America's Gun Violence

1800801803805806903

Comments

  • PJPOWER
    PJPOWER Posts: 6,499
    PJPOWER said:
    mrussel1 said:
    PJPOWER said:
    Sounds like a responsible gun owner.  I wonder if he got a price break on his ammo by buying in bulk.
    How was he a responsible gun owner?  Did you miss the part of the story about the past drug offenses?
    You mentioned that you are a gun owner...are you “responsible”?
    To be fair,  according to some of the logic here,  so long as his past drug offenses didn't include a firearm,  he's still a responsible gun owner.  Personally,  I would consider him a gun owner AND irresponsible. 
    I must have missed that “logic”.  I was under the impression that it is illegal to own firearms if you are a convicted felon or have a rap sheet full of drug offenses.  Oh, wait, this shit-for-brains didn’t care.
    And neither did a “responsible” gun owner.
    Irresponsible people can get their hands on guns, got it.  

  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,201
    edited August 2019
    PJPOWER said:
    PJPOWER said:
    mrussel1 said:
    PJPOWER said:
    Sounds like a responsible gun owner.  I wonder if he got a price break on his ammo by buying in bulk.
    How was he a responsible gun owner?  Did you miss the part of the story about the past drug offenses?
    You mentioned that you are a gun owner...are you “responsible”?
    To be fair,  according to some of the logic here,  so long as his past drug offenses didn't include a firearm,  he's still a responsible gun owner.  Personally,  I would consider him a gun owner AND irresponsible. 
    I must have missed that “logic”.  I was under the impression that it is illegal to own firearms if you are a convicted felon or have a rap sheet full of drug offenses.  Oh, wait, this shit-for-brains didn’t care.
    And neither did a “responsible” gun owner.
    Irresponsible people can get their hands on guns, got it.  

    Because of “responsible” gun owners, got it.
    Post edited by Halifax2TheMax on
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • PJPOWER said:
    PJPOWER said:
    mrussel1 said:
    PJPOWER said:
    Sounds like a responsible gun owner.  I wonder if he got a price break on his ammo by buying in bulk.
    How was he a responsible gun owner?  Did you miss the part of the story about the past drug offenses?
    You mentioned that you are a gun owner...are you “responsible”?
    To be fair,  according to some of the logic here,  so long as his past drug offenses didn't include a firearm,  he's still a responsible gun owner.  Personally,  I would consider him a gun owner AND irresponsible. 
    I must have missed that “logic”.  I was under the impression that it is illegal to own firearms if you are a convicted felon or have a rap sheet full of drug offenses.  Oh, wait, this shit-for-brains didn’t care.
    And neither did a “responsible” gun owner.
    Irresponsible people can get their hands on guns, got it.  

    Your Gun laws are laughable. 
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • get a grip. Solve this now. 
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576
    edited August 2019
    10,000 handgun bullets is a stockpile, period.
    They weren't target rounds either, so quit trying to justify this insanity because it makes you uncomfortable that your hobby is so closely adjacent to disturbing behavior.

    I've seen about 5 articles that specifically mention his quote advising people to "shoot all Federal officers on sight".
    Again, don't defend this wacko just because it makes you uncomfortable to be in a boat similar to his, do the research instead of playing the "don't know, can't say" card.
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • tempo_n_groove
    tempo_n_groove Posts: 41,377
    edited August 2019
    rgambs said:
    10,000 handgun bullets is a stockpile, period.
    They weren't target rounds either, so quit trying to justify this insanity because it makes you uncomfortable that your hobby is so closely adjacent to disturbing behavior.

    I've seen about 5 articles that specifically mention his quote advising people to "shoot all Federal officers on sight".
    Again, don't defend this wacko just because it makes you uncomfortable to be in a boat similar to his, do the research instead of playing the "don't know, can't say" card.
    I'll pipe up.

    I defend actions that I do/have done.  I keep forgetting that everyone ins't like myself, "responsible".

    The outrage is understandable as I tend to forget that others won't conduct themselves as I do.

    We'll hopefully find a way to something amicable.

    EDIT:  I tried finding other articles with what the dude said/threatened and came up zilcho.  Perhaps a day or so later more info has come out because initially it wasn't out there, just read the first two posted on here.
    Post edited by tempo_n_groove on
  • PJPOWER
    PJPOWER Posts: 6,499
    edited August 2019
    rgambs said:
    10,000 handgun bullets is a stockpile, period.
    They weren't target rounds either, so quit trying to justify this insanity because it makes you uncomfortable that your hobby is so closely adjacent to disturbing behavior.

    I've seen about 5 articles that specifically mention his quote advising people to "shoot all Federal officers on sight".
    Again, don't defend this wacko just because it makes you uncomfortable to be in a boat similar to his, do the research instead of playing the "don't know, can't say" card.
    Who are you talking to?  I sure as hell am not “defending” this wacko.  “A boat similar to his”?  What a joke...If he made threats against federal agents, then he should definitely be investigated.
    Post edited by PJPOWER on
  • tempo_n_groove
    tempo_n_groove Posts: 41,377
    PJPOWER said:
    rgambs said:
    10,000 handgun bullets is a stockpile, period.
    They weren't target rounds either, so quit trying to justify this insanity because it makes you uncomfortable that your hobby is so closely adjacent to disturbing behavior.

    I've seen about 5 articles that specifically mention his quote advising people to "shoot all Federal officers on sight".
    Again, don't defend this wacko just because it makes you uncomfortable to be in a boat similar to his, do the research instead of playing the "don't know, can't say" card.
    Who are you talking to?  I sure as hell am not “defending” this wacko.  “A boat similar to his”?  What a joke...If he made threats against federal agents, then he should definitely be investigated.
    I defended certain things because I didn't have all the facts and because people like to throw gas on the fire before all the info comes out.
  • PJPOWER
    PJPOWER Posts: 6,499
    edited August 2019
    PJPOWER said:
    rgambs said:
    10,000 handgun bullets is a stockpile, period.
    They weren't target rounds either, so quit trying to justify this insanity because it makes you uncomfortable that your hobby is so closely adjacent to disturbing behavior.

    I've seen about 5 articles that specifically mention his quote advising people to "shoot all Federal officers on sight".
    Again, don't defend this wacko just because it makes you uncomfortable to be in a boat similar to his, do the research instead of playing the "don't know, can't say" card.
    Who are you talking to?  I sure as hell am not “defending” this wacko.  “A boat similar to his”?  What a joke...If he made threats against federal agents, then he should definitely be investigated.
    I defended certain things because I didn't have all the facts and because people like to throw gas on the fire before all the info comes out.
    That seems like a normal train of thought in a country that favors due process.  How dare you believe someone is innocent until proven guilty!
    Post edited by PJPOWER on
  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,201
    PJPOWER said:
    PJPOWER said:
    rgambs said:
    10,000 handgun bullets is a stockpile, period.
    They weren't target rounds either, so quit trying to justify this insanity because it makes you uncomfortable that your hobby is so closely adjacent to disturbing behavior.

    I've seen about 5 articles that specifically mention his quote advising people to "shoot all Federal officers on sight".
    Again, don't defend this wacko just because it makes you uncomfortable to be in a boat similar to his, do the research instead of playing the "don't know, can't say" card.
    Who are you talking to?  I sure as hell am not “defending” this wacko.  “A boat similar to his”?  What a joke...If he made threats against federal agents, then he should definitely be investigated.
    I defended certain things because I didn't have all the facts and because people like to throw gas on the fire before all the info comes out.
    That seems like a normal train of thought in a country that favors due process.  How dare you believe someone is innocent until proven guilty!
    You mean like, “lock her up” innocent until proven guilty? Or Benghazi innocent until proven guilty? Maybe Uranium One innocent or Cosmic Pizza innocent? Give us a break from your fetish defense please. And some people voted a certain way because of that “guilt.”
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • PJPOWER said:
    PJPOWER said:
    rgambs said:
    10,000 handgun bullets is a stockpile, period.
    They weren't target rounds either, so quit trying to justify this insanity because it makes you uncomfortable that your hobby is so closely adjacent to disturbing behavior.

    I've seen about 5 articles that specifically mention his quote advising people to "shoot all Federal officers on sight".
    Again, don't defend this wacko just because it makes you uncomfortable to be in a boat similar to his, do the research instead of playing the "don't know, can't say" card.
    Who are you talking to?  I sure as hell am not “defending” this wacko.  “A boat similar to his”?  What a joke...If he made threats against federal agents, then he should definitely be investigated.
    I defended certain things because I didn't have all the facts and because people like to throw gas on the fire before all the info comes out.
    That seems like a normal train of thought in a country that favors due process.  How dare you believe someone is innocent until proven guilty!
    The court system has nothing to do with "believing" 

    If you "believe" OJ is innocent, even without him being proven guilty, than you are a dumbass. Whether being a country that favors due process or the country where cops murder black people like dogs in the streets.
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • PJPOWER
    PJPOWER Posts: 6,499
    PJPOWER said:
    PJPOWER said:
    rgambs said:
    10,000 handgun bullets is a stockpile, period.
    They weren't target rounds either, so quit trying to justify this insanity because it makes you uncomfortable that your hobby is so closely adjacent to disturbing behavior.

    I've seen about 5 articles that specifically mention his quote advising people to "shoot all Federal officers on sight".
    Again, don't defend this wacko just because it makes you uncomfortable to be in a boat similar to his, do the research instead of playing the "don't know, can't say" card.
    Who are you talking to?  I sure as hell am not “defending” this wacko.  “A boat similar to his”?  What a joke...If he made threats against federal agents, then he should definitely be investigated.
    I defended certain things because I didn't have all the facts and because people like to throw gas on the fire before all the info comes out.
    That seems like a normal train of thought in a country that favors due process.  How dare you believe someone is innocent until proven guilty!
    You mean like, “lock her up” innocent until proven guilty? Or Benghazi innocent until proven guilty? Maybe Uranium One innocent or Cosmic Pizza innocent? Give us a break from your fetish defense please. And some people voted a certain way because of that “guilt.”
    Straw mans again?  Yes, I believe in innocence until proven guilty...period.
  • PJPOWER
    PJPOWER Posts: 6,499
    PJPOWER said:
    PJPOWER said:
    rgambs said:
    10,000 handgun bullets is a stockpile, period.
    They weren't target rounds either, so quit trying to justify this insanity because it makes you uncomfortable that your hobby is so closely adjacent to disturbing behavior.

    I've seen about 5 articles that specifically mention his quote advising people to "shoot all Federal officers on sight".
    Again, don't defend this wacko just because it makes you uncomfortable to be in a boat similar to his, do the research instead of playing the "don't know, can't say" card.
    Who are you talking to?  I sure as hell am not “defending” this wacko.  “A boat similar to his”?  What a joke...If he made threats against federal agents, then he should definitely be investigated.
    I defended certain things because I didn't have all the facts and because people like to throw gas on the fire before all the info comes out.
    That seems like a normal train of thought in a country that favors due process.  How dare you believe someone is innocent until proven guilty!
    The court system has nothing to do with "believing" 

    If you "believe" OJ is innocent, even without him being proven guilty, than you are a dumbass. Whether being a country that favors due process or the country where cops murder black people like dogs in the streets.
    It doesn’t really surprise me that you do not agree with due process. 
  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,201
    PJPOWER said:
    PJPOWER said:
    PJPOWER said:
    rgambs said:
    10,000 handgun bullets is a stockpile, period.
    They weren't target rounds either, so quit trying to justify this insanity because it makes you uncomfortable that your hobby is so closely adjacent to disturbing behavior.

    I've seen about 5 articles that specifically mention his quote advising people to "shoot all Federal officers on sight".
    Again, don't defend this wacko just because it makes you uncomfortable to be in a boat similar to his, do the research instead of playing the "don't know, can't say" card.
    Who are you talking to?  I sure as hell am not “defending” this wacko.  “A boat similar to his”?  What a joke...If he made threats against federal agents, then he should definitely be investigated.
    I defended certain things because I didn't have all the facts and because people like to throw gas on the fire before all the info comes out.
    That seems like a normal train of thought in a country that favors due process.  How dare you believe someone is innocent until proven guilty!
    You mean like, “lock her up” innocent until proven guilty? Or Benghazi innocent until proven guilty? Maybe Uranium One innocent or Cosmic Pizza innocent? Give us a break from your fetish defense please. And some people voted a certain way because of that “guilt.”
    Straw mans again?  Yes, I believe in innocence until proven guilty...period.
    But you didn’t believe in Hillary’s innocence though, did you?
     
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • PJPOWER
    PJPOWER Posts: 6,499
    PJPOWER said:
    PJPOWER said:
    PJPOWER said:
    rgambs said:
    10,000 handgun bullets is a stockpile, period.
    They weren't target rounds either, so quit trying to justify this insanity because it makes you uncomfortable that your hobby is so closely adjacent to disturbing behavior.

    I've seen about 5 articles that specifically mention his quote advising people to "shoot all Federal officers on sight".
    Again, don't defend this wacko just because it makes you uncomfortable to be in a boat similar to his, do the research instead of playing the "don't know, can't say" card.
    Who are you talking to?  I sure as hell am not “defending” this wacko.  “A boat similar to his”?  What a joke...If he made threats against federal agents, then he should definitely be investigated.
    I defended certain things because I didn't have all the facts and because people like to throw gas on the fire before all the info comes out.
    That seems like a normal train of thought in a country that favors due process.  How dare you believe someone is innocent until proven guilty!
    You mean like, “lock her up” innocent until proven guilty? Or Benghazi innocent until proven guilty? Maybe Uranium One innocent or Cosmic Pizza innocent? Give us a break from your fetish defense please. And some people voted a certain way because of that “guilt.”
    Straw mans again?  Yes, I believe in innocence until proven guilty...period.
    But you didn’t believe in Hillary’s innocence though, did you?
     
    I didn’t trust her, just like I wouldn’t trust the wacko here.  You are comparing apples and oranges here.
  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,471
    edited August 2019
    PJPOWER said:
    PJPOWER said:
    PJPOWER said:
    rgambs said:
    10,000 handgun bullets is a stockpile, period.
    They weren't target rounds either, so quit trying to justify this insanity because it makes you uncomfortable that your hobby is so closely adjacent to disturbing behavior.

    I've seen about 5 articles that specifically mention his quote advising people to "shoot all Federal officers on sight".
    Again, don't defend this wacko just because it makes you uncomfortable to be in a boat similar to his, do the research instead of playing the "don't know, can't say" card.
    Who are you talking to?  I sure as hell am not “defending” this wacko.  “A boat similar to his”?  What a joke...If he made threats against federal agents, then he should definitely be investigated.
    I defended certain things because I didn't have all the facts and because people like to throw gas on the fire before all the info comes out.
    That seems like a normal train of thought in a country that favors due process.  How dare you believe someone is innocent until proven guilty!
    The court system has nothing to do with "believing" 

    If you "believe" OJ is innocent, even without him being proven guilty, than you are a dumbass. Whether being a country that favors due process or the country where cops murder black people like dogs in the streets.
    It doesn’t really surprise me that you do not agree with due process. 
    It doesn't surprise me your reading comprehension is severely lacking. In your boat.
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,201
    PJPOWER said:
    PJPOWER said:
    PJPOWER said:
    PJPOWER said:
    rgambs said:
    10,000 handgun bullets is a stockpile, period.
    They weren't target rounds either, so quit trying to justify this insanity because it makes you uncomfortable that your hobby is so closely adjacent to disturbing behavior.

    I've seen about 5 articles that specifically mention his quote advising people to "shoot all Federal officers on sight".
    Again, don't defend this wacko just because it makes you uncomfortable to be in a boat similar to his, do the research instead of playing the "don't know, can't say" card.
    Who are you talking to?  I sure as hell am not “defending” this wacko.  “A boat similar to his”?  What a joke...If he made threats against federal agents, then he should definitely be investigated.
    I defended certain things because I didn't have all the facts and because people like to throw gas on the fire before all the info comes out.
    That seems like a normal train of thought in a country that favors due process.  How dare you believe someone is innocent until proven guilty!
    You mean like, “lock her up” innocent until proven guilty? Or Benghazi innocent until proven guilty? Maybe Uranium One innocent or Cosmic Pizza innocent? Give us a break from your fetish defense please. And some people voted a certain way because of that “guilt.”
    Straw mans again?  Yes, I believe in innocence until proven guilty...period.
    But you didn’t believe in Hillary’s innocence though, did you?
     
    I didn’t trust her, just like I wouldn’t trust the wacko here.  You are comparing apples and oranges here.
    “Trust” and “innocence” are not the same thing. You’re comparing apples and oranges. Whoa, whoa, whoa, I just know that damn Hillary is guilty of something, dammit! Do you think Team Trump Treason is innocent? Do you trust him? Think he’d be a “responsible” gun owner?
     
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • mcgruff10
    mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 29,117
    PJPOWER said:
    PJPOWER said:
    PJPOWER said:
    PJPOWER said:
    rgambs said:
    10,000 handgun bullets is a stockpile, period.
    They weren't target rounds either, so quit trying to justify this insanity because it makes you uncomfortable that your hobby is so closely adjacent to disturbing behavior.

    I've seen about 5 articles that specifically mention his quote advising people to "shoot all Federal officers on sight".
    Again, don't defend this wacko just because it makes you uncomfortable to be in a boat similar to his, do the research instead of playing the "don't know, can't say" card.
    Who are you talking to?  I sure as hell am not “defending” this wacko.  “A boat similar to his”?  What a joke...If he made threats against federal agents, then he should definitely be investigated.
    I defended certain things because I didn't have all the facts and because people like to throw gas on the fire before all the info comes out.
    That seems like a normal train of thought in a country that favors due process.  How dare you believe someone is innocent until proven guilty!
    You mean like, “lock her up” innocent until proven guilty? Or Benghazi innocent until proven guilty? Maybe Uranium One innocent or Cosmic Pizza innocent? Give us a break from your fetish defense please. And some people voted a certain way because of that “guilt.”
    Straw mans again?  Yes, I believe in innocence until proven guilty...period.
    But you didn’t believe in Hillary’s innocence though, did you?
     
    I didn’t trust her, just like I wouldn’t trust the wacko here.  You are comparing apples and oranges here.
    “Trust” and “innocence” are not the same thing. You’re comparing apples and oranges. Whoa, whoa, whoa, I just know that damn Hillary is guilty of something, dammit! Do you think Team Trump Treason is innocent? Do you trust him? Think he’d be a “responsible” gun owner?
     
    I'm pretty sure Trump has a permit to carry; I don't like the guy but no reason to think he isn't a responsible gun owner.  
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • ed243421
    ed243421 Posts: 7,730

    The whole world will be different soon... - EV
    RED ROCKS 6-19-95
    AUGUSTA 9-26-96
    MANSFIELD 9-15-98
    BOSTON 9-29-04
    BOSTON 5-25-06
    MANSFIELD 6-30-08
    EV SOLO BOSTON 8-01-08
    BOSTON 5-17-10
    EV SOLO BOSTON 6-16-11
    PJ20 9-3-11
    PJ20 9-4-11
    WRIGLEY 7-19-13
    WORCESTER 10-15-13
    WORCESTER 10-16-13
    HARTFORD 10-25-13









  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,471
    edited August 2019
    mcgruff10 said:
    PJPOWER said:
    PJPOWER said:
    PJPOWER said:
    PJPOWER said:
    rgambs said:
    10,000 handgun bullets is a stockpile, period.
    They weren't target rounds either, so quit trying to justify this insanity because it makes you uncomfortable that your hobby is so closely adjacent to disturbing behavior.

    I've seen about 5 articles that specifically mention his quote advising people to "shoot all Federal officers on sight".
    Again, don't defend this wacko just because it makes you uncomfortable to be in a boat similar to his, do the research instead of playing the "don't know, can't say" card.
    Who are you talking to?  I sure as hell am not “defending” this wacko.  “A boat similar to his”?  What a joke...If he made threats against federal agents, then he should definitely be investigated.
    I defended certain things because I didn't have all the facts and because people like to throw gas on the fire before all the info comes out.
    That seems like a normal train of thought in a country that favors due process.  How dare you believe someone is innocent until proven guilty!
    You mean like, “lock her up” innocent until proven guilty? Or Benghazi innocent until proven guilty? Maybe Uranium One innocent or Cosmic Pizza innocent? Give us a break from your fetish defense please. And some people voted a certain way because of that “guilt.”
    Straw mans again?  Yes, I believe in innocence until proven guilty...period.
    But you didn’t believe in Hillary’s innocence though, did you?
     
    I didn’t trust her, just like I wouldn’t trust the wacko here.  You are comparing apples and oranges here.
    “Trust” and “innocence” are not the same thing. You’re comparing apples and oranges. Whoa, whoa, whoa, I just know that damn Hillary is guilty of something, dammit! Do you think Team Trump Treason is innocent? Do you trust him? Think he’d be a “responsible” gun owner?
     
    I'm pretty sure Trump has a permit to carry; I don't like the guy but no reason to think he isn't a responsible gun owner.  
    He can't colour the american flag.
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
This discussion has been closed.