This has to stop
Comments
-
with all the nonsense talk about violence and fairness, i think we (i) may have forgotten the bigger picture here. to me, this encapsulates my feelings on the matter...Big Bank Hank said:First: ATL2 04/03/1994
Last: SEA2 08/10/2018
Next: ??
http://expressobeans.com/members/collections.php?id=29417
“I think you won, but I enjoyed the fight” - EV0 -
People here are complaining about the people starting and managing the lists. Not the people on them.eddiec said:
Who is everyone hating here? The people that ran the lists or everyone who was on the list? Because just about everybody here that is calling people out and saying they would do this and that and blah, blah would have jumped right on that list if they got to the gig and had number 20 or something. I think everyone is being a little to self righteous here. I was at 4 shows so far and didn't hear anyone complain. And no, I was not on the list, I had seats.Olivavu said:I would be interested to see if any of these selfish arseholes are prepared to defend this nasty list.
You have had no choice really to not use them, you would have gotten past by all the people on the lists. The problem starts as soon as people start getting on the list as you have no choice not to after that. You cant have two competing queing systems, one with numbers, and one with a standard line as there is no way to differentiate whos really first. Thats why you have to stick with the numbers if it starts.
I complained about the numbering system to as many as I could at all my shows, to people around me, and to the so called fans starting them.
PJ
2000 Roskilde, 2006 Barcelona, 2007 London, Copenhagen, 2008 New York 1, New York 2, 2009 Berlin, 2010 Dublin, Belfast, 2012 Amsterdam 1, Stockholm, Oslo, Copenhagen, 2013 Brooklyn 1, Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014 Milan, Trieste, Berlin, Stockholm, Milton Keynes
EV
2012 Manchester, London 1, London 20 -
People leaving for hours is only one of many problems, here is a selection of issues explaining why this is bs!
-The people owning the list has no official authority but expect everyone to follow their command (what happens if you rightly question their self-taken authority?)
-There are no standard rules between shows and rules are made by the list managers (means they can set the rules to their benefit, for example so they can go sleep in the hotel which they obvisouly do)
-When you come to a show you may not even know about the list and go to the line without getting a number (realising later about the list and then has lost queing time, and no, not everyone has been to loads of shows, are you expected to be aware of the list on your first show?)
-When you come to a show you dont know who to get the number from (so instead of just getting in line you need to run around looking for someone you dont know. I wouldnt be surprised if the people creating the lists all know eachother, so they wont have to spend much time looking, or will get a number via phone...)
-Numbers har stopped being given out after reaching random levels (meaning that at some point the people arriving cant get a number, and are forced to sit in the queue while the people on the list can do whatever they want and just pass everyone with their number when they come back)
People owning and managing the lists are selfish so called fans and Im not surprised they're not here to defend their system. I would like someone from their side respond to the issues above.PJ
2000 Roskilde, 2006 Barcelona, 2007 London, Copenhagen, 2008 New York 1, New York 2, 2009 Berlin, 2010 Dublin, Belfast, 2012 Amsterdam 1, Stockholm, Oslo, Copenhagen, 2013 Brooklyn 1, Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014 Milan, Trieste, Berlin, Stockholm, Milton Keynes
EV
2012 Manchester, London 1, London 20 -
I have no problem with a list. If done properly, and not abused, it just a tool. I think the problem lies were people are leaving for hours only to return and piss people off. The only place I was on a "list" was Wrigley and it seemed to work fine there. In Detroit, just to leave for food it's going to take you an hour to get to a restaurant ,get you food and get back. All the list should be used for is the time you have to leave and when you get back, you can have a reference to where you were when you left. No biggie and there is no place for telling somebody to Fuck Off,0
-
There is every reason to tell people where to go.
They have absolutely no right whatsoever to tell others where they are in a queue.
Queues work by one person starting at the front and others sequentially joining the end.
That is it.
This list is well out of order and needs to be stopped immediately.Wembley 2000 • Reading 2006 • Paris 2006 • Wembley 2007 • Shepherds Bush 2009 • Manchester 2009 • O2 Arena 2009 • Hyde Park 2010 • Arras 2010 • Manchester 2012 • Manchester II 2012 • Leeds 2014 • Milton Keynes 2014 • Amsterdam 2018 • Amsterdam II 2018 • London 2018 • London II 2018 • Hyde Park II 2022
http://www.last.fm/user/olivavu0 -
I have not seen email yetThis is Not For You0
-
All excellent points! They all explain perfectly why a fan-run list is not workable.its_ok said:People leaving for hours is only one of many problems, here is a selection of issues explaining why this is bs!
-The people owning the list has no official authority but expect everyone to follow their command (what happens if you rightly question their self-taken authority?)
-There are no standard rules between shows and rules are made by the list managers (means they can set the rules to their benefit, for example so they can go sleep in the hotel which they obvisouly do)
-When you come to a show you may not even know about the list and go to the line without getting a number (realising later about the list and then has lost queing time, and no, not everyone has been to loads of shows, are you expected to be aware of the list on your first show?)
-When you come to a show you dont know who to get the number from (so instead of just getting in line you need to run around looking for someone you dont know. I wouldnt be surprised if the people creating the lists all know eachother, so they wont have to spend much time looking, or will get a number via phone...)
-Numbers har stopped being given out after reaching random levels (meaning that at some point the people arriving cant get a number, and are forced to sit in the queue while the people on the list can do whatever they want and just pass everyone with their number when they come back)
People owning and managing the lists are selfish so called fans and Im not surprised they're not here to defend their system. I would like someone from their side respond to the issues above.With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
I did not do GA on this tour because my five digit number makes doing GA not worth the hassle but I can easily defend the use of the list/check-in system because as I said it is the rule for Springsteen European shows and it has worked extremely well. That is a fact and that's why is has been going on for over a decade.Olivavu said:I would be interested to see if any of these selfish arseholes are prepared to defend this nasty list.
0 -
So you're choosing to ignore the facts. Okay then.Luckytwn1 said:
I did not do GA on this tour because my five digit number makes doing GA not worth the hassle but I can easily defend the use of the list/check-in system because as I said it is the rule for Springsteen European shows and it has worked extremely well. That is a fact and that's why is has been going on for over a decade.Olivavu said:I would be interested to see if any of these selfish arseholes are prepared to defend this nasty list.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
The people that think they are better than the fans that sit in line for hours and then just think they have the right to go to the front of the line five minutes before the show. And who knows if those people EVER set foot in a line...or whether the list was just handed to someone after it was created. Basically, people running the list would be first and foremost...thinking that they can pretty much dictate who sits (or stands) where for particular shows...followed by those on the list...especially if those people knew how this list was operating.eddiec said:
Who is everyone hating here? The people that ran the lists or everyone who was on the list? Because just about everybody here that is calling people out and saying they would do this and that and blah, blah would have jumped right on that list if they got to the gig and had number 20 or something. I think everyone is being a little to self righteous here. I was at 4 shows so far and didn't hear anyone complain. And no, I was not on the list, I had seats.Olivavu said:I would be interested to see if any of these selfish arseholes are prepared to defend this nasty list.
I Know All The Rules But The Rules Do Not Know Me.0 -
I think you keep posting the same thing about Springsteen in Europe because you're waiting for someone to agree with you. While I respect the opinion you've formulated from your experiences, it has little to do with this thread. It offers no evidence that the "system" in place here isn't dubious and corrupt. Just because a certain way of doing things has been accepted by lots people for a long time, it doesn't make it right or fair, and doesn't mean it should never change. Sure, the small amount of people who are able to benefit from the perks the list offers think it's great. But does every person in that line feel the same way? Do the people who make the list even care?Luckytwn1 said:
I did not do GA on this tour because my five digit number makes doing GA not worth the hassle but I can easily defend the use of the list/check-in system because as I said it is the rule for Springsteen European shows and it has worked extremely well. That is a fact and that's why is has been going on for over a decade.0 -
Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 061320180
-
I honestly couldn't care less whether you agree with me or not. I decided to respond in the thread because I was reading stuff that was blatantly wrong, especially the claims that this system had never been used by anyone before. Springsteen GA lines in Europe routinely have thousands of people on them and the list helps keep order and settle disputes. That's why it is such an accepted practice at this point and why the Springsteen org allows it to go on. In the States, where they did not want the list/check-in system being used, they created the lottery.melissachun said:
I think you keep posting the same thing about Springsteen in Europe because you're waiting for someone to agree with you. While I respect the opinion you've formulated from your experiences, it has little to do with this thread. It offers no evidence that the "system" in place here isn't dubious and corrupt. Just because a certain way of doing things has been accepted by lots people for a long time, it doesn't make it right or fair, and doesn't mean it should never change. Sure, the small amount of people who are able to benefit from the perks the list offers think it's great. But does every person in that line feel the same way? Do the people who make the list even care?Luckytwn1 said:
I did not do GA on this tour because my five digit number makes doing GA not worth the hassle but I can easily defend the use of the list/check-in system because as I said it is the rule for Springsteen European shows and it has worked extremely well. That is a fact and that's why is has been going on for over a decade.
There is no evidence I've read of widespread corruption involving the lists on this PJ tour, indeed most of the people in this thread who have done GA have said the opposite. It is a fact that the list/check-in system can work (the final check-in should be no later than noon or 1 PM and then everyone remains in line) and much of the hysteria in this thread is not based on actual experience. Having said that, if PJ doesn't want to allow the list, that is certainly their right and it seems that is the decision they made and like with Bruce and the lottery, they should make sure that they have a staffer coordinating with venue security so that the line is properly run.
Post edited by Luckytwn1 on0 -
e
Did you read the original post? You think people checking in every six hours and skipping over people that actually wait is fair? I've read multiple posts on here with people stating similar stories from first hand accounts. Sounds corrupt to me. Unless they are all lying.Luckytwn1 said:
I honestly couldn't care less whether you agree with me or not. I decided to respond in the thread because I was reading stuff that was blatantly wrong, especially the claims that this system had never been used by anyone before. Springsteen GA lines in Europe routinely have thousands of people on them and the list helps keep order and settle disputes. That's why it is such an accepted practice at this point and why the Springsteen org allows it to go on. In the States, where they did not want the list/check-in system being used, they created the lottery.melissachun said:
I think you keep posting the same thing about Springsteen in Europe because you're waiting for someone to agree with you. While I respect the opinion you've formulated from your experiences, it has little to do with this thread. It offers no evidence that the "system" in place here isn't dubious and corrupt. Just because a certain way of doing things has been accepted by lots people for a long time, it doesn't make it right or fair, and doesn't mean it should never change. Sure, the small amount of people who are able to benefit from the perks the list offers think it's great. But does every person in that line feel the same way? Do the people who make the list even care?Luckytwn1 said:
I did not do GA on this tour because my five digit number makes doing GA not worth the hassle but I can easily defend the use of the list/check-in system because as I said it is the rule for Springsteen European shows and it has worked extremely well. That is a fact and that's why is has been going on for over a decade.
There is no evidence I've read of widespread corruption involving the lists on this PJ tour, indeed most of the people in this thread who have done GA have said the opposite. It is a fact that the list/check-in system can work (the final check-in should be no later than noon or 1 PM and then everyone remains in line) and much of the hysteria in this thread is not based on actual experience. Having said that, if PJ doesn't want to allow the list, that is certainly their right and it seems that is the decision they made and like with Bruce and the lottery, they should make sure that they have a staffer coordinating with venue security so that the line is properly run.Post edited by WhatYouTaughtMe on0 -
Get in line and stay there really simple. Arbitrary list creators started at arbitrary times with easy means to add friends before anyone else even gets opportunity to be added. It's a very very bad deal for everyone but the list makers and their friends. This cannot in any way be defended using any logic.Luckytwn1 said:
I honestly couldn't care less whether you agree with me or not. I decided to respond in the thread because I was reading stuff that was blatantly wrong, especially the claims that this system had never been used by anyone before. Springsteen GA lines in Europe routinely have thousands of people on them and the list helps keep order and settle disputes. That's why it is such an accepted practice at this point and why the Springsteen org allows it to go on. In the States, where they did not want the list/check-in system being used, they created the lottery.melissachun said:
I think you keep posting the same thing about Springsteen in Europe because you're waiting for someone to agree with you. While I respect the opinion you've formulated from your experiences, it has little to do with this thread. It offers no evidence that the "system" in place here isn't dubious and corrupt. Just because a certain way of doing things has been accepted by lots people for a long time, it doesn't make it right or fair, and doesn't mean it should never change. Sure, the small amount of people who are able to benefit from the perks the list offers think it's great. But does every person in that line feel the same way? Do the people who make the list even care?Luckytwn1 said:
I did not do GA on this tour because my five digit number makes doing GA not worth the hassle but I can easily defend the use of the list/check-in system because as I said it is the rule for Springsteen European shows and it has worked extremely well. That is a fact and that's why is has been going on for over a decade.
There is no evidence I've read of widespread corruption involving the lists on this PJ tour, indeed most of the people in this thread who have done GA have said the opposite. It is a fact that the list/check-in system can work (the final check-in should be no later than noon or 1 PM and then everyone remains in line) and much of the hysteria in this thread is not based on actual experience. Having said that, if PJ doesn't want to allow the list, that is certainly their right and it seems that is the decision they made and like with Bruce and the lottery, they should make sure that they have a staffer coordinating with venue security so that the line is properly run.10-18-2000 Houston, 04-06-2003 Houston, 6-25-2003 Toronto, 10-8-2004 Kissimmee, 9-4-2005 Calgary, 12-3-05 Sao Paulo, 7-2-2006 Denver, 7-22-06 Gorge, 7-23-2006 Gorge, 9-13-2006 Bern, 6-22-2008 DC, 6-24-2008 MSG, 6-25-2008 MSG0 -
Of course, it's fair. People are told when the check-ins are. If someone chooses to stay, that's totally up to them. Last year, I was on the GA line for Bruce in Munich. I arrived found the list, was given my number, and between check-ins I went to the BMW Museum, got a bite to eat, etc.WhatYouTaughtMe said:e
Did you read the original post? You think people checking in every six hours and skipping over people that actually wait is fair? I've read multiple posts on here with people stating similar stories from first hand accounts. Sounds corrupt to me. Unless they are all lying.Luckytwn1 said:
I honestly couldn't care less whether you agree with me or not. I decided to respond in the thread because I was reading stuff that was blatantly wrong, especially the claims that this system had never been used by anyone before. Springsteen GA lines in Europe routinely have thousands of people on them and the list helps keep order and settle disputes. That's why it is such an accepted practice at this point and why the Springsteen org allows it to go on. In the States, where they did not want the list/check-in system being used, they created the lottery.melissachun said:
I think you keep posting the same thing about Springsteen in Europe because you're waiting for someone to agree with you. While I respect the opinion you've formulated from your experiences, it has little to do with this thread. It offers no evidence that the "system" in place here isn't dubious and corrupt. Just because a certain way of doing things has been accepted by lots people for a long time, it doesn't make it right or fair, and doesn't mean it should never change. Sure, the small amount of people who are able to benefit from the perks the list offers think it's great. But does every person in that line feel the same way? Do the people who make the list even care?Luckytwn1 said:
I did not do GA on this tour because my five digit number makes doing GA not worth the hassle but I can easily defend the use of the list/check-in system because as I said it is the rule for Springsteen European shows and it has worked extremely well. That is a fact and that's why is has been going on for over a decade.
There is no evidence I've read of widespread corruption involving the lists on this PJ tour, indeed most of the people in this thread who have done GA have said the opposite. It is a fact that the list/check-in system can work (the final check-in should be no later than noon or 1 PM and then everyone remains in line) and much of the hysteria in this thread is not based on actual experience. Having said that, if PJ doesn't want to allow the list, that is certainly their right and it seems that is the decision they made and like with Bruce and the lottery, they should make sure that they have a staffer coordinating with venue security so that the line is properly run.
0 -
And the people who don't go to every show, have no idea of an unofficial list, and show up to actually wait in line should just all eat shit? There is absolutely nothing fair about the original post. If it was an endorsed/official policy like Bruce, that is one thing. Ten club stated prior to the tour that there is no list. So the list is just some people buddying up to help themselves and holds as much weight as me declaring myself the King of Nigeria. Even if I had 500 people hanging out with me saying, "yeah he's the King of Nigeria because we say so", it wouldn't be valid.Luckytwn1 said:
Of course, it's fair. People are told when the check-ins are. If someone chooses to stay, that's totally up to them. Last year, I was on the GA line for Bruce in Munich. I arrived found the list, was given my number, and between check-ins I went to the BMW Museum, got a bite to eat, etc.WhatYouTaughtMe said:e
Did you read the original post? You think people checking in every six hours and skipping over people that actually wait is fair? I've read multiple posts on here with people stating similar stories from first hand accounts. Sounds corrupt to me. Unless they are all lying.Luckytwn1 said:
I honestly couldn't care less whether you agree with me or not. I decided to respond in the thread because I was reading stuff that was blatantly wrong, especially the claims that this system had never been used by anyone before. Springsteen GA lines in Europe routinely have thousands of people on them and the list helps keep order and settle disputes. That's why it is such an accepted practice at this point and why the Springsteen org allows it to go on. In the States, where they did not want the list/check-in system being used, they created the lottery.melissachun said:
I think you keep posting the same thing about Springsteen in Europe because you're waiting for someone to agree with you. While I respect the opinion you've formulated from your experiences, it has little to do with this thread. It offers no evidence that the "system" in place here isn't dubious and corrupt. Just because a certain way of doing things has been accepted by lots people for a long time, it doesn't make it right or fair, and doesn't mean it should never change. Sure, the small amount of people who are able to benefit from the perks the list offers think it's great. But does every person in that line feel the same way? Do the people who make the list even care?Luckytwn1 said:
I did not do GA on this tour because my five digit number makes doing GA not worth the hassle but I can easily defend the use of the list/check-in system because as I said it is the rule for Springsteen European shows and it has worked extremely well. That is a fact and that's why is has been going on for over a decade.
There is no evidence I've read of widespread corruption involving the lists on this PJ tour, indeed most of the people in this thread who have done GA have said the opposite. It is a fact that the list/check-in system can work (the final check-in should be no later than noon or 1 PM and then everyone remains in line) and much of the hysteria in this thread is not based on actual experience. Having said that, if PJ doesn't want to allow the list, that is certainly their right and it seems that is the decision they made and like with Bruce and the lottery, they should make sure that they have a staffer coordinating with venue security so that the line is properly run.Post edited by WhatYouTaughtMe on0 -
Are there any reports from Oslo today regarding this issue? Was the list stopped or does it live on in spite of 10c's email? I feel like this will be a tough thing to eliminate completely.___________________________________________
"...I changed by not changing at all..."0 -
It's a totally different situation if the band's reps are in charge and everyone is informed of the process by the official fan club and it's monitored and controlled. That isn't the case here.Luckytwn1 said:
Of course, it's fair. People are told when the check-ins are. If someone chooses to stay, that's totally up to them. Last year, I was on the GA line for Bruce in Munich. I arrived found the list, was given my number, and between check-ins I went to the BMW Museum, got a bite to eat, etc.WhatYouTaughtMe said:e
Did you read the original post? You think people checking in every six hours and skipping over people that actually wait is fair? I've read multiple posts on here with people stating similar stories from first hand accounts. Sounds corrupt to me. Unless they are all lying.Luckytwn1 said:
I honestly couldn't care less whether you agree with me or not. I decided to respond in the thread because I was reading stuff that was blatantly wrong, especially the claims that this system had never been used by anyone before. Springsteen GA lines in Europe routinely have thousands of people on them and the list helps keep order and settle disputes. That's why it is such an accepted practice at this point and why the Springsteen org allows it to go on. In the States, where they did not want the list/check-in system being used, they created the lottery.melissachun said:
I think you keep posting the same thing about Springsteen in Europe because you're waiting for someone to agree with you. While I respect the opinion you've formulated from your experiences, it has little to do with this thread. It offers no evidence that the "system" in place here isn't dubious and corrupt. Just because a certain way of doing things has been accepted by lots people for a long time, it doesn't make it right or fair, and doesn't mean it should never change. Sure, the small amount of people who are able to benefit from the perks the list offers think it's great. But does every person in that line feel the same way? Do the people who make the list even care?Luckytwn1 said:
I did not do GA on this tour because my five digit number makes doing GA not worth the hassle but I can easily defend the use of the list/check-in system because as I said it is the rule for Springsteen European shows and it has worked extremely well. That is a fact and that's why is has been going on for over a decade.
There is no evidence I've read of widespread corruption involving the lists on this PJ tour, indeed most of the people in this thread who have done GA have said the opposite. It is a fact that the list/check-in system can work (the final check-in should be no later than noon or 1 PM and then everyone remains in line) and much of the hysteria in this thread is not based on actual experience. Having said that, if PJ doesn't want to allow the list, that is certainly their right and it seems that is the decision they made and like with Bruce and the lottery, they should make sure that they have a staffer coordinating with venue security so that the line is properly run.With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
It's the difference between asking yourself how early can you get to a show and wait in line the entire time (except for an understandable bathroom break) or how early can you get to a show to put your name on a list and go back to your hotel to sleep for 6 hours, check back in for 10 mins and take another 6 hour break.
People who show up to wait are committed to staying the entire time and so should everyone else in line. You can't create a list off a premise that only a few are aware of and the band doesn't officially support. NO MORE LIST!!
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help