Russia's Influence On The American Election

Options
1…457910…162

Comments

  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,068
    JC29856 said:

    The C.I.A.’s conclusion does not appear to be the product of specific new intelligence obtained since the election, several American officials, including some who had read the agency’s briefing, said on Sunday. Rather, it was an analysis of what many believe is overwhelming circumstantial evidence — evidence that others feel does not support firm judgments — that the Russians put a thumb on the scale for Mr. Trump, and got their desired outcome.

    Where's the link and what's the source for this? And how did what you posted previously add up to this with your claim that you made? Keep trying JC, you might think you're slick but you're not. And OJ is innocent because of the overwhelming circumstantial evidence, right? Maybe Julian can shed some light?
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Gern Blansten
    Gern Blansten Mar-A-Lago Posts: 22,167
    http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/309957-mcmullin-trump-trying-to-obscure-the-truth-on-russia

    Evan McMullin weighs in
    Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
    The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)

    1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
    2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
    2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
    2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
    2020: Oakland, Oakland:  2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
    2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
    2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    Gern Blansten said:

    http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/309957-mcmullin-trump-trying-to-obscure-the-truth-on-russia

    Evan McMullin weighs in

    http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-evan-mcmullin-could-win-utah-and-the-presidency/
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,559
    Bafoon doesn't even believe Climate change lol lol
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    josevolution said:

    Bafoon doesn't even believe Climate change lol lol

    It's cold cold cold in Russia Russia Russia!
  • eddiec
    eddiec Posts: 3,959
    JC29856 said:

    josevolution said:

    Bafoon doesn't even believe Climate change lol lol

    It's cold cold cold in Russia Russia Russia!
    That's weather, not climate.

  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    eddiec said:

    JC29856 said:

    josevolution said:

    Bafoon doesn't even believe Climate change lol lol

    It's cold cold cold in Russia Russia Russia!
    That's weather, not climate.

    Trump and his minions are a diseased disaster when it comes to climate.
    Climate did not win trump the election.
  • JimmyV
    JimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 19,597
    Clinton campaign joins calls for intelligence briefing of Electors before they cast ballots:

    http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/clinton-campaign-backs-call-for-intelligence-briefing-before-electoral-college-vote-232512
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    A hole has been blown in the Democratic Party, and mainstream media’s narrative, that Russia was behind the leak of DNC emails to Wikileaks.

    On Sunday, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan, Craig Murray, said he has met the person who gave the DNC emails and it was not the Russians.

    “As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two,” he wrote. “And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.”

    It’s the reality that so many in the mainstream media ignore. It wasn’t about who leaked the emails. It was about what they said.

    If you choose to believe the CIA who hacks US congress members over wikileaks with a pristine track record, so be it.
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    JimmyV said:

    Clinton campaign joins calls for intelligence briefing of Electors before they cast ballots:

    http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/clinton-campaign-backs-call-for-intelligence-briefing-before-electoral-college-vote-232512

    Death threats didn't work so now invoke plan Russia Russia Russia!
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    https://www.google.com/amp/m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_584edfd1e4b0bd9c3dfdb66e/amp


    https://www.google.com/amp/mobile.nytimes.com/2016/12/11/business/rex-tillerson-secretary-of-state-russia.amp.html


    https://www.google.com/amp/www.cnbc.com/amp/2016/12/12/tillerson-choice-raises-questions-of-corporate-vs-national-interest.html


    Hmmmmm? Theme?
  • Free
    Free Posts: 3,562
    edited December 2016
    JC29856 said:

    A hole has been blown in the Democratic Party, and mainstream media’s narrative, that Russia was behind the leak of DNC emails to Wikileaks.

    On Sunday, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan, Craig Murray, said he has met the person who gave the DNC emails and it was not the Russians.

    “As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two,” he wrote. “And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.”

    It’s the reality that so many in the mainstream media ignore. It wasn’t about who leaked the emails. It was about what they said.

    If you choose to believe the CIA who hacks US congress members over wikileaks with a pristine track record, so be it.

    Yes, this. This whole Russian mess isn't REALLY about Trump, it's about the Democratic Party. It's the same old shit that was happening before the election. Distract distract distract.

    BTW, got a link to this?
  • Gern Blansten
    Gern Blansten Mar-A-Lago Posts: 22,167
    http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/309996-ryan-backs-russia-investigation-shuns-doubts-of-elections-integrity

    good boy...
    Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
    The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)

    1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
    2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
    2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
    2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
    2020: Oakland, Oakland:  2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
    2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
    2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    Free said:

    JC29856 said:

    A hole has been blown in the Democratic Party, and mainstream media’s narrative, that Russia was behind the leak of DNC emails to Wikileaks.

    On Sunday, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan, Craig Murray, said he has met the person who gave the DNC emails and it was not the Russians.

    “As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two,” he wrote. “And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.”

    It’s the reality that so many in the mainstream media ignore. It wasn’t about who leaked the emails. It was about what they said.

    If you choose to believe the CIA who hacks US congress members over wikileaks with a pristine track record, so be it.

    Yes, this. This whole Russian mess isn't REALLY about Trump, it's about the Democratic Party. It's the same old shit that was happening before the election. Distract distract distract.

    BTW, got a link to this?
    http://www.bizpacreview.com/2016/12/11/julian-assange-associate-leak-not-hack-dnc-insider-not-russian-422765
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    CIA proof Russia Russia Russia hacked elections for Trump:


    image
  • JimmyV
    JimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 19,597
    JC29856 said:

    A hole has been blown in the Democratic Party, and mainstream media’s narrative, that Russia was behind the leak of DNC emails to Wikileaks.

    On Sunday, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan, Craig Murray, said he has met the person who gave the DNC emails and it was not the Russians.

    “As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two,” he wrote. “And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.”

    It’s the reality that so many in the mainstream media ignore. It wasn’t about who leaked the emails. It was about what they said.

    If you choose to believe the CIA who hacks US congress members over wikileaks with a pristine track record, so be it.

    If a random former ambassador appeared and said, without any proof, that he had met the Russian operative who hacked the DNC, I would have my doubts and question it. So I also question and also have my doubts when a random former ambassador appears and says, without any proof, that he met the leaker and that it is an inside job.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • Free
    Free Posts: 3,562
    edited December 2016
    JC29856 said:

    CIA proof Russia Russia Russia hacked elections for Trump:


    image

    :lol:
  • Jason P
    Jason P Posts: 19,290
    Is this the 3rd stage of grieving process?
    Be Excellent To Each Other
    Party On, Dudes!
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    JimmyV said:

    JC29856 said:

    A hole has been blown in the Democratic Party, and mainstream media’s narrative, that Russia was behind the leak of DNC emails to Wikileaks.

    On Sunday, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan, Craig Murray, said he has met the person who gave the DNC emails and it was not the Russians.

    “As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two,” he wrote. “And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.”

    It’s the reality that so many in the mainstream media ignore. It wasn’t about who leaked the emails. It was about what they said.

    If you choose to believe the CIA who hacks US congress members over wikileaks with a pristine track record, so be it.

    If a random former ambassador appeared and said, without any proof, that he had met the Russian operative who hacked the DNC, I would have my doubts and question it. So I also question and also have my doubts when a random former ambassador appears and says, without any proof, that he met the leaker and that it is an inside job.
    I agree.


    Best approach is to slaughter Donald for his bromance with Putin, but not go too far betting on Putin re Syria.

    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25651

    Date: 2015-12-21
  • Free
    Free Posts: 3,562
    edited December 2016
    I will never understand how the public just accepts everything they're told, no questioning, no need for real proof what our leaders tell us. If Obama wants to see Trump out of the office, go a different direction. Because defending the corrupt Democratic Party isn't working anymore!

Categories