Why did they boo Eddie?

11618202122

Comments

  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,664
    I have an issue with someone booing the performance. 

    I do not have an issue with someone booing something the artist says in between the songs, especially if it's political in nature. I can't imagine the band would disagree with that. I gather they prefer people be engaged, no matter positive or negative, as long as they are engaged at all. 
    Well that's true. I just meant their performances. I absolutely do not think that Bu$hleaguer is an exception to that, and I don't see why anyone would think so. It's not spoken word btw, not that that should make a difference anyhow.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • BS44325
    BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    I have an issue with someone booing the performance. 

    I do not have an issue with someone booing something the artist says in between the songs, especially if it's political in nature. I can't imagine the band would disagree with that. I gather they prefer people be engaged, no matter positive or negative, as long as they are engaged at all. 
    Exactly this. I love this band because they are passionate about their beliefs...even if they are often opposite to my beliefs. I applaud and support their right to say anything from the stage as I am sure they are ok with my right to boo (without belligerence) when I see fit. Fan engagement is what matters...it is what makes their shows great...and we should all be able to handle this back and forth respectfully. For the record I loved Bush and Bushleaguer and I hope it gets played again.
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,458
    PJ_Soul said:
    I have an issue with someone booing the performance. 

    I do not have an issue with someone booing something the artist says in between the songs, especially if it's political in nature. I can't imagine the band would disagree with that. I gather they prefer people be engaged, no matter positive or negative, as long as they are engaged at all. 
    Well that's true. I just meant their performances. I absolutely do not think that Bu$hleaguer is an exception to that, and I don't see why anyone would think so. It's not spoken word btw, not that that should make a difference anyhow.
    well Ed thinks so, that it is the audience's right to boo him when he sang Bushleaguer. he stated so right after the performance in Uniondale. he also apologized to the audience after they played it at the showbox after going off on his "fuck war" mid-song rant. 
    Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall




  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,458
    BS44325 said:
    I have an issue with someone booing the performance. 

    I do not have an issue with someone booing something the artist says in between the songs, especially if it's political in nature. I can't imagine the band would disagree with that. I gather they prefer people be engaged, no matter positive or negative, as long as they are engaged at all. 
    Exactly this. I love this band because they are passionate about their beliefs...even if they are often opposite to my beliefs. I applaud and support their right to say anything from the stage as I am sure they are ok with my right to boo (without belligerence) when I see fit. Fan engagement is what matters...it is what makes their shows great...and we should all be able to handle this back and forth respectfully. For the record I loved Bush and Bushleaguer and I hope it gets played again.
    Exactly. I think Ed is intelligent enough to recognize that people are there for the music primarily, so if he wants to go off on a political rant, if some of the crowd happens to not agree with what he has to say (and out of 15,000 people, that's a guarantee), then I would imagine he'd welcome the back and forth. Which he seemed to, especially when the crowd started chanting "USA". 

    Jeff also said he loved it.
    Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall




  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,664
    PJ_Soul said:
    I have an issue with someone booing the performance. 

    I do not have an issue with someone booing something the artist says in between the songs, especially if it's political in nature. I can't imagine the band would disagree with that. I gather they prefer people be engaged, no matter positive or negative, as long as they are engaged at all. 
    Well that's true. I just meant their performances. I absolutely do not think that Bu$hleaguer is an exception to that, and I don't see why anyone would think so. It's not spoken word btw, not that that should make a difference anyhow.
    well Ed thinks so, that it is the audience's right to boo him when he sang Bushleaguer. he stated so right after the performance in Uniondale. he also apologized to the audience after they played it at the showbox after going off on his "fuck war" mid-song rant. 
    I don't really care what Ed thinks about it. I also think he never should have apologized. I hate it when he apologizes after making political statements. He did that last year too. It's wimpy IMO.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576
    I think it's perfectly within the rights of an audience member to boo, but I think it's childish and lacks class. 
    If you disagree, that's fine, I won't boo ya for it.
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • oftenreading
    oftenreading Victoria, BC Posts: 12,856
    BS44325 said:
    I have an issue with someone booing the performance. 

    I do not have an issue with someone booing something the artist says in between the songs, especially if it's political in nature. I can't imagine the band would disagree with that. I gather they prefer people be engaged, no matter positive or negative, as long as they are engaged at all. 
    Exactly this. I love this band because they are passionate about their beliefs...even if they are often opposite to my beliefs. I applaud and support their right to say anything from the stage as I am sure they are ok with my right to boo (without belligerence) when I see fit. Fan engagement is what matters...it is what makes their shows great...and we should all be able to handle this back and forth respectfully. For the record I loved Bush and Bushleaguer and I hope it gets played again.
    Exactly. I think Ed is intelligent enough to recognize that people are there for the music primarily, so if he wants to go off on a political rant, if some of the crowd happens to not agree with what he has to say (and out of 15,000 people, that's a guarantee), then I would imagine he'd welcome the back and forth. Which he seemed to, especially when the crowd started chanting "USA". 

    Jeff also said he loved it.
    Jeff loved being booed? Or did I miss something here?

    Personally, I just think booing is classless and rude. The usual method of expressing disagreement at a concert is not to clap or cheer. If you really feel strongly you can walk out. 

    Now, I’m not saying it isn't within someone rights to boo, just that I disagree with it. 
    my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,458
    PJ_Soul said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    I have an issue with someone booing the performance. 

    I do not have an issue with someone booing something the artist says in between the songs, especially if it's political in nature. I can't imagine the band would disagree with that. I gather they prefer people be engaged, no matter positive or negative, as long as they are engaged at all. 
    Well that's true. I just meant their performances. I absolutely do not think that Bu$hleaguer is an exception to that, and I don't see why anyone would think so. It's not spoken word btw, not that that should make a difference anyhow.
    well Ed thinks so, that it is the audience's right to boo him when he sang Bushleaguer. he stated so right after the performance in Uniondale. he also apologized to the audience after they played it at the showbox after going off on his "fuck war" mid-song rant. 
    I don't really care what Ed thinks about it. I also think he never should have apologized. I hate it when he apologizes after making political statements. He did that last year too. It's wimpy IMO.
    so the opinion of the performer making the statement and engaging the crowd is irrelevant to you? oohhhhh kaaaaaayyyyy. 
    Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall




  • BS44325
    BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    BS44325 said:
    I have an issue with someone booing the performance. 

    I do not have an issue with someone booing something the artist says in between the songs, especially if it's political in nature. I can't imagine the band would disagree with that. I gather they prefer people be engaged, no matter positive or negative, as long as they are engaged at all. 
    Exactly this. I love this band because they are passionate about their beliefs...even if they are often opposite to my beliefs. I applaud and support their right to say anything from the stage as I am sure they are ok with my right to boo (without belligerence) when I see fit. Fan engagement is what matters...it is what makes their shows great...and we should all be able to handle this back and forth respectfully. For the record I loved Bush and Bushleaguer and I hope it gets played again.
    Exactly. I think Ed is intelligent enough to recognize that people are there for the music primarily, so if he wants to go off on a political rant, if some of the crowd happens to not agree with what he has to say (and out of 15,000 people, that's a guarantee), then I would imagine he'd welcome the back and forth. Which he seemed to, especially when the crowd started chanting "USA". 

    Jeff also said he loved it.
    Also with respect to rants in general...my thoughts are this...if they are willing to give me 3 hours per show then they can say whatever the hell they want.
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,458
    BS44325 said:
    BS44325 said:
    I have an issue with someone booing the performance. 

    I do not have an issue with someone booing something the artist says in between the songs, especially if it's political in nature. I can't imagine the band would disagree with that. I gather they prefer people be engaged, no matter positive or negative, as long as they are engaged at all. 
    Exactly this. I love this band because they are passionate about their beliefs...even if they are often opposite to my beliefs. I applaud and support their right to say anything from the stage as I am sure they are ok with my right to boo (without belligerence) when I see fit. Fan engagement is what matters...it is what makes their shows great...and we should all be able to handle this back and forth respectfully. For the record I loved Bush and Bushleaguer and I hope it gets played again.
    Exactly. I think Ed is intelligent enough to recognize that people are there for the music primarily, so if he wants to go off on a political rant, if some of the crowd happens to not agree with what he has to say (and out of 15,000 people, that's a guarantee), then I would imagine he'd welcome the back and forth. Which he seemed to, especially when the crowd started chanting "USA". 

    Jeff also said he loved it.
    Also with respect to rants in general...my thoughts are this...if they are willing to give me 3 hours per show then they can say whatever the hell they want.
    I don't particularly think length of show makes a difference. 
    Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall




  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,458
    BS44325 said:
    I have an issue with someone booing the performance. 

    I do not have an issue with someone booing something the artist says in between the songs, especially if it's political in nature. I can't imagine the band would disagree with that. I gather they prefer people be engaged, no matter positive or negative, as long as they are engaged at all. 
    Exactly this. I love this band because they are passionate about their beliefs...even if they are often opposite to my beliefs. I applaud and support their right to say anything from the stage as I am sure they are ok with my right to boo (without belligerence) when I see fit. Fan engagement is what matters...it is what makes their shows great...and we should all be able to handle this back and forth respectfully. For the record I loved Bush and Bushleaguer and I hope it gets played again.
    Exactly. I think Ed is intelligent enough to recognize that people are there for the music primarily, so if he wants to go off on a political rant, if some of the crowd happens to not agree with what he has to say (and out of 15,000 people, that's a guarantee), then I would imagine he'd welcome the back and forth. Which he seemed to, especially when the crowd started chanting "USA". 

    Jeff also said he loved it.
    Jeff loved being booed? Or did I miss something here?

    Personally, I just think booing is classless and rude. The usual method of expressing disagreement at a concert is not to clap or cheer. If you really feel strongly you can walk out. 

    Now, I’m not saying it isn't within someone rights to boo, just that I disagree with it. 
    not that he loved being booed, he loved the back and forth between them and the crowd, of them making a political statement and the crowd doing the same. I think it was in PJ20 movie where he stated that. 

    booing a performance is rude, yes (like when people boo nickelback, for instance). 

    booing a political message is not rude. it is the direct opposite of clapping/cheering. if the door is open to one, it has to be open for the other. 
    Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall




  • oftenreading
    oftenreading Victoria, BC Posts: 12,856
    BS44325 said:
    I have an issue with someone booing the performance. 

    I do not have an issue with someone booing something the artist says in between the songs, especially if it's political in nature. I can't imagine the band would disagree with that. I gather they prefer people be engaged, no matter positive or negative, as long as they are engaged at all. 
    Exactly this. I love this band because they are passionate about their beliefs...even if they are often opposite to my beliefs. I applaud and support their right to say anything from the stage as I am sure they are ok with my right to boo (without belligerence) when I see fit. Fan engagement is what matters...it is what makes their shows great...and we should all be able to handle this back and forth respectfully. For the record I loved Bush and Bushleaguer and I hope it gets played again.
    Exactly. I think Ed is intelligent enough to recognize that people are there for the music primarily, so if he wants to go off on a political rant, if some of the crowd happens to not agree with what he has to say (and out of 15,000 people, that's a guarantee), then I would imagine he'd welcome the back and forth. Which he seemed to, especially when the crowd started chanting "USA". 

    Jeff also said he loved it.
    Jeff loved being booed? Or did I miss something here?

    Personally, I just think booing is classless and rude. The usual method of expressing disagreement at a concert is not to clap or cheer. If you really feel strongly you can walk out. 

    Now, I’m not saying it isn't within someone rights to boo, just that I disagree with it. 
    not that he loved being booed, he loved the back and forth between them and the crowd, of them making a political statement and the crowd doing the same. I think it was in PJ20 movie where he stated that. 

    booing a performance is rude, yes (like when people boo nickelback, for instance). 

    booing a political message is not rude. it is the direct opposite of clapping/cheering. if the door is open to one, it has to be open for the other. 
    The whole show is the performance, not just the singing.

    And no, booing is not the opposite of cheering. Not cheering/clapping is the opposite of cheering/clapping. That’s what you do if you don’t like the performance. Booing isn’t really any different than shouting at the performers. 
    my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,458
    BS44325 said:
    I have an issue with someone booing the performance. 

    I do not have an issue with someone booing something the artist says in between the songs, especially if it's political in nature. I can't imagine the band would disagree with that. I gather they prefer people be engaged, no matter positive or negative, as long as they are engaged at all. 
    Exactly this. I love this band because they are passionate about their beliefs...even if they are often opposite to my beliefs. I applaud and support their right to say anything from the stage as I am sure they are ok with my right to boo (without belligerence) when I see fit. Fan engagement is what matters...it is what makes their shows great...and we should all be able to handle this back and forth respectfully. For the record I loved Bush and Bushleaguer and I hope it gets played again.
    Exactly. I think Ed is intelligent enough to recognize that people are there for the music primarily, so if he wants to go off on a political rant, if some of the crowd happens to not agree with what he has to say (and out of 15,000 people, that's a guarantee), then I would imagine he'd welcome the back and forth. Which he seemed to, especially when the crowd started chanting "USA". 

    Jeff also said he loved it.
    Jeff loved being booed? Or did I miss something here?

    Personally, I just think booing is classless and rude. The usual method of expressing disagreement at a concert is not to clap or cheer. If you really feel strongly you can walk out. 

    Now, I’m not saying it isn't within someone rights to boo, just that I disagree with it. 
    not that he loved being booed, he loved the back and forth between them and the crowd, of them making a political statement and the crowd doing the same. I think it was in PJ20 movie where he stated that. 

    booing a performance is rude, yes (like when people boo nickelback, for instance). 

    booing a political message is not rude. it is the direct opposite of clapping/cheering. if the door is open to one, it has to be open for the other. 
    The whole show is the performance, not just the singing.

    And no, booing is not the opposite of cheering. Not cheering/clapping is the opposite of cheering/clapping. That’s what you do if you don’t like the performance. Booing isn’t really any different than shouting at the performers. 
    google "opposite of cheering/clapping". 

    I can, and I'm sure the band can, differentiate between people booing a political sentiment between songs and booing when Ed fucks up the lyrics to wishlist. completely different things. 
    Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall




  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576
    BS44325 said:
    BS44325 said:
    I have an issue with someone booing the performance. 

    I do not have an issue with someone booing something the artist says in between the songs, especially if it's political in nature. I can't imagine the band would disagree with that. I gather they prefer people be engaged, no matter positive or negative, as long as they are engaged at all. 
    Exactly this. I love this band because they are passionate about their beliefs...even if they are often opposite to my beliefs. I applaud and support their right to say anything from the stage as I am sure they are ok with my right to boo (without belligerence) when I see fit. Fan engagement is what matters...it is what makes their shows great...and we should all be able to handle this back and forth respectfully. For the record I loved Bush and Bushleaguer and I hope it gets played again.
    Exactly. I think Ed is intelligent enough to recognize that people are there for the music primarily, so if he wants to go off on a political rant, if some of the crowd happens to not agree with what he has to say (and out of 15,000 people, that's a guarantee), then I would imagine he'd welcome the back and forth. Which he seemed to, especially when the crowd started chanting "USA". 

    Jeff also said he loved it.
    Also with respect to rants in general...my thoughts are this...if they are willing to give me 3 hours per show then they can say whatever the hell they want.
    Fuck yeah!
    Every time they tour I see weirdo freaks come on here and say their sets are too long, 3 hours is too much they say.

    Blasphemy in the highest degree!
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,664
    rgambs said:
    I think it's perfectly within the rights of an audience member to boo, but I think it's childish and lacks class. 
    If you disagree, that's fine, I won't boo ya for it.
    Yeah, it is certainly within their rights, of course. It's just rude as fuck.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,664
    edited January 2018
    PJ_Soul said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    I have an issue with someone booing the performance. 

    I do not have an issue with someone booing something the artist says in between the songs, especially if it's political in nature. I can't imagine the band would disagree with that. I gather they prefer people be engaged, no matter positive or negative, as long as they are engaged at all. 
    Well that's true. I just meant their performances. I absolutely do not think that Bu$hleaguer is an exception to that, and I don't see why anyone would think so. It's not spoken word btw, not that that should make a difference anyhow.
    well Ed thinks so, that it is the audience's right to boo him when he sang Bushleaguer. he stated so right after the performance in Uniondale. he also apologized to the audience after they played it at the showbox after going off on his "fuck war" mid-song rant. 
    I don't really care what Ed thinks about it. I also think he never should have apologized. I hate it when he apologizes after making political statements. He did that last year too. It's wimpy IMO.
    so the opinion of the performer making the statement and engaging the crowd is irrelevant to you? oohhhhh kaaaaaayyyyy. 
    Well there isn't anything relevant to think about with the first part. It's a fact, not an opinion. Of course it's the audience's right to boo him. It's a free country, relatively. That doesn't mean I think it is right to do in terms of not being a rude idiot. And yeah, I really do think that apologizing for saying something he meant is super lame.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • brianlux
    brianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,662
    Just to clarify, I never said anyone does not have the right to boo.  It's just not something I do. 

    If Ed or Nugent or anybody got up on stage and said something I disagreed with I might, at most, shake my head and said, "no way man" (which would be drowned out by the booing, so who would know or care anyway).  Booing is about the last way to make somebody change their mind about something.  I can think of several better ways to make an opposing argument.  To my way of thinking, booing is childish at best, bullying at worst.
    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni

  • Thoughts_Arrive
    Thoughts_Arrive Melbourne, Australia Posts: 15,165
    Adelaide 17/11/2009, Melbourne 20/11/2009, Sydney 22/11/2009, Melbourne (Big Day Out Festival) 24/01/2014
  • Bentleyspop
    Bentleyspop Craft Beer Brewery, Colorado Posts: 11,406