The Democratic Candidates
Comments
-
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0
-
Just listened to Bernie on Rogan on my drive. It was nice to hear a long-form interview where he actually has the time to explain things like how he intends to eliminate all student loan debt and how he would tackle healthcare. The guy does seem like a man of the people, and that’s why I happily voted for him over Clinton in the 2016 primary, but unfortunately I think that 2016 was his best chance. But we’ll see.2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024: Philly 2, 2025: Pittsburgh 1
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com0 -
I've thought that too. If I were a candidate I would go on YouTube after each debate and explain everything in great detail. Of course they probably don't want to do that so they don't give tRump ammo to use against them.benjs said:
Fully agree. As a fairly tech-forward person, I've been really disappointed at how many direct communication opportunities exist (what's to preclude any candidate from live-streaming on Youtube, Ask Me Anything on Quora/Reddit, writing a blog, etc.? Wasted opportunities so people can go on a crowded stage and produce no-detail soundbites for advertisers instead of solid information for citizens (exactly to your point).mickeyrat said:benjs said:
Maybe I missed it amidst the noise in the debates, but I don't recall Sanders answering this as directly and clearly as he did here. I wish he had - I thought the directness and clarity he showed here would've done him favours in the debate (and in his campaign frankly - I didn't know he had multiple volume settings until this interview).Spiritual_Chaos said:How Bernie Sanders Would Pay for Free Education
https://youtu.be/s-94l1QE5Kkdebate format at present and in general ,doesn't allow for this level of articulation. simply no time for it. especially with 20+ people.they spoke about it during this interview. So far Rogan has had 2 candidates on. I would welcome more for sure. not only because of the reach he has(more or better informed electorate) but the long form conversation is better. Ideas have room to breathe with some articulate push back as well.less sound bite driven and no gotcha bullshit. plus not beholden to advertisers on this platform.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
The whole "But how will they pay for it!" rhetoric and talking points - popping up in this thread from time to time - is pretty crazy, especially with Elisabeth Warren only having one catch phrase and that is "I have a plan for that".Ledbetterman10 said:Just listened to Bernie on Rogan on my drive. It was nice to hear a long-form interview where he actually has the time to explain things like how he intends to eliminate all student loan debt and how he would tackle healthcare. The guy does seem like a man of the people, and that’s why I happily voted for him over Clinton in the 2016 primary, but unfortunately I think that 2016 was his best chance. But we’ll see.
Believe it is the right thing to do or not. Believe it can be voted through or not. But obviously they have some idea on how it would work in practice.
Even if they don't have the time to break it down in a CNN debate."Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
Elizabeth Warren uses the same pool of money to pay for every one of her proposals, so far as I can tell. And secondly, that doesn't mean many of us want those tax dollars to be used for those purposes, specifically the wiping of student debt.Spiritual_Chaos said:
The whole "But how will they pay for it!" rhetoric and talking points - popping up in this thread from time to time - is pretty crazy, especially with Elisabeth Warren only having one catch phrase and that is "I have a plan for that".Ledbetterman10 said:Just listened to Bernie on Rogan on my drive. It was nice to hear a long-form interview where he actually has the time to explain things like how he intends to eliminate all student loan debt and how he would tackle healthcare. The guy does seem like a man of the people, and that’s why I happily voted for him over Clinton in the 2016 primary, but unfortunately I think that 2016 was his best chance. But we’ll see.
Believe it is the right thing to do or not. Believe it can be voted through or not. But obviously they have some idea on how it would work in practice.
Even if they don't have the time to break it down in a CNN debate.0 -
Read my bolded sentence for your "And secondly".mrussel1 said:
Elizabeth Warren uses the same pool of money to pay for every one of her proposals, so far as I can tell. And secondly, that doesn't mean many of us want those tax dollars to be used for those purposes, specifically the wiping of student debt.Spiritual_Chaos said:
The whole "But how will they pay for it!" rhetoric and talking points - popping up in this thread from time to time - is pretty crazy, especially with Elisabeth Warren only having one catch phrase and that is "I have a plan for that".Ledbetterman10 said:Just listened to Bernie on Rogan on my drive. It was nice to hear a long-form interview where he actually has the time to explain things like how he intends to eliminate all student loan debt and how he would tackle healthcare. The guy does seem like a man of the people, and that’s why I happily voted for him over Clinton in the 2016 primary, but unfortunately I think that 2016 was his best chance. But we’ll see.
Believe it is the right thing to do or not. Believe it can be voted through or not. But obviously they have some idea on how it would work in practice.
Even if they don't have the time to break it down in a CNN debate.
I would not want tax money to go to that either. But not every candidate is perfect. Or party. No point in doing what the 2nd amendment-nuts do. "everything or nothing will work" as I think you put it.
And your "the same pool" - I haven't seen any article about her talking out of her ass, so I put my faith in her pool or pools covering what she says good enough to get to keep saying what she says.Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
Yes, and Joe Biden better represents the things we can and should do, IMO. Namely banning assault rifles, expanding Obamacare (public/private option), not waiving student loans, etc.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Read my bolded sentence for your "And secondly".mrussel1 said:
Elizabeth Warren uses the same pool of money to pay for every one of her proposals, so far as I can tell. And secondly, that doesn't mean many of us want those tax dollars to be used for those purposes, specifically the wiping of student debt.Spiritual_Chaos said:
The whole "But how will they pay for it!" rhetoric and talking points - popping up in this thread from time to time - is pretty crazy, especially with Elisabeth Warren only having one catch phrase and that is "I have a plan for that".Ledbetterman10 said:Just listened to Bernie on Rogan on my drive. It was nice to hear a long-form interview where he actually has the time to explain things like how he intends to eliminate all student loan debt and how he would tackle healthcare. The guy does seem like a man of the people, and that’s why I happily voted for him over Clinton in the 2016 primary, but unfortunately I think that 2016 was his best chance. But we’ll see.
Believe it is the right thing to do or not. Believe it can be voted through or not. But obviously they have some idea on how it would work in practice.
Even if they don't have the time to break it down in a CNN debate.
I would not want tax money to go to that either. But not every candidate is perfect. Or party. No point in doing what the 2nd amendment-nuts do. "everything or nothing will work" as I think you put it.0 -
Spiritual_Chaos said:
My post did not have anything to do with chances against trump though. But about strategies if one would want to try and pass Biden in the polls.Lerxst1992 said:Spiritual_Chaos said:
Yep. Affirming my point. No one wants to see an old man being harassed like that. No one wants to see Obamas BFF being put down and looking sad. It made me, and I bet a lot of people just uncomfortable.Lerxst1992 said:Spiritual_Chaos said:
I think he came off good in Cuomos interview also.Halifax2TheMax said:
Thoughtful, intelligent, articulate, experienced and human.cincybearcat said:
Was he creepy or seem like he wanted to rest his eyes? Maybe this was his wake up callHalifax2TheMax said:
He was extremely human.mrussel1 said:
How did he doHalifax2TheMax said:If you haven’t seen Anderson Cooper’s interview with Sleepy Joe tonight, I highly recommend it and if he’s the party’s nominee and you pull the lever for Team Trump Treason, you need your head examined.
And when he is being attacked in the debates like last time (saw a montage of just the attacks) you feel for him. It's like watching someone who is innocent being harassed in an interrogation room by the "bad cop". If you have ever watched a scandinavian noir.
Even though Joe got punched often in the last debate, polls say he did ok
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/08/06/poll-elizabeth-warren-wins-second-debate-1448607
I don't think death of a thousand knifings or groupkicking him ASAP Rocky-style is gonna work with Biden.
They need instead to steal his thunder. And break through and make people see their vision as better.
Bernie or Liz lose to trump. The US is not Europe. Voters are not ready to accept govt controlled healthcare, unfortunately. Whether or not it "polls well."
And even if I think change can come more at once than this moderate idea of a wave building before it breaks, the thing about the US not being Europe, is what will make these type of memes being the truth for many, many New Years ahead (unfortunately):
To use a term from Turok 2: Seeds of Evil - maybe one day a "leap of faith" will be made.
It's not only "voters aren't ready" for govt controlled healthcare (they arent), it's that the US economy is devised to handle the current system.
Convincing employers to pay employees more salary instead of insurance benefits will be one of many headaches in addition to gutting the system and implementing a new one.
And in the US it needs to be implemented quickly, because about 19 months after a President Bernie or Liz were to be inaugurated, its midterm time. As a refresher, recall Obama and Congress, 2009- 2010.
That's why public option makes sense. People who want it can choose it. And all the govt has to do is require employers to add one choice to their benefits currently offered. Simpler first step. Voters will be able to see if it works for them. If it does, then propose MFA.
If the US elections were more representative of the popular vote, perhaps we could have a leap of faith.
Unfortunately for that, rural and middle Americans get a greater say in presidential elections than their population share.0 -
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0
-
If someone interested missed another longform talk with Bernie. A bit louder voice than in the Joe Rogan podcast. but anyways.
On healthcare
"Can you guarantee that no middleclass families taxes will go up by more than they currently are paying in premiums?"
Bernie: Yes, we can.
https://youtu.be/VKbXU_4yVE4
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
What is his definition of middle class? This is an extremely broad range when you look at middle class in San Francisco and middle class in Iowa. I'm curious how he can make such a guarantee.Spiritual_Chaos said:If someone interested missed another longform talk with Bernie. A bit louder voice than in the Joe Rogan podcast. but anyways.On healthcare
"Can you guarantee that no middleclass families taxes will go up by more than they currently are paying in premiums?"
Bernie: Yes, we can.
https://youtu.be/VKbXU_4yVE40 -
I actually like @Gern Blansten's idea for the candidates to go on YouTube and make videos giving detailed explanations of their stances because the debates are such a joke. He suggested they go on after the debates, but really it could be anytime. And it could be the candidate just talking to the camera, or being asked questions by some hand-picked interviewer.Spiritual_Chaos said:
The whole "But how will they pay for it!" rhetoric and talking points - popping up in this thread from time to time - is pretty crazy, especially with Elisabeth Warren only having one catch phrase and that is "I have a plan for that".Ledbetterman10 said:Just listened to Bernie on Rogan on my drive. It was nice to hear a long-form interview where he actually has the time to explain things like how he intends to eliminate all student loan debt and how he would tackle healthcare. The guy does seem like a man of the people, and that’s why I happily voted for him over Clinton in the 2016 primary, but unfortunately I think that 2016 was his best chance. But we’ll see.
Believe it is the right thing to do or not. Believe it can be voted through or not. But obviously they have some idea on how it would work in practice.
Even if they don't have the time to break it down in a CNN debate.
These debates (if you can call them that) have been so god-awful. Nobody gets enough time, everything gets spun and dissected on social media (with more emphasis on who "owned" who than who had the best policy proposals), there's "gotcha" questions, attacks on each other, etc. At least with a long-form interview like Bernie's and Rogan's, what Bernie said is what he said. There's nothing to read into. No body language to judge. Just questions and answers (with explanations). I'd like more of that.
2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024: Philly 2, 2025: Pittsburgh 1
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com0 -
I was impressed with Biden's speech today. He basically just trashed tRump but if he has that attitude as the nominee he's going to win.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
Yeah, I read someone say something like:Ledbetterman10 said:
I actually like @Gern Blansten's idea for the candidates to go on YouTube and make videos giving detailed explanations of their stances because the debates are such a joke. He suggested they go on after the debates, but really it could be anytime. And it could be the candidate just talking to the camera, or being asked questions by some hand-picked interviewer.Spiritual_Chaos said:
The whole "But how will they pay for it!" rhetoric and talking points - popping up in this thread from time to time - is pretty crazy, especially with Elisabeth Warren only having one catch phrase and that is "I have a plan for that".Ledbetterman10 said:Just listened to Bernie on Rogan on my drive. It was nice to hear a long-form interview where he actually has the time to explain things like how he intends to eliminate all student loan debt and how he would tackle healthcare. The guy does seem like a man of the people, and that’s why I happily voted for him over Clinton in the 2016 primary, but unfortunately I think that 2016 was his best chance. But we’ll see.
Believe it is the right thing to do or not. Believe it can be voted through or not. But obviously they have some idea on how it would work in practice.
Even if they don't have the time to break it down in a CNN debate.
These debates (if you can call them that) have been so god-awful. Nobody gets enough time, everything gets spun and dissected on social media (with more emphasis on who "owned" who than who had the best policy proposals), there's "gotcha" questions, attacks on each other, etc. At least with a long-form interview like Bernie's and Rogan's, what Bernie said is what he said. There's nothing to read into. No body language to judge. Just questions and answers (with explanations). I'd like more of that.
CNN in the debate: So candidate A has said this about you candidate C. Now fight!
CNN after the debate: They are fighting too much."Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
Yes, exactly. So annoying.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Yeah, I read someone say something like:Ledbetterman10 said:
I actually like @Gern Blansten's idea for the candidates to go on YouTube and make videos giving detailed explanations of their stances because the debates are such a joke. He suggested they go on after the debates, but really it could be anytime. And it could be the candidate just talking to the camera, or being asked questions by some hand-picked interviewer.Spiritual_Chaos said:
The whole "But how will they pay for it!" rhetoric and talking points - popping up in this thread from time to time - is pretty crazy, especially with Elisabeth Warren only having one catch phrase and that is "I have a plan for that".Ledbetterman10 said:Just listened to Bernie on Rogan on my drive. It was nice to hear a long-form interview where he actually has the time to explain things like how he intends to eliminate all student loan debt and how he would tackle healthcare. The guy does seem like a man of the people, and that’s why I happily voted for him over Clinton in the 2016 primary, but unfortunately I think that 2016 was his best chance. But we’ll see.
Believe it is the right thing to do or not. Believe it can be voted through or not. But obviously they have some idea on how it would work in practice.
Even if they don't have the time to break it down in a CNN debate.
These debates (if you can call them that) have been so god-awful. Nobody gets enough time, everything gets spun and dissected on social media (with more emphasis on who "owned" who than who had the best policy proposals), there's "gotcha" questions, attacks on each other, etc. At least with a long-form interview like Bernie's and Rogan's, what Bernie said is what he said. There's nothing to read into. No body language to judge. Just questions and answers (with explanations). I'd like more of that.
CNN in the debate: So candidate A has said this about you candidate C. Now fight!
CNN after the debate: They are fighting too much.0 -
It was good. A bit lacking in energy and stuttery and telepromptery. But agree it was good.Gern Blansten said:I was impressed with Biden's speech today. He basically just trashed tRump but if he has that attitude as the nominee he's going to win.
Betos honest "WHAT THE FUCK!?" was better though.Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
But I read that your country will do poorly with him. It will be one big crash, but at least China will be happy!mrussel1 said:
Yes, and Joe Biden better represents the things we can and should do, IMO. Namely banning assault rifles, expanding Obamacare (public/private option), not waiving student loans, etc.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Read my bolded sentence for your "And secondly".mrussel1 said:
Elizabeth Warren uses the same pool of money to pay for every one of her proposals, so far as I can tell. And secondly, that doesn't mean many of us want those tax dollars to be used for those purposes, specifically the wiping of student debt.Spiritual_Chaos said:
The whole "But how will they pay for it!" rhetoric and talking points - popping up in this thread from time to time - is pretty crazy, especially with Elisabeth Warren only having one catch phrase and that is "I have a plan for that".Ledbetterman10 said:Just listened to Bernie on Rogan on my drive. It was nice to hear a long-form interview where he actually has the time to explain things like how he intends to eliminate all student loan debt and how he would tackle healthcare. The guy does seem like a man of the people, and that’s why I happily voted for him over Clinton in the 2016 primary, but unfortunately I think that 2016 was his best chance. But we’ll see.
Believe it is the right thing to do or not. Believe it can be voted through or not. But obviously they have some idea on how it would work in practice.
Even if they don't have the time to break it down in a CNN debate.
I would not want tax money to go to that either. But not every candidate is perfect. Or party. No point in doing what the 2nd amendment-nuts do. "everything or nothing will work" as I think you put it."Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
Good guy Beto


Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
mcgruff10 said:
How much will my taxes go up? Where is the money coming from to pay for this?Spiritual_Chaos said:Elizabeth Warren: Medicare For All Is Cheaper Than Our Current System
https://youtu.be/RlHik6YAPns

Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
On the topic of American Cable News being bullshit that do not reach the standards of journalism and Beto being a good guy -
Beto schooling Chris Cuomo (4 minutes in):
https://youtu.be/Zxcn-B5JtL4
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.2K The Porch
- 279 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.3K Flea Market
- 39.3K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help

https://youtu.be/MPJ0AB12h1I




https://youtu.be/Td9v_8N_gvI