Tragic event in which Alec Baldwin 'discharged' prop gun that left cinematographer dead.

Options
1567810

Comments

  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 44,323

     
    Lawsuit settled, film may resume after Alec Baldwin shooting
    By ANDREW DALTON
    Today

    LOS ANGELES (AP) — The family of a cinematographer shot and killed by Alec Baldwin on the set of the film “Rust” has agreed to settle a lawsuit against the actor and the movie’s producers, and producers aim to restart the project in January despite unresolved workplace safety sanctions.

    “We have reached a settlement, subject to court approval, for our wrongful death case against the producers of Rust including Alec Baldwin,” said a statement Wednesday from Matthew Hutchins, widower of the cinematographer Halyna Hutchins and a plaintiff in the lawsuit along with their 9-year-old son Andros. “As part of that settlement, our case will be dismissed. The filming of Rust, which I will now executive produce, will resume with all the original principal players on board, in January 2023.”

    The agreement is a rare piece of positive news for Baldwin, who has had a turbulent year since the Oct. 21 shooting. The actor, who was also a producer on the film, was pointing a gun at Hutchins when it went off, killing her and wounding the director, Joel Souza. They had been inside a small church during setup for filming a scene.

    He announced the settlement agreement in an Instagram post.

    “Throughout this difficult process, everyone has maintained the specific desire to do what is best for Halyna’s son,” Baldwin said in the post. “We are grateful to everyone who contributed to the resolution of this tragic and painful situation.”

    Baldwin has said the gun went off accidentally and that he did not pull the trigger. But a recent FBI forensic report found the weapon could not not have fired unless the trigger was pulled.

    New Mexico’s Office of the Medical Investigator determined the shooting was an accident following the completion of an autopsy and a review of law enforcement reports.

    “I have no interest in engaging in recriminations or attribution of blame (to the producers or Mr. Baldwin),” Matthew Hutchins said in the statement. "All of us believe Halyna’s death was a terrible accident. I am grateful that the producers and the entertainment community have come together to pay tribute to Halyna’s final work.”

    Rust Movie Productions continues to challenge the basis of a $137,000 fine against the company by New Mexico occupational safety regulators who say production managers on the set failed to follow standard industry protocols for firearms safety. The state Occupational Health and Safety Review Commission has scheduled an eight-day hearing on the disputed sanctions in April 2023.

    Matthew Maez, spokesman for the Environment Department that enforces occupational safety regulations, says immediate gun-safety concerns were addressed when “Rust” ceased filming, and that a return to filming in New Mexico would be accompanied by new safety inspections.

    “They’re going through the process as they have a right to," Maez said. "They have not paid the fine or accepted the conclusions.”

    In April, New Mexico’s Occupational Health and Safety Bureau imposed the maximum fine against Rust Movie Productions and distributed a scathing narrative of safety failures, including testimony that production managers took limited or no action to address two misfires of blank ammunition on set prior to the fatal shooting.

    Rust Movie Productions told safety regulators that misfires prior to the fatal shooting of Hutchins did not violate safety protocols and that “appropriate corrective actions were taken,” including briefings of cast and crew.

    Other legal troubles persist in relation to the film and the deadly shooting.

    At least four other lawsuits brought by crew members remain, and the state of New Mexico has granted funds to pay for possible criminal prosecutions.

    Baldwin is also a defendant in an unrelated defamation lawsuit brought by the family of a Marine killed in Afghanistan.

    The Hutchins family lawsuit, filed in February, was harshly critical of Baldwin, the films producers, and the other defendants: unit production manager Katherine Walters, assistant director David Halls, armorer Hannah Guttierez Reed, and ammunition supplier Seth Kenney.

    Their “reckless conduct and cost-cutting measures led to the death of Halyna Hutchins,” plaintiffs' attorney Brian Panish said at a news conference.

    According to the lawsuit, if proper protocols had been followed, “Halyna Hutchins would be alive and well, hugging her husband and 9-year-old son."

    The lawsuit said industry standards call for using a rubber or similar prop gun during the setup, and there was no call for a real gun. It also said Baldwin and Halls, who handed him the gun, should have checked the revolver for live bullets.

    ___

    Associated Press writer Morgan Lee contributed from Santa Fe, New Mexico.

    Follow AP Entertainment Writer Andrew Dalton on Twitter: https://twitter.com/andyjamesdalton


    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • Get_Right
    Get_Right Posts: 14,108
    This was a workplace accident. The result of negligence. A breakdown in the checks and balances that need to occur before a gun is fired on a set. That is a civil matter unless the negligence can be proven to rise to a criminal level of "recklessness" or "criminal negligence" which varies by state. The family has been paid on the civil matter out of court, probably by an insurance company.  If Alec Baldwin is criminally charged, it would most likely be involuntary manslaughter and it would be because the workplace protections in place failed tremendously at many levels and rose to the level of criminality. No one knows the details, but the state violations are telling. Interesting case for sure.

    Consider if you were the actor, you show up on set, staff hands you a gun for a scene, and you end up shooting a person. The result is tragic for everyone. If this happened to Tom Hanks, do you think as many people would be calling for criminal charges?
  • Merkin Baller
    Merkin Baller Posts: 12,754
    Get_Right said:
    This was a workplace accident. The result of negligence. A breakdown in the checks and balances that need to occur before a gun is fired on a set. That is a civil matter unless the negligence can be proven to rise to a criminal level of "recklessness" or "criminal negligence" which varies by state. The family has been paid on the civil matter out of court, probably by an insurance company.  If Alec Baldwin is criminally charged, it would most likely be involuntary manslaughter and it would be because the workplace protections in place failed tremendously at many levels and rose to the level of criminality. No one knows the details, but the state violations are telling. Interesting case for sure.

    Consider if you were the actor, you show up on set, staff hands you a gun for a scene, and you end up shooting a person. The result is tragic for everyone. If this happened to Tom Hanks, do you think as many people would be calling for criminal charges?
    Nope. 
  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 44,323
    Alec Baldwin sues ‘Rust’ armorer and crew members over fatal shooting  https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2022/11/11/alec-baldwin-sues-rust-crew/ 

     Alec Baldwin sues ‘Rust’ armorer and crew members over fatal shooting
    By Meryl Kornfield and Travis M. Andrews
    November 12, 2022 at 10:00 ET
    Alec Baldwin is suing the armorer and other people associated with the film “Rust” after he was given a loaded gun onset that fired, killing cinematographer Halyna Hutchins.
    Baldwin alleges in the lawsuit that the Oct. 21, 2021, shooting was caused by the negligence of armorer Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, who was in charge of guns and ammunition on the set, assistant director Dave Halls, who handed the gun to Baldwin and said it was safe, Sarah Zachry, who was in charge of props, and Seth Kenney, who supplied the guns and ammunition on the set and assisted the armorer.
    Baldwin, who was sued after the shooting, “seeks to clear his name” and hold the defendants “accountable for their misconduct,” according to the counterclaim filed Friday in Los Angeles Superior Court by his attorney, Luke Nikas.
    “This tragedy happened because live bullets were delivered to the set and loaded into the gun, Gutierrez-Reed failed to check the bullets or the gun carefully, Halls failed to check the gun carefully and yet announced the gun was safe before handing it to Baldwin, and Zachry failed to disclose that Gutierrez-Reed had been acting recklessly offset and was a safety risk to those around her,” Nikas wrote.
    [FBI tests suggest gun on ‘Rust’ set could not fire without trigger pull]
    Jason Bowles, an attorney for Gutierrez-Reed, told The Washington Post that Baldwin was the one to blame for the shooting. “Baldwin is solely responsible for this tragedy,” Bowles said. “He declined training on the cross draw, and pointed a weapon, and had his finger on the trigger.” The other defendants did not respond to requests for comment.
    Baldwin was inside a building on Bonanza Creek Ranch in Santa Fe, N.M., practicing cocking the gun when it went off, killing cinematographer Hutchins and injuring director Joel Souza. It was not clear why the prop had live ammunition.
    According to interviews conducted by the Sante Fe County Sheriff’s Office, people on the set saw and heard Halls retrieve a .45 Long Colt revolver from Gutierrez-Reed, announce it was a “cold gun” and hand it to Baldwin. The industry term means there are no live rounds in a weapon.
    A New Mexico medical examiner ruled the death of Hutchins an accident after she was shot in the chest. An FBI report suggested that the gun could not have fired without its trigger having been pulled.
    Baldwin’s lawsuit is the latest since the shooting. Gutierrez-Reed sued Kenney, saying he was liable for the live ammunition on set. Script supervisor Mamie Mitchell sued several people, including Baldwin, Gutierrez-Reed and Halls, over workplace safety allegations.
    Matthew Hutchins, Halyna Hutchins’s husband, filed a wrongful-death lawsuit this year against Baldwin and other entities involved in the production, seeking compensatory and punitive damages. The defendants settled the lawsuit last month.
    After news of the settlement, Hutchins called his wife’s death a “terrible accident” and said “I have no interest in engaging in recriminations or attribution of blame” in a statement last month. “All of us believe Halyna’s death was a terrible accident.”
    Filming will resume next year, according to the statement, with the surviving Hutchins as an executive producer. The Santa Fe County Sheriff’s Office delivered its investigative report to local prosecutors in October, but the results of the investigation are not public. Local prosecutors have not filed criminal charges in the shooting.

    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,449
    Top 10 Hilarious Spider-Man Memes
    Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall




  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 44,323

     
    Prosecutors weigh options in fatal shooting by Alec Baldwin
    By MORGAN LEE
    Yesterday

    SANTA FE, N.M. (AP) — A Santa Fe district attorney will announce Thursday whether charges will be brought in the fatal 2021 film-set shooting of a cinematographer by actor Alec Baldwin during a rehearsal of the Western “Rust.”

    Santa Fe District Attorney Mary Carmack-Altwies said a decision will be announced Thursday morning in a statement and on social media, without public appearances by prosecutors.

    “The announcement will be a solemn occasion, made in a manner keeping with the office’s commitment to upholding the integrity of the judicial process and respecting the victim’s family,” said Heather Brewer, a spokeswoman for the district attorney's office.

    Cinematographer Halyna Hutchins died shortly after being wounded by a gunshot during setup for a scene at the ranch on the outskirts of Santa Fe on Oct. 21, 2021. Baldwin was pointing a pistol at Hutchins when the gun went off, killing her and wounding the director, Joel Souza.

    Santa Fe County Sheriff Adan Mendoza, who led the initial investigation into Hutchins' death, described “a degree of neglect” on the film set. But he left decisions about potential criminal charges to prosecutors after delivering the results of a yearlong investigation in October. That report did not specify how live ammunition wound up on the film set.

    Taking control of the investigation, Carmack-Altwies was granted an emergency $300,000 request for the state to pay for a special prosecutor, special investigator and other experts and personnel.

    Baldwin — known for his roles in “30 Rock” and “The Hunt for Red October” and his impression of former President Donald Trump on “Saturday Night Live” — has described the killing of Hutchins as a “tragic accident.”

    He has sought to clear his name by suing people involved in handling and supplying the loaded gun that was handed to him on set. Baldwin, also a co-producer on “Rust,” said he was told the gun was safe.

    In his lawsuit, Baldwin said that while working on camera angles with Hutchins during rehearsal for a scene, he pointed the gun in her direction and pulled back and released the hammer of the gun, which discharged.

    New Mexico’s Office of the Medical Investigator determined the shooting was an accident following the completion of an autopsy and a review of law enforcement reports.

    New Mexico’s Occupational Health and Safety Bureau has levied the maximum fine against Rust Movie Productions, based on a scathing narrative of safety failures, including testimony that production managers took limited or no action to address two misfires of blank ammunition on set prior to the fatal shooting.

    Rust Movie Productions continues to challenge the basis of a $137,000 fine by regulators who say production managers on the set failed to follow standard industry protocols for firearms safety.

    The armorer who oversaw firearms on the set, Hannah Gutierrez Reed, has been the subject of much of the scrutiny in the case, along with an independent ammunition supplier. An attorney for Gutierrez Reed has said the armorer did not put a live round in the gun that killed Hutchins, and believes she was the victim of sabotage. Authorities said they’ve found no evidence of that.

    Investigators initially found 500 rounds of ammunition at the movie set on the outskirts of Santa Fe — a mix of blanks, dummy rounds and what appeared to be live rounds. Industry experts have said live rounds should never be on set.

    In April 2022, the Santa Fe Sheriff’s Department released a trove of files including lapel camera video of the mortally wounded Hutchins slipping in and out of consciousness as an evacuation helicopter arrived. Witness interrogations, email threads, text conversations, inventories of ammunition and hundreds of photographs rounded out that collection of evidence.

    State workplace safety regulators said that immediate gun-safety concerns were addressed when “Rust” ceased filming, and that a return to filming in New Mexico would be accompanied by new safety inspections.

    The family of Hutchins — widower Matthew Hutchins and son Andros — settled a lawsuit against producers under an agreement that aims to restart filming with Matthew’s involvement as executive producer.

    “Rust” was beset by disputes from the start in early October 2021. Seven crew members walked off the set just hours before the fatal shooting amid discord over working conditions.

    Hutchins' death has influenced negotiations over safety provisions in film crew union contracts with Hollywood producers and spurred other filmmakers to choose computer-generated imagery of gunfire rather than real weapons with blank ammunition to minimize risks.


    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • PJPOWER
    PJPOWER Posts: 6,499
  • brianlux
    brianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,658
    PJPOWER said:

    Yeah, saw that in the NY Times. That just seems wrong to me.  Bummer.
    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni











  • tbergs
    tbergs Posts: 10,398
    I don't think it's wrong, but we often feel bad for people who make serious mistakes like this. It's still negligence that caused loss of life.
    It's a hopeless situation...
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,449
    he'll get convicted and won't serve a day. but then bring on a civil suits. 
    Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall




  • I would be curious on going back and seeing the ruling on how he gets negligence.  I know we argued about this early on but they paid a professional to make sure that safety and dead ammo was used...
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,449
    I would be curious on going back and seeing the ruling on how he gets negligence.  I know we argued about this early on but they paid a professional to make sure that safety and dead ammo was used...
    and he hired said professional. and then he fired the gun. easy route to make to negligence to me. 
    Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall




  • Get_Right
    Get_Right Posts: 14,108
    I would be curious on going back and seeing the ruling on how he gets negligence.  I know we argued about this early on but they paid a professional to make sure that safety and dead ammo was used...
    and he hired said professional. and then he fired the gun. easy route to make to negligence to me. 
    Perhaps the fact he was a producer and their were prior allegations of negligence is what led to this. I think the producers got hit with the highest possible workplace fines and it is believed that crew members complained about the conditions. They were pushing to get this movie done.  There could be more to this than a movie star walking out of his trailer, being handed a prop, pointing the gun as directed and firing a live bullet. 
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,657
    he'll get convicted and won't serve a day. but then bring on a civil suits. 

    He and the production company already settled out of court for those.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • PJPOWER
    PJPOWER Posts: 6,499
    edited January 2023
    brianlux said:
    PJPOWER said:

    Yeah, saw that in the NY Times. That just seems wrong to me.  Bummer.
    It is sad and unfortunate for all parties involved, but I do think that the charges are reasonable and justified and that firearm safety needs a complete overhaul in movie production.  Truthfully, unless it is a true “prop gun” (as in not a real firearm), it should never be pointed at someone.  There is no exception saying “unless you are producing a movie”.  Under no circumstance should the barrel of a real gun pass over (be pointed at) something that you are not comfortable destroying, even if you “think” it’s unloaded, has the safety on, has blanks, etc.
    I know some studios say that they use safety glass when creating these scenes, which is a little smarter than in this incident, but I still don’t think it’s the best idea.
    Post edited by PJPOWER on
  • I would be curious on going back and seeing the ruling on how he gets negligence.  I know we argued about this early on but they paid a professional to make sure that safety and dead ammo was used...
    and he hired said professional. and then he fired the gun. easy route to make to negligence to me. 
    You hire a company to do a job.  You don't sue the person that hired them you sue the company...

    Well wait.  If the professional wasn't a company but an actual person that makes Baldwin the company...

    I think I just answered my own question if that's how it went.
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,449
    I would be curious on going back and seeing the ruling on how he gets negligence.  I know we argued about this early on but they paid a professional to make sure that safety and dead ammo was used...
    and he hired said professional. and then he fired the gun. easy route to make to negligence to me. 
    You hire a company to do a job.  You don't sue the person that hired them you sue the company...

    Well wait.  If the professional wasn't a company but an actual person that makes Baldwin the company...

    I think I just answered my own question if that's how it went.
    the producer (baldwin) is responsible for everything that happens during production. AND he was the actor who fired the gun. 
    Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall




  • Get_Right
    Get_Right Posts: 14,108
    AND there were prior complaints and findings of poor workplace conditions. Not as simple as it seems. The shooting may be a result of more than bad oversight on the prop gun. Sorry I is a lawyer.

  • I would be curious on going back and seeing the ruling on how he gets negligence.  I know we argued about this early on but they paid a professional to make sure that safety and dead ammo was used...
    and he hired said professional. and then he fired the gun. easy route to make to negligence to me. 
    You hire a company to do a job.  You don't sue the person that hired them you sue the company...

    Well wait.  If the professional wasn't a company but an actual person that makes Baldwin the company...

    I think I just answered my own question if that's how it went.
    the producer (baldwin) is responsible for everything that happens during production. AND he was the actor who fired the gun. 
    Get_Right said:
    AND there were prior complaints and findings of poor workplace conditions. Not as simple as it seems. The shooting may be a result of more than bad oversight on the prop gun. Sorry I is a lawyer.

    I'm looking at it like this.  I am a GC. I hire X to do a certain task.  If it's not an OCIP job then they carry their own insurance.  If I am carrying the insurance, OCIP job, then I and every other contractor can be liable for any occurrence.  Either way though, the person hired to do the task is responsible and liable as an independent, unless they are directly working for me, the GC.

    If Baldwin is acting like the GC and did not hire an independent contractor then I see how he is liable.

    Him pulling the trigger still means squat to me.  You are in a supposed safe zone where people are doing what they were hired to do and at no time should you be double checking them.  It's like double checking the mechanic you hired to do your tuneup.  if you need to check that much then you should have just did the work yourself.

    I'm not checking my parachute when I do a tandem jump, I expect the jumpmaster to take care of that task.
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,449
    but if the jumpmaster cut corners, and someone dies, and the person who hired the jumpmaster (baldwin) (allegedly) knowing corners were being cut, the person who hired that jumpmaster would be liable criminally. 
    Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall