Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez
Comments
-
And anyone willing to have a real conversation with people from other viewpoints instead of jumping to conclusions ot calling names will get to understand their points.
i was against socialized health for a very long time. Only recently did I begin to be open to it, and it’s not because I think it’s a great idea, but our current system continues to get worse. The biggest hurdle for me, and for just about anyone I have a real conversation with, isn’t that they are unwilling to help others or that some people just don’t deserve it. But it comes down to 1 thing. They don’t trust the government to run it effectively. And why would they? Has anyone ever met someone coming out of the DMV and say “wow. That was a great experience?” Literally every single thing run by the government has major flaws. Social Security is almost bankrupt, postal service sucks and is inefficient, the VA is corrupt and lets veterans die before taking care of them, our school system sucks. Why would medicine be the one thing we get right? It probably wouldn’t be, it would probably suck too. And those who are against it think, just like the DMV, they’ll die in the waiting room. But I’m at the point where a poorly run government health plan is probably better than this for greed system we have now.0 -
mace1229 said:HughFreakingDillon said:it's funny how all the people who criticize AOC for her response to "how are you going to pay for it?" with regards to basic human needs/rights might just be the same people that are a-ok with the government writing blank cheques in the name of protecting their "freedom".
you know what she's doing? showing you for the hypocrites you are.
And I’m not okay with blank checks for military either. I think everything should be cut back until we can reduce, or at least stabilize our debt.
There’s nothing hypocritical about criticizing someone who wants to spend $40 trillion with zero clue on how to pay for it. Who’s it going to help when the economy crashes and there is no government assistance at all?
criticism is warranted of any politician, but my own observation, with obvious exceptions, is that many fall into that category. no need to get offended if it doesn't apply to you.By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
mace1229 said:And anyone willing to have a real conversation with people from other viewpoints instead of jumping to conclusions ot calling names will get to understand their points.
i was against socialized health for a very long time. Only recently did I begin to be open to it, and it’s not because I think it’s a great idea, but our current system continues to get worse. The biggest hurdle for me, and for just about anyone I have a real conversation with, isn’t that they are unwilling to help others or that some people just don’t deserve it. But it comes down to 1 thing. They don’t trust the government to run it effectively. And why would they? Has anyone ever met someone coming out of the DMV and say “wow. That was a great experience?” Literally every single thing run by the government has major flaws. Social Security is almost bankrupt, postal service sucks and is inefficient, the VA is corrupt and lets veterans die before taking care of them, our school system sucks. Why would medicine be the one thing we get right? It probably wouldn’t be, it would probably suck too. And those who are against it think, just like the DMV, they’ll die in the waiting room. But I’m at the point where a poorly run government health plan is probably better than this for greed system we have now.
yes, there is unending corruption and waste in government, dare i say, on both sides. but as you've stated, the "for greed" system isn't sustainable for health of the populace.By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
HughFreakingDillon said:mace1229 said:HughFreakingDillon said:it's funny how all the people who criticize AOC for her response to "how are you going to pay for it?" with regards to basic human needs/rights might just be the same people that are a-ok with the government writing blank cheques in the name of protecting their "freedom".
you know what she's doing? showing you for the hypocrites you are.
And I’m not okay with blank checks for military either. I think everything should be cut back until we can reduce, or at least stabilize our debt.
There’s nothing hypocritical about criticizing someone who wants to spend $40 trillion with zero clue on how to pay for it. Who’s it going to help when the economy crashes and there is no government assistance at all?
criticism is warranted of any politician, but my own observation, with obvious exceptions, is that many fall into that category. no need to get offended if it doesn't apply to you.0 -
mace1229 said:HughFreakingDillon said:mace1229 said:HughFreakingDillon said:it's funny how all the people who criticize AOC for her response to "how are you going to pay for it?" with regards to basic human needs/rights might just be the same people that are a-ok with the government writing blank cheques in the name of protecting their "freedom".
you know what she's doing? showing you for the hypocrites you are.
And I’m not okay with blank checks for military either. I think everything should be cut back until we can reduce, or at least stabilize our debt.
There’s nothing hypocritical about criticizing someone who wants to spend $40 trillion with zero clue on how to pay for it. Who’s it going to help when the economy crashes and there is no government assistance at all?
criticism is warranted of any politician, but my own observation, with obvious exceptions, is that many fall into that category. no need to get offended if it doesn't apply to you.By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
HughFreakingDillon said:mace1229 said:HughFreakingDillon said:mace1229 said:HughFreakingDillon said:it's funny how all the people who criticize AOC for her response to "how are you going to pay for it?" with regards to basic human needs/rights might just be the same people that are a-ok with the government writing blank cheques in the name of protecting their "freedom".
you know what she's doing? showing you for the hypocrites you are.
And I’m not okay with blank checks for military either. I think everything should be cut back until we can reduce, or at least stabilize our debt.
There’s nothing hypocritical about criticizing someone who wants to spend $40 trillion with zero clue on how to pay for it. Who’s it going to help when the economy crashes and there is no government assistance at all?
criticism is warranted of any politician, but my own observation, with obvious exceptions, is that many fall into that category. no need to get offended if it doesn't apply to you.0 -
mace1229 said:HughFreakingDillon said:mace1229 said:HughFreakingDillon said:mace1229 said:HughFreakingDillon said:it's funny how all the people who criticize AOC for her response to "how are you going to pay for it?" with regards to basic human needs/rights might just be the same people that are a-ok with the government writing blank cheques in the name of protecting their "freedom".
you know what she's doing? showing you for the hypocrites you are.
And I’m not okay with blank checks for military either. I think everything should be cut back until we can reduce, or at least stabilize our debt.
There’s nothing hypocritical about criticizing someone who wants to spend $40 trillion with zero clue on how to pay for it. Who’s it going to help when the economy crashes and there is no government assistance at all?
criticism is warranted of any politician, but my own observation, with obvious exceptions, is that many fall into that category. no need to get offended if it doesn't apply to you.By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
gimmesometruth27 said:mace1229 said:nicknyr15 said:mace1229 said:oftenreading said:cincybearcat said:oftenreading said:cincybearcat said:Her speech did highlight major concern on mine with her thoughts and beliefs. She said she goes to work in Congress to make sure her constituents have a roof over their heads. Government providing. Everything.
I would hope that all elected officials are toward every constituent having a roof over their head, clean and safe water, accessible health care, safe schools, and the rest of what makes a decent society. That's not the same thing as "government providing everything".Everyone wants what she wants. We all want good healthcare for everyone and a roof, and food and good schools and the latest Air Jordan’s. The problem is some realize it costs more money than we have. Others just want to run up the debt and let the next generation worry about it. From what I can tell she’s the spend everything now and let others worry about it later type.
But you bring that up and the response is “you’re just afraid of smart young females.”hippiemom = goodness0 -
I love her new green deal. Love it. The cost to actually go through with it is a bit robust though.
Do I think college can be free? Sure can. Why a university costs 25K and up to attend is mind boggling.0 -
tempo_n_groove said:I love her new green deal. Love it. The cost to actually go through with it is a bit robust though.
Do I think college can be free? Sure can. Why a university costs 25K and up to attend is mind boggling.A college is going to have better facilities and equipment and wider range of options. But a public school has some other expenses too.
The biggest waste in college funding is how many classes professors take (other than coaches salaries). Many profs only teach 2 classes each semester. Literally 2 classes on M,W, F and that’s it in terms of teaching. They may have other obligations that make the school look better, like conducting research or a book deal or something. But those don’t really do a lot for kids. To me it’s kind of a joke to have a full time instructor literally teach 6 hours a week and the rest of their job is making the school look good.
Have teachers teach 20-25 hours a week will still allow plenty of time for grade Nd and prepping, etc. and put the other things as a side project, you could cut staff by more than half. School may then only cost 15-20k, and that seems reasonable. Not cheap I know, but on par with what k-12 education costs.Post edited by mace1229 on0 -
I'm not a fan.0
-
mace1229 said:tempo_n_groove said:I love her new green deal. Love it. The cost to actually go through with it is a bit robust though.
Do I think college can be free? Sure can. Why a university costs 25K and up to attend is mind boggling.A college is going to have better facilities and equipment and wider range of options. But a public school has some other expenses too.
The biggest waste in college funding is how many classes professors take (other than coaches salaries). Many profs only teach 2 classes each semester. Literally 2 classes on M,W, F and that’s it in terms of teaching. They may have other obligations that make the school look better, like conducting research or a book deal or something. But those don’t really do a lot for kids. To me it’s kind of a joke to have a full time instructor literally teach 6 hours a week and the rest of their job is making the school look good.
Have teachers teach 20-25 hours a week will still allow plenty of time for grade Nd and prepping, etc. and put the other things as a side project, you could cut staff by more than half. School may then only cost 15-20k, and that seems reasonable. Not cheap I know, but on par with what k-12 education costs.0 -
College costs and facilities are ridiculous. College should be two to three years max unless it is a field of public safety/health (health, engineering, etc...).
0 -
bootlegger10 said:College costs and facilities are ridiculous. College should be two to three years max unless it is a field of public safety/health (health, engineering, etc...).0
-
mrussel1 said:bootlegger10 said:College costs and facilities are ridiculous. College should be two to three years max unless it is a field of public safety/health (health, engineering, etc...).hippiemom = goodness0
-
mrussel1 said:bootlegger10 said:College costs and facilities are ridiculous. College should be two to three years max unless it is a field of public safety/health (health, engineering, etc...).Scio me nihil scire
There are no kings inside the gates of eden0 -
cincybearcat said:mrussel1 said:bootlegger10 said:College costs and facilities are ridiculous. College should be two to three years max unless it is a field of public safety/health (health, engineering, etc...).0
-
static111 said:mrussel1 said:bootlegger10 said:College costs and facilities are ridiculous. College should be two to three years max unless it is a field of public safety/health (health, engineering, etc...).0
-
mrussel1 said:static111 said:mrussel1 said:bootlegger10 said:College costs and facilities are ridiculous. College should be two to three years max unless it is a field of public safety/health (health, engineering, etc...).Scio me nihil scire
There are no kings inside the gates of eden0 -
cincybearcat said:mrussel1 said:bootlegger10 said:College costs and facilities are ridiculous. College should be two to three years max unless it is a field of public safety/health (health, engineering, etc...).This weekend we rock Portland0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help