Why is there no album for PJ's Unplugged performance?

WhyGo91
WhyGo91 Posts: 639
edited December 2013 in The Porch
I know this topic has probably already been discussed and that some people may not like the idea of it, but I'd really love to know why an official album from Pearl Jam's MTV Unplugged performance was never released?

I've got the Ten Reissue with the DVD of the performance, so I'm grateful for having that.

I'm just kind of confused why there isn't one. Anyone know?
446927_artist.jpg?0119
Post edited by Unknown User on
«13

Comments

  • Leezestarr313
    Leezestarr313 Temple of the cat Posts: 14,457
    I would still prefer the Benny Hall show on vinyl over this, but yeah, it would be super cool to have an acoustic PJ show on vinyl 8-)

    I don't know why it would not be released. Maybe there are copyright issues? But AIC and Nirvana are readily available too :think:
  • red mos
    red mos Posts: 4,953
    My guess is that it was too short of a show. That's the only reason I can think of. I love it though. I do think it would have been cool if they had waited until Vitalogy to make the unplugged or they had played a few off VS.
    PJ: 10/14/00 06/09/03 10/4/09 11/15/13 11/16/13 10/08/14
    EV Solo: 7/11/11 11/12/12 11/13/12
  • The timing of the appearance in Unplugged was explained in PJ20. I don't know why there was no CD, but the length of the show would make it perfect for vinyl. You can find the performance on the CD "Vs the World."
  • if happens,this will be the best thing this band ever released
    "...Dimitri...He talks to me...'.."The Ghost of Greece..".
    "..That's One Happy Fuckin Ghost.."
    “..That came up on the Pillow Case...This is for the Greek, With Our Apologies.....”
  • Pearl Jam should perform on MTV Unplugged again! :corn:
    "I'll end up alone like I began..."

    "You need the patience of like a National Geographic photographer sitting underneath the bush in a tent, trying to get a picture of zebras fucking or something for the first time." -Eddie Vedder
  • PJammer4life
    PJammer4life Los Angeles Posts: 2,673
    The timing of the appearance in Unplugged was explained in PJ20. I don't know why there was no CD, but the length of the show would make it perfect for vinyl. You can find the performance on the CD "Vs the World."

    One of my desert island bootleg cd's back in 1993-1994. Also had Angel live from Bridge 1993, Let Me Sleep, Hard to Imagine, Sonic Reducer, Whipping, Masters of War from Dylan tribute, Fuckin Up, live Footseps...definitely a favorite. Still have my copy. You can buy them on Amazon.

    http://www.amazon.com/Pearl-Jam-Versus- ... B006KK8NL2

    Black from MTV Unplugged is on the PJ20 Soundtrack vinyl. :-)
    Bridge Benefit 1994, San Francisco 1995, San Diego 1995 1 & 2, Missoula 1998, Los Angeles 2000, San Diego 2000, Eddie Vedder/Beck 2/26/2002, Santa Barbara 2003, Irvine 2003, San Diego 2003, Vancouver 2005, Gorge 2005, San Diego 2006, Los Angeles 2006 1 & 2, Santa Barbara 2006, Eddie Vedder 4/10/08, Eddie Vedder 4/12/08, Eddie Vedder 4/15/08, 7/12/2008, SF 8/28/09, LA 9/30/09, LA 10/1/09, LA 10/06/09, LA 10/07/09, San Diego 10/09/09, Eddie Vedder 7/6/2011, Eddie Vedder 7/8/2011, PJ20 9/3/2011, PJ20 9/4/2011, Vancouver 9/25/2011, San Diego 11/21/13, LA 11/24/13, Ohana 9/25/21, Ohana 9/26/21, Ohana 10/1/21, EV 2/17/22, LA Forum 5/6/22, LA Forum 5/7/22, EV 10/1/22, EV 9/30/23
  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,717
    edited December 2013
    if happens,this will be the best thing this band ever released
    No, because it would be censored and overdubbed like the DVD.

    And they would probably replace Dave A's drumming with Matt C's.
    Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • WhyGo91 wrote:
    I know this topic has probably already been discussed and that some people may not like the idea of it, but I'd really love to know why an official album from Pearl Jam's MTV Unplugged performance was never released?

    I've got the Ten Reissue with the DVD of the performance, so I'm grateful for having that.

    I'm just kind of confused why there isn't one. Anyone know?

    You mean like how MTV officially released some of the other unplugged performances? They actually only released a small percentage of the performances that happened as official albums, so for whatever reason PJ's fell into the unreleased category. Lots of big artists weren't released though.

    Have a look here to see what got released and what didn't:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ar ... ugged#1989
  • pjradio wrote:
    I actually looked this up once, and emailed a swedish pressing plant. Had an idea of pressing up like 300 of the Unplugged show on vinyl and sell them to fans for the cost. Even designed a cover for it (which was the thing I actually enjoyed).

    But there doesn't seem to be a great audio source for the uncut show (not counting the butchered DVD release),
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • rtwilli4
    rtwilli4 Posts: 261
    Weren't they pretty unhappy with the recording? I remember that the band didn't even want the show to be aired. I think MTV would have LOVED to release it in as many formats as possible. I could be wrong... Sure someone knows.
  • DewieCox
    DewieCox Posts: 11,432
    I think it's pretty short compared to the other that got an official release.

    There are a couple really good songs on here, but I don't think PJ translates to acoustic as well as some of the other performers. AIC has the vocal harmonies and more layered guitar parts and Nirvana, Unledded and Clapton have quite a few reworks to fit the unplugged theme better.

    I know the PJ unplugged was a bit rushed, but even when they've planned it they have done virtually nothing to make their tunes distinguishable from the originals.
  • DewieCox wrote:
    I think it's pretty short compared to the other that got an official release.

    There are a couple really good songs on here, but I don't think PJ translates to acoustic as well as some of the other performers. AIC has the vocal harmonies and more layered guitar parts and Nirvana, Unledded and Clapton have quite a few reworks to fit the unplugged theme better.
    And Neil Youngs set was just moody magic.

    I think pearl Jam did it too soon in their career with the tracks they had under their belt and the band they were. they only had one record out then, Nirvana and AiC had more and were at a place where they dared to do more with it.

    Pearl Jam pretty much played a hard rock set on acoustic guitars.

    Pearl Jam should have done it in 1996-2000 or something (don't know how long that show ran).
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • buck502000
    buck502000 Birthplace of GIBSON guitar Posts: 8,951
    thinking about this today
  • pjradio said:
    jesus, that's expensive!

    Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer



  • christopherfischer24@gmail.com
    christopherfischer24@gmail.com Baltimore, Maryland Posts: 1
    WhyGo91 said:

    I know this topic has probably already been discussed and that some people may not like the idea of it, but I'd really love to know why an official album from Pearl Jam's MTV Unplugged performance was never released?



    I've got the Ten Reissue with the DVD of the performance, so I'm grateful for having that.



    I'm just kind of confused why there isn't one. Anyone know?

  • Because it's not a very good set? (hides for cover)

    They got it right in 2003 with the experiment, Santa Barbara and then Benaroya. Like others said, it was too soon for them. I enjoy it for what it is, but even waiting just one year would have been such a different set.
  • Jbarker
    Jbarker Alberta Posts: 560

    Because it's not a very good set? (hides for cover)

    They got it right in 2003 with the experiment, Santa Barbara and then Benaroya. Like others said, it was too soon for them. I enjoy it for what it is, but even waiting just one year would have been such a different set.

    Absolutely.
    The rise to fame was too fast to pause and construct a decent acoustic show with minimal material.
  • Because it's not a very good set? (hides for cover)

    They got it right in 2003 with the experiment, Santa Barbara and then Benaroya. Like others said, it was too soon for them. I enjoy it for what it is, but even waiting just one year would have been such a different set.

    good thing you ducked. I just threw a virtual rock at your head.

    I see what you are saying, but I love that recording. Probably because I a) love Pearl Jam and b) am a sucker for the unplugged format.
    Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer



  • Jbarker
    Jbarker Alberta Posts: 560
    rtwilli4 said:

    Weren't they pretty unhappy with the recording? I remember that the band didn't even want the show to be aired. I think MTV would have LOVED to release it in as many formats as possible. I could be wrong... Sure someone knows.

    Isn't there an article from way back where Eddie talks about MTV being the ones unhappy with either their behavior or language or something, and holding it 'hostage' so to speak.
    I remember there was a pirated download that was completely uncut with the running time count along the bottom that sort of revealed all the in between banter, shenanigans, etc.
    Maybe that's why? I don't know.