Trump

1…478479481483484…623

Comments

  • ledvedderman
    ledvedderman Posts: 7,762
    Nope. That's a very logical way of looking at it.
    E8toX.gif

    http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
  • PJfanwillneverleave1
    PJfanwillneverleave1 Posts: 12,885
    ledvedderman said:

    Nope. That's a very logical way of looking at it.

    To who?
  • Bentleyspop
    Bentleyspop Craft Beer Brewery, Colorado Posts: 11,420
    Gern Blansten said:

    It's interesting to me that, within about a 30 second stretch, Trump will say the election is rigged then switch to a narrative that he has Hillary scared that she is losing Michigan and has to make a campaign stop there tonight.

    Do any of his supporters pick up on this shit?

    Clearly they do not
  • PJfanwillneverleave1
    PJfanwillneverleave1 Posts: 12,885
    Bentleyspop said:

    Gern Blansten said:

    It's interesting to me that, within about a 30 second stretch, Trump will say the election is rigged then switch to a narrative that he has Hillary scared that she is losing Michigan and has to make a campaign stop there tonight.

    Do any of his supporters pick up on this shit?

    Clearly they do not
    What's wrong w/ a little politicking to the bitter end?
  • bootlegger10
    bootlegger10 Posts: 16,256
    edited November 2016
    Gern Blansten said:

    image

    Meh


    Post edited by Kat on
  • PJfanwillneverleave1
    PJfanwillneverleave1 Posts: 12,885
    ^^^
    Trump doesn't do that anymore because he has listened to his advisors.
    Like a good POTUS does.
  • bootlegger10
    bootlegger10 Posts: 16,256
    I got a post edited by Kat finally. I finally feel like part of the team. That must have been the most tame post ever to be censored though.
  • PJfanwillneverleave1
    PJfanwillneverleave1 Posts: 12,885
    bootlegger10 said:

    I got a post edited by Kat finally. I finally feel like part of the team. That must have been the most tame post ever to be censored though.

    Team Trump?
  • Kat
    Kat Posts: 4,961
    A sexist post about Sarah Palin is not ok here. If you find this to be a badge of honor of some kind, we can close your forum account right now and be done with it.
    Falling down,...not staying down
  • bootlegger10
    bootlegger10 Posts: 16,256
    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    bootlegger10 said:

    I got a post edited by Kat finally. I finally feel like part of the team. That must have been the most tame post ever to be censored though.

    Team Trump?
    No political team. Just the team of posters.
  • PJfanwillneverleave1
    PJfanwillneverleave1 Posts: 12,885
    Kat said:

    A sexist post about Sarah Palin is not ok here. If you find this to be a badge of honor of some kind, we can close your forum account right now and be done with it.

    100%
  • CM189191
    CM189191 Posts: 6,927
    bootlegger10 said:

    I got a post edited by Kat finally. I finally feel like part of the team. That must have been the most tame post ever to be censored though.

    Welcome to the club!
  • bootlegger10
    bootlegger10 Posts: 16,256
    edited November 2016
    Kat said:

    A sexist post about Sarah Palin is not ok here. If you find this to be a badge of honor of some kind, we can close your forum account right now and be done with it.

    How was my post sexist? Did my post cast any judgement good or bad on her appearance? No, it did not. We had two posts prior though where one said she was hot and then one said "meh". I merely asked if Gern was going to rank like Trump, because I thought judging women's appearances was a no no. So you leave the post where someone judges her appearance and then call the post where there was no judging of appearance sexist. That makes no sense.

    I want to know how my post was sexist, especially when said in context of this election and Trump. Please let me know.

    Still curious to understand how posting a picture of Palin coming out of the gym with no make-up for the sole intent to comment negatively on her appearance with a "meh" is acceptable.
    Post edited by bootlegger10 on
  • PJfanwillneverleave1
    PJfanwillneverleave1 Posts: 12,885
    bootlegger10 said:

    Kat said:

    A sexist post about Sarah Palin is not ok here. If you find this to be a badge of honor of some kind, we can close your forum account right now and be done with it.

    How was my post sexist? Did my post cast any judgement good or bad on her appearance? No, it did not. We had two posts prior though where one said she was hot and then one said "meh". I merely asked if Gern was going to rank like Trump, because I thought judging women's appearances was a no no. So you leave the post where someone judges her appearance and then call the post where there was no judging of appearance sexist. That makes no sense.

    I want to know how my post was sexist, especially when said in context of this election and Trump. Please let me know.

    For the love of god man.
    Stop with the egging of the mods.
    Ask anyone.
    Not good.
  • bootlegger10
    bootlegger10 Posts: 16,256
    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    bootlegger10 said:

    Kat said:

    A sexist post about Sarah Palin is not ok here. If you find this to be a badge of honor of some kind, we can close your forum account right now and be done with it.

    How was my post sexist? Did my post cast any judgement good or bad on her appearance? No, it did not. We had two posts prior though where one said she was hot and then one said "meh". I merely asked if Gern was going to rank like Trump, because I thought judging women's appearances was a no no. So you leave the post where someone judges her appearance and then call the post where there was no judging of appearance sexist. That makes no sense.

    I want to know how my post was sexist, especially when said in context of this election and Trump. Please let me know.

    For the love of god man.
    Stop with the egging of the mods.
    Ask anyone.
    Not good.
    Sorry, I am not egging on. Kat deletes my post and then calls it sexist so now when people read the thread they are going to assume it was a horrible sexist post when there was nothing sexist about it at all. I have never had a post edited by a Mod in my 10 years or so of posting on this board so I am not one to go after the Mods.

    I didn't even vote for Trump either.
  • PJfanwillneverleave1
    PJfanwillneverleave1 Posts: 12,885
    Wow.

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/07/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-election-day-final-voting-push
    Leaving nothing to chance, Clinton and President Barack Obama held afternoon rallies in Michigan and were due to appear on stage together in Philadelphia with Bruce Springsteen, a one-man songbook for America’s blue-collar angst, before Clinton headed to another midnight concert with Lady Gaga and Jon Bon Jovi in North Carolina.
    Trump still hopes to pull off an upset that would send shockwaves around the world by appealing to anger over jobs and trade in the traditionally Democratic state, though he also needs an almost clean sweep of battleground states such as Florida and North Carolina to win outright.
  • bootlegger10
    bootlegger10 Posts: 16,256
    As a private citizen I am limited to contributing $2,700 to Clinton's campaign.

    Bruce Springsteen would normally charge $500k (estimating low) for a concert appearance.

    It doesn't seem right that Springsteen can donate $500,000 of free time to Hillary. Does she pay Springsteen a nominal amount?
  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    bootlegger10 said:

    As a private citizen I am limited to contributing $2,700 to Clinton's campaign.

    Bruce Springsteen would normally charge $500k (estimating low) for a concert appearance.

    It doesn't seem right that Springsteen can donate $500,000 of free time to Hillary. Does she pay Springsteen a nominal amount?

    Really?
  • PJfanwillneverleave1
    PJfanwillneverleave1 Posts: 12,885
    I like this
    Speaking to a packed crowd in a community college gymnasium in Scranton, Pennsylvania, Trump outlined his closing message that “this election will decide whether we are ruled by a corrupt political class or by yourselves, the people”.
    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/07/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-election-day-final-voting-push
  • bootlegger10
    bootlegger10 Posts: 16,256
    edited November 2016
    dignin said:

    bootlegger10 said:

    As a private citizen I am limited to contributing $2,700 to Clinton's campaign.

    Bruce Springsteen would normally charge $500k (estimating low) for a concert appearance.

    It doesn't seem right that Springsteen can donate $500,000 of free time to Hillary. Does she pay Springsteen a nominal amount?

    Really?
    What? I think it is a fair question. It is illegal for me to give Hillary, Trump or any other politician $4,000, but if I were a famous person I could put on a free concert at a rally for Hillary or Trump when I would normally charge $500k to a promoter for and it is perfectly fine? Does that not seem backward to you? I understand that is a donation of time, and volunteers on the ground for politicians definitely put in hours and hours of free time. It just doesn't seem right that Springsteen, Vedder, Nugent or whoever can have so much influence and I can only donate $2,700. Look at the crowds and excitement that these concerts generate, but if bootlegger10 slips Hillary $2,800 the FEC will be all over me.

    This is not anti-Hillary post. Just an observation.
    Post edited by bootlegger10 on
This discussion has been closed.

Categories