To the Person Who Just Dropped 3k on Ebay for Hartford '98 Poster

1356

Comments

  • Jimmydean55
    Jimmydean55 Posts: 1,618
    How would you know if a poster is a fake/reproduction anyway?
  • PB11041
    PB11041 Earth Posts: 2,845
    densan said:
    As a person who collects I see copies as taking food or income to live on from someone. When it's your living or passions no one should be that disrespectful or uncaring. All I can do is pass it on. Not cool at all. 
    How come no one has said anything about the Dallas 98 that appears to have sold for 3k recently. I may be missing something, but I watched it sell. I think I did at least. I may have been tricked. Dammit! This is not a link that has anything to do with me. Please do not think that.
    Here is a link:
    https://www.ebay.com/itm/1998-Ames-bros-Pearl-Jam-Poster-Artist-Print-79-350-Signed-By-The-Artist-Framed/163554001132?hash=item26149400ec:g:3vIAAOSw~9JcbLC8
    my guess is because it is confirmed on ebeans, a site that I would imagine about 1.5% of pearl jam fans knows exists.  
    His eminence has yet to show. 
    http://www.hi5sports.org/ (Sports Program for Kids with Disabilities)
    http://www.livefootsteps.org/user/?usr=3652

  • tempo_n_groove
    tempo_n_groove Posts: 42,163
    PB11041 said:
    densan said:
    As a person who collects I see copies as taking food or income to live on from someone. When it's your living or passions no one should be that disrespectful or uncaring. All I can do is pass it on. Not cool at all. 
    How come no one has said anything about the Dallas 98 that appears to have sold for 3k recently. I may be missing something, but I watched it sell. I think I did at least. I may have been tricked. Dammit! This is not a link that has anything to do with me. Please do not think that.
    Here is a link:
    https://www.ebay.com/itm/1998-Ames-bros-Pearl-Jam-Poster-Artist-Print-79-350-Signed-By-The-Artist-Framed/163554001132?hash=item26149400ec:g:3vIAAOSw~9JcbLC8
    my guess is because it is confirmed on ebeans, a site that I would imagine about 1.5% of pearl jam fans knows exists.  
    Those 1.5% also know that the site has been whack for a year now too.
  • tempo_n_groove
    tempo_n_groove Posts: 42,163
    Jimmydean55 said:
    How would you know if a poster is a fake/reproduction anyway?
    If you can't tell the difference then you shouldn't be buying high end posters.

    The paper it's printed on.

    99% of the PJ posters were silk screened.  The difference between a screen print and something on a computer is night and day.  You can see/feel the layers on a screen and the ink can be almost "cahalky", is that a good word to describe it?
  • deadendp
    deadendp Northeast Ohio Posts: 10,434
    edited March 2019
    tempo_n_groove said:
    Jimmydean55 said:
    How would you know if a poster is a fake/reproduction anyway?
    If you can't tell the difference then you shouldn't be buying high end posters.

    The paper it's printed on.

    99% of the PJ posters were silk screened.  The difference between a screen print and something on a computer is night and day.  You can see/feel the layers on a screen and the ink can be almost "cahalky", is that a good word to describe it?
    Are you trying to say chalky?  Just wondering.  :smiley:
    2014: Cincinnati
    2016: Lexington and Wrigley 1
  • Mattchew
    Mattchew Posts: 1,345
    densan said:
    As a person who collects I see copies as taking food or income to live on from someone. When it's your living or passions no one should be that disrespectful or uncaring. All I can do is pass it on. Not cool at all. 
    How come no one has said anything about the Dallas 98 that appears to have sold for 3k recently. I may be missing something, but I watched it sell. I think I did at least. I may have been tricked. Dammit! This is not a link that has anything to do with me. Please do not think that.
    Here is a link:
    https://www.ebay.com/itm/1998-Ames-bros-Pearl-Jam-Poster-Artist-Print-79-350-Signed-By-The-Artist-Framed/163554001132?hash=item26149400ec:g:3vIAAOSw~9JcbLC8
    I agree 100%!
  • tempo_n_groove
    tempo_n_groove Posts: 42,163
    deadendp said:
    tempo_n_groove said:
    Jimmydean55 said:
    How would you know if a poster is a fake/reproduction anyway?
    If you can't tell the difference then you shouldn't be buying high end posters.

    The paper it's printed on.

    99% of the PJ posters were silk screened.  The difference between a screen print and something on a computer is night and day.  You can see/feel the layers on a screen and the ink can be almost "cahalky", is that a good word to describe it?
    Are you trying to say chalky?  Just wondering.  :smiley:
    Yes, lol.  "Chalky".  Don't know what kind of brain fart that was?  Caulk and Chalk I guess?!?
  • deadendp
    deadendp Northeast Ohio Posts: 10,434
    tempo_n_groove said:
    deadendp said:
    tempo_n_groove said:
    Jimmydean55 said:
    How would you know if a poster is a fake/reproduction anyway?
    If you can't tell the difference then you shouldn't be buying high end posters.

    The paper it's printed on.

    99% of the PJ posters were silk screened.  The difference between a screen print and something on a computer is night and day.  You can see/feel the layers on a screen and the ink can be almost "cahalky", is that a good word to describe it?
    Are you trying to say chalky?  Just wondering.  :smiley:
    Yes, lol.  "Chalky".  Don't know what kind of brain fart that was?  Caulk and Chalk I guess?!?
    "Well, the surface is somewhat indescribable so I am going to blend a word and hope that they get it."  :lol:  It's all good.  I guess that another thing that came to mind is that a silk screen is not pixilated on the surface.  There are layers of ink.  There should be layers of ink. 
    2014: Cincinnati
    2016: Lexington and Wrigley 1
  • derbydave
    derbydave Columbus, OH Posts: 11,254
    tempo_n_groove said:
    PB11041 said:
    densan said:
    As a person who collects I see copies as taking food or income to live on from someone. When it's your living or passions no one should be that disrespectful or uncaring. All I can do is pass it on. Not cool at all. 
    How come no one has said anything about the Dallas 98 that appears to have sold for 3k recently. I may be missing something, but I watched it sell. I think I did at least. I may have been tricked. Dammit! This is not a link that has anything to do with me. Please do not think that.
    Here is a link:
    https://www.ebay.com/itm/1998-Ames-bros-Pearl-Jam-Poster-Artist-Print-79-350-Signed-By-The-Artist-Framed/163554001132?hash=item26149400ec:g:3vIAAOSw~9JcbLC8
    my guess is because it is confirmed on ebeans, a site that I would imagine about 1.5% of pearl jam fans knows exists.  
    Those 1.5% also know that the site has been whack for a year now too.
    Sure has...maybe even YEARS at this point!!
    '96: Seattle: Key Arena
    '98: Seattle: Memorial Stadium 1 & 2
    '00: Columbus: Polaris
    '03: Columbus: Germain
    '10: Columbus: Nationwide Arena
    '11: East Troy: Alpine Valley - PJ20 1 & 2 + EV Detroit
    '12: Missoula + EV Jacksonville 1 & 2
    '13: Chicago / Pittsburgh / Buffalo / Seattle
    '14: Cincinnati / St. Louis / Tulsa / Lincoln / Memphis / Detroit / Moline
    '15: New York City - Global Citizen Festival
    '16: Greenville / Hampton / Raleigh / Columbia / Lexington / Ottawa / Toronto 1 & 2 / Wrigley 1 & 2
    '17: Brooklyn - Rock & Roll Hall of Fame Induction Ceremony
    '18: London 1 & 2 / Seattle 1 & 2 / Missoula / Wrigley 1
    '22: Nashville / St. Louis


    http://www.livefootsteps.org/user/?usr=170

  • tempo_n_groove
    tempo_n_groove Posts: 42,163
    deadendp said:
    tempo_n_groove said:
    deadendp said:
    tempo_n_groove said:
    Jimmydean55 said:
    How would you know if a poster is a fake/reproduction anyway?
    If you can't tell the difference then you shouldn't be buying high end posters.

    The paper it's printed on.

    99% of the PJ posters were silk screened.  The difference between a screen print and something on a computer is night and day.  You can see/feel the layers on a screen and the ink can be almost "cahalky", is that a good word to describe it?
    Are you trying to say chalky?  Just wondering.  :smiley:
    Yes, lol.  "Chalky".  Don't know what kind of brain fart that was?  Caulk and Chalk I guess?!?
    "Well, the surface is somewhat indescribable so I am going to blend a word and hope that they get it."  :lol:  It's all good.  I guess that another thing that came to mind is that a silk screen is not pixilated on the surface.  There are layers of ink.  There should be layers of ink. 
    You got it so I guess I nailed it?!?

    Layers is another great way to describe it.  Thank you!!!
  • 2-feign-reluctance
    2-feign-reluctance TigerTown, USA Posts: 23,461
    tempo_n_groove said:
    deadendp said:
    tempo_n_groove said:
    Jimmydean55 said:
    How would you know if a poster is a fake/reproduction anyway?
    If you can't tell the difference then you shouldn't be buying high end posters.

    The paper it's printed on.

    99% of the PJ posters were silk screened.  The difference between a screen print and something on a computer is night and day.  You can see/feel the layers on a screen and the ink can be almost "cahalky", is that a good word to describe it?
    Are you trying to say chalky?  Just wondering.  :smiley:
    Yes, lol.  "Chalky".  Don't know what kind of brain fart that was?  Caulk and Chalk I guess?!?
    Chalky like a bottle of Maalox 'G!

    season 13 flirt GIF

    www.cluthelee.com
  • Jimmydean55
    Jimmydean55 Posts: 1,618
    tempo_n_groove said:
    Jimmydean55 said:
    How would you know if a poster is a fake/reproduction anyway?
    If you can't tell the difference then you shouldn't be buying high end posters.

    The paper it's printed on.

    99% of the PJ posters were silk screened.  The difference between a screen print and something on a computer is night and day.  You can see/feel the layers on a screen and the ink can be almost "cahalky", is that a good word to describe it?
    Yeah, I get what you’re saying. I understand it’s easy to tell the difference between a silkscreen and a digital printout. I just wasn’t sure if the fakes were better than just a digital print. 
  • tempo_n_groove
    tempo_n_groove Posts: 42,163
    Jimmydean55 said:
    tempo_n_groove said:
    Jimmydean55 said:
    How would you know if a poster is a fake/reproduction anyway?
    If you can't tell the difference then you shouldn't be buying high end posters.

    The paper it's printed on.

    99% of the PJ posters were silk screened.  The difference between a screen print and something on a computer is night and day.  You can see/feel the layers on a screen and the ink can be almost "cahalky", is that a good word to describe it?
    Yeah, I get what you’re saying. I understand it’s easy to tell the difference between a silkscreen and a digital printout. I just wasn’t sure if the fakes were better than just a digital print. 
    There is talk that fake silk screen posters are out there.  It's not that hard if you think about it and have the means.
  • Jimmydean55
    Jimmydean55 Posts: 1,618
    tempo_n_groove said:
    Jimmydean55 said:
    tempo_n_groove said:
    Jimmydean55 said:
    How would you know if a poster is a fake/reproduction anyway?
    If you can't tell the difference then you shouldn't be buying high end posters.

    The paper it's printed on.

    99% of the PJ posters were silk screened.  The difference between a screen print and something on a computer is night and day.  You can see/feel the layers on a screen and the ink can be almost "cahalky", is that a good word to describe it?
    Yeah, I get what you’re saying. I understand it’s easy to tell the difference between a silkscreen and a digital printout. I just wasn’t sure if the fakes were better than just a digital print. 
    There is talk that fake silk screen posters are out there.  It's not that hard if you think about it and have the means.
    Well, that would just suck to get a fake silkscreen. 
  • tempo_n_groove
    tempo_n_groove Posts: 42,163
    Jimmydean55 said:
    tempo_n_groove said:
    Jimmydean55 said:
    tempo_n_groove said:
    Jimmydean55 said:
    How would you know if a poster is a fake/reproduction anyway?
    If you can't tell the difference then you shouldn't be buying high end posters.

    The paper it's printed on.

    99% of the PJ posters were silk screened.  The difference between a screen print and something on a computer is night and day.  You can see/feel the layers on a screen and the ink can be almost "cahalky", is that a good word to describe it?
    Yeah, I get what you’re saying. I understand it’s easy to tell the difference between a silkscreen and a digital printout. I just wasn’t sure if the fakes were better than just a digital print. 
    There is talk that fake silk screen posters are out there.  It's not that hard if you think about it and have the means.
    Well, that would just suck to get a fake silkscreen. 
    That is just "talk" as I have yet to see and confirm one.
  • tommy boy
    tommy boy United States Posts: 691
    edited March 2019
    heres an idea....print more posters...
    "taking food" from an artist. .. wow.  I would gladly buy an original from the artist, how many bags of cheetohs is a Hartford 98 worth?
    100 bgs, 1000 bags, 10,000 bags 100,000 bags of cheetohs...Where does it end...then maybe in 2 years (LOL) I can sell it for 100 Million bags of cheetohs!!!....

    LOL.  God Bless us all.  PS, NEED A NEW RECORD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  NEED TOUR DATES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Post edited by tommy boy on
    1996: TORONTO, TOLEDO, BUFFALO
    1998: BARRIE, PITTSBURGH, CLEVELAND*, MERRIWEATHER POST
    2000: TORONTO, PITTSBURGH, DETROIT, SARATOGA SPRINGS
    2003: TORONTO, BUFFALO*, CLEVELAND, MSG 1
    2004: TOLEDO, GRAND RAPIDS
    2006: PITTSBURGH
    2008: HARTFORD
    2009: PHILLY II
    2010: BUFFALO
    2013: BUFFALO
    2014: DETROIT
    2016: NYC I NYC II
  • PB11041
    PB11041 Earth Posts: 2,845
    tommy boy said:
    heres an idea....print more posters...
    "taking food" from an artist. .. wow.  I would gladly buy an original from the artist, how many bags of cheetohs is a Hartford 98 worth?
    100 bgs, 1000 bags, 10,000 bags 100,000 bags of cheetohs...Where does it end...then maybe in 2 years (LOL) I can sell it for 100 Million bags of cheetohs!!!....

    LOL.  God Bless us all.  PS, NEED A NEW RECORD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  NEED TOUR DATES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Image result for cheetos gif
    His eminence has yet to show. 
    http://www.hi5sports.org/ (Sports Program for Kids with Disabilities)
    http://www.livefootsteps.org/user/?usr=3652

  • tempo_n_groove
    tempo_n_groove Posts: 42,163
    tommy boy said:
    heres an idea....print more posters...
    "taking food" from an artist. .. wow.  I would gladly buy an original from the artist, how many bags of cheetohs is a Hartford 98 worth?
    100 bgs, 1000 bags, 10,000 bags 100,000 bags of cheetohs...Where does it end...then maybe in 2 years (LOL) I can sell it for 100 Million bags of cheetohs!!!....

    LOL.  God Bless us all.  PS, NEED A NEW RECORD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  NEED TOUR DATES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Have you been on the last two tours?  They printed PLENTY of posters whether they were good or not.

    Yes, we need a new tour.
  • CopperTom
    CopperTom Posts: 3,164
    tempo_n_groove said:
    Jimmydean55 said:
    tempo_n_groove said:
    Jimmydean55 said:
    tempo_n_groove said:
    Jimmydean55 said:
    How would you know if a poster is a fake/reproduction anyway?
    If you can't tell the difference then you shouldn't be buying high end posters.

    The paper it's printed on.

    99% of the PJ posters were silk screened.  The difference between a screen print and something on a computer is night and day.  You can see/feel the layers on a screen and the ink can be almost "cahalky", is that a good word to describe it?
    Yeah, I get what you’re saying. I understand it’s easy to tell the difference between a silkscreen and a digital printout. I just wasn’t sure if the fakes were better than just a digital print. 
    There is talk that fake silk screen posters are out there.  It's not that hard if you think about it and have the means.
    Well, that would just suck to get a fake silkscreen. 
    That is just "talk" as I have yet to see and confirm one.
    Didn't fake Seattle 2004 silk screen posters exist?  You could tell real vs. fake since the fake did not list the small print text( i.e. Ames Bros design, Ceribellum Press).  
    http://www.livefootsteps.org/user/?usr=28
  • tempo_n_groove
    tempo_n_groove Posts: 42,163
    CopperTom said:
    tempo_n_groove said:
    Jimmydean55 said:
    tempo_n_groove said:
    Jimmydean55 said:
    tempo_n_groove said:
    Jimmydean55 said:
    How would you know if a poster is a fake/reproduction anyway?
    If you can't tell the difference then you shouldn't be buying high end posters.

    The paper it's printed on.

    99% of the PJ posters were silk screened.  The difference between a screen print and something on a computer is night and day.  You can see/feel the layers on a screen and the ink can be almost "cahalky", is that a good word to describe it?
    Yeah, I get what you’re saying. I understand it’s easy to tell the difference between a silkscreen and a digital printout. I just wasn’t sure if the fakes were better than just a digital print. 
    There is talk that fake silk screen posters are out there.  It's not that hard if you think about it and have the means.
    Well, that would just suck to get a fake silkscreen. 
    That is just "talk" as I have yet to see and confirm one.
    Didn't fake Seattle 2004 silk screen posters exist?  You could tell real vs. fake since the fake did not list the small print text( i.e. Ames Bros design, Ceribellum Press).  
    I had to look that poster up.  Why on earth would that poster be faked?!?

Categories