America's Gun Violence
Comments
-
Irresponsible people can get their hands on guns, got it.Halifax2TheMax said:
And neither did a “responsible” gun owner.PJPOWER said:
I must have missed that “logic”. I was under the impression that it is illegal to own firearms if you are a convicted felon or have a rap sheet full of drug offenses. Oh, wait, this shit-for-brains didn’t care.mrussel1 said:
To be fair, according to some of the logic here, so long as his past drug offenses didn't include a firearm, he's still a responsible gun owner. Personally, I would consider him a gun owner AND irresponsible.PJPOWER said:
How was he a responsible gun owner? Did you miss the part of the story about the past drug offenses?Gern Blansten said:Sounds like a responsible gun owner. I wonder if he got a price break on his ammo by buying in bulk.
You mentioned that you are a gun owner...are you “responsible”?
0 -
Because of “responsible” gun owners, got it.PJPOWER said:
Irresponsible people can get their hands on guns, got it.Halifax2TheMax said:
And neither did a “responsible” gun owner.PJPOWER said:
I must have missed that “logic”. I was under the impression that it is illegal to own firearms if you are a convicted felon or have a rap sheet full of drug offenses. Oh, wait, this shit-for-brains didn’t care.mrussel1 said:
To be fair, according to some of the logic here, so long as his past drug offenses didn't include a firearm, he's still a responsible gun owner. Personally, I would consider him a gun owner AND irresponsible.PJPOWER said:
How was he a responsible gun owner? Did you miss the part of the story about the past drug offenses?Gern Blansten said:Sounds like a responsible gun owner. I wonder if he got a price break on his ammo by buying in bulk.
You mentioned that you are a gun owner...are you “responsible”?Post edited by Halifax2TheMax on09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Your Gun laws are laughable.PJPOWER said:
Irresponsible people can get their hands on guns, got it.Halifax2TheMax said:
And neither did a “responsible” gun owner.PJPOWER said:
I must have missed that “logic”. I was under the impression that it is illegal to own firearms if you are a convicted felon or have a rap sheet full of drug offenses. Oh, wait, this shit-for-brains didn’t care.mrussel1 said:
To be fair, according to some of the logic here, so long as his past drug offenses didn't include a firearm, he's still a responsible gun owner. Personally, I would consider him a gun owner AND irresponsible.PJPOWER said:
How was he a responsible gun owner? Did you miss the part of the story about the past drug offenses?Gern Blansten said:Sounds like a responsible gun owner. I wonder if he got a price break on his ammo by buying in bulk.
You mentioned that you are a gun owner...are you “responsible”?"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
get a grip. Solve this now."Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0
-
10,000 handgun bullets is a stockpile, period.
They weren't target rounds either, so quit trying to justify this insanity because it makes you uncomfortable that your hobby is so closely adjacent to disturbing behavior.
I've seen about 5 articles that specifically mention his quote advising people to "shoot all Federal officers on sight".
Again, don't defend this wacko just because it makes you uncomfortable to be in a boat similar to his, do the research instead of playing the "don't know, can't say" card.Monkey Driven, Call this Living?0 -
I'll pipe up.rgambs said:10,000 handgun bullets is a stockpile, period.
They weren't target rounds either, so quit trying to justify this insanity because it makes you uncomfortable that your hobby is so closely adjacent to disturbing behavior.
I've seen about 5 articles that specifically mention his quote advising people to "shoot all Federal officers on sight".
Again, don't defend this wacko just because it makes you uncomfortable to be in a boat similar to his, do the research instead of playing the "don't know, can't say" card.
I defend actions that I do/have done. I keep forgetting that everyone ins't like myself, "responsible".
The outrage is understandable as I tend to forget that others won't conduct themselves as I do.
We'll hopefully find a way to something amicable.
EDIT: I tried finding other articles with what the dude said/threatened and came up zilcho. Perhaps a day or so later more info has come out because initially it wasn't out there, just read the first two posted on here.Post edited by tempo_n_groove on0 -
Who are you talking to? I sure as hell am not “defending” this wacko. “A boat similar to his”? What a joke...If he made threats against federal agents, then he should definitely be investigated.rgambs said:10,000 handgun bullets is a stockpile, period.
They weren't target rounds either, so quit trying to justify this insanity because it makes you uncomfortable that your hobby is so closely adjacent to disturbing behavior.
I've seen about 5 articles that specifically mention his quote advising people to "shoot all Federal officers on sight".
Again, don't defend this wacko just because it makes you uncomfortable to be in a boat similar to his, do the research instead of playing the "don't know, can't say" card.Post edited by PJPOWER on0 -
I defended certain things because I didn't have all the facts and because people like to throw gas on the fire before all the info comes out.PJPOWER said:
Who are you talking to? I sure as hell am not “defending” this wacko. “A boat similar to his”? What a joke...If he made threats against federal agents, then he should definitely be investigated.rgambs said:10,000 handgun bullets is a stockpile, period.
They weren't target rounds either, so quit trying to justify this insanity because it makes you uncomfortable that your hobby is so closely adjacent to disturbing behavior.
I've seen about 5 articles that specifically mention his quote advising people to "shoot all Federal officers on sight".
Again, don't defend this wacko just because it makes you uncomfortable to be in a boat similar to his, do the research instead of playing the "don't know, can't say" card.0 -
That seems like a normal train of thought in a country that favors due process. How dare you believe someone is innocent until proven guilty!tempo_n_groove said:
I defended certain things because I didn't have all the facts and because people like to throw gas on the fire before all the info comes out.PJPOWER said:
Who are you talking to? I sure as hell am not “defending” this wacko. “A boat similar to his”? What a joke...If he made threats against federal agents, then he should definitely be investigated.rgambs said:10,000 handgun bullets is a stockpile, period.
They weren't target rounds either, so quit trying to justify this insanity because it makes you uncomfortable that your hobby is so closely adjacent to disturbing behavior.
I've seen about 5 articles that specifically mention his quote advising people to "shoot all Federal officers on sight".
Again, don't defend this wacko just because it makes you uncomfortable to be in a boat similar to his, do the research instead of playing the "don't know, can't say" card.Post edited by PJPOWER on0 -
You mean like, “lock her up” innocent until proven guilty? Or Benghazi innocent until proven guilty? Maybe Uranium One innocent or Cosmic Pizza innocent? Give us a break from your fetish defense please. And some people voted a certain way because of that “guilt.”PJPOWER said:
That seems like a normal train of thought in a country that favors due process. How dare you believe someone is innocent until proven guilty!tempo_n_groove said:
I defended certain things because I didn't have all the facts and because people like to throw gas on the fire before all the info comes out.PJPOWER said:
Who are you talking to? I sure as hell am not “defending” this wacko. “A boat similar to his”? What a joke...If he made threats against federal agents, then he should definitely be investigated.rgambs said:10,000 handgun bullets is a stockpile, period.
They weren't target rounds either, so quit trying to justify this insanity because it makes you uncomfortable that your hobby is so closely adjacent to disturbing behavior.
I've seen about 5 articles that specifically mention his quote advising people to "shoot all Federal officers on sight".
Again, don't defend this wacko just because it makes you uncomfortable to be in a boat similar to his, do the research instead of playing the "don't know, can't say" card.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
The court system has nothing to do with "believing"PJPOWER said:
That seems like a normal train of thought in a country that favors due process. How dare you believe someone is innocent until proven guilty!tempo_n_groove said:
I defended certain things because I didn't have all the facts and because people like to throw gas on the fire before all the info comes out.PJPOWER said:
Who are you talking to? I sure as hell am not “defending” this wacko. “A boat similar to his”? What a joke...If he made threats against federal agents, then he should definitely be investigated.rgambs said:10,000 handgun bullets is a stockpile, period.
They weren't target rounds either, so quit trying to justify this insanity because it makes you uncomfortable that your hobby is so closely adjacent to disturbing behavior.
I've seen about 5 articles that specifically mention his quote advising people to "shoot all Federal officers on sight".
Again, don't defend this wacko just because it makes you uncomfortable to be in a boat similar to his, do the research instead of playing the "don't know, can't say" card.
If you "believe" OJ is innocent, even without him being proven guilty, than you are a dumbass. Whether being a country that favors due process or the country where cops murder black people like dogs in the streets."Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
Straw mans again? Yes, I believe in innocence until proven guilty...period.Halifax2TheMax said:
You mean like, “lock her up” innocent until proven guilty? Or Benghazi innocent until proven guilty? Maybe Uranium One innocent or Cosmic Pizza innocent? Give us a break from your fetish defense please. And some people voted a certain way because of that “guilt.”PJPOWER said:
That seems like a normal train of thought in a country that favors due process. How dare you believe someone is innocent until proven guilty!tempo_n_groove said:
I defended certain things because I didn't have all the facts and because people like to throw gas on the fire before all the info comes out.PJPOWER said:
Who are you talking to? I sure as hell am not “defending” this wacko. “A boat similar to his”? What a joke...If he made threats against federal agents, then he should definitely be investigated.rgambs said:10,000 handgun bullets is a stockpile, period.
They weren't target rounds either, so quit trying to justify this insanity because it makes you uncomfortable that your hobby is so closely adjacent to disturbing behavior.
I've seen about 5 articles that specifically mention his quote advising people to "shoot all Federal officers on sight".
Again, don't defend this wacko just because it makes you uncomfortable to be in a boat similar to his, do the research instead of playing the "don't know, can't say" card.0 -
It doesn’t really surprise me that you do not agree with due process.Spiritual_Chaos said:
The court system has nothing to do with "believing"PJPOWER said:
That seems like a normal train of thought in a country that favors due process. How dare you believe someone is innocent until proven guilty!tempo_n_groove said:
I defended certain things because I didn't have all the facts and because people like to throw gas on the fire before all the info comes out.PJPOWER said:
Who are you talking to? I sure as hell am not “defending” this wacko. “A boat similar to his”? What a joke...If he made threats against federal agents, then he should definitely be investigated.rgambs said:10,000 handgun bullets is a stockpile, period.
They weren't target rounds either, so quit trying to justify this insanity because it makes you uncomfortable that your hobby is so closely adjacent to disturbing behavior.
I've seen about 5 articles that specifically mention his quote advising people to "shoot all Federal officers on sight".
Again, don't defend this wacko just because it makes you uncomfortable to be in a boat similar to his, do the research instead of playing the "don't know, can't say" card.
If you "believe" OJ is innocent, even without him being proven guilty, than you are a dumbass. Whether being a country that favors due process or the country where cops murder black people like dogs in the streets.0 -
But you didn’t believe in Hillary’s innocence though, did you?PJPOWER said:
Straw mans again? Yes, I believe in innocence until proven guilty...period.Halifax2TheMax said:
You mean like, “lock her up” innocent until proven guilty? Or Benghazi innocent until proven guilty? Maybe Uranium One innocent or Cosmic Pizza innocent? Give us a break from your fetish defense please. And some people voted a certain way because of that “guilt.”PJPOWER said:
That seems like a normal train of thought in a country that favors due process. How dare you believe someone is innocent until proven guilty!tempo_n_groove said:
I defended certain things because I didn't have all the facts and because people like to throw gas on the fire before all the info comes out.PJPOWER said:
Who are you talking to? I sure as hell am not “defending” this wacko. “A boat similar to his”? What a joke...If he made threats against federal agents, then he should definitely be investigated.rgambs said:10,000 handgun bullets is a stockpile, period.
They weren't target rounds either, so quit trying to justify this insanity because it makes you uncomfortable that your hobby is so closely adjacent to disturbing behavior.
I've seen about 5 articles that specifically mention his quote advising people to "shoot all Federal officers on sight".
Again, don't defend this wacko just because it makes you uncomfortable to be in a boat similar to his, do the research instead of playing the "don't know, can't say" card.
09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
I didn’t trust her, just like I wouldn’t trust the wacko here. You are comparing apples and oranges here.Halifax2TheMax said:
But you didn’t believe in Hillary’s innocence though, did you?PJPOWER said:
Straw mans again? Yes, I believe in innocence until proven guilty...period.Halifax2TheMax said:
You mean like, “lock her up” innocent until proven guilty? Or Benghazi innocent until proven guilty? Maybe Uranium One innocent or Cosmic Pizza innocent? Give us a break from your fetish defense please. And some people voted a certain way because of that “guilt.”PJPOWER said:
That seems like a normal train of thought in a country that favors due process. How dare you believe someone is innocent until proven guilty!tempo_n_groove said:
I defended certain things because I didn't have all the facts and because people like to throw gas on the fire before all the info comes out.PJPOWER said:
Who are you talking to? I sure as hell am not “defending” this wacko. “A boat similar to his”? What a joke...If he made threats against federal agents, then he should definitely be investigated.rgambs said:10,000 handgun bullets is a stockpile, period.
They weren't target rounds either, so quit trying to justify this insanity because it makes you uncomfortable that your hobby is so closely adjacent to disturbing behavior.
I've seen about 5 articles that specifically mention his quote advising people to "shoot all Federal officers on sight".
Again, don't defend this wacko just because it makes you uncomfortable to be in a boat similar to his, do the research instead of playing the "don't know, can't say" card.
0 -
It doesn't surprise me your reading comprehension is severely lacking. In your boat.PJPOWER said:
It doesn’t really surprise me that you do not agree with due process.Spiritual_Chaos said:
The court system has nothing to do with "believing"PJPOWER said:
That seems like a normal train of thought in a country that favors due process. How dare you believe someone is innocent until proven guilty!tempo_n_groove said:
I defended certain things because I didn't have all the facts and because people like to throw gas on the fire before all the info comes out.PJPOWER said:
Who are you talking to? I sure as hell am not “defending” this wacko. “A boat similar to his”? What a joke...If he made threats against federal agents, then he should definitely be investigated.rgambs said:10,000 handgun bullets is a stockpile, period.
They weren't target rounds either, so quit trying to justify this insanity because it makes you uncomfortable that your hobby is so closely adjacent to disturbing behavior.
I've seen about 5 articles that specifically mention his quote advising people to "shoot all Federal officers on sight".
Again, don't defend this wacko just because it makes you uncomfortable to be in a boat similar to his, do the research instead of playing the "don't know, can't say" card.
If you "believe" OJ is innocent, even without him being proven guilty, than you are a dumbass. Whether being a country that favors due process or the country where cops murder black people like dogs in the streets.
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
“Trust” and “innocence” are not the same thing. You’re comparing apples and oranges. Whoa, whoa, whoa, I just know that damn Hillary is guilty of something, dammit! Do you think Team Trump Treason is innocent? Do you trust him? Think he’d be a “responsible” gun owner?PJPOWER said:
I didn’t trust her, just like I wouldn’t trust the wacko here. You are comparing apples and oranges here.Halifax2TheMax said:
But you didn’t believe in Hillary’s innocence though, did you?PJPOWER said:
Straw mans again? Yes, I believe in innocence until proven guilty...period.Halifax2TheMax said:
You mean like, “lock her up” innocent until proven guilty? Or Benghazi innocent until proven guilty? Maybe Uranium One innocent or Cosmic Pizza innocent? Give us a break from your fetish defense please. And some people voted a certain way because of that “guilt.”PJPOWER said:
That seems like a normal train of thought in a country that favors due process. How dare you believe someone is innocent until proven guilty!tempo_n_groove said:
I defended certain things because I didn't have all the facts and because people like to throw gas on the fire before all the info comes out.PJPOWER said:
Who are you talking to? I sure as hell am not “defending” this wacko. “A boat similar to his”? What a joke...If he made threats against federal agents, then he should definitely be investigated.rgambs said:10,000 handgun bullets is a stockpile, period.
They weren't target rounds either, so quit trying to justify this insanity because it makes you uncomfortable that your hobby is so closely adjacent to disturbing behavior.
I've seen about 5 articles that specifically mention his quote advising people to "shoot all Federal officers on sight".
Again, don't defend this wacko just because it makes you uncomfortable to be in a boat similar to his, do the research instead of playing the "don't know, can't say" card.
09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
I'm pretty sure Trump has a permit to carry; I don't like the guy but no reason to think he isn't a responsible gun owner.Halifax2TheMax said:
“Trust” and “innocence” are not the same thing. You’re comparing apples and oranges. Whoa, whoa, whoa, I just know that damn Hillary is guilty of something, dammit! Do you think Team Trump Treason is innocent? Do you trust him? Think he’d be a “responsible” gun owner?PJPOWER said:
I didn’t trust her, just like I wouldn’t trust the wacko here. You are comparing apples and oranges here.Halifax2TheMax said:
But you didn’t believe in Hillary’s innocence though, did you?PJPOWER said:
Straw mans again? Yes, I believe in innocence until proven guilty...period.Halifax2TheMax said:
You mean like, “lock her up” innocent until proven guilty? Or Benghazi innocent until proven guilty? Maybe Uranium One innocent or Cosmic Pizza innocent? Give us a break from your fetish defense please. And some people voted a certain way because of that “guilt.”PJPOWER said:
That seems like a normal train of thought in a country that favors due process. How dare you believe someone is innocent until proven guilty!tempo_n_groove said:
I defended certain things because I didn't have all the facts and because people like to throw gas on the fire before all the info comes out.PJPOWER said:
Who are you talking to? I sure as hell am not “defending” this wacko. “A boat similar to his”? What a joke...If he made threats against federal agents, then he should definitely be investigated.rgambs said:10,000 handgun bullets is a stockpile, period.
They weren't target rounds either, so quit trying to justify this insanity because it makes you uncomfortable that your hobby is so closely adjacent to disturbing behavior.
I've seen about 5 articles that specifically mention his quote advising people to "shoot all Federal officers on sight".
Again, don't defend this wacko just because it makes you uncomfortable to be in a boat similar to his, do the research instead of playing the "don't know, can't say" card.
I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
The whole world will be different soon... - EV
RED ROCKS 6-19-95
AUGUSTA 9-26-96
MANSFIELD 9-15-98
BOSTON 9-29-04
BOSTON 5-25-06
MANSFIELD 6-30-08
EV SOLO BOSTON 8-01-08
BOSTON 5-17-10
EV SOLO BOSTON 6-16-11
PJ20 9-3-11
PJ20 9-4-11
WRIGLEY 7-19-13
WORCESTER 10-15-13
WORCESTER 10-16-13
HARTFORD 10-25-130 -
He can't colour the american flag.mcgruff10 said:
I'm pretty sure Trump has a permit to carry; I don't like the guy but no reason to think he isn't a responsible gun owner.Halifax2TheMax said:
“Trust” and “innocence” are not the same thing. You’re comparing apples and oranges. Whoa, whoa, whoa, I just know that damn Hillary is guilty of something, dammit! Do you think Team Trump Treason is innocent? Do you trust him? Think he’d be a “responsible” gun owner?PJPOWER said:
I didn’t trust her, just like I wouldn’t trust the wacko here. You are comparing apples and oranges here.Halifax2TheMax said:
But you didn’t believe in Hillary’s innocence though, did you?PJPOWER said:
Straw mans again? Yes, I believe in innocence until proven guilty...period.Halifax2TheMax said:
You mean like, “lock her up” innocent until proven guilty? Or Benghazi innocent until proven guilty? Maybe Uranium One innocent or Cosmic Pizza innocent? Give us a break from your fetish defense please. And some people voted a certain way because of that “guilt.”PJPOWER said:
That seems like a normal train of thought in a country that favors due process. How dare you believe someone is innocent until proven guilty!tempo_n_groove said:
I defended certain things because I didn't have all the facts and because people like to throw gas on the fire before all the info comes out.PJPOWER said:
Who are you talking to? I sure as hell am not “defending” this wacko. “A boat similar to his”? What a joke...If he made threats against federal agents, then he should definitely be investigated.rgambs said:10,000 handgun bullets is a stockpile, period.
They weren't target rounds either, so quit trying to justify this insanity because it makes you uncomfortable that your hobby is so closely adjacent to disturbing behavior.
I've seen about 5 articles that specifically mention his quote advising people to "shoot all Federal officers on sight".
Again, don't defend this wacko just because it makes you uncomfortable to be in a boat similar to his, do the research instead of playing the "don't know, can't say" card.
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help