Riots/Looting/Violence and general post-George Floyd madness
Comments
- 
            
Those were literally your quotes, didn’t make that up. Kinda hard to take a conversation seriously, thinking MS13 is a made up hoax is on par with think covid is made up too.dignin said:
Jesus, you keep making shit up. MS 13 is a hoax just for one. Missed where I said that.mace1229 said:
If you believe I am twisting your point then I would be curious to know what you meant bydignin said:
Didn't say that. You're now twisting the point.mace1229 said:
I've never knowingly had an interaction with a serial rapist. I guess we shouldnt be concerned about them?dignin said:JW269453 said:
Funny. The exact same thing can be said about those in fear of being killed by the police, but here we are.dignin said:
The point is on the list of things that are a threat to you and your loved ones there are probably at least a 1000 things more dangerous.mace1229 said:
You don't think Antifa and MS13 are real?Bentleyspop said:
That is exactly what happened.Ledbetterman10 said:
My guess is that someone (who may not even be affiliated with the Biden campaign) bought that URL and set it up to redirect to Biden's website? Or...it could very much be someone affiliated with the campaign. Or it could even be an agitator trying to link Antifa to Biden. Who knows? But it's very strange.brianlux said:
Strange indeed! WTF?Ledbetterman10 said:Posted this in the Biden thread but I guess it could go here to. What's going on here?
http://www.antifa.com
If you don't trust my link, just type it into your browser yourself.
I can't believe that people actually believe that Antifa is actually a thing.
All Antifa is is the boogeyman that the piece-of-shit-in-chief says is sleeping under your bed.
Antifa and MS-13 and SOCIALISTS OH MY!!
But here you and others are fretting in your boots seriously concerned, chasing the little glowing dot that Trump wants you to chase. Meanwhile he's compromising your democracy, grifting the country of billions and that isn't even on your radar.
You're being duped. Willingly at this point, because there is no other excuse.
I've had dozens of interactions with police in my lifetime. I'm sure we all have. Most of them good, a few bad. I've never felt in danger, but I'm white and have always lived in relatively affluent places. I do have empathy for anyone not white dealing with police, almost all seem to have a story where they have dealt with racism from a cop. I see that as a pretty large problem, effecting millions of people negatively.
Can't say I've ever knowingly had an interaction with MS 13 or antifa. If I was a fascist or a gangster, I might be more concerned I guess.
I don't get the logic of it doesnt impact me, so why should I care. WHich is what this sounds like? You've never suffered from the hands of a gang member, so we shouldnt care or worry about them. Anyone who is concerned, is being duped.
Which do you think is the bigger problem in America today. Systemic racism or MS 13/Antifa?
“Can't say I've ever knowingly had an interaction with MS 13 or antifa. If I was a fascist or a gangster, I might be more concerned“
and
” The point is on the list of things that are a threat to you and your loved ones there are probably at least a 1000 things more dangerous.”
After telling us MS13 is a hoax and we’re being duped.
If that truly is your logic, there’s 1000 things that kill more blacks than cops. And your reasoning for not being “concerned” with gang violoncello or MS13 violence is that it doesn’t directly affect you. Those are your words, not mine.So I am very curious what you meant then after telling me I should only be concerned with things that impact me directly and that are on the top of the list.
If were only supposed to be concerned with the bigger problems, police are far more likely to be killed than a black person is to be killed by a cop. Black on black deaths are 300 times bigger than unarmed blacks being shot and killed. Not saying we shouldn’t work towards better policing, but just going off your words, why aren’t we focusing on the bigger pictures?
And you didn't answer my question. I will make it even easier, do you believe there is systemic racism? Do you believe that the police have a systemic racism problem?
Forgive me for missing your question after reading through 30 posts. I’ll answer, even though you dodged my question twice.
Systemic racism is real. I also believe most of the issues are less directly about race, but other factors that race has influenced, mostly poverty. Poverty is one of the biggest factors when it comes to violence and crime and gangs, and because of generations of racism it impacts minorities and blacks more. This also applies to policing. Not that pure racism doesn’t exist, but poverty is a bigger factor than just race. But as mentioned, generations of racism has impacted poverty, so yes systemic racism in that form exists.0 - 
            
Unless it shows up in the polls.Ledbetterman10 said:
Nope. Just like Biden, the major party candidate. I guess that’s just the way of it these days.Halifax2TheMax said:
Has your third party candidate said anything regarding the riots? Taken any questions about it and the causes?Ledbetterman10 said:
With the low bar set by Trump, sure, it was fine. Whoever wrote it had him say the right things. I would like to see him take questions at some point though, from someone other than Cardi B.dignin said:
I thought Biden had a great response today.Ledbetterman10 said:
Well I added to it with an edit as you were responding.....Halifax2TheMax said:
You “guess?” Need a little more time to pass before you’re certain?Ledbetterman10 said:
Yeah, that's the defense he should go with if someone was attacking him with something.Halifax2TheMax said:
Which they had been by PJPower, if memory serves. If I were the accused, my defense is, “I thought the spray can was a gun and I feared for my life.” Sound about right? Is this where someone tells me to express sympathy for the victim or is it appropriate to label the victim a “deplorable,” or the winner of a stupid prize for playing a stupid game? Just asking.Ledbetterman10 said:
I'm not good with that at all. I'm suggesting Halifax is when I said that in response to him. Well...not that he's "all good with one for one you kill one of us we kill one of you." But when he said "play stupid games, win stupid prizes," he's very much implying that the victim had it coming, or that the victim's actions caused his death. Under that logic, the same would be applied to the victims of the Kenosha shootings.josevolution said:
So we’re all good with one for one you kill one of us we kill one of you that’s where we’re at! It can only go up from here , Putin has won mission accomplished!Ledbetterman10 said:
So it sounds the same as the two that were killed by the 17-year-old in Kenosha. Running towards a person holding a semi-automatic is “playing a stupid game”Halifax2TheMax said:
And a witness is quoted as saying the victim sprayed bear spray before he was shot. “Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.”dignin said:
Authorities have not yet identified a suspect in Danielson's deathLedbetterman10 said:Here's a screencap from the Instagram of the guy that shot the Trump supporter...where he says he's "100 % Antifa"
And apparently, early on July 5th, he was cited on allegations of possessing a loaded gun in a public place, resisting arrest and interfering with police. "He was given a date to appear in court later that month, but the allegations were dropped on July 30 with a “no complaint,” according to court records. The documents don’t indicate why prosecutors decided not to pursue the accusations. Reinoehl spent no time behind bars."
https://www.oregonlive.com/crime/2020/08/man-under-investigation-in-fatal-shooting-after-pro-trump-rally-allegedly-took-loaded-gun-to-earlier-portland-protest.html?utm_campaign=oregonian_sf&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social
https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/31/us/governor-brown-portland-plan-curb-protests/index.html
Wait what? The way you guys have been talking I thought they arrested the guy.See, the difference is that I stand with Sleepy Woke Joe and his attitude and leadership on this. Who do you stand with and who’s leadership do you side with?
No one gives a shit about you expressing sympathy or labeling anything. Since you're asking.
And I don't know why you're bringing up Biden. But if the comparison is his attitude and leadership versus Trump's, I guess I'd take Biden's.
Maybe after tomorrow you won’t have to guess.
"I guess I'd take Biden's. Just because Trump's the worst though. Not because Biden is any good."0 - 
            
Another false equivalency. Why am I not surprised?Ledbetterman10 said:
Nope. Just like Biden, the major party candidate. I guess that’s just the way of it these days.Halifax2TheMax said:
Has your third party candidate said anything regarding the riots? Taken any questions about it and the causes?Ledbetterman10 said:
With the low bar set by Trump, sure, it was fine. Whoever wrote it had him say the right things. I would like to see him take questions at some point though, from someone other than Cardi B.dignin said:
I thought Biden had a great response today.Ledbetterman10 said:
Well I added to it with an edit as you were responding.....Halifax2TheMax said:
You “guess?” Need a little more time to pass before you’re certain?Ledbetterman10 said:
Yeah, that's the defense he should go with if someone was attacking him with something.Halifax2TheMax said:
Which they had been by PJPower, if memory serves. If I were the accused, my defense is, “I thought the spray can was a gun and I feared for my life.” Sound about right? Is this where someone tells me to express sympathy for the victim or is it appropriate to label the victim a “deplorable,” or the winner of a stupid prize for playing a stupid game? Just asking.Ledbetterman10 said:
I'm not good with that at all. I'm suggesting Halifax is when I said that in response to him. Well...not that he's "all good with one for one you kill one of us we kill one of you." But when he said "play stupid games, win stupid prizes," he's very much implying that the victim had it coming, or that the victim's actions caused his death. Under that logic, the same would be applied to the victims of the Kenosha shootings.josevolution said:
So we’re all good with one for one you kill one of us we kill one of you that’s where we’re at! It can only go up from here , Putin has won mission accomplished!Ledbetterman10 said:
So it sounds the same as the two that were killed by the 17-year-old in Kenosha. Running towards a person holding a semi-automatic is “playing a stupid game”Halifax2TheMax said:
And a witness is quoted as saying the victim sprayed bear spray before he was shot. “Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.”dignin said:
Authorities have not yet identified a suspect in Danielson's deathLedbetterman10 said:Here's a screencap from the Instagram of the guy that shot the Trump supporter...where he says he's "100 % Antifa"
And apparently, early on July 5th, he was cited on allegations of possessing a loaded gun in a public place, resisting arrest and interfering with police. "He was given a date to appear in court later that month, but the allegations were dropped on July 30 with a “no complaint,” according to court records. The documents don’t indicate why prosecutors decided not to pursue the accusations. Reinoehl spent no time behind bars."
https://www.oregonlive.com/crime/2020/08/man-under-investigation-in-fatal-shooting-after-pro-trump-rally-allegedly-took-loaded-gun-to-earlier-portland-protest.html?utm_campaign=oregonian_sf&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social
https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/31/us/governor-brown-portland-plan-curb-protests/index.html
Wait what? The way you guys have been talking I thought they arrested the guy.See, the difference is that I stand with Sleepy Woke Joe and his attitude and leadership on this. Who do you stand with and who’s leadership do you side with?
No one gives a shit about you expressing sympathy or labeling anything. Since you're asking.
And I don't know why you're bringing up Biden. But if the comparison is his attitude and leadership versus Trump's, I guess I'd take Biden's.
Maybe after tomorrow you won’t have to guess.
"I guess I'd take Biden's. Just because Trump's the worst though. Not because Biden is any good."09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 - 
            
Stop lying. I didn't say MS 13 is a made up hoax. Why do Trump and his supporters always have to resort to making stuff up? Go back and read my first responses before you asked the questions, the answers are there.mace1229 said:
Those were literally your quotes, didn’t make that up. Kinda hard to take a conversation seriously, thinking MS13 is a made up hoax is on par with think covid is made up too.dignin said:
Jesus, you keep making shit up. MS 13 is a hoax just for one. Missed where I said that.mace1229 said:
If you believe I am twisting your point then I would be curious to know what you meant bydignin said:
Didn't say that. You're now twisting the point.mace1229 said:
I've never knowingly had an interaction with a serial rapist. I guess we shouldnt be concerned about them?dignin said:JW269453 said:
Funny. The exact same thing can be said about those in fear of being killed by the police, but here we are.dignin said:
The point is on the list of things that are a threat to you and your loved ones there are probably at least a 1000 things more dangerous.mace1229 said:
You don't think Antifa and MS13 are real?Bentleyspop said:
That is exactly what happened.Ledbetterman10 said:
My guess is that someone (who may not even be affiliated with the Biden campaign) bought that URL and set it up to redirect to Biden's website? Or...it could very much be someone affiliated with the campaign. Or it could even be an agitator trying to link Antifa to Biden. Who knows? But it's very strange.brianlux said:
Strange indeed! WTF?Ledbetterman10 said:Posted this in the Biden thread but I guess it could go here to. What's going on here?
http://www.antifa.com
If you don't trust my link, just type it into your browser yourself.
I can't believe that people actually believe that Antifa is actually a thing.
All Antifa is is the boogeyman that the piece-of-shit-in-chief says is sleeping under your bed.
Antifa and MS-13 and SOCIALISTS OH MY!!
But here you and others are fretting in your boots seriously concerned, chasing the little glowing dot that Trump wants you to chase. Meanwhile he's compromising your democracy, grifting the country of billions and that isn't even on your radar.
You're being duped. Willingly at this point, because there is no other excuse.
I've had dozens of interactions with police in my lifetime. I'm sure we all have. Most of them good, a few bad. I've never felt in danger, but I'm white and have always lived in relatively affluent places. I do have empathy for anyone not white dealing with police, almost all seem to have a story where they have dealt with racism from a cop. I see that as a pretty large problem, effecting millions of people negatively.
Can't say I've ever knowingly had an interaction with MS 13 or antifa. If I was a fascist or a gangster, I might be more concerned I guess.
I don't get the logic of it doesnt impact me, so why should I care. WHich is what this sounds like? You've never suffered from the hands of a gang member, so we shouldnt care or worry about them. Anyone who is concerned, is being duped.
Which do you think is the bigger problem in America today. Systemic racism or MS 13/Antifa?
“Can't say I've ever knowingly had an interaction with MS 13 or antifa. If I was a fascist or a gangster, I might be more concerned“
and
” The point is on the list of things that are a threat to you and your loved ones there are probably at least a 1000 things more dangerous.”
After telling us MS13 is a hoax and we’re being duped.
If that truly is your logic, there’s 1000 things that kill more blacks than cops. And your reasoning for not being “concerned” with gang violoncello or MS13 violence is that it doesn’t directly affect you. Those are your words, not mine.So I am very curious what you meant then after telling me I should only be concerned with things that impact me directly and that are on the top of the list.
If were only supposed to be concerned with the bigger problems, police are far more likely to be killed than a black person is to be killed by a cop. Black on black deaths are 300 times bigger than unarmed blacks being shot and killed. Not saying we shouldn’t work towards better policing, but just going off your words, why aren’t we focusing on the bigger pictures?
And you didn't answer my question. I will make it even easier, do you believe there is systemic racism? Do you believe that the police have a systemic racism problem?
Forgive me for missing your question after reading through 30 posts. I’ll answer, even though you dodged my question twice.
Systemic racism is real. I also believe most of the issues are less directly about race, but other factors that race has influenced, mostly poverty. Poverty is one of the biggest factors when it comes to violence and crime and gangs, and because of generations of racism it impacts minorities and blacks more. This also applies to policing. Not that pure racism doesn’t exist, but poverty is a bigger factor than just race. But as mentioned, generations of racism has impacted poverty, so yes systemic racism in that form exists.0 - 
            
Suggesting that a third-party candidate is equivalent to a major party candidate is laughable. And you know that. Funny how you’ve changed the conversation from you blaming the victim of the Portland shooting for his own death to third-party presidential candidates. What a joke.Halifax2TheMax said:
Another false equivalency. Why am I not surprised?Ledbetterman10 said:
Nope. Just like Biden, the major party candidate. I guess that’s just the way of it these days.Halifax2TheMax said:
Has your third party candidate said anything regarding the riots? Taken any questions about it and the causes?Ledbetterman10 said:
With the low bar set by Trump, sure, it was fine. Whoever wrote it had him say the right things. I would like to see him take questions at some point though, from someone other than Cardi B.dignin said:
I thought Biden had a great response today.Ledbetterman10 said:
Well I added to it with an edit as you were responding.....Halifax2TheMax said:
You “guess?” Need a little more time to pass before you’re certain?Ledbetterman10 said:
Yeah, that's the defense he should go with if someone was attacking him with something.Halifax2TheMax said:
Which they had been by PJPower, if memory serves. If I were the accused, my defense is, “I thought the spray can was a gun and I feared for my life.” Sound about right? Is this where someone tells me to express sympathy for the victim or is it appropriate to label the victim a “deplorable,” or the winner of a stupid prize for playing a stupid game? Just asking.Ledbetterman10 said:
I'm not good with that at all. I'm suggesting Halifax is when I said that in response to him. Well...not that he's "all good with one for one you kill one of us we kill one of you." But when he said "play stupid games, win stupid prizes," he's very much implying that the victim had it coming, or that the victim's actions caused his death. Under that logic, the same would be applied to the victims of the Kenosha shootings.josevolution said:
So we’re all good with one for one you kill one of us we kill one of you that’s where we’re at! It can only go up from here , Putin has won mission accomplished!Ledbetterman10 said:
So it sounds the same as the two that were killed by the 17-year-old in Kenosha. Running towards a person holding a semi-automatic is “playing a stupid game”Halifax2TheMax said:
And a witness is quoted as saying the victim sprayed bear spray before he was shot. “Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.”dignin said:
Authorities have not yet identified a suspect in Danielson's deathLedbetterman10 said:Here's a screencap from the Instagram of the guy that shot the Trump supporter...where he says he's "100 % Antifa"
And apparently, early on July 5th, he was cited on allegations of possessing a loaded gun in a public place, resisting arrest and interfering with police. "He was given a date to appear in court later that month, but the allegations were dropped on July 30 with a “no complaint,” according to court records. The documents don’t indicate why prosecutors decided not to pursue the accusations. Reinoehl spent no time behind bars."
https://www.oregonlive.com/crime/2020/08/man-under-investigation-in-fatal-shooting-after-pro-trump-rally-allegedly-took-loaded-gun-to-earlier-portland-protest.html?utm_campaign=oregonian_sf&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social
https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/31/us/governor-brown-portland-plan-curb-protests/index.html
Wait what? The way you guys have been talking I thought they arrested the guy.See, the difference is that I stand with Sleepy Woke Joe and his attitude and leadership on this. Who do you stand with and who’s leadership do you side with?
No one gives a shit about you expressing sympathy or labeling anything. Since you're asking.
And I don't know why you're bringing up Biden. But if the comparison is his attitude and leadership versus Trump's, I guess I'd take Biden's.
Maybe after tomorrow you won’t have to guess.
"I guess I'd take Biden's. Just because Trump's the worst though. Not because Biden is any good."2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024: Philly 2, 2025: Pittsburgh 1
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com0 - 
            
Just taking a play out of PJPower’s book but I don’t recall you condemning him for blaming the victims in Kenosha. Why is that?Ledbetterman10 said:
Suggesting that a third-party candidate is equivalent to a major party candidate is laughable. And you know that. Funny how you’ve changed the conversation from you blaming the victim of the Portland shooting for his own death to third-party presidential candidates. What a joke.Halifax2TheMax said:
Another false equivalency. Why am I not surprised?Ledbetterman10 said:
Nope. Just like Biden, the major party candidate. I guess that’s just the way of it these days.Halifax2TheMax said:
Has your third party candidate said anything regarding the riots? Taken any questions about it and the causes?Ledbetterman10 said:
With the low bar set by Trump, sure, it was fine. Whoever wrote it had him say the right things. I would like to see him take questions at some point though, from someone other than Cardi B.dignin said:
I thought Biden had a great response today.Ledbetterman10 said:
Well I added to it with an edit as you were responding.....Halifax2TheMax said:
You “guess?” Need a little more time to pass before you’re certain?Ledbetterman10 said:
Yeah, that's the defense he should go with if someone was attacking him with something.Halifax2TheMax said:
Which they had been by PJPower, if memory serves. If I were the accused, my defense is, “I thought the spray can was a gun and I feared for my life.” Sound about right? Is this where someone tells me to express sympathy for the victim or is it appropriate to label the victim a “deplorable,” or the winner of a stupid prize for playing a stupid game? Just asking.Ledbetterman10 said:
I'm not good with that at all. I'm suggesting Halifax is when I said that in response to him. Well...not that he's "all good with one for one you kill one of us we kill one of you." But when he said "play stupid games, win stupid prizes," he's very much implying that the victim had it coming, or that the victim's actions caused his death. Under that logic, the same would be applied to the victims of the Kenosha shootings.josevolution said:
So we’re all good with one for one you kill one of us we kill one of you that’s where we’re at! It can only go up from here , Putin has won mission accomplished!Ledbetterman10 said:
So it sounds the same as the two that were killed by the 17-year-old in Kenosha. Running towards a person holding a semi-automatic is “playing a stupid game”Halifax2TheMax said:
And a witness is quoted as saying the victim sprayed bear spray before he was shot. “Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.”dignin said:
Authorities have not yet identified a suspect in Danielson's deathLedbetterman10 said:Here's a screencap from the Instagram of the guy that shot the Trump supporter...where he says he's "100 % Antifa"
And apparently, early on July 5th, he was cited on allegations of possessing a loaded gun in a public place, resisting arrest and interfering with police. "He was given a date to appear in court later that month, but the allegations were dropped on July 30 with a “no complaint,” according to court records. The documents don’t indicate why prosecutors decided not to pursue the accusations. Reinoehl spent no time behind bars."
https://www.oregonlive.com/crime/2020/08/man-under-investigation-in-fatal-shooting-after-pro-trump-rally-allegedly-took-loaded-gun-to-earlier-portland-protest.html?utm_campaign=oregonian_sf&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social
https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/31/us/governor-brown-portland-plan-curb-protests/index.html
Wait what? The way you guys have been talking I thought they arrested the guy.See, the difference is that I stand with Sleepy Woke Joe and his attitude and leadership on this. Who do you stand with and who’s leadership do you side with?
No one gives a shit about you expressing sympathy or labeling anything. Since you're asking.
And I don't know why you're bringing up Biden. But if the comparison is his attitude and leadership versus Trump's, I guess I'd take Biden's.
Maybe after tomorrow you won’t have to guess.
"I guess I'd take Biden's. Just because Trump's the worst though. Not because Biden is any good."
What is a joke is that you’re demanding Sleepy Woke Joe “do something” or “say something” about the riots and dismiss that he has, repeatedly, spoken out about it. He can’t “do anything” about it because he doesn’t have access to the levers of power to do something. But all of that is lost on you and yet, your candidate, whomever it is, isn’t held to the same standard by you. Shouldn’t even be running for POTUS if they can’t express their opinion about the rioting. Thanks for the laugh, what a joke.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 - 
            
You just called it a hoax, twice. I didn’t make that up. You said you haven’t interacted with anyone from MS13 and therefore is of no concern. I quoted you in that a couple replies ago. I’ve asked you twice to clarify and you just respond by saying I’m making stuff up. What am I suppose to infer by that? I have to conclude you believe they aren’t a threat and the violence isn’t real, or made up.dignin said:
Stop lying. I didn't say MS 13 is a made up hoax. Why do Trump and his supporters always have to resort to making stuff up? Go back and read my first responses before you asked the questions, the answers are there.mace1229 said:
Those were literally your quotes, didn’t make that up. Kinda hard to take a conversation seriously, thinking MS13 is a made up hoax is on par with think covid is made up too.dignin said:
Jesus, you keep making shit up. MS 13 is a hoax just for one. Missed where I said that.mace1229 said:
If you believe I am twisting your point then I would be curious to know what you meant bydignin said:
Didn't say that. You're now twisting the point.mace1229 said:
I've never knowingly had an interaction with a serial rapist. I guess we shouldnt be concerned about them?dignin said:JW269453 said:
Funny. The exact same thing can be said about those in fear of being killed by the police, but here we are.dignin said:
The point is on the list of things that are a threat to you and your loved ones there are probably at least a 1000 things more dangerous.mace1229 said:
You don't think Antifa and MS13 are real?Bentleyspop said:
That is exactly what happened.Ledbetterman10 said:
My guess is that someone (who may not even be affiliated with the Biden campaign) bought that URL and set it up to redirect to Biden's website? Or...it could very much be someone affiliated with the campaign. Or it could even be an agitator trying to link Antifa to Biden. Who knows? But it's very strange.brianlux said:
Strange indeed! WTF?Ledbetterman10 said:Posted this in the Biden thread but I guess it could go here to. What's going on here?
http://www.antifa.com
If you don't trust my link, just type it into your browser yourself.
I can't believe that people actually believe that Antifa is actually a thing.
All Antifa is is the boogeyman that the piece-of-shit-in-chief says is sleeping under your bed.
Antifa and MS-13 and SOCIALISTS OH MY!!
But here you and others are fretting in your boots seriously concerned, chasing the little glowing dot that Trump wants you to chase. Meanwhile he's compromising your democracy, grifting the country of billions and that isn't even on your radar.
You're being duped. Willingly at this point, because there is no other excuse.
I've had dozens of interactions with police in my lifetime. I'm sure we all have. Most of them good, a few bad. I've never felt in danger, but I'm white and have always lived in relatively affluent places. I do have empathy for anyone not white dealing with police, almost all seem to have a story where they have dealt with racism from a cop. I see that as a pretty large problem, effecting millions of people negatively.
Can't say I've ever knowingly had an interaction with MS 13 or antifa. If I was a fascist or a gangster, I might be more concerned I guess.
I don't get the logic of it doesnt impact me, so why should I care. WHich is what this sounds like? You've never suffered from the hands of a gang member, so we shouldnt care or worry about them. Anyone who is concerned, is being duped.
Which do you think is the bigger problem in America today. Systemic racism or MS 13/Antifa?
“Can't say I've ever knowingly had an interaction with MS 13 or antifa. If I was a fascist or a gangster, I might be more concerned“
and
” The point is on the list of things that are a threat to you and your loved ones there are probably at least a 1000 things more dangerous.”
After telling us MS13 is a hoax and we’re being duped.
If that truly is your logic, there’s 1000 things that kill more blacks than cops. And your reasoning for not being “concerned” with gang violoncello or MS13 violence is that it doesn’t directly affect you. Those are your words, not mine.So I am very curious what you meant then after telling me I should only be concerned with things that impact me directly and that are on the top of the list.
If were only supposed to be concerned with the bigger problems, police are far more likely to be killed than a black person is to be killed by a cop. Black on black deaths are 300 times bigger than unarmed blacks being shot and killed. Not saying we shouldn’t work towards better policing, but just going off your words, why aren’t we focusing on the bigger pictures?
And you didn't answer my question. I will make it even easier, do you believe there is systemic racism? Do you believe that the police have a systemic racism problem?
Forgive me for missing your question after reading through 30 posts. I’ll answer, even though you dodged my question twice.
Systemic racism is real. I also believe most of the issues are less directly about race, but other factors that race has influenced, mostly poverty. Poverty is one of the biggest factors when it comes to violence and crime and gangs, and because of generations of racism it impacts minorities and blacks more. This also applies to policing. Not that pure racism doesn’t exist, but poverty is a bigger factor than just race. But as mentioned, generations of racism has impacted poverty, so yes systemic racism in that form exists.
I’ve never claimed to be a trump supporter. I don’t like Trump, I thought Hilary was an equally bad option, and think the same of Biden. I’d vote third party except I’ve always thought of third party votes as a copout, just a way to get the I voted sticker without taking any responsibility of a vote. So I’m not sure what I’m doing this election.0 - 
            
You can infer that I don't like it when people say I say stuff that I didn't say. Honesty is kinda a big thing for me. If I said that, it's really easy to quote it and highlight it.mace1229 said:
You just called it a hoax, twice. I didn’t make that up. You said you haven’t interacted with anyone from MS13 and therefore is of no concern. I quoted you in that a couple replies ago. I’ve asked you twice to clarify and you just respond by saying I’m making stuff up. What am I suppose to infer by that? I have to conclude you believe they aren’t a threat and the violence isn’t real, or made up.dignin said:
Stop lying. I didn't say MS 13 is a made up hoax. Why do Trump and his supporters always have to resort to making stuff up? Go back and read my first responses before you asked the questions, the answers are there.mace1229 said:
Those were literally your quotes, didn’t make that up. Kinda hard to take a conversation seriously, thinking MS13 is a made up hoax is on par with think covid is made up too.dignin said:
Jesus, you keep making shit up. MS 13 is a hoax just for one. Missed where I said that.mace1229 said:
If you believe I am twisting your point then I would be curious to know what you meant bydignin said:
Didn't say that. You're now twisting the point.mace1229 said:
I've never knowingly had an interaction with a serial rapist. I guess we shouldnt be concerned about them?dignin said:JW269453 said:
Funny. The exact same thing can be said about those in fear of being killed by the police, but here we are.dignin said:
The point is on the list of things that are a threat to you and your loved ones there are probably at least a 1000 things more dangerous.mace1229 said:
You don't think Antifa and MS13 are real?Bentleyspop said:
That is exactly what happened.Ledbetterman10 said:
My guess is that someone (who may not even be affiliated with the Biden campaign) bought that URL and set it up to redirect to Biden's website? Or...it could very much be someone affiliated with the campaign. Or it could even be an agitator trying to link Antifa to Biden. Who knows? But it's very strange.brianlux said:
Strange indeed! WTF?Ledbetterman10 said:Posted this in the Biden thread but I guess it could go here to. What's going on here?
http://www.antifa.com
If you don't trust my link, just type it into your browser yourself.
I can't believe that people actually believe that Antifa is actually a thing.
All Antifa is is the boogeyman that the piece-of-shit-in-chief says is sleeping under your bed.
Antifa and MS-13 and SOCIALISTS OH MY!!
But here you and others are fretting in your boots seriously concerned, chasing the little glowing dot that Trump wants you to chase. Meanwhile he's compromising your democracy, grifting the country of billions and that isn't even on your radar.
You're being duped. Willingly at this point, because there is no other excuse.
I've had dozens of interactions with police in my lifetime. I'm sure we all have. Most of them good, a few bad. I've never felt in danger, but I'm white and have always lived in relatively affluent places. I do have empathy for anyone not white dealing with police, almost all seem to have a story where they have dealt with racism from a cop. I see that as a pretty large problem, effecting millions of people negatively.
Can't say I've ever knowingly had an interaction with MS 13 or antifa. If I was a fascist or a gangster, I might be more concerned I guess.
I don't get the logic of it doesnt impact me, so why should I care. WHich is what this sounds like? You've never suffered from the hands of a gang member, so we shouldnt care or worry about them. Anyone who is concerned, is being duped.
Which do you think is the bigger problem in America today. Systemic racism or MS 13/Antifa?
“Can't say I've ever knowingly had an interaction with MS 13 or antifa. If I was a fascist or a gangster, I might be more concerned“
and
” The point is on the list of things that are a threat to you and your loved ones there are probably at least a 1000 things more dangerous.”
After telling us MS13 is a hoax and we’re being duped.
If that truly is your logic, there’s 1000 things that kill more blacks than cops. And your reasoning for not being “concerned” with gang violoncello or MS13 violence is that it doesn’t directly affect you. Those are your words, not mine.So I am very curious what you meant then after telling me I should only be concerned with things that impact me directly and that are on the top of the list.
If were only supposed to be concerned with the bigger problems, police are far more likely to be killed than a black person is to be killed by a cop. Black on black deaths are 300 times bigger than unarmed blacks being shot and killed. Not saying we shouldn’t work towards better policing, but just going off your words, why aren’t we focusing on the bigger pictures?
And you didn't answer my question. I will make it even easier, do you believe there is systemic racism? Do you believe that the police have a systemic racism problem?
Forgive me for missing your question after reading through 30 posts. I’ll answer, even though you dodged my question twice.
Systemic racism is real. I also believe most of the issues are less directly about race, but other factors that race has influenced, mostly poverty. Poverty is one of the biggest factors when it comes to violence and crime and gangs, and because of generations of racism it impacts minorities and blacks more. This also applies to policing. Not that pure racism doesn’t exist, but poverty is a bigger factor than just race. But as mentioned, generations of racism has impacted poverty, so yes systemic racism in that form exists.
I’ve never claimed to be a trump supporter. I don’t like Trump, I thought Hilary was an equally bad option, and think the same of Biden. I’d vote third party except I’ve always thought of third party votes as a copout, just a way to get the I voted sticker without taking any responsibility of a vote. So I’m not sure what I’m doing this election.
It's really easy to admit when you're wrong, I've done it already today when I misread someone's comment.
Also, glad to see you no longer support Trump.0 - 
            
I’m not demanding anything of Joe. He talked today. I said I’d like to see him take actual questions from real reporters. Not from Cardi B. And not fromHalifax2TheMax said:
Just taking a play out of PJPower’s book but I don’t recall you condemning him for blaming the victims in Kenosha. Why is that?Ledbetterman10 said:
Suggesting that a third-party candidate is equivalent to a major party candidate is laughable. And you know that. Funny how you’ve changed the conversation from you blaming the victim of the Portland shooting for his own death to third-party presidential candidates. What a joke.Halifax2TheMax said:
Another false equivalency. Why am I not surprised?Ledbetterman10 said:
Nope. Just like Biden, the major party candidate. I guess that’s just the way of it these days.Halifax2TheMax said:
Has your third party candidate said anything regarding the riots? Taken any questions about it and the causes?Ledbetterman10 said:
With the low bar set by Trump, sure, it was fine. Whoever wrote it had him say the right things. I would like to see him take questions at some point though, from someone other than Cardi B.dignin said:
I thought Biden had a great response today.Ledbetterman10 said:
Well I added to it with an edit as you were responding.....Halifax2TheMax said:
You “guess?” Need a little more time to pass before you’re certain?Ledbetterman10 said:
Yeah, that's the defense he should go with if someone was attacking him with something.Halifax2TheMax said:
Which they had been by PJPower, if memory serves. If I were the accused, my defense is, “I thought the spray can was a gun and I feared for my life.” Sound about right? Is this where someone tells me to express sympathy for the victim or is it appropriate to label the victim a “deplorable,” or the winner of a stupid prize for playing a stupid game? Just asking.Ledbetterman10 said:
I'm not good with that at all. I'm suggesting Halifax is when I said that in response to him. Well...not that he's "all good with one for one you kill one of us we kill one of you." But when he said "play stupid games, win stupid prizes," he's very much implying that the victim had it coming, or that the victim's actions caused his death. Under that logic, the same would be applied to the victims of the Kenosha shootings.josevolution said:
So we’re all good with one for one you kill one of us we kill one of you that’s where we’re at! It can only go up from here , Putin has won mission accomplished!Ledbetterman10 said:
So it sounds the same as the two that were killed by the 17-year-old in Kenosha. Running towards a person holding a semi-automatic is “playing a stupid game”Halifax2TheMax said:
And a witness is quoted as saying the victim sprayed bear spray before he was shot. “Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.”dignin said:
Authorities have not yet identified a suspect in Danielson's deathLedbetterman10 said:Here's a screencap from the Instagram of the guy that shot the Trump supporter...where he says he's "100 % Antifa"
And apparently, early on July 5th, he was cited on allegations of possessing a loaded gun in a public place, resisting arrest and interfering with police. "He was given a date to appear in court later that month, but the allegations were dropped on July 30 with a “no complaint,” according to court records. The documents don’t indicate why prosecutors decided not to pursue the accusations. Reinoehl spent no time behind bars."
https://www.oregonlive.com/crime/2020/08/man-under-investigation-in-fatal-shooting-after-pro-trump-rally-allegedly-took-loaded-gun-to-earlier-portland-protest.html?utm_campaign=oregonian_sf&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social
https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/31/us/governor-brown-portland-plan-curb-protests/index.html
Wait what? The way you guys have been talking I thought they arrested the guy.See, the difference is that I stand with Sleepy Woke Joe and his attitude and leadership on this. Who do you stand with and who’s leadership do you side with?
No one gives a shit about you expressing sympathy or labeling anything. Since you're asking.
And I don't know why you're bringing up Biden. But if the comparison is his attitude and leadership versus Trump's, I guess I'd take Biden's.
Maybe after tomorrow you won’t have to guess.
"I guess I'd take Biden's. Just because Trump's the worst though. Not because Biden is any good."
What is a joke is that you’re demanding Sleepy Woke Joe “do something” or “say something” about the riots and dismiss that he has, repeatedly, spoken out about it. He can’t “do anything” about it because he doesn’t have access to the levers of power to do something. But all of that is lost on you and yet, your candidate, whomever it is, isn’t held to the same standard by you. Shouldn’t even be running for POTUS if they can’t express their opinion about the rioting. Thanks for the laugh, what a joke.
media outlets that won’t challenge him on anything.And I don’t recall those posts by PJPower. I don’t read every post on this board like you do. But yeah, l’d disagree with him if he was excusing the 17-year-old based on the legality of a self-defense defense when the 17-year-old showed up there looking for trouble.And I don’t have a candidate, obviously. I’m just not voting for either Trump or Biden.2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024: Philly 2, 2025: Pittsburgh 1
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com0 - 
            josevolution said:Ok misunderstood the post my bad!
https://twitter.com/ddale8/status/1300556607412146179?s=21
Ok so what is to be thought about this statement ?stuckinline said:
0 - 
            
I did that. Which is also why I asked you to clarify so I don’t misread or infer Incorrectly.dignin said:
You can infer that I don't like it when people say I say stuff that I didn't say. Honesty is kinda a big thing for me. If I said that, it's really easy to quote it and highlight it.mace1229 said:
You just called it a hoax, twice. I didn’t make that up. You said you haven’t interacted with anyone from MS13 and therefore is of no concern. I quoted you in that a couple replies ago. I’ve asked you twice to clarify and you just respond by saying I’m making stuff up. What am I suppose to infer by that? I have to conclude you believe they aren’t a threat and the violence isn’t real, or made up.dignin said:
Stop lying. I didn't say MS 13 is a made up hoax. Why do Trump and his supporters always have to resort to making stuff up? Go back and read my first responses before you asked the questions, the answers are there.mace1229 said:
Those were literally your quotes, didn’t make that up. Kinda hard to take a conversation seriously, thinking MS13 is a made up hoax is on par with think covid is made up too.dignin said:
Jesus, you keep making shit up. MS 13 is a hoax just for one. Missed where I said that.mace1229 said:
If you believe I am twisting your point then I would be curious to know what you meant bydignin said:
Didn't say that. You're now twisting the point.mace1229 said:
I've never knowingly had an interaction with a serial rapist. I guess we shouldnt be concerned about them?dignin said:JW269453 said:
Funny. The exact same thing can be said about those in fear of being killed by the police, but here we are.dignin said:
The point is on the list of things that are a threat to you and your loved ones there are probably at least a 1000 things more dangerous.mace1229 said:
You don't think Antifa and MS13 are real?Bentleyspop said:
That is exactly what happened.Ledbetterman10 said:
My guess is that someone (who may not even be affiliated with the Biden campaign) bought that URL and set it up to redirect to Biden's website? Or...it could very much be someone affiliated with the campaign. Or it could even be an agitator trying to link Antifa to Biden. Who knows? But it's very strange.brianlux said:
Strange indeed! WTF?Ledbetterman10 said:Posted this in the Biden thread but I guess it could go here to. What's going on here?
http://www.antifa.com
If you don't trust my link, just type it into your browser yourself.
I can't believe that people actually believe that Antifa is actually a thing.
All Antifa is is the boogeyman that the piece-of-shit-in-chief says is sleeping under your bed.
Antifa and MS-13 and SOCIALISTS OH MY!!
But here you and others are fretting in your boots seriously concerned, chasing the little glowing dot that Trump wants you to chase. Meanwhile he's compromising your democracy, grifting the country of billions and that isn't even on your radar.
You're being duped. Willingly at this point, because there is no other excuse.
I've had dozens of interactions with police in my lifetime. I'm sure we all have. Most of them good, a few bad. I've never felt in danger, but I'm white and have always lived in relatively affluent places. I do have empathy for anyone not white dealing with police, almost all seem to have a story where they have dealt with racism from a cop. I see that as a pretty large problem, effecting millions of people negatively.
Can't say I've ever knowingly had an interaction with MS 13 or antifa. If I was a fascist or a gangster, I might be more concerned I guess.
I don't get the logic of it doesnt impact me, so why should I care. WHich is what this sounds like? You've never suffered from the hands of a gang member, so we shouldnt care or worry about them. Anyone who is concerned, is being duped.
Which do you think is the bigger problem in America today. Systemic racism or MS 13/Antifa?
“Can't say I've ever knowingly had an interaction with MS 13 or antifa. If I was a fascist or a gangster, I might be more concerned“
and
” The point is on the list of things that are a threat to you and your loved ones there are probably at least a 1000 things more dangerous.”
After telling us MS13 is a hoax and we’re being duped.
If that truly is your logic, there’s 1000 things that kill more blacks than cops. And your reasoning for not being “concerned” with gang violoncello or MS13 violence is that it doesn’t directly affect you. Those are your words, not mine.So I am very curious what you meant then after telling me I should only be concerned with things that impact me directly and that are on the top of the list.
If were only supposed to be concerned with the bigger problems, police are far more likely to be killed than a black person is to be killed by a cop. Black on black deaths are 300 times bigger than unarmed blacks being shot and killed. Not saying we shouldn’t work towards better policing, but just going off your words, why aren’t we focusing on the bigger pictures?
And you didn't answer my question. I will make it even easier, do you believe there is systemic racism? Do you believe that the police have a systemic racism problem?
Forgive me for missing your question after reading through 30 posts. I’ll answer, even though you dodged my question twice.
Systemic racism is real. I also believe most of the issues are less directly about race, but other factors that race has influenced, mostly poverty. Poverty is one of the biggest factors when it comes to violence and crime and gangs, and because of generations of racism it impacts minorities and blacks more. This also applies to policing. Not that pure racism doesn’t exist, but poverty is a bigger factor than just race. But as mentioned, generations of racism has impacted poverty, so yes systemic racism in that form exists.
I’ve never claimed to be a trump supporter. I don’t like Trump, I thought Hilary was an equally bad option, and think the same of Biden. I’d vote third party except I’ve always thought of third party votes as a copout, just a way to get the I voted sticker without taking any responsibility of a vote. So I’m not sure what I’m doing this election.
It's really easy to admit when you're wrong, I've done it already today when I misread someone's comment.
Also, glad to see you no longer support Trump.As far as I could tell you said I was making stuff up, then repeated it by saying again it’s a hoax. Is it the “made up” that got you hung up? Should I have said “exaggerated” instead?0 - 
            brianlux said:HughFreakingDillon said:antifa exists, whether you think so or not. are they an "official" organization? no, but neither are the white racists that carry confederate flags. they're just a bunch of racists that call themselves that. do they exist and share a similar ideology? yes.
i don't know that anyone has said they are afraid of antifa. just that people who call themselves antifa are sometimes not representing the cause very well.Yeah, Antifa, and racists are loosely organized groups at best, but they certainly do exist.As an example: In 1970, I agreed (with much hesitation and humiliation) to become a member of an organization a friend at the time proposed: UAOA: United Assholes of America. He declared himself president and chief asshole and wanted me to be treasurer. Fortunately, we never had a meeting and I never collected any dues. I think the next time we got together we got drunk. Anyway, the point is, we never had cards or signed an agreement or anything. We were just assholes.
So what you're telling us is that you're essentially ground zero for the asshole movement in this country? Thanks Brian.
0 - 
            HughFreakingDillon said:
it was only a matter of time. and then in a few days, that sack of shit press sec will explain it away as trump being misunderstood (more lies).stuckinline said:
Trump's greenlighting this shit. Patriot Prayer right wing fu*knuts have another Portland gathering scheduled for late September. Hold on to your favorite PJ hat because sadly this could be really ugly.
0 - 
            Go Beavers said:brianlux said:HughFreakingDillon said:antifa exists, whether you think so or not. are they an "official" organization? no, but neither are the white racists that carry confederate flags. they're just a bunch of racists that call themselves that. do they exist and share a similar ideology? yes.
i don't know that anyone has said they are afraid of antifa. just that people who call themselves antifa are sometimes not representing the cause very well.Yeah, Antifa, and racists are loosely organized groups at best, but they certainly do exist.As an example: In 1970, I agreed (with much hesitation and humiliation) to become a member of an organization a friend at the time proposed: UAOA: United Assholes of America. He declared himself president and chief asshole and wanted me to be treasurer. Fortunately, we never had a meeting and I never collected any dues. I think the next time we got together we got drunk. Anyway, the point is, we never had cards or signed an agreement or anything. We were just assholes.
So what you're telling us is that you're essentially ground zero for the asshole movement in this country? Thanks Brian.WAS, my friend, WAS! I have been cured by this good fellow:
"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 - 
            I still can't get over the fact that this conversation doesn't happen if senseless violence doesn't occur to black men and women at the hands of police. Once again, the message is lost by focusing on a downstream result. We would have nothing to fear, if black men and women were treated equally to white men and women.
I wish I was a sacrifice, but somehow still lived on.0 - 
            Apparently a black man was shot and killed in LA yesterday after running from cops, punching a cop in the face once they caught up to him and armed with a handgun in a bag that he dropped upon punching the cop. So the obvious reaction is outrage, protesting and likely rioting next. There is an ongoing investigation, so I’ll wait for all of the facts to come out before rushing to judgement, but I’m becoming concerned that cops won’t be able to do anything to violent and/or armed criminals before long; at least not without the serious backlash of what comes next. This man punched a cop in the face while holding a bag with a gun in it. Think about that for a second. I know, I know....he didn’t have the gun in his hand. I’ll say it for you. But what are cops supposed to do? Take a shot to the face and then hold their hands in the air until he reaches for the gun? I think a non-lethal shot should have been used in this case. That’s the part I don’t understand. Take his leg out rather than shoot to kill, but in the heat of the moment, split second decisions need to be made and we don’t know if the gun was within reach of the criminal. I just think we’re on a very slippery slope here where a cop cannot even do his/her job when someone is violent, armed and dangerous (this man was all three).
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-08-31/man-fatally-shot-by-los-angeles-county-deputy-in-westmont%3f_amp=true
0 - 
            
Can there be reform in how to initially apprehend a suspect? It seems like more often than not this starts with resistance and escalates. I'm not in the camp of taking away a police officers right toward forceful apprehension, but it's the escalation that usually leads to something grave. What can be done from law enforcement's end to prevent escalation? Maybe nothing in this particular situation, but more often that not it seems to ramp up without a cop being punched in the face or something of the like.bbiggs said:Apparently a black man was shot and killed in LA yesterday after running from cops, punching a cop in the face once they caught up to him and armed with a handgun in a bag that he dropped upon punching the cop. So the obvious reaction is outrage, protesting and likely rioting next. There is an ongoing investigation, so I’ll wait for all of the facts to come out before rushing to judgement, but I’m becoming concerned that cops won’t be able to do anything to violent and/or armed criminals before long; at least not without the serious backlash of what comes next. This man punched a cop in the face while holding a bag with a gun in it. Think about that for a second. I know, I know....he didn’t have the gun in his hand. I’ll say it for you. But what are cops supposed to do? Take a shot to the face and then hold their hands in the air until he reaches for the gun? I think a non-lethal shot should have been used in this case. That’s the part I don’t understand. Take his leg out rather than shoot to kill, but in the heat of the moment, split second decisions need to be made and we don’t know if the gun was within reach of the criminal. I just think we’re on a very slippery slope here where a cop cannot even do his/her job when someone is violent, armed and dangerous (this man was all three).
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-08-31/man-fatally-shot-by-los-angeles-county-deputy-in-westmont%3f_amp=true
I wish I was a sacrifice, but somehow still lived on.0 - 
            ^ Just to expand on this. I don't expect the people in this thread to figure this out. It's up to the legislature to start taking the first step. However, the republican law makers just blew off Governor Evers request to convene to discuss potential reform from the fallout from Jacob Blake. This shit will keep going on until there are bipartisan efforts.
I wish I was a sacrifice, but somehow still lived on.0 - 
            
All good questions that need to be answered by folks with more control of the situation than you and I.Glorified KC said:
Can there be reform in how to initially apprehend a suspect? It seems like more often than not this starts with resistance and escalates. I'm not in the camp of taking away a police officers right toward forceful apprehension, but it's the escalation that usually leads to something grave. What can be done from law enforcement's end to prevent escalation? Maybe nothing in this particular situation, but more often that not it seems to ramp up without a cop being punched in the face or something of the like.bbiggs said:Apparently a black man was shot and killed in LA yesterday after running from cops, punching a cop in the face once they caught up to him and armed with a handgun in a bag that he dropped upon punching the cop. So the obvious reaction is outrage, protesting and likely rioting next. There is an ongoing investigation, so I’ll wait for all of the facts to come out before rushing to judgement, but I’m becoming concerned that cops won’t be able to do anything to violent and/or armed criminals before long; at least not without the serious backlash of what comes next. This man punched a cop in the face while holding a bag with a gun in it. Think about that for a second. I know, I know....he didn’t have the gun in his hand. I’ll say it for you. But what are cops supposed to do? Take a shot to the face and then hold their hands in the air until he reaches for the gun? I think a non-lethal shot should have been used in this case. That’s the part I don’t understand. Take his leg out rather than shoot to kill, but in the heat of the moment, split second decisions need to be made and we don’t know if the gun was within reach of the criminal. I just think we’re on a very slippery slope here where a cop cannot even do his/her job when someone is violent, armed and dangerous (this man was all three).
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-08-31/man-fatally-shot-by-los-angeles-county-deputy-in-westmont%3f_amp=true
0 - 
            
We agree fully. My post above was written before I read this and pretty much mirrors the response. I just don't want cops to be in fear of doing what is sometimes necessary due to the potential backlash. It seems to be trending in that direction.Glorified KC said:^ Just to expand on this. I don't expect the people in this thread to figure this out. It's up to the legislature to start taking the first step. However, the republican law makers just blew off Governor Evers request to convene to discuss potential reform from the fallout from Jacob Blake. This shit will keep going on until there are bipartisan efforts.
0 
This discussion has been closed.
            Categories
- All Categories
 - 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
 - 110.1K The Porch
 - 278 Vitalogy
 - 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
 - 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
 - 39.2K Flea Market
 - 39.2K Lost Dogs
 - 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
 - 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
 - 29.1K Other Music
 - 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
 - 1.1K The Art Wall
 - 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
 - 22.2K A Moving Train
 - 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
 - 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help
 









