to enhance that. Who did it on this level before her? She was the true maverick.0 -
History is going to have a field day with Palin & tRump.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
Gern Blansten said:History is going to have a field day with Palin & tRump.0
-
Yeah I was leaning towards McCain until he chose Palin. That was basically the last straw for me and the republican party moving forward actually.www.myspace.com0
-
The Juggler said:Yeah I was leaning towards McCain until he chose Palin. That was basically the last straw for me and the republican party moving forward actually.
I would have veered back for McCain but the party lost me with Palin. The GOP needs to die and re-emerge as a real party. Right now it's just a bunch of racist hilljacks/morons.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
Gern Blansten said:The Juggler said:Yeah I was leaning towards McCain until he chose Palin. That was basically the last straw for me and the republican party moving forward actually.
I would have veered back for McCain but the party lost me with Palin. The GOP needs to die and re-emerge as a real party. Right now it's just a bunch of racist hilljacks/morons.Spoken like a true cpa..0 -
Lerxst1992 said:Gern Blansten said:The Juggler said:Yeah I was leaning towards McCain until he chose Palin. That was basically the last straw for me and the republican party moving forward actually.
I would have veered back for McCain but the party lost me with Palin. The GOP needs to die and re-emerge as a real party. Right now it's just a bunch of racist hilljacks/morons.Spoken like a true cpa..Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
Gern Blansten said:The Juggler said:Yeah I was leaning towards McCain until he chose Palin. That was basically the last straw for me and the republican party moving forward actually.
I would have veered back for McCain but the party lost me with Palin. The GOP needs to die and re-emerge as a real party. Right now it's just a bunch of racist hilljacks/morons.www.myspace.com0 -
OnWis97 said:cincybearcat said:Halifax2TheMax said:tempo_n_groove said:mickeyrat said:
I often wonder where we would be today if he had been able to beat Obama...would he have had 8 years....and then would Obama have ever been president...would the republicans not have abandoned their principles...
Nominating McCain and Romney and losing both times gave the crazies of the part a larger voice to try something different. It did not end well.
Of course, I've heard it argued that McCain choosing Sarah Palin as his running mate was a key step in the crazification of the party. And I get this. I don't specifically blame McCain or think that this was a turning point. But it was probably a sign, i.e., there were already Republicans that just could not deal with the kind of candidate that worked across the aisle and was complimentary at times of his Democratic opponent. And, yeah, back then, Palin seemed off the wall. Now? She's not even on the top-25 deranged list.
I generally appreciated McCain and I toyed with voting 3rd* before he announced his running mate. And I think choosing her was probably an misstep. But he chose her to appease a group of people that was just about to explode in terms of numbers and influence. And now, choosing someone like her would be met with unimpressed shrugs and accusations of choosing a RINO to appease the establishment.
*I am sure I would have voted for Obama either way; I only ever followed through on 3rd once and it was not for president. But she ended my entertainment of that abruptly.hippiemom = goodness0 -
I had a client get rooked into this...actually my client's son talked her into putting all of her retirement money into a gold fund and ended up losing at least a third of it.
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help