America's Gun Violence

1356357359361362903

Comments

  • unsung
    unsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:

    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said: 
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:p
    tbergs said:
    Aurora: AR-15
    Orlando: AR-15
    Las Vegas: AR-15
    Sandy Hook: AR-15
    Umpqua CC: AR-15
    San Bernardino: AR-15
    Sutherland Springs: AR-15

    Nothing can be done.
    Well, one state made it illegal to own a bump stock with your pretty AR killing device.

    Is there anybody on here opposed to the ban of owning AR-15 style assault rifles outside of LE and military?
    Yes.

    You can't even get the terminology correct.

    Besides I have been hearing non-stop for a year how "literally Hitler" was elected President, and now those people want "literally Hitler" to be the one in control of all firearms.

    Why do you want to give "literally Hitler" oh and the white supremacist and racist and apparently woman abusing and Russian colluder so much control?
    every gun
    every owner
    every transfer
    documented

    how's that for terminology
    Already is in my State.

    So how does that stop a bad person from doing bad things?

    it's not about stopping bad people from doing bad things
    it's about restricting the opportunities for bad people to do bad things so easily

    how many times does it have to be explained to you gun-fetishists?  more guns = more gun deaths
    this is not a cultural issue of 'the usa has too many bad people", it's an issue of "the usa has too many guns and gun-nuts"

    less guns, less gun deaths
    it really is that fucking simple, and has been proven the world over.  How is this not sinking in?

    I'd just like to know how you propose doing this?

    "But nobody is calling for a gun ban!"


    edit: the same way they do it in every other modern industrialized nation that seems to make it through the week without a mass shooting

    you act like this is so difficult

    And what way is that?

    I don't act.


    If explain it to you, but you probably wouldn't understand the terminology. 

    Typical conservative. Doesn't realize he's part of the problem. Wants progressives to fix it. 

    It's sad this isn't an act. If you had any sense of shame or embarrassment, now would be the time for you to feel it. 
    I’d never ask a progressive to fix my problems, I handle them myself.
    Alright wise guy, then what's your solution to gun violence?  You seem pretty content with the status quo when that's clearly not working. 
    The law that could have stopped this was there, the Air Force failed to comply.  


  • 09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • tbergs
    tbergs Posts: 10,401
    unsung said:
    Better contact the DPS in Texas so they get their terminology right.

    Though he did not identify Willeford by name, the Texas department of public safety regional director, Freeman Martin, said at a news conference on Monday that the armed resident who confronted Kelley was toting an “AR assault rifle and engaged” the shooter.
    It's a hopeless situation...
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,589
    tbergs said:
    unsung said:
    Better contact the DPS in Texas so they get their terminology right.

    Though he did not identify Willeford by name, the Texas department of public safety regional director, Freeman Martin, said at a news conference on Monday that the armed resident who confronted Kelley was toting an “AR assault rifle and engaged” the shooter.
    Yep better to go to church armed these days or to ball games or concerts ...
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • tbergs
    tbergs Posts: 10,401
    unsung said:
    mace1229 said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    Jason P said:
    unsung said:
    You don't have to be a genius to know this idiot had issues.
    Evidence would suggest otherwise.   Laws were in place and he still legally bought guns. 
    Wouldn't that mean that it wasn't legally purchased then? I thought he legally bought it because the laws suck, since they still allow someone with a criminal record purchase them. If it's against the law for someone to have sold it to him because of his record, then that's not a legal firearm purchase, right?
    What I heard on the news was that he only legally purchased guns because his criminal record wasn't properly recorded, so it didn't show up on his background check.
    So yes, he purchased them legally, but only due to a clerical error because he was technically not approved to be a gun owner under current gun laws.
    Texas denied him a concealed carry permit, sounds like the feds dropped the ball.
    Interesting to see you willing to blame the feds in this instance, but at the same time you think they are overstepping whenever governmental issues arise other times. And technically isn't this on the Air Force and them alone?
    It's a hopeless situation...
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,589
    So 26 people are dead because of failed human competence...
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • tbergs
    tbergs Posts: 10,401
    edited November 2017
    So 26 people are dead because of failed human competence...
    There are those who would argue that thousands die daily due to human incompetence.
    It's a hopeless situation...
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,589
    tbergs said:
    So 26 people are dead because of failed human competence...
    There are those who would argue that thousands die daily due to human incompetence.
    Yes there are it's shame ..
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • unsung
    unsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    edited November 2017
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:

    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said: 
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:p
    tbergs said:
    Aurora: AR-15
    Orlando: AR-15
    Las Vegas: AR-15
    Sandy Hook: AR-15
    Umpqua CC: AR-15
    San Bernardino: AR-15
    Sutherland Springs: AR-15

    Nothing can be done.
    Well, one state made it illegal to own a bump stock with your pretty AR killing device.

    Is there anybody on here opposed to the ban of owning AR-15 style assault rifles outside of LE and military?
    Yes.

    You can't even get the terminology correct.

    Besides I have been hearing non-stop for a year how "literally Hitler" was elected President, and now those people want "literally Hitler" to be the one in control of all firearms.

    Why do you want to give "literally Hitler" oh and the white supremacist and racist and apparently woman abusing and Russian colluder so much control?
    every gun
    every owner
    every transfer
    documented

    how's that for terminology
    Already is in my State.

    So how does that stop a bad person from doing bad things?

    it's not about stopping bad people from doing bad things
    it's about restricting the opportunities for bad people to do bad things so easily

    how many times does it have to be explained to you gun-fetishists?  more guns = more gun deaths
    this is not a cultural issue of 'the usa has too many bad people", it's an issue of "the usa has too many guns and gun-nuts"

    less guns, less gun deaths
    it really is that fucking simple, and has been proven the world over.  How is this not sinking in?

    I'd just like to know how you propose doing this?

    "But nobody is calling for a gun ban!"


    edit: the same way they do it in every other modern industrialized nation that seems to make it through the week without a mass shooting

    you act like this is so difficult

    And what way is that?

    I don't act.


    If explain it to you, but you probably wouldn't understand the terminology. 

    Typical conservative. Doesn't realize he's part of the problem. Wants progressives to fix it. 

    It's sad this isn't an act. If you had any sense of shame or embarrassment, now would be the time for you to feel it. 
    I’d never ask a progressive to fix my problems, I handle them myself.
    Alright wise guy, then what's your solution to gun violence?  You seem pretty content with the status quo when that's clearly not working. 
    Could always ban leftists from owning firearms as most of the violence done in the US today is done by leftists.

    Shouldn't be too much of an issue since you all hate guns anyway.

    BTW, assault any Senators today?
  • unsung said:
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:

    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said: 
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:p
    tbergs said:
    Aurora: AR-15
    Orlando: AR-15
    Las Vegas: AR-15
    Sandy Hook: AR-15
    Umpqua CC: AR-15
    San Bernardino: AR-15
    Sutherland Springs: AR-15

    Nothing can be done.
    Well, one state made it illegal to own a bump stock with your pretty AR killing device.

    Is there anybody on here opposed to the ban of owning AR-15 style assault rifles outside of LE and military?
    Yes.

    You can't even get the terminology correct.

    Besides I have been hearing non-stop for a year how "literally Hitler" was elected President, and now those people want "literally Hitler" to be the one in control of all firearms.

    Why do you want to give "literally Hitler" oh and the white supremacist and racist and apparently woman abusing and Russian colluder so much control?
    every gun
    every owner
    every transfer
    documented

    how's that for terminology
    Already is in my State.

    So how does that stop a bad person from doing bad things?

    it's not about stopping bad people from doing bad things
    it's about restricting the opportunities for bad people to do bad things so easily

    how many times does it have to be explained to you gun-fetishists?  more guns = more gun deaths
    this is not a cultural issue of 'the usa has too many bad people", it's an issue of "the usa has too many guns and gun-nuts"

    less guns, less gun deaths
    it really is that fucking simple, and has been proven the world over.  How is this not sinking in?

    I'd just like to know how you propose doing this?

    "But nobody is calling for a gun ban!"


    edit: the same way they do it in every other modern industrialized nation that seems to make it through the week without a mass shooting

    you act like this is so difficult

    And what way is that?

    I don't act.


    If explain it to you, but you probably wouldn't understand the terminology. 

    Typical conservative. Doesn't realize he's part of the problem. Wants progressives to fix it. 

    It's sad this isn't an act. If you had any sense of shame or embarrassment, now would be the time for you to feel it. 
    I’d never ask a progressive to fix my problems, I handle them myself.
    Alright wise guy, then what's your solution to gun violence?  You seem pretty content with the status quo when that's clearly not working. 
    Could always ban leftists from owning firearms as most of the violence done in the US today is done by leftists.

    Shouldn't be too much of an issue since you all hate guns anyway.

    BTW, assault any Senators today?
    Link? Or just another one of your unfounded, irrational fears?
     
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,589
    unsung said:
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:

    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said: 
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:p
    tbergs said:
    Aurora: AR-15
    Orlando: AR-15
    Las Vegas: AR-15
    Sandy Hook: AR-15
    Umpqua CC: AR-15
    San Bernardino: AR-15
    Sutherland Springs: AR-15

    Nothing can be done.
    Well, one state made it illegal to own a bump stock with your pretty AR killing device.

    Is there anybody on here opposed to the ban of owning AR-15 style assault rifles outside of LE and military?
    Yes.

    You can't even get the terminology correct.

    Besides I have been hearing non-stop for a year how "literally Hitler" was elected President, and now those people want "literally Hitler" to be the one in control of all firearms.

    Why do you want to give "literally Hitler" oh and the white supremacist and racist and apparently woman abusing and Russian colluder so much control?
    every gun
    every owner
    every transfer
    documented

    how's that for terminology
    Already is in my State.

    So how does that stop a bad person from doing bad things?

    it's not about stopping bad people from doing bad things
    it's about restricting the opportunities for bad people to do bad things so easily

    how many times does it have to be explained to you gun-fetishists?  more guns = more gun deaths
    this is not a cultural issue of 'the usa has too many bad people", it's an issue of "the usa has too many guns and gun-nuts"

    less guns, less gun deaths
    it really is that fucking simple, and has been proven the world over.  How is this not sinking in?

    I'd just like to know how you propose doing this?

    "But nobody is calling for a gun ban!"


    edit: the same way they do it in every other modern industrialized nation that seems to make it through the week without a mass shooting

    you act like this is so difficult

    And what way is that?

    I don't act.


    If explain it to you, but you probably wouldn't understand the terminology. 

    Typical conservative. Doesn't realize he's part of the problem. Wants progressives to fix it. 

    It's sad this isn't an act. If you had any sense of shame or embarrassment, now would be the time for you to feel it. 
    I’d never ask a progressive to fix my problems, I handle them myself.
    Alright wise guy, then what's your solution to gun violence?  You seem pretty content with the status quo when that's clearly not working. 
    Could always ban leftists from owning firearms as most of the violence done in the US today is done by leftists.

    Shouldn't be too much of an issue since you all hate guns anyway.

    BTW, assault any Senators today?
    Your boy got his ass kicked 
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    Those bad ass angry violent leftists.

    I remember when those antifa thugs brought all their guns to Charlottesville to intimidate those poor Nazis, even fired some shots at the crowd of defenseless Nazis.

    And then that leftist punk ran that women over with his car.

    I'm sure that's how it went down.
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,589
    Hey Unsung would you rather Paul & his neighbor dual it out with their guns cause you know Paul will never win a fist fight 
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • PJPOWER
    PJPOWER Posts: 6,499
    unsung said:
    tbergs said:
    unsung said:
    tbergs said:
    unsung said:
    tbergs said:
    Aurora: AR-15
    Orlando: AR-15
    Las Vegas: AR-15
    Sandy Hook: AR-15
    Umpqua CC: AR-15
    San Bernardino: AR-15
    Sutherland Springs: AR-15

    Nothing can be done.
    Well, one state made it illegal to own a bump stock with your pretty AR killing device.

    Is there anybody on here opposed to the ban of owning AR-15 style assault rifles outside of LE and military?
    Yes.

    You can't even get the terminology correct.

    Besides I have been hearing non-stop for a year how "literally Hitler" was elected President, and now those people want "literally Hitler" to be the one in control of all firearms.

    Why do you want to give "literally Hitler" oh and the white supremacist and racist and apparently woman abusing and Russian colluder so much control?
    Ok. My apologies. I haven't fired an AR or its like in about 10 years. What is the correct terminology you would like me to use? You have lots of criticism, but no answers or suggestions. Only Mace seems to be able to provide some sort of reasonable discussion points.
    Have you ever shot one?

    If not, I will take you out to a range and introduce you to one.  I can then go over terminology and show you how it operates, including breaking it down and re-assembling it.
    Yeah, did you read my answer? It's been about 9 years. I shot it several thousand times and was qualified with it before that. A crack shot with it. I could break it down and put it back together no problems. That's what I did.

    Again, do you have any other suggestions. A civilian has no need to own an AR or other types of semi-auto assault rifles. Fear is the only reason no one is willing to give up these types of guns. Don't worry, we'll all die of lack of water and tillable land before the government comes for your guns. You will probably need your gun to protect your bunker of supplies from the raving masses of starving and thirsty.

    Reminds me of this beautiful song;
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fj-10lIrboM

    Clearly yesterday proved that we need them, in order to stop bad people from harming others.

    Thankfully it isn't the Bill of Needs.  Thankfully I don't need someone telling me what I do or don't.

    You asked me what my terminology was, that lead me to believe your experience was not vast.  My terminology is what it actually is, not what the media says it is.
    pretty sure that guy didn't have an assault weapon
    Just following up:
    http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2017/11/robert-farago/sutherland-springs-good-guy-gun-stephen-willeford-got-ar-15-safe-video/
  • tbergs
    tbergs Posts: 10,401
    PJPOWER said:
    unsung said:
    tbergs said:
    unsung said:
    tbergs said:
    unsung said:
    tbergs said:
    Aurora: AR-15
    Orlando: AR-15
    Las Vegas: AR-15
    Sandy Hook: AR-15
    Umpqua CC: AR-15
    San Bernardino: AR-15
    Sutherland Springs: AR-15

    Nothing can be done.
    Well, one state made it illegal to own a bump stock with your pretty AR killing device.

    Is there anybody on here opposed to the ban of owning AR-15 style assault rifles outside of LE and military?
    Yes.

    You can't even get the terminology correct.

    Besides I have been hearing non-stop for a year how "literally Hitler" was elected President, and now those people want "literally Hitler" to be the one in control of all firearms.

    Why do you want to give "literally Hitler" oh and the white supremacist and racist and apparently woman abusing and Russian colluder so much control?
    Ok. My apologies. I haven't fired an AR or its like in about 10 years. What is the correct terminology you would like me to use? You have lots of criticism, but no answers or suggestions. Only Mace seems to be able to provide some sort of reasonable discussion points.
    Have you ever shot one?

    If not, I will take you out to a range and introduce you to one.  I can then go over terminology and show you how it operates, including breaking it down and re-assembling it.
    Yeah, did you read my answer? It's been about 9 years. I shot it several thousand times and was qualified with it before that. A crack shot with it. I could break it down and put it back together no problems. That's what I did.

    Again, do you have any other suggestions. A civilian has no need to own an AR or other types of semi-auto assault rifles. Fear is the only reason no one is willing to give up these types of guns. Don't worry, we'll all die of lack of water and tillable land before the government comes for your guns. You will probably need your gun to protect your bunker of supplies from the raving masses of starving and thirsty.

    Reminds me of this beautiful song;
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fj-10lIrboM

    Clearly yesterday proved that we need them, in order to stop bad people from harming others.

    Thankfully it isn't the Bill of Needs.  Thankfully I don't need someone telling me what I do or don't.

    You asked me what my terminology was, that lead me to believe your experience was not vast.  My terminology is what it actually is, not what the media says it is.
    pretty sure that guy didn't have an assault weapon
    Just following up:
    http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2017/11/robert-farago/sutherland-springs-good-guy-gun-stephen-willeford-got-ar-15-safe-video/
    Gloating as your follow-up to don't fuck with Texans. I don't get your thinking. Keep spinning this all as a positive. Again, another argument that only makes sense in a world where you allow everyone to own an assault rifle. Playing field has to be equal between good and evil when there's an open market.
    It's a hopeless situation...
  • Bentleyspop
    Bentleyspop Craft Beer Brewery, Colorado Posts: 11,411
  • tbergs
    tbergs Posts: 10,401
    unsung said:
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:

    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said: 
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:p
    tbergs said:
    Aurora: AR-15
    Orlando: AR-15
    Las Vegas: AR-15
    Sandy Hook: AR-15
    Umpqua CC: AR-15
    San Bernardino: AR-15
    Sutherland Springs: AR-15

    Nothing can be done.
    Well, one state made it illegal to own a bump stock with your pretty AR killing device.

    Is there anybody on here opposed to the ban of owning AR-15 style assault rifles outside of LE and military?
    Yes.

    You can't even get the terminology correct.

    Besides I have been hearing non-stop for a year how "literally Hitler" was elected President, and now those people want "literally Hitler" to be the one in control of all firearms.

    Why do you want to give "literally Hitler" oh and the white supremacist and racist and apparently woman abusing and Russian colluder so much control?
    every gun
    every owner
    every transfer
    documented

    how's that for terminology
    Already is in my State.

    So how does that stop a bad person from doing bad things?

    it's not about stopping bad people from doing bad things
    it's about restricting the opportunities for bad people to do bad things so easily

    how many times does it have to be explained to you gun-fetishists?  more guns = more gun deaths
    this is not a cultural issue of 'the usa has too many bad people", it's an issue of "the usa has too many guns and gun-nuts"

    less guns, less gun deaths
    it really is that fucking simple, and has been proven the world over.  How is this not sinking in?

    I'd just like to know how you propose doing this?

    "But nobody is calling for a gun ban!"


    edit: the same way they do it in every other modern industrialized nation that seems to make it through the week without a mass shooting

    you act like this is so difficult

    And what way is that?

    I don't act.


    If explain it to you, but you probably wouldn't understand the terminology. 

    Typical conservative. Doesn't realize he's part of the problem. Wants progressives to fix it. 

    It's sad this isn't an act. If you had any sense of shame or embarrassment, now would be the time for you to feel it. 
    I’d never ask a progressive to fix my problems, I handle them myself.
    Alright wise guy, then what's your solution to gun violence?  You seem pretty content with the status quo when that's clearly not working. 
    Could always ban leftists from owning firearms as most of the violence done in the US today is done by leftists.

    Shouldn't be too much of an issue since you all hate guns anyway.

    BTW, assault any Senators today?
    Do you think this guy is a leftist? Seems to be such a rational open minded guy. Good thing he had a gun to solve that problem with his son. What a rotten piece of shit.

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/father-kills-14-old-son-233839242.html
    It's a hopeless situation...
  • Bentleyspop
    Bentleyspop Craft Beer Brewery, Colorado Posts: 11,411
  • PJPOWER
    PJPOWER Posts: 6,499
    dignin said:
    Those bad ass angry violent leftists.

    I remember when those antifa thugs brought all their guns to Charlottesville to intimidate those poor Nazis, even fired some shots at the crowd of defenseless Nazis.

    And then that leftist punk ran that women over with his car.

    I'm sure that's how it went down.
    Speaking of which, what happened to both of these groups?  Weren’t they supposed to duke it out again this past weekend?  
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,473
    the last two pages is part and parcel of why nothing gets done in the US regarding any fucking problem at all. no one can have a level headed, open, factual conversation anymore. it's all "I ain't budging an inch!". everything is "that side is wrong". 

    Mental health checks won't solve anything on their own. if you have those in place, people will stop getting the help they need so they won't lose their second amendment rights. 

    new gun laws won't do it on their own because there are already so many guns out there. it will take generations of the guns in the system to break down for that to make a difference. restrictions should be put in place, but thinking that would be an immediate fix is wishful. 

    education at the very basic level needs to be implemented. what kind? not sure. if you go down the "respect all life" road, you are reopening the religion in schools debate. if you go down the "guns are bad" road, you are going to have the gun lobby breathing down the neck of all politicians and those programs won't get funding. if you go down the "gun safety" road, you are going to have people like me screaming to not encourage gun usage to kids. 

    anyone have any logical, multi-faceted approach that they think might honestly work? anything they've read about?


    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




This discussion has been closed.