MLB 2025 World Series
Comments
- 
            
 I loved Crime Dog. Followed him from his Toronto days until he joined that loaded Braves line-up. His consecutive 30+ homer seasons were still a rare thing at that time and the fact that he was a lefty like me made me enjoy watching him, and Griffey, the most.SPEEDY MCCREADY said:Nobody should be allowed in the Hall Of Fame, until Fred Mcgriff is enshrined.
 493 HR's and I am pretty damned sure he wasnt a steroid freak.It's a hopeless situation...0
- 
            I'm shocked the first 2 Post I read are from NYY fans bitching about Ortiz.
 Can it still be a HOF when the Hit King, the Home Run King and the pitcher who won the most Cy Youngs are not in? But, Bud Selig is in the HOF?
 Do you take away the records from the players who took Greenies (which were taken over decades)? The players who ONLY played against white players? Where does it end?
 Players should be in the HOF from their era, regardless of what people may THINK a player did, if they deserve to be inducted?0
- 
            
 I really am wishy washy on Schilling... Sheffield hmmm.igotid88 said:
 Sheffield and Pettitte should be in. Especially if people are saying Schilling should be in. Pettitte is over 100 wins over .500. That has to account for somethingtempo_n_groove said:
 Out of all the names I saw thrown around, I agree with this one. Rollins was really good for a run. Does Howard get a chance in later?Jearlpam0925 said:
 No doubt. Hopefully he can turn it around.Wobbie said:
 yeah, except for right now he kinda sucks.Jearlpam0925 said:I think Bumgarner and Lester are both on the outside looking in, but MadBum is closer than Lester imo because he has the next 6, 7, 8 years to change that.
 But at the end of the day I think the first ballot guys are: Kershaw, Verlander, Kershaw, Grienke. Also, I guess Grienke goes in as a Royal and Scherzer as a Nat? Talk about two dominant guys that have spent close to half their time as journeymen (using that term very, very loosely).
 Now to some hot takes: Jimmy Rollins should be a HOFer, full stop.
 He didn't even get 5% and an argument could be made for him but I don't think he gets in.
 Scott Rolen? If he gets in then Vizquel should but he will never see the Hall for the batboy incident.
 Modern pitchers Kershaw, Scherzer and Verlander get in for sure. Grienke I don't know. I think DeGrom and Buehler are both headed in the right direction for that. Sale hasn't done enough.
 I am on the fence w people like Andruw Jones. Really good for a bit then fell off a cliff. Beltre has 3000 hits so he gets in when eligible.
 Many Ramirez should get more votes. I think he should be in.
 Kent, Sheffield, Helton and Petite are all fringe HOFers to me. They were good but the numbers aren't there.
 So we talked about league leaders and stuff. Sheffield is one of those guys that never led the league in any of the major categories except once! He led the league in average. Crazy right?
 He does have 500 HR's though but that doesn't guarantee you in anymore which is stupid. He has 500, open up the doors. These writers I just don't understand. It's a personal merit contest now. Asshole-not in, nice guy/decent ball player-welcome to the hall...0
- 
            
 Pettitte is not in only because he admitted to the hghtempo_n_groove said:
 I really am wishy washy on Schilling... Sheffield hmmm.igotid88 said:
 Sheffield and Pettitte should be in. Especially if people are saying Schilling should be in. Pettitte is over 100 wins over .500. That has to account for somethingtempo_n_groove said:
 Out of all the names I saw thrown around, I agree with this one. Rollins was really good for a run. Does Howard get a chance in later?Jearlpam0925 said:
 No doubt. Hopefully he can turn it around.Wobbie said:
 yeah, except for right now he kinda sucks.Jearlpam0925 said:I think Bumgarner and Lester are both on the outside looking in, but MadBum is closer than Lester imo because he has the next 6, 7, 8 years to change that.
 But at the end of the day I think the first ballot guys are: Kershaw, Verlander, Kershaw, Grienke. Also, I guess Grienke goes in as a Royal and Scherzer as a Nat? Talk about two dominant guys that have spent close to half their time as journeymen (using that term very, very loosely).
 Now to some hot takes: Jimmy Rollins should be a HOFer, full stop.
 He didn't even get 5% and an argument could be made for him but I don't think he gets in.
 Scott Rolen? If he gets in then Vizquel should but he will never see the Hall for the batboy incident.
 Modern pitchers Kershaw, Scherzer and Verlander get in for sure. Grienke I don't know. I think DeGrom and Buehler are both headed in the right direction for that. Sale hasn't done enough.
 I am on the fence w people like Andruw Jones. Really good for a bit then fell off a cliff. Beltre has 3000 hits so he gets in when eligible.
 Many Ramirez should get more votes. I think he should be in.
 Kent, Sheffield, Helton and Petite are all fringe HOFers to me. They were good but the numbers aren't there.
 So we talked about league leaders and stuff. Sheffield is one of those guys that never led the league in any of the major categories except once! He led the league in average. Crazy right?
 He does have 500 HR's though but that doesn't guarantee you in anymore which is stupid. He has 500, open up the doors. These writers I just don't understand. It's a personal merit contest now. Asshole-not in, nice guy/decent ball player-welcome to the hall...I miss igotid880
- 
            
 Then you have a player like Arod. He was great from the beginning as a junior Olympian. He got thrown off the team because he wouldn't sign a deal w Topps. His agent told him don't worry, you'll be taken care of down the road. He has always been good.cutz said:I'm shocked the first 2 Post I read are from NYY fans bitching about Ortiz.
 Can it still be a HOF when the Hit King, the Home Run King and the pitcher who won the most Cy Youngs are not in? But, Bud Selig is in the HOF?
 Do you take away the records from the players who took Greenies (which were taken over decades)? The players who ONLY played against white players? Where does it end?
 Players should be in the HOF from their era, regardless of what people may THINK a player did, if they deserve to be inducted?
 Problem is he got popped, twice.
 I still think he should be in the hall. I don't see how steroids help him be the best 3rd basemen in baseball all those years...0
- 
            
 Borderline for me. He has a decent amount of wins that should be the standard now to get in. The WAR is a little low for HOF pitchers but not the lowest.igotid88 said:
 Pettitte is not in only because he admitted to the hghtempo_n_groove said:
 I really am wishy washy on Schilling... Sheffield hmmm.igotid88 said:
 Sheffield and Pettitte should be in. Especially if people are saying Schilling should be in. Pettitte is over 100 wins over .500. That has to account for somethingtempo_n_groove said:
 Out of all the names I saw thrown around, I agree with this one. Rollins was really good for a run. Does Howard get a chance in later?Jearlpam0925 said:
 No doubt. Hopefully he can turn it around.Wobbie said:
 yeah, except for right now he kinda sucks.Jearlpam0925 said:I think Bumgarner and Lester are both on the outside looking in, but MadBum is closer than Lester imo because he has the next 6, 7, 8 years to change that.
 But at the end of the day I think the first ballot guys are: Kershaw, Verlander, Kershaw, Grienke. Also, I guess Grienke goes in as a Royal and Scherzer as a Nat? Talk about two dominant guys that have spent close to half their time as journeymen (using that term very, very loosely).
 Now to some hot takes: Jimmy Rollins should be a HOFer, full stop.
 He didn't even get 5% and an argument could be made for him but I don't think he gets in.
 Scott Rolen? If he gets in then Vizquel should but he will never see the Hall for the batboy incident.
 Modern pitchers Kershaw, Scherzer and Verlander get in for sure. Grienke I don't know. I think DeGrom and Buehler are both headed in the right direction for that. Sale hasn't done enough.
 I am on the fence w people like Andruw Jones. Really good for a bit then fell off a cliff. Beltre has 3000 hits so he gets in when eligible.
 Many Ramirez should get more votes. I think he should be in.
 Kent, Sheffield, Helton and Petite are all fringe HOFers to me. They were good but the numbers aren't there.
 So we talked about league leaders and stuff. Sheffield is one of those guys that never led the league in any of the major categories except once! He led the league in average. Crazy right?
 He does have 500 HR's though but that doesn't guarantee you in anymore which is stupid. He has 500, open up the doors. These writers I just don't understand. It's a personal merit contest now. Asshole-not in, nice guy/decent ball player-welcome to the hall...0
- 
            
 Wow, talk about the weakest, most raaaaaaiiiin on your wedding day, homer defense of Bonds anyone could possibly come up withWobbie said:MayDay10 said:
 At this point though, there absolutely are roiders in the hall of fame. They just didnt get caught or implicated. I think Bonds, Clemens, and Schilling should be in at this point, but I do think they should somehow strip the HR records from Bonds (and McGuire) (and Sosa). Aaron and Maris should still be the official HR record holders. I think that is why I hate Bonds the most (and hated the other 2). Basically cheapened those hallowed records.Bonds - , faced 'roided pitchers,This weekend we rock Portland0
- 
            
 The rest of it was well put though.Poncier said:
 Wow, talk about the weakest, most raaaaaaiiiin on your wedding day, homer defense of Bonds anyone could possibly come up withWobbie said:MayDay10 said:
 At this point though, there absolutely are roiders in the hall of fame. They just didnt get caught or implicated. I think Bonds, Clemens, and Schilling should be in at this point, but I do think they should somehow strip the HR records from Bonds (and McGuire) (and Sosa). Aaron and Maris should still be the official HR record holders. I think that is why I hate Bonds the most (and hated the other 2). Basically cheapened those hallowed records.Bonds - , faced 'roided pitchers,0
- 
            
 Pettitte is not a Hall of Famer to me. If he pitched for the Twins would anyone think he was a Hall of Famer? I don't think so. Good pitcher but never close to the best 5-10 in the game at any time in his career.tempo_n_groove said:
 Borderline for me. He has a decent amount of wins that should be the standard now to get in. The WAR is a little low for HOF pitchers but not the lowest.igotid88 said:
 Pettitte is not in only because he admitted to the hghtempo_n_groove said:
 I really am wishy washy on Schilling... Sheffield hmmm.igotid88 said:
 Sheffield and Pettitte should be in. Especially if people are saying Schilling should be in. Pettitte is over 100 wins over .500. That has to account for somethingtempo_n_groove said:
 Out of all the names I saw thrown around, I agree with this one. Rollins was really good for a run. Does Howard get a chance in later?Jearlpam0925 said:
 No doubt. Hopefully he can turn it around.Wobbie said:
 yeah, except for right now he kinda sucks.Jearlpam0925 said:I think Bumgarner and Lester are both on the outside looking in, but MadBum is closer than Lester imo because he has the next 6, 7, 8 years to change that.
 But at the end of the day I think the first ballot guys are: Kershaw, Verlander, Kershaw, Grienke. Also, I guess Grienke goes in as a Royal and Scherzer as a Nat? Talk about two dominant guys that have spent close to half their time as journeymen (using that term very, very loosely).
 Now to some hot takes: Jimmy Rollins should be a HOFer, full stop.
 He didn't even get 5% and an argument could be made for him but I don't think he gets in.
 Scott Rolen? If he gets in then Vizquel should but he will never see the Hall for the batboy incident.
 Modern pitchers Kershaw, Scherzer and Verlander get in for sure. Grienke I don't know. I think DeGrom and Buehler are both headed in the right direction for that. Sale hasn't done enough.
 I am on the fence w people like Andruw Jones. Really good for a bit then fell off a cliff. Beltre has 3000 hits so he gets in when eligible.
 Many Ramirez should get more votes. I think he should be in.
 Kent, Sheffield, Helton and Petite are all fringe HOFers to me. They were good but the numbers aren't there.
 So we talked about league leaders and stuff. Sheffield is one of those guys that never led the league in any of the major categories except once! He led the league in average. Crazy right?
 He does have 500 HR's though but that doesn't guarantee you in anymore which is stupid. He has 500, open up the doors. These writers I just don't understand. It's a personal merit contest now. Asshole-not in, nice guy/decent ball player-welcome to the hall...
 0
- 
            
 If he had the same numbers probably. And his post season he probably helps them win a World Series.pjhawks said:
 Pettitte is not a Hall of Famer to me. If he pitched for the Twins would anyone think he was a Hall of Famer? I don't think so. Good pitcher but never close to the best 5-10 in the game at any time in his career.tempo_n_groove said:
 Borderline for me. He has a decent amount of wins that should be the standard now to get in. The WAR is a little low for HOF pitchers but not the lowest.igotid88 said:
 Pettitte is not in only because he admitted to the hghtempo_n_groove said:
 I really am wishy washy on Schilling... Sheffield hmmm.igotid88 said:
 Sheffield and Pettitte should be in. Especially if people are saying Schilling should be in. Pettitte is over 100 wins over .500. That has to account for somethingtempo_n_groove said:
 Out of all the names I saw thrown around, I agree with this one. Rollins was really good for a run. Does Howard get a chance in later?Jearlpam0925 said:
 No doubt. Hopefully he can turn it around.Wobbie said:
 yeah, except for right now he kinda sucks.Jearlpam0925 said:I think Bumgarner and Lester are both on the outside looking in, but MadBum is closer than Lester imo because he has the next 6, 7, 8 years to change that.
 But at the end of the day I think the first ballot guys are: Kershaw, Verlander, Kershaw, Grienke. Also, I guess Grienke goes in as a Royal and Scherzer as a Nat? Talk about two dominant guys that have spent close to half their time as journeymen (using that term very, very loosely).
 Now to some hot takes: Jimmy Rollins should be a HOFer, full stop.
 He didn't even get 5% and an argument could be made for him but I don't think he gets in.
 Scott Rolen? If he gets in then Vizquel should but he will never see the Hall for the batboy incident.
 Modern pitchers Kershaw, Scherzer and Verlander get in for sure. Grienke I don't know. I think DeGrom and Buehler are both headed in the right direction for that. Sale hasn't done enough.
 I am on the fence w people like Andruw Jones. Really good for a bit then fell off a cliff. Beltre has 3000 hits so he gets in when eligible.
 Many Ramirez should get more votes. I think he should be in.
 Kent, Sheffield, Helton and Petite are all fringe HOFers to me. They were good but the numbers aren't there.
 So we talked about league leaders and stuff. Sheffield is one of those guys that never led the league in any of the major categories except once! He led the league in average. Crazy right?
 He does have 500 HR's though but that doesn't guarantee you in anymore which is stupid. He has 500, open up the doors. These writers I just don't understand. It's a personal merit contest now. Asshole-not in, nice guy/decent ball player-welcome to the hall...I miss igotid880
- 
            
 how is that a “homer” defense? Bonds and others were facing pitchers the likes of which ruth, maris, etc. never saw. Aaron faced great pitchers but he saw them over and over and they weren’t throwing 100+ mph. Do you realize how fast you have to react to 100 mph?Poncier said:
 Wow, talk about the weakest, most raaaaaaiiiin on your wedding day, homer defense of Bonds anyone could possibly come up withWobbie said:MayDay10 said:
 At this point though, there absolutely are roiders in the hall of fame. They just didnt get caught or implicated. I think Bonds, Clemens, and Schilling should be in at this point, but I do think they should somehow strip the HR records from Bonds (and McGuire) (and Sosa). Aaron and Maris should still be the official HR record holders. I think that is why I hate Bonds the most (and hated the other 2). Basically cheapened those hallowed records.Bonds - , faced 'roided pitchers,If I had known then what I know now...
 Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
 VIC 07
 EV LA1 08
 Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
 Columbus 10
 EV LA 11
 Vancouver 11
 Missoula 12
 Portland 13, Spokane 13
 St. Paul 14, Denver 14Philly I & II, 16Denver 22
 Missoula 240
- 
            
 Had a cool swing. Should be in at some point. Very good for quite awhile.tbergs said:
 I loved Crime Dog. Followed him from his Toronto days until he joined that loaded Braves line-up. His consecutive 30+ homer seasons were still a rare thing at that time and the fact that he was a lefty like me made me enjoy watching him, and Griffey, the most.SPEEDY MCCREADY said:Nobody should be allowed in the Hall Of Fame, until Fred Mcgriff is enshrined.
 493 HR's and I am pretty damned sure he wasnt a steroid freak.Post edited by DewieCox on0
- 
            
 Because you said the pitchers were "roided up" when Barry is the poster child (a very large poster to fit that enormous head) for steroids in baseball.Wobbie said:
 how is that a “homer” defense? Bonds and others were facing pitchers the likes of which ruth, maris, etc. never saw. Aaron faced great pitchers but he saw them over and over and they weren’t throwing 100+ mph. Do you realize how fast you have to react to 100 mph?Poncier said:
 Wow, talk about the weakest, most raaaaaaiiiin on your wedding day, homer defense of Bonds anyone could possibly come up withWobbie said:MayDay10 said:
 At this point though, there absolutely are roiders in the hall of fame. They just didnt get caught or implicated. I think Bonds, Clemens, and Schilling should be in at this point, but I do think they should somehow strip the HR records from Bonds (and McGuire) (and Sosa). Aaron and Maris should still be the official HR record holders. I think that is why I hate Bonds the most (and hated the other 2). Basically cheapened those hallowed records.Bonds - , faced 'roided pitchers,
 Barry was at a disadvantage because he faced pitchers that took steroids? I'd say that his steroid use more than nullified that disadvantage. Only the most ardent of Bonds apologists would use pitchers on steroids to make his case for induction.This weekend we rock Portland0
- 
            
 Thoughts?cutz said:
 Can it still be a HOF when the Hit King, the Home Run King and the pitcher who won the most Cy Youngs are not in? But, Bud Selig is in the HOF?
 Do you take away the records from the players who took Greenies (which were taken over decades)? The players who ONLY played against white players? Where does it end?
 Players should be in the HOF from their era, regardless of what people may THINK a player did, if they deserve to be inducted?0
- 
            
 Good questions. Some of the HOF decisions seem hypocritical. I understand your point about Selig.cutz said:
 Thoughts?cutz said:
 Can it still be a HOF when the Hit King, the Home Run King and the pitcher who won the most Cy Youngs are not in? But, Bud Selig is in the HOF?
 Do you take away the records from the players who took Greenies (which were taken over decades)? The players who ONLY played against white players? Where does it end?
 Players should be in the HOF from their era, regardless of what people may THINK a player did, if they deserve to be inducted?
 I’ve heard reasoning for Ortiz was that he never failed a test after (so he hid it better or played clean after being caught?)
 you are correct in the nuances of where do you start drawing the lines
 other comparisons I have seen today include:
 Should Lance Armstrong be given his titles back?
 Ben Johnson his gold medal?
 Milli Vanilli their Grammys?
 to me, if you cheated to get there you shouldn’t be in the HOF, but like you said, where do you start drawing the lines
 I just don’t care for the argument that it wasn’t illegal then, or everyone else was doing it1996: Toronto
 2003: St. Paul
 2005: Thunder Bay
 2008: West Palm Beach, Tampa
 2009: Chicago I, Chicago II
 2010: Boston
 2011: Toronto I, Toronto II, Winnipeg
 2012: Missoula
 2013: London, Pittsburgh, Buffalo
 2014: St. Paul, Milwaukee
 2016: Quebec City, Ottawa, Toronto I, Toronto II
 2022: Hamilton, Toronto
 2023: St. Paul I, St. Paul II
 2024: Vancouver I, Vancouver II0
- 
            I’m fine with them taking PED’s into consideration but to simply blackball some guys and not others is just ludicrous.If someone wants to look at a guy like Ortiz or Sosa and say “ya know, looking at these numbers and the way his career unfolded, I don’t think he has the resume without PED’s”, I feel like that’s part of the risk they took. I’m not one of those that says, they got the numbers, they saved baseball, whatever…Just make informed decisions and leave the grudges and asskissing out of it.0
- 
            
 It wasn’t necessarily a “case for induction”…..it was more an “every era is different “ argument.Poncier said:
 Because you said the pitchers were "roided up" when Barry is the poster child (a very large poster to fit that enormous head) for steroids in baseball.Wobbie said:
 how is that a “homer” defense? Bonds and others were facing pitchers the likes of which ruth, maris, etc. never saw. Aaron faced great pitchers but he saw them over and over and they weren’t throwing 100+ mph. Do you realize how fast you have to react to 100 mph?Poncier said:
 Wow, talk about the weakest, most raaaaaaiiiin on your wedding day, homer defense of Bonds anyone could possibly come up withWobbie said:MayDay10 said:
 At this point though, there absolutely are roiders in the hall of fame. They just didnt get caught or implicated. I think Bonds, Clemens, and Schilling should be in at this point, but I do think they should somehow strip the HR records from Bonds (and McGuire) (and Sosa). Aaron and Maris should still be the official HR record holders. I think that is why I hate Bonds the most (and hated the other 2). Basically cheapened those hallowed records.Bonds - , faced 'roided pitchers,
 Barry was at a disadvantage because he faced pitchers that took steroids? I'd say that his steroid use more than nullified that disadvantage. Only the most ardent of Bonds apologists would use pitchers on steroids to make his case for induction.
 just like basketball numbers (e.g. 3 point shot and changes in coaching philosophies), football numbers (more games, protecting the QB, etc), baseball (integration, coast to coast travel, emphasis on relief pitching, etc.)If I had known then what I know now...
 Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
 VIC 07
 EV LA1 08
 Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
 Columbus 10
 EV LA 11
 Vancouver 11
 Missoula 12
 Portland 13, Spokane 13
 St. Paul 14, Denver 14Philly I & II, 16Denver 22
 Missoula 240
- 
            
 tons of guys DIDN’T fail tests. the only big names dumb enough to get caught were braun, manny (TWICE!), a-rod, tejada, palmiero, cruz and melky cabrera.erebus said:
 Good questions. Some of the HOF decisions seem hypocritical. I understand your point about Selig.cutz said:
 Thoughts?cutz said:
 Can it still be a HOF when the Hit King, the Home Run King and the pitcher who won the most Cy Youngs are not in? But, Bud Selig is in the HOF?
 Do you take away the records from the players who took Greenies (which were taken over decades)? The players who ONLY played against white players? Where does it end?
 Players should be in the HOF from their era, regardless of what people may THINK a player did, if they deserve to be inducted?
 I’ve heard reasoning for Ortiz was that he never failed a test after (so he hid it better or played clean after being caught?)
 the selig case burns my ass…mr. see no evil do nothing act surprised. I also find it hypocritical that two steroid managers, torre and TLR, were elected on the first ballot.If I had known then what I know now...
 Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
 VIC 07
 EV LA1 08
 Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
 Columbus 10
 EV LA 11
 Vancouver 11
 Missoula 12
 Portland 13, Spokane 13
 St. Paul 14, Denver 14Philly I & II, 16Denver 22
 Missoula 240
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help







