MLB 2025 World Series
Comments
- 
            His liver hurt.
 Liver trumps back.The love he receives is the love that is saved0
- 
            Yeah, the 2 rings (plus an ALCS MVP) for Kirby trump Donnie Backache's 1 league MVP.
 Their career stats otherwise are pretty similar, but being a winner is important.This weekend we rock Portland0
- 
            
 When he first was up for it I couldn't believe he got in. His numbers do not support it.Ledbetterman10 said:
 I'm shocked that you're shocked by this. I'd be more inclined to argue for Mattingly being in the HOF than I would to argue that Puckett shouldn't be. Though I personally wouldn't make either of those arguments.tempo_n_groove said:
 That's a good one.F Me In The Brain said:
 Yeah, as a fan I loved Cunningham. Now, living in the Philly area, the jerseys I like to see at the games are the Kelly Green Cunninghams.Wobbie said:
 the mattingly is the better statue but randall is more HOF worthy. I kinda hated him since he played for the iggles but he’s probably UNLV’s most famous FB alum….too bad they had to forfeit all the wins in his senior season!F Me In The Brain said:@wobbie what do you think?
 Dude was a badass.
 The day before Thanksgiving NFL network had an only Thanksgiving day game between the Cowboys and Vikings going. Randy Moss rookie year. You know what that meant...some RC moon shots to RM.
 He wasn't a super runner any longer but dude had arm, all day long. All day.
 Who was better:
 Don Mattingly
 Or
 Kirby Puckett
 ???
 I am still shocked that Puckett is in.
 It's a push. Neither one is better than the other. If you had to do a tiebreaker Mattingly has the MVP.
 He was beloved by everyone though.0
- 
            The World Series is a team accomplishment. So it shouldn't hinder someone's chances. MVPs are not determined by what a player does in the post seasonI miss igotid880
- 
            You could make a case for Albert Belle. Whether he was juicing or not. I don't know.Post edited by igotid88 onI miss igotid880
- 
            And the all-time greats have the ability to carry their team to some level of post season success, not one losing series over an entire career for the winningest franchise in history.This weekend we rock Portland0
- 
            
 There's only so much a guy can do in baseball though. Look at Ken Griffey Jr. If he can't carry his teams to post-season success, there's no chance someone like Mattingly could.Poncier said:And the all-time greats have the ability to carry their team to some level of post season success, not one losing series over an entire career for the winningest franchise in history.
 For Hall of Fames, I'm big on crediting guys for their post-season success (Curt Schilling for example), but I don't take away from someone that doesn't have any. So in the Mattingly/Puckett comparison, I wouldn't move Mattingly down any notches for having little post-season success, but I'd bump Puckett up for having it...if that makes sense.2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024: Philly 2, 2025: Pittsburgh 1
 
 Pearl Jam bootlegs:
 http://wegotshit.blogspot.com0
- 
            
 Makes perfect sense and pretty much encapsulates my viewpoint here.Ledbetterman10 said:
 . So in the Mattingly/Puckett comparison, I wouldn't move Mattingly down any notches for having little post-season success, but I'd bump Puckett up for having it...if that makes sense.Poncier said:And the all-time greats have the ability to carry their team to some level of post season success, not one losing series over an entire career for the winningest franchise in history.
 2 borderline at best candidates. One has postseason success, bumps up enough to get in. The other has none, stays on the outside where he belongs.This weekend we rock Portland0
- 
            
 If Donnie Backbreak had hit over 500 HRs he'd be in. Ridiculous comparisonigotid88 said:
 So Ernie Banks doesn't belong in the Hall then?Poncier said:And the all-time greats have the ability to carry their team to some level of post season success, not one losing series over an entire career for the winningest franchise in history.This weekend we rock Portland0
- 
            
 Well if he had played 19 seasons he might have.Poncier said:
 If Donnie Backbreak had hit over 500 HRs he'd be in. Ridiculous comparisonigotid88 said:
 So Ernie Banks doesn't belong in the Hall then?Poncier said:And the all-time greats have the ability to carry their team to some level of post season success, not one losing series over an entire career for the winningest franchise in history.I miss igotid880
- 
            
 Then why isn't David Cone in then?Poncier said:
 Makes perfect sense and pretty much encapsulates my viewpoint here.Ledbetterman10 said:
 . So in the Mattingly/Puckett comparison, I wouldn't move Mattingly down any notches for having little post-season success, but I'd bump Puckett up for having it...if that makes sense.Poncier said:And the all-time greats have the ability to carry their team to some level of post season success, not one losing series over an entire career for the winningest franchise in history.
 2 borderline at best candidates. One has postseason success, bumps up enough to get in. The other has none, stays on the outside where he belongs.I miss igotid880
- 
            
 He played 14 seasons and hit 222, so you think he was gonna hit almost 300 HR's in 5 seasons in his late 30's?igotid88 said:
 Well if he had played 19 seasons he might have.Poncier said:
 If Donnie Backbreak had hit over 500 HRs he'd be in. Ridiculous comparisonigotid88 said:
 So Ernie Banks doesn't belong in the Hall then?Poncier said:And the all-time greats have the ability to carry their team to some level of post season success, not one losing series over an entire career for the winningest franchise in history.
 Wow.This weekend we rock Portland0
- 
            
 David Cone? OK now you're just fucking with me, right?igotid88 said:
 Then why isn't David Cone in then?Poncier said:
 Makes perfect sense and pretty much encapsulates my viewpoint here.Ledbetterman10 said:
 . So in the Mattingly/Puckett comparison, I wouldn't move Mattingly down any notches for having little post-season success, but I'd bump Puckett up for having it...if that makes sense.Poncier said:And the all-time greats have the ability to carry their team to some level of post season success, not one losing series over an entire career for the winningest franchise in history.
 2 borderline at best candidates. One has postseason success, bumps up enough to get in. The other has none, stays on the outside where he belongs.
 Or the pinstripe colored glasses are so thick you can't see clearly.This weekend we rock Portland0
- 
            
 Again. You're not taking into account the injury. And maybe he would have taken hgh or steroids by then to further his career. And even if not the hrs he would have had 3000 hits or close to it. Over 500 doubles. A .300 average. His MVP. Had 9 Gold Gloves. So possibly 3-5 more. A possible 4 World Series championships if everything else played out the same.Poncier said:
 He played 14 seasons and hit 222, so you think he was gonna hit almost 300 HR's in 5 seasons in his late 30's?igotid88 said:
 Well if he had played 19 seasons he might have.Poncier said:
 If Donnie Backbreak had hit over 500 HRs he'd be in. Ridiculous comparisonigotid88 said:
 So Ernie Banks doesn't belong in the Hall then?Poncier said:And the all-time greats have the ability to carry their team to some level of post season success, not one losing series over an entire career for the winningest franchise in history.
 Wow.I miss igotid880
- 
            
 Once again, if the queen had balls, she'd be king.igotid88 said:
 Again. You're not taking into account the injury. And maybe he would have taken hgh or steroids by then to further his career. And even if not the hrs he would have had 3000 hits or close to it. Over 500 doubles. A .300 average. His MVP. Had 9 Gold Gloves. So possibly 3-5 more. A possible 4 World Series championships if everything else played out the same.Poncier said:
 He played 14 seasons and hit 222, so you think he was gonna hit almost 300 HR's in 5 seasons in his late 30's?igotid88 said:
 Well if he had played 19 seasons he might have.Poncier said:
 If Donnie Backbreak had hit over 500 HRs he'd be in. Ridiculous comparisonigotid88 said:
 So Ernie Banks doesn't belong in the Hall then?Poncier said:And the all-time greats have the ability to carry their team to some level of post season success, not one losing series over an entire career for the winningest franchise in history.
 Wow.
 You get entry into the Hall based on what you did, not what maybe you could have done.This weekend we rock Portland0
- 
            I'd put JR Richard, Mo Vaugh, Prince Fielder, Don Mattingly, Jose Fernandez, Thurman Munson, Bo Jackson all go on the "What If list".
 Am I forgetting anybody?0
- 
            
 Tommy John, Tony Conigliarotempo_n_groove said:I'd put JR Richard, Mo Vaugh, Prince Fielder, Don Mattingly, Jose Fernandez, Thurman Munson, Bo Jackson all go on the "What If list".
 Am I forgetting anybody?This weekend we rock Portland0
- 
            
 Again. What he did was still pretty good.? Enough to get brought up time and again for a vote. Koufax is in for what he could have done. Kirby is in for what he could have done. I understood why he isn't in. But if players whom I believe he is better than are getting in. Then why not him? He was a dominant player who was still a good player by the time he retired prematurely.Poncier said:
 Once again, if the queen had balls, she'd be king.igotid88 said:
 Again. You're not taking into account the injury. And maybe he would have taken hgh or steroids by then to further his career. And even if not the hrs he would have had 3000 hits or close to it. Over 500 doubles. A .300 average. His MVP. Had 9 Gold Gloves. So possibly 3-5 more. A possible 4 World Series championships if everything else played out the same.Poncier said:
 He played 14 seasons and hit 222, so you think he was gonna hit almost 300 HR's in 5 seasons in his late 30's?igotid88 said:
 Well if he had played 19 seasons he might have.Poncier said:
 If Donnie Backbreak had hit over 500 HRs he'd be in. Ridiculous comparisonigotid88 said:
 So Ernie Banks doesn't belong in the Hall then?Poncier said:And the all-time greats have the ability to carry their team to some level of post season success, not one losing series over an entire career for the winningest franchise in history.
 Wow.
 You get entry into the Hall based on what you did, not what maybe you could have done.I miss igotid880
- 
            
 I don't know about Bo. He was more of a hr guy. But he wasn't a good hitter.tempo_n_groove said:I'd put JR Richard, Mo Vaugh, Prince Fielder, Don Mattingly, Jose Fernandez, Thurman Munson, Bo Jackson all go on the "What If list".
 Am I forgetting anybody?I miss igotid880
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help



