America's Gun Violence

KC138045 said:

unsung said:

tbergs said:

elvistheking44 said:

Someone now suing Deerfield.

"Cause it's all or none." Anybody watched that Frontline peace on the NRA from a few years ago? Tells you all you need to know about the gun advocate side. No compromise, ever. 

See that is the thing, there never has been compromise.  We just lose, lose, and lose.  Your "compromise" is taking away our rights.

Or please, tell me, what have you compromised? What have you given me in exchange for me losing rights?

People's lives are being compromised because wackos are able to get their hands on military grade assault weapons.

mrussel1 said:

mcgruff10 said:

KC138045 said:

unsung said:

tbergs said:

elvistheking44 said:

Someone now suing Deerfield.

"Cause it's all or none." Anybody watched that Frontline peace on the NRA from a few years ago? Tells you all you need to know about the gun advocate side. No compromise, ever. 

See that is the thing, there never has been compromise.  We just lose, lose, and lose.  Your "compromise" is taking away our rights.

Or please, tell me, what have you compromised? What have you given me in exchange for me losing rights?

People's lives are being compromised because wackos are able to get their hands on military grade assault weapons.

Approx 450 people died from rifles in 2016; how many were from military grade assault weapons?  
https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2016/crime-in-the-u.s.-2016/tables/table-12

Don't know.. but...
58 killed and 400+ wounded in Vegas from AR
49 killed about same injured at Pulse
27 killed at Sandy Hook (including 20 6/7 year old) and 4 wounded

Three incidents, almost 600 casualties.  Hard to justify that.

Bentleyspop said:

mrussel1 said:

mcgruff10 said:

KC138045 said:

unsung said:

tbergs said:

elvistheking44 said:

Someone now suing Deerfield.

"Cause it's all or none." Anybody watched that Frontline peace on the NRA from a few years ago? Tells you all you need to know about the gun advocate side. No compromise, ever. 

See that is the thing, there never has been compromise.  We just lose, lose, and lose.  Your "compromise" is taking away our rights.

Or please, tell me, what have you compromised? What have you given me in exchange for me losing rights?

People's lives are being compromised because wackos are able to get their hands on military grade assault weapons.

Approx 450 people died from rifles in 2016; how many were from military grade assault weapons?  
https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2016/crime-in-the-u.s.-2016/tables/table-12

Don't know.. but...
58 killed and 400+ wounded in Vegas from AR
49 killed about same injured at Pulse
27 killed at Sandy Hook (including 20 6/7 year old) and 4 wounded

Three incidents, almost 600 casualties.  Hard to justify that.

But but but the 2nd amendment 

“We also recognize another important limitation on the right to keep and carry arms. ‘Miller’ said, as we have explained, that the sorts of weapons protected were those ‘in common use at the time.’ 307 U.S., at 179, 59 S.Ct. 816. We think that limitation is fairly supported by the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of ‘dangerous and unusual weapons.’”

Justice Scalia also wrote:

“It may be objected that if weapons that are most useful in military service — M-16 rifles and the like — may be banned, then the Second Amendment right is completely detached from the prefatory clause. But as we have said, the conception of the militia at the time of the Second Amendment’s ratification was the body of all citizens capable of military service, who would bring the sorts of lawful weapons that they possessed at home to militia duty. It may well be true today that a militia, to be as effective as militias in the 18th century, would require sophisticated arms that are highly unusual in society at large. Indeed, it may be true that no amount of small arms could be useful against modern-day bombers and tanks. But the fact that modern developments have limited the degree of fit between the prefatory clause and the protected right cannot change our interpretation of the right

Said in non-leagalese, the 2nd Amendment is not an unlimited right.  

unsung said:

HesCalledDyer said:

unsung said:

HesCalledDyer said:

unsung said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

mcgruff10 said:

Seriously what happened to america?  my dad tells me stories of walking into hardware shops in the 50's and 60s and seeing hundreds of military ww2 surplus weapons for sale for literally less than $20 a pop with zero background check. "you over 18?  yeah.  cool, enjoy this (insert military surplus rifle from ww2)."  I mean these weapons were apart of the most destructive war in history and there wasn't any of the mass shootings that we see today.  and yes some of those were semi-automatic with high capacity mags.  what the heck happened to america?

The NRA sold everyone on the concept of fear. Back then, nobody bought them. Everyone used to leave their back door unlocked, remember? Now? Everyone is a threat. Just ask Unsung.

Not everyone.  Just the left.

This might be the dumbest post you've ever made.

Says a guy who thinks he will get my guns.

And with just one post, you've managed to outdo yourself.

And you confuse me with someone that believes your opinion on me matters.

mrussel1 said:

unsung said:

tbergs said:

elvistheking44 said:

Someone now suing Deerfield.

"Cause it's all or none." Anybody watched that Frontline peace on the NRA from a few years ago? Tells you all you need to know about the gun advocate side. No compromise, ever. 

See that is the thing, there never has been compromise.  We just lose, lose, and lose.  Your "compromise" is taking away our rights.

Or please, tell me, what have you compromised? What have you given me in exchange for me losing rights?

The SCOTUS has already decided on this matter.  Limiting your access to any weapon of your choosing does not impair your rights.  

tbergs said:

mrussel1 said:

mcgruff10 said:

KC138045 said:

unsung said:

tbergs said:

elvistheking44 said:

Someone now suing Deerfield.

"Cause it's all or none." Anybody watched that Frontline peace on the NRA from a few years ago? Tells you all you need to know about the gun advocate side. No compromise, ever. 

See that is the thing, there never has been compromise.  We just lose, lose, and lose.  Your "compromise" is taking away our rights.

Or please, tell me, what have you compromised? What have you given me in exchange for me losing rights?

People's lives are being compromised because wackos are able to get their hands on military grade assault weapons.

Approx 450 people died from rifles in 2016; how many were from military grade assault weapons?  
https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2016/crime-in-the-u.s.-2016/tables/table-12

Don't know.. but...
58 killed and 400+ wounded in Vegas from AR
49 killed about same injured at Pulse
27 killed at Sandy Hook (including 20 6/7 year old) and 4 wounded

Three incidents, almost 600 casualties.  Hard to justify that.

That is what is often forgot, the walking wounded who didn't die and are discarded when these incidents are discussed and reviewed. This has been said before, but extrapolate out the actual direct impact (I'm not even talking about indirect) of these events and you are talking about thousands of people. Every person who was in that school, club, venue or area where the incident happened went through the worst day of their life until they were able to reunite, make contact or confirm their loved one wasn't among the dead. Then consider everyone one who didn't reunite or make contact and later found out their loved one was dead or injured. Do those people matter to any of you who scoff at the number of dead like it's a piece of lifeless shit so you can still own a weapon you neither need nor can justify usage of besides protection from government tyranny and sport shooting?

You're right McGruff, removing those weapons from the streets will not stop gun violence or murder, but it will make it harder and less capable of being carried out in such a quick and efficient (scary word when you consider the context) manner. Do we not want to be a society that can advance past pure primal desire to shoot and kill if we want? If we can't take it upon ourselves to change an unnecessary part of our existence for the better, then we are not the sentient beings we proclaim to be.

I don't hear anyone demanding that the 1st amendment not be infringed upon when certain words and statements were made criminal and illegal.

Thirty Bills Unpaid said:

mrussel1 said:

mcgruff10 said:

KC138045 said:

unsung said:

tbergs said:

elvistheking44 said:

Someone now suing Deerfield.

"Cause it's all or none." Anybody watched that Frontline peace on the NRA from a few years ago? Tells you all you need to know about the gun advocate side. No compromise, ever. 

See that is the thing, there never has been compromise.  We just lose, lose, and lose.  Your "compromise" is taking away our rights.

Or please, tell me, what have you compromised? What have you given me in exchange for me losing rights?

People's lives are being compromised because wackos are able to get their hands on military grade assault weapons.

Approx 450 people died from rifles in 2016; how many were from military grade assault weapons?  
https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2016/crime-in-the-u.s.-2016/tables/table-12

Don't know.. but...
58 killed and 400+ wounded in Vegas from AR
49 killed about same injured at Pulse
27 killed at Sandy Hook (including 20 6/7 year old) and 4 wounded

Three incidents, almost 600 casualties.  Hard to justify that.

Yah come on, Scruffy.

I thought you had come to your senses?

mcgruff10 said:

Thirty Bills Unpaid said:

mrussel1 said:

mcgruff10 said:

KC138045 said:

unsung said:

tbergs said:

elvistheking44 said:

Someone now suing Deerfield.

"Cause it's all or none." Anybody watched that Frontline peace on the NRA from a few years ago? Tells you all you need to know about the gun advocate side. No compromise, ever. 

See that is the thing, there never has been compromise.  We just lose, lose, and lose.  Your "compromise" is taking away our rights.

Or please, tell me, what have you compromised? What have you given me in exchange for me losing rights?

People's lives are being compromised because wackos are able to get their hands on military grade assault weapons.

Approx 450 people died from rifles in 2016; how many were from military grade assault weapons?  
https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2016/crime-in-the-u.s.-2016/tables/table-12

Don't know.. but...
58 killed and 400+ wounded in Vegas from AR
49 killed about same injured at Pulse
27 killed at Sandy Hook (including 20 6/7 year old) and 4 wounded

Three incidents, almost 600 casualties.  Hard to justify that.

Yah come on, Scruffy.

I thought you had come to your senses?

It was an honest question del

Thirty Bills Unpaid said:

mcgruff10 said:

Thirty Bills Unpaid said:

mrussel1 said:

mcgruff10 said:

KC138045 said:

unsung said:

tbergs said:

elvistheking44 said:

Someone now suing Deerfield.

"Cause it's all or none." Anybody watched that Frontline peace on the NRA from a few years ago? Tells you all you need to know about the gun advocate side. No compromise, ever. 

See that is the thing, there never has been compromise.  We just lose, lose, and lose.  Your "compromise" is taking away our rights.

Or please, tell me, what have you compromised? What have you given me in exchange for me losing rights?

People's lives are being compromised because wackos are able to get their hands on military grade assault weapons.

Approx 450 people died from rifles in 2016; how many were from military grade assault weapons?  
https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2016/crime-in-the-u.s.-2016/tables/table-12

Don't know.. but...
58 killed and 400+ wounded in Vegas from AR
49 killed about same injured at Pulse
27 killed at Sandy Hook (including 20 6/7 year old) and 4 wounded

Three incidents, almost 600 casualties.  Hard to justify that.

Yah come on, Scruffy.

I thought you had come to your senses?

It was an honest question del

What do you think of the response?