America's Gun Violence
Comments
-
I own an ar 15. It s scary because it looks scary. Barely any crimes are committed with this rifle.Gern Blansten said:
enough evidence to support that civilians shouldn't be able to buy AR-15s.mace1229 said:enough evidence for what? To ban the AR-15 or ban all guns?
It's being sold as a "sporting" weapon...it's not. It's an assault weapon built for war.
However when I fire my m1 garand i shit my pants. This one weapon literally killed tens of thousands of nazis, japs, Chinese, North Koreans, nva and Vietcong. I can't imagine being hit by one of those bullets. It is a pure weapon of war. Crazy that everyone wants to ban an ar15 because they look scary but no one ever mentions the garand because they look pretty.Post edited by mcgruff10 onI'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
By the way, what evidence do you have? I hate to quote the 2nd amendment and all.....and heller....Gern Blansten said:
enough evidence to support that civilians shouldn't be able to buy AR-15s.mace1229 said:enough evidence for what? To ban the AR-15 or ban all guns?
It's being sold as a "sporting" weapon...it's not. It's an assault weapon built for war.I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
The circles this thread spins...mcgruff10 said:
By the way, what evidence do you have? I hate to quote the 2nd amendment and all.....and heller....Gern Blansten said:
enough evidence to support that civilians shouldn't be able to buy AR-15s.mace1229 said:enough evidence for what? To ban the AR-15 or ban all guns?
It's being sold as a "sporting" weapon...it's not. It's an assault weapon built for war.
Yes, you can quote the 2nd amendment and the heller case. Just as we can say that no gun designed specifically for military use in warfare should be released for public sale. That doesn't infringe upon your right to bear arms. You can still own guns.will myself to find a home, a home within myself
we will find a way, we will find our place0 -
But there are military guns released for public sales. The ar 15 is not one of them. Why go after this gun? It accounts to minuscule deaths..., is it because it s scary looking? Be honest.Degeneratefk said:
The circles this thread spins...mcgruff10 said:
By the way, what evidence do you have? I hate to quote the 2nd amendment and all.....and heller....Gern Blansten said:
enough evidence to support that civilians shouldn't be able to buy AR-15s.mace1229 said:enough evidence for what? To ban the AR-15 or ban all guns?
It's being sold as a "sporting" weapon...it's not. It's an assault weapon built for war.
Yes, you can quote the 2nd amendment and the heller case. Just as we can say that no gun designed specifically for military use in warfare should be released for public sale. That doesn't infringe upon your right to bear arms. You can still own guns.I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
Are you kidding?mcgruff10 said:
But there are military guns released for public sales. The ar 15 is not one of them. Why go after this gun? It accounts to minuscule deaths..., is it because it s scary looking? Be honest.Degeneratefk said:
The circles this thread spins...mcgruff10 said:
By the way, what evidence do you have? I hate to quote the 2nd amendment and all.....and heller....Gern Blansten said:
enough evidence to support that civilians shouldn't be able to buy AR-15s.mace1229 said:enough evidence for what? To ban the AR-15 or ban all guns?
It's being sold as a "sporting" weapon...it's not. It's an assault weapon built for war.
Yes, you can quote the 2nd amendment and the heller case. Just as we can say that no gun designed specifically for military use in warfare should be released for public sale. That doesn't infringe upon your right to bear arms. You can still own guns.
You haven't seen enough of its capacity to wreak havoc and death that you're willing to tolerate another f**king elementary school shooting... or movie theatre shooting... or mall shooting as some maniac expresses his rage with it?
Come on Scruffy.
There's simply no need for a weapon like this in the hands of the average, everyday common citizen.
None. Other than to let the average, everyday common citizen have a fancy gun to shoot shit with."My brain's a good brain!"0 -
It's got nothing to do with looks. That's just absurd. Look what that guns did in Sandy hook and tell me it doesn't just tear human flesh to pieces. I don't really care how many deaths it accounts for. It's not designed for civilian use.mcgruff10 said:
But there are military guns released for public sales. The ar 15 is not one of them. Why go after this gun? It accounts to minuscule deaths..., is it because it s scary looking? Be honest.Degeneratefk said:
The circles this thread spins...mcgruff10 said:
By the way, what evidence do you have? I hate to quote the 2nd amendment and all.....and heller....Gern Blansten said:
enough evidence to support that civilians shouldn't be able to buy AR-15s.mace1229 said:enough evidence for what? To ban the AR-15 or ban all guns?
It's being sold as a "sporting" weapon...it's not. It's an assault weapon built for war.
Yes, you can quote the 2nd amendment and the heller case. Just as we can say that no gun designed specifically for military use in warfare should be released for public sale. That doesn't infringe upon your right to bear arms. You can still own guns.will myself to find a home, a home within myself
we will find a way, we will find our place0 -
It's not just because it looks scary, you would have a pretty difficult time sneaking a Garand into a movie theater to mow people down indiscriminately, and you wouldn't have a fore grip and huge magazine for greatest terrorist effect either.mcgruff10 said:
I own an ar 15. It s scary because it looks scary. Barely any crimes are committed with this rifle.Gern Blansten said:
enough evidence to support that civilians shouldn't be able to buy AR-15s.mace1229 said:enough evidence for what? To ban the AR-15 or ban all guns?
It's being sold as a "sporting" weapon...it's not. It's an assault weapon built for war.
However when I fire my m1 garand i shit my pants. This one weapon literally killed tens of thousands of nazis, japs, Chinese, North Koreans, nva and Vietcong. I can't imagine being hit by one of those bullets. It is a pure weapon of war. Crazy that everyone wants to ban an ar15 because they look scary but no one ever mentions the garand because they look pretty.
Monkey Driven, Call this Living?0 -
the number of suicides by gun I believe actually does out-number violent gun deaths, I was just reading some stuff on the interweb that had some pretty interesting facts.PJ_Soul said:eddiec said:
Nobody fears walking into a movie theater and having some guy start tossing cocaine into the air.Godfather. said:there are more deaths from legal and illegal drugs every year, a gun kills with a loud bang and drugs kill for the most part silently, something to think about while people are protesting guns while they're high on who knows what.
Godfather.
That's funny, but is a very good point.
I know that I wouldn't really have any issue with guns if people only used them to kill themselves by choice.
Godfather.
0 -
I do enjoy shooting shit with my fancy gun. When are you coming to the range with me?Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
Are you kidding?mcgruff10 said:
But there are military guns released for public sales. The ar 15 is not one of them. Why go after this gun? It accounts to minuscule deaths..., is it because it s scary looking? Be honest.Degeneratefk said:
The circles this thread spins...mcgruff10 said:
By the way, what evidence do you have? I hate to quote the 2nd amendment and all.....and heller....Gern Blansten said:
enough evidence to support that civilians shouldn't be able to buy AR-15s.mace1229 said:enough evidence for what? To ban the AR-15 or ban all guns?
It's being sold as a "sporting" weapon...it's not. It's an assault weapon built for war.
Yes, you can quote the 2nd amendment and the heller case. Just as we can say that no gun designed specifically for military use in warfare should be released for public sale. That doesn't infringe upon your right to bear arms. You can still own guns.
You haven't seen enough of its capacity to wreak havoc and death that you're willing to tolerate another f**king elementary school shooting... or movie theatre shooting... or mall shooting as some maniac expresses his rage with it?
Come on Scruffy.
There's simply no need for a weapon like this in the hands of the average, everyday common citizen.
None. Other than to let the average, everyday common citizen have a fancy gun to shoot shit with.I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
Lolmcgruff10 said:
I do enjoy shooting shit with my fancy gun. When are you coming to the range with me?Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
Are you kidding?mcgruff10 said:
But there are military guns released for public sales. The ar 15 is not one of them. Why go after this gun? It accounts to minuscule deaths..., is it because it s scary looking? Be honest.Degeneratefk said:
The circles this thread spins...mcgruff10 said:
By the way, what evidence do you have? I hate to quote the 2nd amendment and all.....and heller....Gern Blansten said:
enough evidence to support that civilians shouldn't be able to buy AR-15s.mace1229 said:enough evidence for what? To ban the AR-15 or ban all guns?
It's being sold as a "sporting" weapon...it's not. It's an assault weapon built for war.
Yes, you can quote the 2nd amendment and the heller case. Just as we can say that no gun designed specifically for military use in warfare should be released for public sale. That doesn't infringe upon your right to bear arms. You can still own guns.
You haven't seen enough of its capacity to wreak havoc and death that you're willing to tolerate another f**king elementary school shooting... or movie theatre shooting... or mall shooting as some maniac expresses his rage with it?
Come on Scruffy.
There's simply no need for a weapon like this in the hands of the average, everyday common citizen.
None. Other than to let the average, everyday common citizen have a fancy gun to shoot shit with.
As soon as I can get my ass down there."My brain's a good brain!"0 -
get a shotgun. In my world you wouldn't have an AR-15PJPOWER said:
So I built an AR-15 specifically for hunting wild hogs...not for war...unless you are talking about waging war on those damn 4-legged menaces. I chose that platform as it is lighter weight and easier to carry through the thick brush where I hunt and sometimes those bastards require quick follow up shots (if you've ever been charged by one, you would understand).Gern Blansten said:
enough evidence to support that civilians shouldn't be able to buy AR-15s.mace1229 said:enough evidence for what? To ban the AR-15 or ban all guns?
It's being sold as a "sporting" weapon...it's not. It's an assault weapon built for war.
I'm pretty sure the rifles the military uses are fully automatic and not semi-auto only (like the AR-15).
There are many many semi-auto rifles out there in different platforms that fire at the exact same rate as AR-15s and have been used for hunting for years. Oh, I forgot, AR-15s "look scary".
I would rather ban the toy replicas that encourage improper safe handling.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
Right....but someone wanting to use it for mass murder won't follow the lawtempo_n_groove said:
Eugene Stoner also designed "sporting rifles" and described them as such.Gern Blansten said:The guy that designed the AR-15 (M-16) was interviewed on Bryant Gumbel's HBO show last night.
He can't believe that the AR-15 is available for public purchase.
That's enough evidence for me folks....should be for you too.
He designed the weapon for war. A $90 addition makes the AR-15 fully automatic.
Also the add on to make the weapon automatic is a felony. Why a legal gun owner would do that is beyond me.
So why is the modded stock even available?
At least by banning the weapon we make it more difficult to obtain.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
Lol, shotgun just pisses them off. Even buck shot will sometimes bounce off them. I load my own ammo specifically for the game I'm hunting... Just like I would not use a rifle for quail, I don't use a shotgun for wild pigs.Gern Blansten said:
get a shotgun. In my world you wouldn't have an AR-15PJPOWER said:
So I built an AR-15 specifically for hunting wild hogs...not for war...unless you are talking about waging war on those damn 4-legged menaces. I chose that platform as it is lighter weight and easier to carry through the thick brush where I hunt and sometimes those bastards require quick follow up shots (if you've ever been charged by one, you would understand).Gern Blansten said:
enough evidence to support that civilians shouldn't be able to buy AR-15s.mace1229 said:enough evidence for what? To ban the AR-15 or ban all guns?
It's being sold as a "sporting" weapon...it's not. It's an assault weapon built for war.
I'm pretty sure the rifles the military uses are fully automatic and not semi-auto only (like the AR-15).
There are many many semi-auto rifles out there in different platforms that fire at the exact same rate as AR-15s and have been used for hunting for years. Oh, I forgot, AR-15s "look scary".
I would rather ban the toy replicas that encourage improper safe handling.0 -
Because it's an assault weapon. The maker even states that it shouldn't be for public use or sale.mcgruff10 said:
But there are military guns released for public sales. The ar 15 is not one of them. Why go after this gun? It accounts to minuscule deaths..., is it because it s scary looking? Be honest.Degeneratefk said:
The circles this thread spins...mcgruff10 said:
By the way, what evidence do you have? I hate to quote the 2nd amendment and all.....and heller....Gern Blansten said:
enough evidence to support that civilians shouldn't be able to buy AR-15s.mace1229 said:enough evidence for what? To ban the AR-15 or ban all guns?
It's being sold as a "sporting" weapon...it's not. It's an assault weapon built for war.
Yes, you can quote the 2nd amendment and the heller case. Just as we can say that no gun designed specifically for military use in warfare should be released for public sale. That doesn't infringe upon your right to bear arms. You can still own guns.
You disagree....that's fine.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
I d love to go hog hunting again. Is texas really over run by then?PJPOWER said:
Lol, shotgun just pisses them off. Even buck shot will sometimes bounce off them. I load my own ammo specifically for the game I'm hunting... Just like I would not use a rifle for quail, I don't use a shotgun for wild pigs.Gern Blansten said:
get a shotgun. In my world you wouldn't have an AR-15PJPOWER said:
So I built an AR-15 specifically for hunting wild hogs...not for war...unless you are talking about waging war on those damn 4-legged menaces. I chose that platform as it is lighter weight and easier to carry through the thick brush where I hunt and sometimes those bastards require quick follow up shots (if you've ever been charged by one, you would understand).Gern Blansten said:
enough evidence to support that civilians shouldn't be able to buy AR-15s.mace1229 said:enough evidence for what? To ban the AR-15 or ban all guns?
It's being sold as a "sporting" weapon...it's not. It's an assault weapon built for war.
I'm pretty sure the rifles the military uses are fully automatic and not semi-auto only (like the AR-15).
There are many many semi-auto rifles out there in different platforms that fire at the exact same rate as AR-15s and have been used for hunting for years. Oh, I forgot, AR-15s "look scary".
I would rather ban the toy replicas that encourage improper safe handling.I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
I still don't get how you chose hawaii over New Jersey. I was actually insulted.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
Lolmcgruff10 said:
I do enjoy shooting shit with my fancy gun. When are you coming to the range with me?Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
Are you kidding?mcgruff10 said:
But there are military guns released for public sales. The ar 15 is not one of them. Why go after this gun? It accounts to minuscule deaths..., is it because it s scary looking? Be honest.Degeneratefk said:
The circles this thread spins...mcgruff10 said:
By the way, what evidence do you have? I hate to quote the 2nd amendment and all.....and heller....Gern Blansten said:
enough evidence to support that civilians shouldn't be able to buy AR-15s.mace1229 said:enough evidence for what? To ban the AR-15 or ban all guns?
It's being sold as a "sporting" weapon...it's not. It's an assault weapon built for war.
Yes, you can quote the 2nd amendment and the heller case. Just as we can say that no gun designed specifically for military use in warfare should be released for public sale. That doesn't infringe upon your right to bear arms. You can still own guns.
You haven't seen enough of its capacity to wreak havoc and death that you're willing to tolerate another f**king elementary school shooting... or movie theatre shooting... or mall shooting as some maniac expresses his rage with it?
Come on Scruffy.
There's simply no need for a weapon like this in the hands of the average, everyday common citizen.
None. Other than to let the average, everyday common citizen have a fancy gun to shoot shit with.
As soon as I can get my ass down there.I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
I saw a real AK47 or what ever you call it at a gun shop for $26,000 and was told that the real ones are very hard to get ahold of and the people that have them wont sell them easily, have any of you heard of this ?
Godfather.
0 -
I don't know what he means by "real"? The first generation created by the Russians in the late 40s? Even then I doubt it is near that much. They are cheap because millions have been made, how else would so many small arms rebels around the world get such a supply of them? I believe it's one of the most, if not the most manufactured gun world wide.0
-
ummmmmm I'm sorry maybe it was another rifle, but there was no mistaking the price tag and it was that kind of rifle I was looking at, forgive my weapons ignorance I was just curious if you had seen or heard such a thing.mace1229 said:I don't know what he means by "real"? The first generation created by the Russians in the late 40s? Even then I doubt it is near that much. They are cheap because millions have been made, how else would so many small arms rebels around the world get such a supply of them? I believe it's one of the most, if not the most manufactured gun world wide.
Godfather.
0 -
Probably a stg 44. It s an assault weapon made by the nazis in ww2. I m saving up for the .22 lr version. Sick gun.Godfather. said:
ummmmmm I'm sorry maybe it was another rifle, but there was no mistaking the price tag and it was that kind of rifle I was looking at, forgive my weapons ignorance I was just curious if you had seen or heard such a thing.mace1229 said:I don't know what he means by "real"? The first generation created by the Russians in the late 40s? Even then I doubt it is near that much. They are cheap because millions have been made, how else would so many small arms rebels around the world get such a supply of them? I believe it's one of the most, if not the most manufactured gun world wide.
Godfather.I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help