The National Football League
Comments
- 
            mrussel1 said:
 Is Tom Brady's 600th TD really worth a half million? Unsigned? I don't believe that. Is the sports market that out of whack?tempo_n_groove said:
 Reputation? What reputation? Take the money. No one is going to remember this after a few weeks. What was the guys name that caught the Bonds ball? McGwire ball? Jeter 3000 hit/HR ball?cp3iverson said:Brady just gave the guy a Bitcoin so that’s a nice start.I’d still rather have 500k but like you guys said it’s a tough spot reputation wise 
 No one will give a shit...
 I think they are basing it off of Brady's 1st TD ball going for $450k. People will pay absurd amounts of money for sports memorabilia.
 Seems the Bucs heard all the talk and came back and gave him more.Post edited by Jumb0 on0
- 
            
 I guess I don't see football records in the same light as baseball. Baseball is such a stat driven sport and has such a long history, that those numbers are forever ingrained; Williams hitting .400, 56 game hit streak, 63 home runs, etc. Football stats never seemed nearly as historical. Think of the build up every night when McGwire was chasing, or Bonds. It was the sports headline. Evans didn't have any idea about 600. I didn't either.tempo_n_groove said:
 1 million something for the McGwire ball.mrussel1 said:
 Is Tom Brady's 600th TD really worth a half million? Unsigned? I don't believe that. Is the sports market that out of whack?tempo_n_groove said:
 Reputation? What reputation? Take the money. No one is going to remember this after a few weeks. What was the guys name that caught the Bonds ball? McGwire ball? Jeter 3000 hit/HR ball?cp3iverson said:Brady just gave the guy a Bitcoin so that’s a nice start.I’d still rather have 500k but like you guys said it’s a tough spot reputation wise 
 No one will give a shit...
 If you have a historical significance or milestone attached to an item whether it be game worn or used the value increases exponentially.
 Brady will go down as the best QB so that ball is cheap at 500K.0
- 
            
 Yes! That' why you don't let a QB like Mahomes in his prime go for the next 10 years!!tempo_n_groove said:The Broncos would like a word with the other teams about QB's...
 Since Manning it has been a disaster...
 I wish I was a sacrifice, but somehow still lived on.0
- 
            
 Again... No one ever said to let him go. No where was that said. Read my response.Glorified KC said:
 Yes! That' why you don't let a QB like Mahomes in his prime go for the next 10 years!!tempo_n_groove said:The Broncos would like a word with the other teams about QB's...
 Since Manning it has been a disaster...0
- 
            
 Williams hit 406, 60 and 61 are Ruth and Maris' HR total. i think Sosa hit 63 his 2nd year after doing 66.mrussel1 said:
 I guess I don't see football records in the same light as baseball. Baseball is such a stat driven sport and has such a long history, that those numbers are forever ingrained; Williams hitting .400, 56 game hit streak, 63 home runs, etc. Football stats never seemed nearly as historical. Think of the build up every night when McGwire was chasing, or Bonds. It was the sports headline. Evans didn't have any idea about 600. I didn't either.tempo_n_groove said:
 1 million something for the McGwire ball.mrussel1 said:
 Is Tom Brady's 600th TD really worth a half million? Unsigned? I don't believe that. Is the sports market that out of whack?tempo_n_groove said:
 Reputation? What reputation? Take the money. No one is going to remember this after a few weeks. What was the guys name that caught the Bonds ball? McGwire ball? Jeter 3000 hit/HR ball?cp3iverson said:Brady just gave the guy a Bitcoin so that’s a nice start.I’d still rather have 500k but like you guys said it’s a tough spot reputation wise 
 No one will give a shit...
 If you have a historical significance or milestone attached to an item whether it be game worn or used the value increases exponentially.
 Brady will go down as the best QB so that ball is cheap at 500K.
 But yes I understand that. Baseball is all numbers. Football and 600 though? That's an easy one.0
- 
            
 Haha, he's arguing against his own point.Glorified KC said:
 Yes! That' why you don't let a QB like Mahomes in his prime go for the next 10 years!!tempo_n_groove said:The Broncos would like a word with the other teams about QB's...
 Since Manning it has been a disaster...0
- 
            
 How so?Jearlpam0925 said:
 Haha, he's arguing against his own point.Glorified KC said:
 Yes! That' why you don't let a QB like Mahomes in his prime go for the next 10 years!!tempo_n_groove said:The Broncos would like a word with the other teams about QB's...
 Since Manning it has been a disaster...
 I'm wondering of people read everything on here or just pick the older points so they look smart?0
- 
            I'll say this. The window for Mahomes and the Chiefs is now closed until the GM does some internal fixes.0
- 
            I've read your response(s) multiple times, nothing said about GMs. Just that Mahomes has screwed the team. Not trying to look smart, and are older posts considered old when they're from a day ago?0
- 
            Geno Smith has a gig and Kaepernick does not.
 Ridiculous.If I had known then what I know now...
 Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
 VIC 07
 EV LA1 08
 Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
 Columbus 10
 EV LA 11
 Vancouver 11
 Missoula 12
 Portland 13, Spokane 13
 St. Paul 14, Denver 14Philly I & II, 16Denver 22
 Missoula 240
- 
            
 I would also think you’d need a letter of authenticity from Tampa and the NFL…mrussel1 said:
 Is Tom Brady's 600th TD really worth a half million? Unsigned? I don't believe that. Is the sports market that out of whack?tempo_n_groove said:
 Reputation? What reputation? Take the money. No one is going to remember this after a few weeks. What was the guys name that caught the Bonds ball? McGwire ball? Jeter 3000 hit/HR ball?cp3iverson said:Brady just gave the guy a Bitcoin so that’s a nice start.I’d still rather have 500k but like you guys said it’s a tough spot reputation wise 
 No one will give a shit...
 Give Peas A Chance…0
- 
            
 Highlighted it for you.tempo_n_groove said:
 The team is doing great now aren't they?Jearlpam0925 said:No team with a franchise QB - one that has won a Super Bowl and an MVP - doesn't sign and/or extend and/or take up the largest portion of their salaries. How is this even a conversation? The team doesn't suffer. The team benefits from having a top-3/5 QB, which is rightly paid as such as it's the most important position in the game. They already benefitted by getting a "discount" by winning a SB, and going to an additional SB, while on his rookie deal. Seriously, what are we even talking about here?
 Of course you sign your QB long term. It's your plan after that really matters.
 What we are talking about that none of you see is the part of the GM that screwed up. You can have the greatest QB in the world but without the pieces around him that means squat. That is exactly what is happening now.
 I also mentioned that the SB's were on his rookie deal and now that he is paid unless management is smarter w their money the team is going nowhere.
 EDIT: It was at 735 this morning...Post edited by tempo_n_groove on0
- 
            Yes, I saw you walk back what you meant from yesterday to this morning.0
- 
            
 No, just explaining my point further since people were putting words in my mouth hence the GM comment, and that you said I didn't make and then said I'm "walking back".Jearlpam0925 said:Yes, I saw you walk back what you meant from yesterday to this morning.
 Never did I say it was a mistake to sign him. Him getting paid made the rest of the team suffer. Yes, that is what is going on and I blame the GM for it.
 Moving on now... The window for Mahomes and the SB are done for a few years now.
 0
- 
            
- 
            
 I won't disagree with you there. So what is your point then on Mahomes contract?tempo_n_groove said:I'll say this. The window for Mahomes and the Chiefs is now closed until the GM does some internal fixes.
 I wish I was a sacrifice, but somehow still lived on.0
- 
            
 What would you have done if you were the GM and Mahomes contract needed to be extended then?tempo_n_groove said:
 Highlighted it for you.tempo_n_groove said:
 The team is doing great now aren't they?Jearlpam0925 said:No team with a franchise QB - one that has won a Super Bowl and an MVP - doesn't sign and/or extend and/or take up the largest portion of their salaries. How is this even a conversation? The team doesn't suffer. The team benefits from having a top-3/5 QB, which is rightly paid as such as it's the most important position in the game. They already benefitted by getting a "discount" by winning a SB, and going to an additional SB, while on his rookie deal. Seriously, what are we even talking about here?
 Of course you sign your QB long term. It's your plan after that really matters.
 What we are talking about that none of you see is the part of the GM that screwed up. You can have the greatest QB in the world but without the pieces around him that means squat. That is exactly what is happening now.
 I also mentioned that the SB's were on his rookie deal and now that he is paid unless management is smarter w their money the team is going nowhere.
 EDIT: It was at 735 this morning...
 I wish I was a sacrifice, but somehow still lived on.0
- 
            Glorified KC said:
 I won't disagree with you there. So what is your point then on Mahomes contract?tempo_n_groove said:I'll say this. The window for Mahomes and the Chiefs is now closed until the GM does some internal fixes.
 Mahomes needed to get paid. I agree. What screwed the team was how the GM used the rest of the cap. That was my problem.Glorified KC said:
 What would you have done if you were the GM and Mahomes contract needed to be extended then?tempo_n_groove said:
 Highlighted it for you.tempo_n_groove said:
 The team is doing great now aren't they?Jearlpam0925 said:No team with a franchise QB - one that has won a Super Bowl and an MVP - doesn't sign and/or extend and/or take up the largest portion of their salaries. How is this even a conversation? The team doesn't suffer. The team benefits from having a top-3/5 QB, which is rightly paid as such as it's the most important position in the game. They already benefitted by getting a "discount" by winning a SB, and going to an additional SB, while on his rookie deal. Seriously, what are we even talking about here?
 Of course you sign your QB long term. It's your plan after that really matters.
 What we are talking about that none of you see is the part of the GM that screwed up. You can have the greatest QB in the world but without the pieces around him that means squat. That is exactly what is happening now.
 I also mentioned that the SB's were on his rookie deal and now that he is paid unless management is smarter w their money the team is going nowhere.
 EDIT: It was at 735 this morning...
 You can't keep everybody but certain pieces they did hold and didn't spend wisely on the rest. The O-line isn't panning out and the defense is anemic.
 It's a shame too. I was very much enjoying the numbers Mahomes was putting up.0
- 
            
 I thought I read 42 posts back that Glorified KC's criticism on the salary situation was about Frank Clark.tempo_n_groove said:Glorified KC said:
 I won't disagree with you there. So what is your point then on Mahomes contract?tempo_n_groove said:I'll say this. The window for Mahomes and the Chiefs is now closed until the GM does some internal fixes.
 Mahomes needed to get paid. I agree. What screwed the team was how the GM used the rest of the cap. That was my problem.Glorified KC said:
 What would you have done if you were the GM and Mahomes contract needed to be extended then?tempo_n_groove said:
 Highlighted it for you.tempo_n_groove said:
 The team is doing great now aren't they?Jearlpam0925 said:No team with a franchise QB - one that has won a Super Bowl and an MVP - doesn't sign and/or extend and/or take up the largest portion of their salaries. How is this even a conversation? The team doesn't suffer. The team benefits from having a top-3/5 QB, which is rightly paid as such as it's the most important position in the game. They already benefitted by getting a "discount" by winning a SB, and going to an additional SB, while on his rookie deal. Seriously, what are we even talking about here?
 Of course you sign your QB long term. It's your plan after that really matters.
 What we are talking about that none of you see is the part of the GM that screwed up. You can have the greatest QB in the world but without the pieces around him that means squat. That is exactly what is happening now.
 I also mentioned that the SB's were on his rookie deal and now that he is paid unless management is smarter w their money the team is going nowhere.
 EDIT: It was at 735 this morning...
 You can't keep everybody but certain pieces they did hold and didn't spend wisely on the rest. The O-line isn't panning out and the defense is anemic.
 It's a shame too. I was very much enjoying the numbers Mahomes was putting up.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help







