MLB 2025 Season
Comments
-
It's a museum0
-
Is Barry Bonds the best player of a generation? Yes/No
Is Clemens one of the best pitchers of a generation? Yes/No0 -
1. No, not just a generation. Barry Bonds is the greatest player of all-time.Cliffy6745 said:Is Barry Bonds the best player of a generation? Yes/No
Is Clemens one of the best pitchers of a generation? Yes/No
2. Yes.
Star Lake 00 / Pittsburgh 03 / State College 03 / Bristow 03 / Cleveland 06 / Camden II 06 / DC 08 / Pittsburgh 13 / Baltimore 13 / Charlottesville 13 / Cincinnati 14 / St. Paul 14 / Hampton 16 / Wrigley I 16 / Wrigley II 16 / Baltimore 20 / Camden 22 / Baltimore 24 / Raleigh I 25 / Raleigh II 25 / Pittsburgh I 250 -
Statistically speaking, yes, but those stats weren't necessarily legit and earned without aid.Cliffy6745 said:Is Barry Bonds the best player of a generation? Yes/No
Is Clemens one of the best pitchers of a generation? Yes/NoAlpine Valley 6/26/98, Alpine Valley 10/8/00, Champaign 4/23/03, Chicago 6/18/03, Alpine Valley 6/21/03, Grand Rapids 10/3/04
Chicago 5/16/06, Chicago 5/17/06, Grand Rapids 5/19/06
Milwaukee 6/29/06, Milwaukee 6/30/06, Lollapalooza 8/5/07
Eddie Solo Milwaukee 8/19/08, Toronto 8/21/09, Chicago 8/23/09
Chicago 8/24/09, Indianapolis 5/7/10, Ed Chicago 6/29/11, Alpine Valley 9/3/11 and 9/4/11, Wrigley 7/19/13, Moline 10/18/14, Milwaukee 10/20/140 -
Milton Bradley...not like it needs to be said again, but yep, he is an absolute heaping pile of garbage
http://www.si.com/mlb/2015/04/08/milton-bradley-domestic-abuse-mlb-monique-bradley?page=5&devicetype=phonewww.myspace.com0 -
Their statistics are 100% legit and were earned by playing within the rules of the league at the time.pureoc said:
Statistically speaking, yes, but those stats weren't necessarily legit and earned without aid.Cliffy6745 said:Is Barry Bonds the best player of a generation? Yes/No
Is Clemens one of the best pitchers of a generation? Yes/No
Star Lake 00 / Pittsburgh 03 / State College 03 / Bristow 03 / Cleveland 06 / Camden II 06 / DC 08 / Pittsburgh 13 / Baltimore 13 / Charlottesville 13 / Cincinnati 14 / St. Paul 14 / Hampton 16 / Wrigley I 16 / Wrigley II 16 / Baltimore 20 / Camden 22 / Baltimore 24 / Raleigh I 25 / Raleigh II 25 / Pittsburgh I 250 -
You ever read the article on his girlfriend/wife and their relationship? Fucking sickening and she's dead now.The Juggler said:Milton Bradley...not like it needs to be said again, but yep, he is an absolute heaping pile of garbage
http://www.si.com/mlb/2015/04/08/milton-bradley-domestic-abuse-mlb-monique-bradley?page=5&devicetype=phone0 -
how's that? ... steroids were banned unofficially till they were officially banned in 2005HesCalledDyer said:
Their statistics are 100% legit and were earned by playing within the rules of the league at the time.pureoc said:
Statistically speaking, yes, but those stats weren't necessarily legit and earned without aid.Cliffy6745 said:Is Barry Bonds the best player of a generation? Yes/No
Is Clemens one of the best pitchers of a generation? Yes/No0 -
Bonds never officially even popped for steroids. He technically did once on a test he was told was anonymous and would never be used against him or the other players in that survey test. Other than that he never failed a test or was convicted of anything steroid related. Even his one conviction for obstruction has now been thrown out. He is an innocent man damnit.
I'm not stupid but within the rules MLB set he is only suspected of doing them. Much like Piazza who just got in.Tom Brady & Donald Trump, BFF's
Fuckus rules all
Rob
Seattle0 -
Ya and Lance Armstrong never failed a doping test either ... or at least one that wasn't covered up for him ...
I'm not sure how he fits within the rules MLB set ... people hanging on to the fact he didn't test positive?0 -
http://mlb.nbcsports.com/2016/01/08/former-cardinals-scouting-director-to-be-indicted-for-hacking-the-astros-today/
How is this not the biggest deal ever? How are there not some insane penalties on the Cards?0 -
In 1990, Congress passed the Anabolic Steroids Control Act, making steroids a Class III substance (same as amphetamines, opium, morphine). As a response, MLB mentioned steroids as part of the illegal drugs/controlled substances memo in 1991. However, there were no standards constituting education, testing, punishment, or even what specific drugs were considered.polaris_x said:
how's that? ... steroids were banned unofficially till they were officially banned in 2005HesCalledDyer said:
Their statistics are 100% legit and were earned by playing within the rules of the league at the time.pureoc said:
Statistically speaking, yes, but those stats weren't necessarily legit and earned without aid.Cliffy6745 said:Is Barry Bonds the best player of a generation? Yes/No
Is Clemens one of the best pitchers of a generation? Yes/No
I mean, if you can prove that these players were all injecting themselves with anabolic steroids, and thus performing illegally, then I'll eat crow for dinner. The fact is, players used other performance enhancers to circumvent the controlled subtances ban; substances that were not specifically mentioned as being banned and were perfectly legal in the eyes of the sport. And as the home runs were being hit and viewership & attendance were rising, what did MLB do? Turned a blind eye because they were raking in millions. MLB promoted it. They created the monster. Why should the players' accomplishments during that era suffer because of that?Star Lake 00 / Pittsburgh 03 / State College 03 / Bristow 03 / Cleveland 06 / Camden II 06 / DC 08 / Pittsburgh 13 / Baltimore 13 / Charlottesville 13 / Cincinnati 14 / St. Paul 14 / Hampton 16 / Wrigley I 16 / Wrigley II 16 / Baltimore 20 / Camden 22 / Baltimore 24 / Raleigh I 25 / Raleigh II 25 / Pittsburgh I 250 -
YepHesCalledDyer said:
In 1990, Congress passed the Anabolic Steroids Control Act, making steroids a Class III substance (same as amphetamines, opium, morphine). As a response, MLB mentioned steroids as part of the illegal drugs/controlled substances memo in 1991. However, there were no standards constituting education, testing, punishment, or even what specific drugs were considered.polaris_x said:
how's that? ... steroids were banned unofficially till they were officially banned in 2005HesCalledDyer said:
Their statistics are 100% legit and were earned by playing within the rules of the league at the time.pureoc said:
Statistically speaking, yes, but those stats weren't necessarily legit and earned without aid.Cliffy6745 said:Is Barry Bonds the best player of a generation? Yes/No
Is Clemens one of the best pitchers of a generation? Yes/No
I mean, if you can prove that these players were all injecting themselves with anabolic steroids, and thus performing illegally, then I'll eat crow for dinner. The fact is, players used other performance enhancers to circumvent the controlled subtances ban; substances that were not specifically mentioned as being banned and were perfectly legal in the eyes of the sport. And as the home runs were being hit and viewership & attendance were rising, what did MLB do? Turned a blind eye because they were raking in millions. MLB promoted it. They created the monster. Why should the players' accomplishments during that era suffer because of that?0 -
http://espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3884416HesCalledDyer said:
In 1990, Congress passed the Anabolic Steroids Control Act, making steroids a Class III substance (same as amphetamines, opium, morphine). As a response, MLB mentioned steroids as part of the illegal drugs/controlled substances memo in 1991. However, there were no standards constituting education, testing, punishment, or even what specific drugs were considered.polaris_x said:
how's that? ... steroids were banned unofficially till they were officially banned in 2005HesCalledDyer said:
Their statistics are 100% legit and were earned by playing within the rules of the league at the time.pureoc said:
Statistically speaking, yes, but those stats weren't necessarily legit and earned without aid.Cliffy6745 said:Is Barry Bonds the best player of a generation? Yes/No
Is Clemens one of the best pitchers of a generation? Yes/No
I mean, if you can prove that these players were all injecting themselves with anabolic steroids, and thus performing illegally, then I'll eat crow for dinner. The fact is, players used other performance enhancers to circumvent the controlled subtances ban; substances that were not specifically mentioned as being banned and were perfectly legal in the eyes of the sport. And as the home runs were being hit and viewership & attendance were rising, what did MLB do? Turned a blind eye because they were raking in millions. MLB promoted it. They created the monster. Why should the players' accomplishments during that era suffer because of that?
don't get me wrong ... i'm not saying the mlb is innocent here ... they are just like every other league in their motivations ...
i do think at the heart of it all - all those guys cheated and they know they cheated ... mcgwire knew he cheated and so did all the others ... if they managed to circumvent rules but did not cheat - why cover it up? ... pro sports is all about trying to circumnavigating rules ...
i also believe that there were players who chose not to cheat ... and denying some of these guys entry into the HOF is, albeit, a token gesture that they did the right thing ... rewarding people who knowingly cheated doesn't seem right to me ...0 -
Sounds good. So please provide a list of people who cheated and who didn't. Easy as that.polaris_x said:
http://espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3884416HesCalledDyer said:
In 1990, Congress passed the Anabolic Steroids Control Act, making steroids a Class III substance (same as amphetamines, opium, morphine). As a response, MLB mentioned steroids as part of the illegal drugs/controlled substances memo in 1991. However, there were no standards constituting education, testing, punishment, or even what specific drugs were considered.polaris_x said:
how's that? ... steroids were banned unofficially till they were officially banned in 2005HesCalledDyer said:
Their statistics are 100% legit and were earned by playing within the rules of the league at the time.pureoc said:
Statistically speaking, yes, but those stats weren't necessarily legit and earned without aid.Cliffy6745 said:Is Barry Bonds the best player of a generation? Yes/No
Is Clemens one of the best pitchers of a generation? Yes/No
I mean, if you can prove that these players were all injecting themselves with anabolic steroids, and thus performing illegally, then I'll eat crow for dinner. The fact is, players used other performance enhancers to circumvent the controlled subtances ban; substances that were not specifically mentioned as being banned and were perfectly legal in the eyes of the sport. And as the home runs were being hit and viewership & attendance were rising, what did MLB do? Turned a blind eye because they were raking in millions. MLB promoted it. They created the monster. Why should the players' accomplishments during that era suffer because of that?
don't get me wrong ... i'm not saying the mlb is innocent here ... they are just like every other league in their motivations ...
i do think at the heart of it all - all those guys cheated and they know they cheated ... mcgwire knew he cheated and so did all the others ... if they managed to circumvent rules but did not cheat - why cover it up? ... pro sports is all about trying to circumnavigating rules ...
i also believe that there were players who chose not to cheat ... and denying some of these guys entry into the HOF is, albeit, a token gesture that they did the right thing ... rewarding people who knowingly cheated doesn't seem right to me ...
0 -
well ... sure ... it's all speculation and for sure some are gonna get through the cracks because they don't have the integrity to admit to cheating ...Cliffy6745 said:
Sounds good. So please provide a list of people who cheated and who didn't. Easy as that.polaris_x said:
http://espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3884416HesCalledDyer said:
In 1990, Congress passed the Anabolic Steroids Control Act, making steroids a Class III substance (same as amphetamines, opium, morphine). As a response, MLB mentioned steroids as part of the illegal drugs/controlled substances memo in 1991. However, there were no standards constituting education, testing, punishment, or even what specific drugs were considered.polaris_x said:
how's that? ... steroids were banned unofficially till they were officially banned in 2005HesCalledDyer said:
Their statistics are 100% legit and were earned by playing within the rules of the league at the time.pureoc said:
Statistically speaking, yes, but those stats weren't necessarily legit and earned without aid.Cliffy6745 said:Is Barry Bonds the best player of a generation? Yes/No
Is Clemens one of the best pitchers of a generation? Yes/No
I mean, if you can prove that these players were all injecting themselves with anabolic steroids, and thus performing illegally, then I'll eat crow for dinner. The fact is, players used other performance enhancers to circumvent the controlled subtances ban; substances that were not specifically mentioned as being banned and were perfectly legal in the eyes of the sport. And as the home runs were being hit and viewership & attendance were rising, what did MLB do? Turned a blind eye because they were raking in millions. MLB promoted it. They created the monster. Why should the players' accomplishments during that era suffer because of that?
don't get me wrong ... i'm not saying the mlb is innocent here ... they are just like every other league in their motivations ...
i do think at the heart of it all - all those guys cheated and they know they cheated ... mcgwire knew he cheated and so did all the others ... if they managed to circumvent rules but did not cheat - why cover it up? ... pro sports is all about trying to circumnavigating rules ...
i also believe that there were players who chose not to cheat ... and denying some of these guys entry into the HOF is, albeit, a token gesture that they did the right thing ... rewarding people who knowingly cheated doesn't seem right to me ...
but who currently being blacklisted doesn't have some reasonable evidence against them?0 -
Cracks? Dude, some speculated that almost 90% of big leaguers were juicing. That is not people slipping through cracks. That is 9 our of 10 players going into the hall from a time period likely cheated, regardless if their name is associated with it or not.polaris_x said:
well ... sure ... it's all speculation and for sure some are gonna get through the cracks because they don't have the integrity to admit to cheating ...Cliffy6745 said:
Sounds good. So please provide a list of people who cheated and who didn't. Easy as that.polaris_x said:
http://espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3884416HesCalledDyer said:
In 1990, Congress passed the Anabolic Steroids Control Act, making steroids a Class III substance (same as amphetamines, opium, morphine). As a response, MLB mentioned steroids as part of the illegal drugs/controlled substances memo in 1991. However, there were no standards constituting education, testing, punishment, or even what specific drugs were considered.polaris_x said:
how's that? ... steroids were banned unofficially till they were officially banned in 2005HesCalledDyer said:
Their statistics are 100% legit and were earned by playing within the rules of the league at the time.pureoc said:
Statistically speaking, yes, but those stats weren't necessarily legit and earned without aid.Cliffy6745 said:Is Barry Bonds the best player of a generation? Yes/No
Is Clemens one of the best pitchers of a generation? Yes/No
I mean, if you can prove that these players were all injecting themselves with anabolic steroids, and thus performing illegally, then I'll eat crow for dinner. The fact is, players used other performance enhancers to circumvent the controlled subtances ban; substances that were not specifically mentioned as being banned and were perfectly legal in the eyes of the sport. And as the home runs were being hit and viewership & attendance were rising, what did MLB do? Turned a blind eye because they were raking in millions. MLB promoted it. They created the monster. Why should the players' accomplishments during that era suffer because of that?
don't get me wrong ... i'm not saying the mlb is innocent here ... they are just like every other league in their motivations ...
i do think at the heart of it all - all those guys cheated and they know they cheated ... mcgwire knew he cheated and so did all the others ... if they managed to circumvent rules but did not cheat - why cover it up? ... pro sports is all about trying to circumnavigating rules ...
i also believe that there were players who chose not to cheat ... and denying some of these guys entry into the HOF is, albeit, a token gesture that they did the right thing ... rewarding people who knowingly cheated doesn't seem right to me ...
but who currently being blacklisted doesn't have some reasonable evidence against them?0 -
Everyone cheated. Even in the 1920sI miss igotid880
-
HesCalledDyer is the man!!HesCalledDyer said:
1. No, not just a generation. Barry Bonds is the greatest player of all-time.Cliffy6745 said:Is Barry Bonds the best player of a generation? Yes/No
Is Clemens one of the best pitchers of a generation? Yes/No
2. Yes.
I would not be shocked if, at some point, Griffey Jr. had a little "help." Most think Piazza did. As Cliffy said, the HOF is a museum and IMHO you shouldn't leave out guys who had the impact of Bonds, Clemens, Rose, etc.
Bagwell will probably get in and I'd bet the ranch that he juiced.If I had known then what I know now...
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14Philly I & II, 16Denver 22
Missoula 240 -
Yepigotid88 said:Everyone cheated. Even in the 1920s
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help