The New York Knicks Offical Thread
Comments
-
Just saying having home court advantage and losing in 5 is pretty bad.crookedcross said:
The Knicks weren't even expected to make the playoffs. So for them to get 4th seed was already a treat. I mean look at that team. It's mixed and matched like a mofo. Not even a consistent starting 5. They played the same way they did early in the season during that series. If I weren't a Knicks fan, I would've put a lot of money on a Hawks sweep regardless of what Vegas said. Sports book analytics lean heavily on the present, it almost never takes into account how much the same exact players sucked just six months ago and the likelihood of essentially the same team going back to its old ways. Which is exactly what happened to the Knicks.The Juggler said:
Maybe they were. But they likely saw it going 7 as the Knicks were favored in 3 of the 5 games.igotid88 said:
For the series I believe Vegas had them as the underdogThe Juggler said:
Well they were favorites in games 1 and 2 and then again last night...igotid88 said:
We were still the underdogThe Juggler said:
You had home court advantage and lost in five...igotid88 said:At least we didn't get swept. We were the underdog
As a Sixers fan, I'm just salty we didn't get an extra couple days of rest! lol
Knicks are pretty good. They are really good defensively. I like their physicality. Offense is a different story though.www.myspace.com0 -
Knicks were -120 to win series, slight favorites, about what you'd expect in a 4 vs 5 matchup.igotid88 said:
For the series I believe Vegas had them as the underdogThe Juggler said:
Well they were favorites in games 1 and 2 and then again last night...igotid88 said:
We were still the underdogThe Juggler said:
You had home court advantage and lost in five...igotid88 said:At least we didn't get swept. We were the underdogThis weekend we rock Portland0 -
It is, but it's the 4-5 series with both team having the same record.The Juggler said:
Just saying having home court advantage and losing in 5 is pretty bad.crookedcross said:
The Knicks weren't even expected to make the playoffs. So for them to get 4th seed was already a treat. I mean look at that team. It's mixed and matched like a mofo. Not even a consistent starting 5. They played the same way they did early in the season during that series. If I weren't a Knicks fan, I would've put a lot of money on a Hawks sweep regardless of what Vegas said. Sports book analytics lean heavily on the present, it almost never takes into account how much the same exact players sucked just six months ago and the likelihood of essentially the same team going back to its old ways. Which is exactly what happened to the Knicks.The Juggler said:
Maybe they were. But they likely saw it going 7 as the Knicks were favored in 3 of the 5 games.igotid88 said:
For the series I believe Vegas had them as the underdogThe Juggler said:
Well they were favorites in games 1 and 2 and then again last night...igotid88 said:
We were still the underdogThe Juggler said:
You had home court advantage and lost in five...igotid88 said:At least we didn't get swept. We were the underdog
As a Sixers fan, I'm just salty we didn't get an extra couple days of rest! lol
Knicks are pretty good. They are really good defensively. I like their physicality. Offense is a different story though.
Defense can only take teams so far. Especially in an era where teams are capable of dropping 150 points any night. Gotta be able to keep up if the defense is failing. I don't know how a point guard has been an issue for about a decade and the best we could come up with is Frank Ntikilina.0 -
That's what I figured. Wouldn't be favored in 3 of those 5 games and not have been the favorite overall.Poncier said:
Knicks were -120 to win series, slight favorites, about what you'd expect in a 4 vs 5 matchup.igotid88 said:
For the series I believe Vegas had them as the underdogThe Juggler said:
Well they were favorites in games 1 and 2 and then again last night...igotid88 said:
We were still the underdogThe Juggler said:
You had home court advantage and lost in five...igotid88 said:At least we didn't get swept. We were the underdog
These fucking Hawks though...Sheesh. Pesky little turds.www.myspace.com0 -
They are fast, move the ball very well, and everybody in that team not named Clint Capela can shoot.The Juggler said:
That's what I figured. Wouldn't be favored in 3 of those 5 games and not have been the favorite overall.Poncier said:
Knicks were -120 to win series, slight favorites, about what you'd expect in a 4 vs 5 matchup.igotid88 said:
For the series I believe Vegas had them as the underdogThe Juggler said:
Well they were favorites in games 1 and 2 and then again last night...igotid88 said:
We were still the underdogThe Juggler said:
You had home court advantage and lost in five...igotid88 said:At least we didn't get swept. We were the underdog
These fucking Hawks though...Sheesh. Pesky little turds.0 -
Thibodeau coach of the yearI miss igotid880
-
It's all over my feed. It's awesome. No contest imoigotid88 said:Thibodeau coach of the year0 -
Discuss this w CP3.crookedcross said:
It's all over my feed. It's awesome. No contest imoigotid88 said:Thibodeau coach of the year0 -
They had CP3tempo_n_groove said:
Discuss this w CP3.crookedcross said:
It's all over my feed. It's awesome. No contest imoigotid88 said:Thibodeau coach of the yearI miss igotid880 -
-
Lol...how does this guy with 5,000 followers have a blue check mark?igotid88 said:www.myspace.com0 -
He hit a lot of home runz thankz to steroidz.The Juggler said:
Lol...how does this guy with 5,000 followers have a blue check mark?igotid88 said:This weekend we rock Portland0 -
Now that Giannis won with the Bucks. He can try to get out of his contract and come here. One can only hopeI miss igotid880
-
DRose running it back. 3 yrs 43mil0
-
Knicks got Kemba WalkerI miss igotid880
-
Don't like it. Need someone who can average more assists than Randle at the point.0
-
Not gonna lie, was not a fan of Randle signing when we first got him... I super respect him now after this new contract. 114m for 4 years. Knowing your value, but agreeing to much less.... that is a guy who wants to winPost edited by crookedcross on0
-
He'll probably be traded. Almost $30 million is more than I thought he would getcrookedcross said:Not gonna lie, was not a fan of Randle signing when we first got him... I super respect him now after this new contract. 114m for 4 years. Knowing your value, but agreeing to much less.... that is a guy who wants to winPost edited by igotid88 onI miss igotid880 -
Fucking Boston always hitting those game tying/winning 3s on usI miss igotid880
-
That was a close one. We usually lose these gamesI miss igotid880
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help



