2024/2025 NBA Season October 22nd Opening Tip off! Pg 112
Comments
-
We've talked about this before too, Knicks fans are delusional... They may have been "2nd" in attendance over the Knicks but had a better shot at winning a title.igotid88 said:
I doubt they sold out every gametempo_n_groove said:
We talked about the Nets way more, for better or worse. Theres only so many times you can talk about Julius Randle...igotid88 said:
But the Nets were? Even with the players they got were still the 2nd team in the citytempo_n_groove said:
I remember him saying specifically that The Knicks aren't a team that players want to play for. "The cool thing is not the Knicks"igotid88 said:KD just should have gone to the Knicks like he wanted to.
0 -
^
This got me curious. Believe it or not the Bulls lead the league in attendance. Would never have guessed that
http://www.espn.com/nba/attendance
www.myspace.com0 -
They are funny. They think their franchise is one of the NBA's elite franchises. 2 titles all time, last one 50 years ago,tempo_n_groove said:
Knicks fans are delusional...igotid88 said:
I doubt they sold out every gametempo_n_groove said:
We talked about the Nets way more, for better or worse. Theres only so many times you can talk about Julius Randle...igotid88 said:
But the Nets were? Even with the players they got were still the 2nd team in the citytempo_n_groove said:
I remember him saying specifically that The Knicks aren't a team that players want to play for. "The cool thing is not the Knicks"igotid88 said:KD just should have gone to the Knicks like he wanted to.
The elite NBA franchises start and end with the Celtics and Lakers, Honorable mentions to Bulls, Warriors, Spurs and Sixers.
Knicks are only relevant in the media because of the city they play in. As a franchise they are pretty much a joke, especially under Dolan.This weekend we rock Portland0 -
Funny you mention where they play. In the news here there is talk of having MSG moved... My guess is they want the space to create another skyscraper and build the arena somewhere else.Poncier said:
They are funny. They think their franchise is one of the NBA's elite franchises. 2 titles all time, last one 50 years ago,tempo_n_groove said:
Knicks fans are delusional...igotid88 said:
I doubt they sold out every gametempo_n_groove said:
We talked about the Nets way more, for better or worse. Theres only so many times you can talk about Julius Randle...igotid88 said:
But the Nets were? Even with the players they got were still the 2nd team in the citytempo_n_groove said:
I remember him saying specifically that The Knicks aren't a team that players want to play for. "The cool thing is not the Knicks"igotid88 said:KD just should have gone to the Knicks like he wanted to.
The elite NBA franchises start and end with the Celtics and Lakers, Honorable mentions to Bulls, Warriors, Spurs and Sixers.
Knicks are only relevant in the media because of the city they play in. As a franchise they are pretty much a joke, especially under Dolan.0 -
I am so, so glad that one is not working out.tempo_n_groove said:
Clippers w PG and Kawhi.The Juggler said:I guess you could even make the argument that the Sixers of the early 80's were the original super team.
actually, I root for them all to fail.If I had known then what I know now...
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14Philly I & II, 16Denver 22
Missoula 240 -
Actually I guess it would be better to look at this as percentage of full arena, in which case the Mavs, Hawks, and Bucks lead the league.The Juggler said:^
This got me curious. Believe it or not the Bulls lead the league in attendance. Would never have guessed that
http://www.espn.com/nba/attendancewww.myspace.com0 -
How do you move an arena?www.myspace.com0
-
Shocked that the Pelicans are doing so bad but I guess when Zion isn't playing there isn't anything to see.The Juggler said:^
This got me curious. Believe it or not the Bulls lead the league in attendance. Would never have guessed that
http://www.espn.com/nba/attendance0 -
-
The Juggler said:How do you move an arena?
HAHAHAHA!!!.Poncier said:
Slowly.The Juggler said:How do you move an arena?
This is the stupid shit that the powers of be are discussing...0 -
Obviously the Nets had the better players. I'm talking about relevance. It's not delusional it's fact. Sure if they had won 2 or 3 titles they might have taken over NY. But they didn't. Not sure what you have against the Knicks. I've never seen someone hate a team that hasn't won in over 50 yearstempo_n_groove said:
We've talked about this before too, Knicks fans are delusional... They may have been "2nd" in attendance over the Knicks but had a better shot at winning a title.igotid88 said:
I doubt they sold out every gametempo_n_groove said:
We talked about the Nets way more, for better or worse. Theres only so many times you can talk about Julius Randle...igotid88 said:
But the Nets were? Even with the players they got were still the 2nd team in the citytempo_n_groove said:
I remember him saying specifically that The Knicks aren't a team that players want to play for. "The cool thing is not the Knicks"igotid88 said:KD just should have gone to the Knicks like he wanted to.I miss igotid880 -
Never ever have I stated that I hate the Knicks. I just think the fans are delusional in thinking that they have something special year, after year after year... It's not hope, it's delusional. I have hope for the Angels doing better than what they have done, not thinking they have a shot at winning a WS.igotid88 said:
Obviously the Nets had the better players. I'm talking about relevance. It's not delusional it's fact. Sure if they had won 2 or 3 titles they might have taken over NY. But they didn't. Not sure what you have against the Knicks. I've never seen someone hate a team that hasn't won in over 50 yearstempo_n_groove said:
We've talked about this before too, Knicks fans are delusional... They may have been "2nd" in attendance over the Knicks but had a better shot at winning a title.igotid88 said:
I doubt they sold out every gametempo_n_groove said:
We talked about the Nets way more, for better or worse. Theres only so many times you can talk about Julius Randle...igotid88 said:
But the Nets were? Even with the players they got were still the 2nd team in the citytempo_n_groove said:
I remember him saying specifically that The Knicks aren't a team that players want to play for. "The cool thing is not the Knicks"igotid88 said:KD just should have gone to the Knicks like he wanted to.
The Nets with their big 3 were more relevant at first. Then the stupid shit started piling up and became the talk of the town for a different reason.
The Mets, like the Nets sometimes gain more traction than their cross town rivals in relevance, it happens.0 -
The Knicks have not been relevant since Patrick Ewing left town.www.myspace.com0
-
Remember when they won 1 game in the playoffs against Atlanta and they did everything short of having a parade?0
-
You get excited when a huge free agent turns us down. It's not our fault the media names us as a possible destination. And no we don't think we have something special year after year.tempo_n_groove said:
Never ever have I stated that I hate the Knicks. I just think the fans are delusional in thinking that they have something special year, after year after year... It's not hope, it's delusional. I have hope for the Angels doing better than what they have done, not thinking they have a shot at winning a WS.igotid88 said:
Obviously the Nets had the better players. I'm talking about relevance. It's not delusional it's fact. Sure if they had won 2 or 3 titles they might have taken over NY. But they didn't. Not sure what you have against the Knicks. I've never seen someone hate a team that hasn't won in over 50 yearstempo_n_groove said:
We've talked about this before too, Knicks fans are delusional... They may have been "2nd" in attendance over the Knicks but had a better shot at winning a title.igotid88 said:
I doubt they sold out every gametempo_n_groove said:
We talked about the Nets way more, for better or worse. Theres only so many times you can talk about Julius Randle...igotid88 said:
But the Nets were? Even with the players they got were still the 2nd team in the citytempo_n_groove said:
I remember him saying specifically that The Knicks aren't a team that players want to play for. "The cool thing is not the Knicks"igotid88 said:KD just should have gone to the Knicks like he wanted to.
The Nets with their big 3 were more relevant at first. Then the stupid shit started piling up and became the talk of the town for a different reason.
The Mets, like the Nets sometimes gain more traction than their cross town rivals in relevance, it happens.
And I could be wrong but were the Nets on ESPN/ABC and TNT more than the Knicks?I miss igotid880 -
EVERY free agent turns the Knicks down... The players talk, nobody wants to come here. They love playing here and beating the Knicks but they don't want to play for them.igotid88 said:
You get excited when a huge free agent turns us down. It's not our fault the media names us as a possible destination. And no we don't think we have something special year after year.tempo_n_groove said:
Never ever have I stated that I hate the Knicks. I just think the fans are delusional in thinking that they have something special year, after year after year... It's not hope, it's delusional. I have hope for the Angels doing better than what they have done, not thinking they have a shot at winning a WS.igotid88 said:
Obviously the Nets had the better players. I'm talking about relevance. It's not delusional it's fact. Sure if they had won 2 or 3 titles they might have taken over NY. But they didn't. Not sure what you have against the Knicks. I've never seen someone hate a team that hasn't won in over 50 yearstempo_n_groove said:
We've talked about this before too, Knicks fans are delusional... They may have been "2nd" in attendance over the Knicks but had a better shot at winning a title.igotid88 said:
I doubt they sold out every gametempo_n_groove said:
We talked about the Nets way more, for better or worse. Theres only so many times you can talk about Julius Randle...igotid88 said:
But the Nets were? Even with the players they got were still the 2nd team in the citytempo_n_groove said:
I remember him saying specifically that The Knicks aren't a team that players want to play for. "The cool thing is not the Knicks"igotid88 said:KD just should have gone to the Knicks like he wanted to.
The Nets with their big 3 were more relevant at first. Then the stupid shit started piling up and became the talk of the town for a different reason.
The Mets, like the Nets sometimes gain more traction than their cross town rivals in relevance, it happens.
And I could be wrong but were the Nets on ESPN/ABC and TNT more than the Knicks?
As far as having something special in a team year after year? I listen to enough sports radio to get an ear full from the fans.
0 -
I believe that was a screw up, lol.Jumb0 said:Remember when they won 1 game in the playoffs against Atlanta and they did everything short of having a parade?
The confetti dropped.0 -
Not every free agent otherwise all our players would only be draft picks.tempo_n_groove said:
EVERY free agent turns the Knicks down... The players talk, nobody wants to come here. They love playing here and beating the Knicks but they don't want to play for them.igotid88 said:
You get excited when a huge free agent turns us down. It's not our fault the media names us as a possible destination. And no we don't think we have something special year after year.tempo_n_groove said:
Never ever have I stated that I hate the Knicks. I just think the fans are delusional in thinking that they have something special year, after year after year... It's not hope, it's delusional. I have hope for the Angels doing better than what they have done, not thinking they have a shot at winning a WS.igotid88 said:
Obviously the Nets had the better players. I'm talking about relevance. It's not delusional it's fact. Sure if they had won 2 or 3 titles they might have taken over NY. But they didn't. Not sure what you have against the Knicks. I've never seen someone hate a team that hasn't won in over 50 yearstempo_n_groove said:
We've talked about this before too, Knicks fans are delusional... They may have been "2nd" in attendance over the Knicks but had a better shot at winning a title.igotid88 said:
I doubt they sold out every gametempo_n_groove said:
We talked about the Nets way more, for better or worse. Theres only so many times you can talk about Julius Randle...igotid88 said:
But the Nets were? Even with the players they got were still the 2nd team in the citytempo_n_groove said:
I remember him saying specifically that The Knicks aren't a team that players want to play for. "The cool thing is not the Knicks"igotid88 said:KD just should have gone to the Knicks like he wanted to.
The Nets with their big 3 were more relevant at first. Then the stupid shit started piling up and became the talk of the town for a different reason.
The Mets, like the Nets sometimes gain more traction than their cross town rivals in relevance, it happens.
And I could be wrong but were the Nets on ESPN/ABC and TNT more than the Knicks?
As far as having something special in a team year after year? I listen to enough sports radio to get an ear full from the fans.I miss igotid880 -
Stop it, you know what I mean.igotid88 said:
Not every free agent otherwise all our players would only be draft picks.tempo_n_groove said:
EVERY free agent turns the Knicks down... The players talk, nobody wants to come here. They love playing here and beating the Knicks but they don't want to play for them.igotid88 said:
You get excited when a huge free agent turns us down. It's not our fault the media names us as a possible destination. And no we don't think we have something special year after year.tempo_n_groove said:
Never ever have I stated that I hate the Knicks. I just think the fans are delusional in thinking that they have something special year, after year after year... It's not hope, it's delusional. I have hope for the Angels doing better than what they have done, not thinking they have a shot at winning a WS.igotid88 said:
Obviously the Nets had the better players. I'm talking about relevance. It's not delusional it's fact. Sure if they had won 2 or 3 titles they might have taken over NY. But they didn't. Not sure what you have against the Knicks. I've never seen someone hate a team that hasn't won in over 50 yearstempo_n_groove said:
We've talked about this before too, Knicks fans are delusional... They may have been "2nd" in attendance over the Knicks but had a better shot at winning a title.igotid88 said:
I doubt they sold out every gametempo_n_groove said:
We talked about the Nets way more, for better or worse. Theres only so many times you can talk about Julius Randle...igotid88 said:
But the Nets were? Even with the players they got were still the 2nd team in the citytempo_n_groove said:
I remember him saying specifically that The Knicks aren't a team that players want to play for. "The cool thing is not the Knicks"igotid88 said:KD just should have gone to the Knicks like he wanted to.
The Nets with their big 3 were more relevant at first. Then the stupid shit started piling up and became the talk of the town for a different reason.
The Mets, like the Nets sometimes gain more traction than their cross town rivals in relevance, it happens.
And I could be wrong but were the Nets on ESPN/ABC and TNT more than the Knicks?
As far as having something special in a team year after year? I listen to enough sports radio to get an ear full from the fans.0 -
This season 17 national TV games for Nets, 12 for Knicksigotid88 said:tempo_n_groove said:
Never ever have I stated that I hate the Knicks. I just think the fans are delusional in thinking that they have something special year, after year after year... It's not hope, it's delusional. I have hope for the Angels doing better than what they have done, not thinking they have a shot at winning a WS.igotid88 said:
Obviously the Nets had the better players. I'm talking about relevance. It's not delusional it's fact. Sure if they had won 2 or 3 titles they might have taken over NY. But they didn't. Not sure what you have against the Knicks. I've never seen someone hate a team that hasn't won in over 50 yearstempo_n_groove said:
We've talked about this before too, Knicks fans are delusional... They may have been "2nd" in attendance over the Knicks but had a better shot at winning a title.igotid88 said:
I doubt they sold out every gametempo_n_groove said:
We talked about the Nets way more, for better or worse. Theres only so many times you can talk about Julius Randle...igotid88 said:
But the Nets were? Even with the players they got were still the 2nd team in the citytempo_n_groove said:
I remember him saying specifically that The Knicks aren't a team that players want to play for. "The cool thing is not the Knicks"igotid88 said:KD just should have gone to the Knicks like he wanted to.
The Nets with their big 3 were more relevant at first. Then the stupid shit started piling up and became the talk of the town for a different reason.
The Mets, like the Nets sometimes gain more traction than their cross town rivals in relevance, it happens.
And I could be wrong but were the Nets on ESPN/ABC and TNT more than the Knicks?
NBA schedule 2022-23: Which teams have the most games on national TV? Warriors, Lakers, Celtics... - AS USA
Last season 26 for Nets, 22 for Knicks
National TV Games By Team: 2021-22 : nba (reddit.com)
This weekend we rock Portland0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help