Russia's Influence On The American Election
Comments
-
http://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/353834-for-now-trump-dossier-creates-more-questions-than-answersJC29856 said:
the pee tape is real!!!JC29856 said:Russia and facebook!!!!!
https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2017/10/hard-questions-russian-ads-delivered-to-congress/- 44% of total ad impressions (number of times ads were displayed) were before the US election on November 8, 2016; 56% were after the election.
- Roughly 25% of the ads were never shown to anyone. That’s because advertising auctions are designed so that ads reach people based on relevance, and certain ads may not reach anyone as a result.
Exclusive: Russian-linked Facebook ads targeted Michigan and Wisconsin
http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/03/politics/russian-facebook-ads-michigan-wisconsin/index.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/27/mystery-death-ex-kgb-chief-linked-mi6-spys-dossier-donald-trump/
Steele is like WTF people, at this point you dont realize I had no sources? that most of the "dossier" was made up? jeeez, I was trying to sell the damn thing, not prove its authenticity! now you want me to answer for it?
0 -
Speaking of being informed, Em for full disclosure, I want to see the Facebook and twitter ads, what the NSA has on the DNC hack/leak and the Senate Intel report the Dems don't want released in full. Lets see it all.benjs said:
Who said you're supposed to believe that? The statement is crystal clear: "To protect the public, American people deserve to see @facebook ads, and how Russian intel services used social media to divide our country." Where do you see Trump's name, or even an insinuation (veiled or not) that Trump was responsible?JC29856 said:
25% of of the 3000 ads were not geo-targeted
large number of ads were run in areas of the country that were not heavily contested
Im supposed to believe that Trump was behind the Russia linked operatives that ran approximately 750 facebook ads in Michigan and Wisconsin and those ads swung those states to Trump?
https://www.facebook.com/BarrierBreakers2016/
http://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000154-3082-d20b-a1fc-b3e3368b0000
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President. Whether Russia decided to intervene on their own or on Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was), doesn't make an ounce of a difference. As I've said here before, Russia played smart by virtually interfering with this election (just as America does in typically more abrasive ways). It's not their fault that so many American people choose being proven right over being informed.
0 -
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President...how so?benjs said:
Who said you're supposed to believe that? The statement is crystal clear: "To protect the public, American people deserve to see @facebook ads, and how Russian intel services used social media to divide our country." Where do you see Trump's name, or even an insinuation (veiled or not) that Trump was responsible?JC29856 said:
25% of of the 3000 ads were not geo-targeted
large number of ads were run in areas of the country that were not heavily contested
Im supposed to believe that Trump was behind the Russia linked operatives that ran approximately 750 facebook ads in Michigan and Wisconsin and those ads swung those states to Trump?
https://www.facebook.com/BarrierBreakers2016/
http://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000154-3082-d20b-a1fc-b3e3368b0000
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President. Whether Russia decided to intervene on their own or on Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was), doesn't make an ounce of a difference. As I've said here before, Russia played smart by virtually interfering with this election (just as America does in typically more abrasive ways). It's not their fault that so many American people choose being proven right over being informed.
Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was)... how so?
0 -
^
At this point, if you have to ask those questions in bold above, you're either not paying attention or choosing to be ignorant on this subject.
Country over party. Be better than this. Please.www.myspace.com0 -
I'll ask you, what is so easy to see that Russia preferred Trump over Hillary? What have they gained or what did they expect to gain with Trump in office, not including war with US over Syrian airspace? Hillary would have been "tougher" (no more knock it offs!) on Putin?The Juggler said:^
At this point, if you have to ask those questions in bold above, you're either not paying attention or choosing to be ignorant on this subject.
Country over party. Be better than this. Please.
I admit I prefer Gilbert Godfrey as pres then anyone else who threatens war with a nuclear power over Syrian airspace. If I had to go to war with a nation, I would choose NK before I would think about choosing Russia Russia Russia.
Where was the Trump suggestion? To FIND the 33,000 emails Hillary deleted as part of the coverup? I actually thought that was pretty brilliant on Trumps part, every Brock bot and Hill bot claimed that Trump told Putin/Russia to hack (hack = find) Hillarys emails.
Nothing like you're own CREW pointing out that you purposefully and willfully deleted emails after records retention requesta and a subpoena (no intent!).
0 -
Trump's suggestion was actually publicly stated: "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing". It is also somewhere between highly likely and certain based on the throngs of undisclosed connections to Russian-connected personnel which keep surfacing - but I know you only participate in the game of connect-the-dots when it's to do with the DNC (a party you say you don't even belong to but exclusively criticize).JC29856 said:
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President...how so?benjs said:
Who said you're supposed to believe that? The statement is crystal clear: "To protect the public, American people deserve to see @facebook ads, and how Russian intel services used social media to divide our country." Where do you see Trump's name, or even an insinuation (veiled or not) that Trump was responsible?JC29856 said:
25% of of the 3000 ads were not geo-targeted
large number of ads were run in areas of the country that were not heavily contested
Im supposed to believe that Trump was behind the Russia linked operatives that ran approximately 750 facebook ads in Michigan and Wisconsin and those ads swung those states to Trump?
https://www.facebook.com/BarrierBreakers2016/
http://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000154-3082-d20b-a1fc-b3e3368b0000
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President. Whether Russia decided to intervene on their own or on Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was), doesn't make an ounce of a difference. As I've said here before, Russia played smart by virtually interfering with this election (just as America does in typically more abrasive ways). It's not their fault that so many American people choose being proven right over being informed.
Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was)... how so?
In terms of the talking points, Trump was overwhelmingly pro-Russian in his campaign. There are also documented financial dealings between Russia and Trump, his subsidiary organization, members of his administration his subsidiary organizations. Clinton has also been visibly at odds with Russian policy, and at personal odds with Putin.
You have a bewildering way of ignoring inconvenient information.
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/8qbbdx/why-putin-hates-clinton-and-helped-trump-win
http://time.com/4949414/hillary-clinton-vladimir-putin-manspreading/
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/clinton-putin-226153
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/from-reset-to-pause-the-real-story-behind-hillary-clintons-feud-with-vladimir-putin/2016/11/03/f575f9fa-a116-11e6-8832-23a007c77bb4_story.html
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/video/2017/sep/19/hillary-clinton-on-trump-putin-i-ran-against-both-of-them-video
https://www.wsj.com/articles/for-hillary-clinton-and-vladimir-putin-the-mistrust-is-mutual-1475055001
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/09/world/europe/putin-accuses-clinton-of-instigating-russian-protests.html
'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 10 -
It's the 3D way.benjs said:
Trump's suggestion was actually publicly stated: "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing". It is also somewhere between highly likely and certain based on the throngs of undisclosed connections to Russian-connected personnel which keep surfacing - but I know you only participate in the game of connect-the-dots when it's to do with the DNC (a party you say you don't even belong to but exclusively criticize).JC29856 said:
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President...how so?benjs said:
Who said you're supposed to believe that? The statement is crystal clear: "To protect the public, American people deserve to see @facebook ads, and how Russian intel services used social media to divide our country." Where do you see Trump's name, or even an insinuation (veiled or not) that Trump was responsible?JC29856 said:
25% of of the 3000 ads were not geo-targeted
large number of ads were run in areas of the country that were not heavily contested
Im supposed to believe that Trump was behind the Russia linked operatives that ran approximately 750 facebook ads in Michigan and Wisconsin and those ads swung those states to Trump?
https://www.facebook.com/BarrierBreakers2016/
http://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000154-3082-d20b-a1fc-b3e3368b0000
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President. Whether Russia decided to intervene on their own or on Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was), doesn't make an ounce of a difference. As I've said here before, Russia played smart by virtually interfering with this election (just as America does in typically more abrasive ways). It's not their fault that so many American people choose being proven right over being informed.
Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was)... how so?
In terms of the talking points, Trump was overwhelmingly pro-Russian in his campaign. There are also documented financial dealings between Russia and Trump, his subsidiary organization, members of his administration his subsidiary organizations. Clinton has also been visibly at odds with Russian policy, and at personal odds with Putin.
You have a bewildering way of ignoring inconvenient information.
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/8qbbdx/why-putin-hates-clinton-and-helped-trump-win
http://time.com/4949414/hillary-clinton-vladimir-putin-manspreading/
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/clinton-putin-226153
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/from-reset-to-pause-the-real-story-behind-hillary-clintons-feud-with-vladimir-putin/2016/11/03/f575f9fa-a116-11e6-8832-23a007c77bb4_story.html
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/video/2017/sep/19/hillary-clinton-on-trump-putin-i-ran-against-both-of-them-video
https://www.wsj.com/articles/for-hillary-clinton-and-vladimir-putin-the-mistrust-is-mutual-1475055001
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/09/world/europe/putin-accuses-clinton-of-instigating-russian-protests.html09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Halifax2TheMax said:
It's the 3D way.benjs said:
Trump's suggestion was actually publicly stated: "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing". It is also somewhere between highly likely and certain based on the throngs of undisclosed connections to Russian-connected personnel which keep surfacing - but I know you only participate in the game of connect-the-dots when it's to do with the DNC (a party you say you don't even belong to but exclusively criticize).JC29856 said:
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President...how so?benjs said:
Who said you're supposed to believe that? The statement is crystal clear: "To protect the public, American people deserve to see @facebook ads, and how Russian intel services used social media to divide our country." Where do you see Trump's name, or even an insinuation (veiled or not) that Trump was responsible?JC29856 said:
25% of of the 3000 ads were not geo-targeted
large number of ads were run in areas of the country that were not heavily contested
Im supposed to believe that Trump was behind the Russia linked operatives that ran approximately 750 facebook ads in Michigan and Wisconsin and those ads swung those states to Trump?
https://www.facebook.com/BarrierBreakers2016/
http://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000154-3082-d20b-a1fc-b3e3368b0000
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President. Whether Russia decided to intervene on their own or on Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was), doesn't make an ounce of a difference. As I've said here before, Russia played smart by virtually interfering with this election (just as America does in typically more abrasive ways). It's not their fault that so many American people choose being proven right over being informed.
Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was)... how so?
In terms of the talking points, Trump was overwhelmingly pro-Russian in his campaign. There are also documented financial dealings between Russia and Trump, his subsidiary organization, members of his administration his subsidiary organizations. Clinton has also been visibly at odds with Russian policy, and at personal odds with Putin.
You have a bewildering way of ignoring inconvenient information.
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/8qbbdx/why-putin-hates-clinton-and-helped-trump-win
http://time.com/4949414/hillary-clinton-vladimir-putin-manspreading/
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/clinton-putin-226153
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/from-reset-to-pause-the-real-story-behind-hillary-clintons-feud-with-vladimir-putin/2016/11/03/f575f9fa-a116-11e6-8832-23a007c77bb4_story.html
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/video/2017/sep/19/hillary-clinton-on-trump-putin-i-ran-against-both-of-them-video
https://www.wsj.com/articles/for-hillary-clinton-and-vladimir-putin-the-mistrust-is-mutual-1475055001
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/09/world/europe/putin-accuses-clinton-of-instigating-russian-protests.htmlDeflect, deflect, deflect and ignore questions that have been answered countless times over the past 12 months.
But.....COMET PIZZA!
www.myspace.com0 -
Distort, distract, divide. The 3D way.The Juggler said:Halifax2TheMax said:
It's the 3D way.benjs said:
Trump's suggestion was actually publicly stated: "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing". It is also somewhere between highly likely and certain based on the throngs of undisclosed connections to Russian-connected personnel which keep surfacing - but I know you only participate in the game of connect-the-dots when it's to do with the DNC (a party you say you don't even belong to but exclusively criticize).JC29856 said:
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President...how so?benjs said:
Who said you're supposed to believe that? The statement is crystal clear: "To protect the public, American people deserve to see @facebook ads, and how Russian intel services used social media to divide our country." Where do you see Trump's name, or even an insinuation (veiled or not) that Trump was responsible?JC29856 said:
25% of of the 3000 ads were not geo-targeted
large number of ads were run in areas of the country that were not heavily contested
Im supposed to believe that Trump was behind the Russia linked operatives that ran approximately 750 facebook ads in Michigan and Wisconsin and those ads swung those states to Trump?
https://www.facebook.com/BarrierBreakers2016/
http://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000154-3082-d20b-a1fc-b3e3368b0000
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President. Whether Russia decided to intervene on their own or on Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was), doesn't make an ounce of a difference. As I've said here before, Russia played smart by virtually interfering with this election (just as America does in typically more abrasive ways). It's not their fault that so many American people choose being proven right over being informed.
Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was)... how so?
In terms of the talking points, Trump was overwhelmingly pro-Russian in his campaign. There are also documented financial dealings between Russia and Trump, his subsidiary organization, members of his administration his subsidiary organizations. Clinton has also been visibly at odds with Russian policy, and at personal odds with Putin.
You have a bewildering way of ignoring inconvenient information.
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/8qbbdx/why-putin-hates-clinton-and-helped-trump-win
http://time.com/4949414/hillary-clinton-vladimir-putin-manspreading/
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/clinton-putin-226153
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/from-reset-to-pause-the-real-story-behind-hillary-clintons-feud-with-vladimir-putin/2016/11/03/f575f9fa-a116-11e6-8832-23a007c77bb4_story.html
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/video/2017/sep/19/hillary-clinton-on-trump-putin-i-ran-against-both-of-them-video
https://www.wsj.com/articles/for-hillary-clinton-and-vladimir-putin-the-mistrust-is-mutual-1475055001
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/09/world/europe/putin-accuses-clinton-of-instigating-russian-protests.htmlDeflect, deflect, deflect and ignore questions that have been answered countless times over the past 12 months.
But.....COMET PIZZA!
09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Sad. The saddest of all sad things. Sad.The Juggler said:Halifax2TheMax said:
It's the 3D way.benjs said:
Trump's suggestion was actually publicly stated: "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing". It is also somewhere between highly likely and certain based on the throngs of undisclosed connections to Russian-connected personnel which keep surfacing - but I know you only participate in the game of connect-the-dots when it's to do with the DNC (a party you say you don't even belong to but exclusively criticize).JC29856 said:
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President...how so?benjs said:
Who said you're supposed to believe that? The statement is crystal clear: "To protect the public, American people deserve to see @facebook ads, and how Russian intel services used social media to divide our country." Where do you see Trump's name, or even an insinuation (veiled or not) that Trump was responsible?JC29856 said:
25% of of the 3000 ads were not geo-targeted
large number of ads were run in areas of the country that were not heavily contested
Im supposed to believe that Trump was behind the Russia linked operatives that ran approximately 750 facebook ads in Michigan and Wisconsin and those ads swung those states to Trump?
https://www.facebook.com/BarrierBreakers2016/
http://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000154-3082-d20b-a1fc-b3e3368b0000
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President. Whether Russia decided to intervene on their own or on Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was), doesn't make an ounce of a difference. As I've said here before, Russia played smart by virtually interfering with this election (just as America does in typically more abrasive ways). It's not their fault that so many American people choose being proven right over being informed.
Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was)... how so?
In terms of the talking points, Trump was overwhelmingly pro-Russian in his campaign. There are also documented financial dealings between Russia and Trump, his subsidiary organization, members of his administration his subsidiary organizations. Clinton has also been visibly at odds with Russian policy, and at personal odds with Putin.
You have a bewildering way of ignoring inconvenient information.
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/8qbbdx/why-putin-hates-clinton-and-helped-trump-win
http://time.com/4949414/hillary-clinton-vladimir-putin-manspreading/
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/clinton-putin-226153
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/from-reset-to-pause-the-real-story-behind-hillary-clintons-feud-with-vladimir-putin/2016/11/03/f575f9fa-a116-11e6-8832-23a007c77bb4_story.html
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/video/2017/sep/19/hillary-clinton-on-trump-putin-i-ran-against-both-of-them-video
https://www.wsj.com/articles/for-hillary-clinton-and-vladimir-putin-the-mistrust-is-mutual-1475055001
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/09/world/europe/putin-accuses-clinton-of-instigating-russian-protests.htmlDeflect, deflect, deflect and ignore questions that have been answered countless times over the past 12 months.
But.....COMET PIZZA!
I LOVE MUSIC.
www.cluthelee.com
www.cluthe.com0 -
This Russian thing is still on? Really?0
-
Wait are the investigations done ?PJfanwillneverleave1 said:This Russian thing is still on? Really?jesus greets me looks just like me ....0 -
josevolution said:
Wait are the investigations done ?PJfanwillneverleave1 said:This Russian thing is still on? Really?
I'm not saying they are. I am saying that the nothingburger Russia stuff always exists and is becoming more prevalent due to recent events.0 -
You know the expression “where there’s smoke, there’s fire”? I know you take the stance of “where there’s smoke, there’s smoke”, but please call the fire department if you see smoke in a building on behalf of the logical ones.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:josevolution said:
Wait are the investigations done ?PJfanwillneverleave1 said:This Russian thing is still on? Really?
I'm not saying they are. I am saying that the nothingburger Russia stuff always exists and is becoming more prevalent due to recent events.'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 10 -
benjs said:
You know the expression “where there’s smoke, there’s fire”? I know you take the stance of “where there’s smoke, there’s smoke”, but please call the fire department if you see smoke in a building on behalf of the logical ones.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:josevolution said:
Wait are the investigations done ?PJfanwillneverleave1 said:This Russian thing is still on? Really?
I'm not saying they are. I am saying that the nothingburger Russia stuff always exists and is becoming more prevalent due to recent events.
Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
"that smoke coming from the kitchen must be from the nothing burgers I'm cooking. should be ok though".Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0
-
wow, implicating regular citizens, maybe the stupid ones referenced on here so often
0 -
Traitors.JC29856 said:wow, implicating regular citizens, maybe the stupid ones referenced on here so often09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Apparently Putin shared many of the same feelings about Hilliary as the more than 4 million voters that make a conscience decision not to vote for such a terrible corrupt weeble wobble of a candidate.benjs said:
Trump's suggestion was actually publicly stated: "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing". It is also somewhere between highly likely and certain based on the throngs of undisclosed connections to Russian-connected personnel which keep surfacing - but I know you only participate in the game of connect-the-dots when it's to do with the DNC (a party you say you don't even belong to but exclusively criticize).JC29856 said:
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President...how so?benjs said:
Who said you're supposed to believe that? The statement is crystal clear: "To protect the public, American people deserve to see @facebook ads, and how Russian intel services used social media to divide our country." Where do you see Trump's name, or even an insinuation (veiled or not) that Trump was responsible?JC29856 said:
25% of of the 3000 ads were not geo-targeted
large number of ads were run in areas of the country that were not heavily contested
Im supposed to believe that Trump was behind the Russia linked operatives that ran approximately 750 facebook ads in Michigan and Wisconsin and those ads swung those states to Trump?
https://www.facebook.com/BarrierBreakers2016/
http://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000154-3082-d20b-a1fc-b3e3368b0000
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President. Whether Russia decided to intervene on their own or on Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was), doesn't make an ounce of a difference. As I've said here before, Russia played smart by virtually interfering with this election (just as America does in typically more abrasive ways). It's not their fault that so many American people choose being proven right over being informed.
Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was)... how so?
In terms of the talking points, Trump was overwhelmingly pro-Russian in his campaign. There are also documented financial dealings between Russia and Trump, his subsidiary organization, members of his administration his subsidiary organizations. Clinton has also been visibly at odds with Russian policy, and at personal odds with Putin.
You have a bewildering way of ignoring inconvenient information.
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/8qbbdx/why-putin-hates-clinton-and-helped-trump-win
http://time.com/4949414/hillary-clinton-vladimir-putin-manspreading/
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/clinton-putin-226153
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/from-reset-to-pause-the-real-story-behind-hillary-clintons-feud-with-vladimir-putin/2016/11/03/f575f9fa-a116-11e6-8832-23a007c77bb4_story.html
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/video/2017/sep/19/hillary-clinton-on-trump-putin-i-ran-against-both-of-them-video
https://www.wsj.com/articles/for-hillary-clinton-and-vladimir-putin-the-mistrust-is-mutual-1475055001
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/09/world/europe/putin-accuses-clinton-of-instigating-russian-protests.html
I was under the impression that Putin was hacking our democracy over something more than a personal vendetta against Hill. I thought there was something more for Putin/Russia to gain. Maybe the gains at this point are unrealized, we'll see.
0 -
Wait so all the investigations are done can you please post the results from all of them , thanks in advance since you are in the know how please enlighten us with the findings ...JC29856 said:
Apparently Putin shared many of the same feelings about Hilliary as the more than 4 million voters that make a conscience decision not to vote for such a terrible corrupt weeble wobble of a candidate.benjs said:
Trump's suggestion was actually publicly stated: "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing". It is also somewhere between highly likely and certain based on the throngs of undisclosed connections to Russian-connected personnel which keep surfacing - but I know you only participate in the game of connect-the-dots when it's to do with the DNC (a party you say you don't even belong to but exclusively criticize).JC29856 said:
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President...how so?benjs said:
Who said you're supposed to believe that? The statement is crystal clear: "To protect the public, American people deserve to see @facebook ads, and how Russian intel services used social media to divide our country." Where do you see Trump's name, or even an insinuation (veiled or not) that Trump was responsible?JC29856 said:
25% of of the 3000 ads were not geo-targeted
large number of ads were run in areas of the country that were not heavily contested
Im supposed to believe that Trump was behind the Russia linked operatives that ran approximately 750 facebook ads in Michigan and Wisconsin and those ads swung those states to Trump?
https://www.facebook.com/BarrierBreakers2016/
http://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000154-3082-d20b-a1fc-b3e3368b0000
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President. Whether Russia decided to intervene on their own or on Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was), doesn't make an ounce of a difference. As I've said here before, Russia played smart by virtually interfering with this election (just as America does in typically more abrasive ways). It's not their fault that so many American people choose being proven right over being informed.
Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was)... how so?
In terms of the talking points, Trump was overwhelmingly pro-Russian in his campaign. There are also documented financial dealings between Russia and Trump, his subsidiary organization, members of his administration his subsidiary organizations. Clinton has also been visibly at odds with Russian policy, and at personal odds with Putin.
You have a bewildering way of ignoring inconvenient information.
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/8qbbdx/why-putin-hates-clinton-and-helped-trump-win
http://time.com/4949414/hillary-clinton-vladimir-putin-manspreading/
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/clinton-putin-226153
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/from-reset-to-pause-the-real-story-behind-hillary-clintons-feud-with-vladimir-putin/2016/11/03/f575f9fa-a116-11e6-8832-23a007c77bb4_story.html
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/video/2017/sep/19/hillary-clinton-on-trump-putin-i-ran-against-both-of-them-video
https://www.wsj.com/articles/for-hillary-clinton-and-vladimir-putin-the-mistrust-is-mutual-1475055001
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/09/world/europe/putin-accuses-clinton-of-instigating-russian-protests.html
I was under the impression that Putin was hacking our democracy over something more than a personal vendetta against Hill. I thought there was something more for Putin/Russia to gain. Maybe the gains at this point are unrealized, we'll see.jesus greets me looks just like me ....0
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help