*** 1948 * 1949 * 1960 * 2017 * 2024...YOUR SUPER BOWL CHAMPIONS: THE PHILADELPHIA EAGLES ***
Comments
-
rick1zoo2 wrote:For me, this thread is un-usable as a place to casually discuss the team. Just a lot of long-winded posts trying to defend pointless positions and opinions. There is nothing I could contribute to any of it. not fun at all, blah.
You're god damn right about that.0 -
rick1zoo2 wrote:For me, this thread is un-usable as a place to casually discuss the team. Just a lot of long-winded posts trying to defend pointless positions and opinions. There is nothing I could contribute to any of it. not fun at all, blah.
Well done.
Alright, alright, alright!
Tom O.
"I never had any friends later on like the ones I had when I was twelve. Jesus, does anyone?"
-The Writer0 -
Jearlpam0925 wrote:Now there's some dumb fucking logic right there - depth only matters when you have 'stars'.
I don't think I've ever read anything more idiotic from this dipshit. Man oh man....
yup because teams with 53 average players win all the fucking time in the NFL. :fp:
maybe you think the 53rd player on the roster is as important as the top 3 or 4 too. :roll:0 -
pjhawks wrote:Jearlpam0925 wrote:Now there's some dumb fucking logic right there - depth only matters when you have 'stars'.
I don't think I've ever read anything more idiotic from this dipshit. Man oh man....
yup because teams with 53 average players win all the fucking time in the NFL. :fp:
maybe you think the 53rd player on the roster is as important as the top 3 or 4 too. :roll:
:?www.myspace.com0 -
Will the Reid lovers give Chip his due? I know at least 2 people that made fun of us for liking his pressers.Go Birds!!!!0
-
The Juggler wrote:pjhawks wrote:
yup because teams with 53 average players win all the fucking time in the NFL. :fp:
maybe you think the 53rd player on the roster is as important as the top 3 or 4 too. :roll:
:?
Exactly.
My only conclusion is he is of the philly.com commenter ilk.0 -
jamminpearls wrote:Will the Reid lovers give Chip his due? I know at least 2 people that made fun of us for liking his pressers.
when it's time but it's way too early for that. I mean he is 6-5 with zero wins over teams with a winning record and has lost by a combined 42 points to the two teams on the schedule with a winning record (and won't even bring up who one of those teams was). win the division or get a wild card then we can talk about giving him his due. 11 games does not a success make.0 -
pjhawks wrote:jamminpearls wrote:Will the Reid lovers give Chip his due? I know at least 2 people that made fun of us for liking his pressers.
when it's time but it's way too early for that. I mean he is 6-5 with zero wins over teams with a winning record and has lost by a combined 42 points to the two teams on the schedule with a winning record (and won't even bring up who one of those teams was). win the division or get a wild card then we can talk about giving him his due. 11 games does not a success make.
it's his first year and he has already exceeded expectations. doing the things you are mentioning after predicting them to win 5 or 6 games is g-r-a-v-y, dude. i swear to god some fans in this town just forget what it was like in 1999. you are a constant source of amusement in these threads.
again, as always: www.myspace.com0 -
0
-
Jearlpam0925 wrote:
haha....
seriously though, can you ever remember him making sense? it is uncanny. i mean it's been yeeeaaars of this.
UNCANNY.www.myspace.com0 -
he's the washington generals of these threads.www.myspace.com0
-
The Juggler wrote:Jearlpam0925 wrote:
haha....
seriously though, can you ever remember him making sense? it is uncanny. it's been yeeeaaars of this. UNCANNY.
Years. Insane - that's what it is. I'd say since I noticed him posting on here it's always been terrible - not even any funny banter or amiable back-and-forth, just straight-up idiocy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hfYJsQAhl00 -
The Juggler wrote:pjhawks wrote:jamminpearls wrote:Will the Reid lovers give Chip his due? I know at least 2 people that made fun of us for liking his pressers.
when it's time but it's way too early for that. I mean he is 6-5 with zero wins over teams with a winning record and has lost by a combined 42 points to the two teams on the schedule with a winning record (and won't even bring up who one of those teams was). win the division or get a wild card then we can talk about giving him his due. 11 games does not a success make.
it's his first year and he has already exceeded expectations. doing the things you are mentioning after predicting them to win 5 or 6 games is g-r-a-v-y, dude. i swear to god some fans in this town just forget what it was like in 1999. you are a constant source of amusement in these threads.
again, as always:
some assholes forget what it was like to win 10 games a year, division titles and lots of playoff games and are now giddy over 6-5 and interesting press conferences. love this generation of eagles fan. fucking hilarious they don't even realize how fucking retarded they sound mocking on a 2 time super bowl mvp and a coach who is 9 and fucking 1. even the guy I've quoted here not one page ago mocked andy for being 0-1 against winning teams...but completely ignores chip being 0-2 minus 42 fucking points against winning teams. the fucking logic of some of you guys is fucking mind boggling. you guys make me laugh.0 -
My comment on Andy being 0-1 was a direct response to you saying Chip was 0-2 v. winning teams.
Context, it's all about context and extremism.
No one said they didn't enjoy those times but they are long gone because of the same guy that helped create them.
Don't call me names, I didn't call you any. :nono:Alright, alright, alright!
Tom O.
"I never had any friends later on like the ones I had when I was twelve. Jesus, does anyone?"
-The Writer0 -
JK_Livin wrote:My comment on Andy being 0-1 was a direct response to you saying Chip was 0-2 v. winning teams.
Context, it's all about context and extremism.
No one said they didn't enjoy those times but they are long gone because of the same guy that helped create them.
Don't call me names, I didn't call you any. :nono:
Rational human being right there.0 -
JK_Livin wrote:My comment on Andy being 0-1 was a direct response to you saying Chip was 0-2 v. winning teams.
Context, it's all about context and extremism.
No one said they didn't enjoy those times but they are long gone because of the same guy that helped create them.
Don't call me names, I didn't call you any. :nono:
i wasn't referring to you. i even reference in my post that the guy i was referring about the 0-1 comment was the guy i quoted in my post. didn't think that was hard to follow.
as for calling anyone names yea i didn't do that either. just provided a general but apt description of a large group of so-called eagles fans.0 -
0
-
pjhawks wrote:The Juggler wrote:pjhawks wrote:
when it's time but it's way too early for that. I mean he is 6-5 with zero wins over teams with a winning record and has lost by a combined 42 points to the two teams on the schedule with a winning record (and won't even bring up who one of those teams was). win the division or get a wild card then we can talk about giving him his due. 11 games does not a success make.
it's his first year and he has already exceeded expectations. doing the things you are mentioning after predicting them to win 5 or 6 games is g-r-a-v-y, dude. i swear to god some fans in this town just forget what it was like in 1999. you are a constant source of amusement in these threads.
again, as always:
some assholes forget what it was like to win 10 games a year, division titles and lots of playoff games and are now giddy over 6-5 and interesting press conferences. love this generation of eagles fan. fucking hilarious they don't even realize how fucking retarded they sound mocking on a 2 time super bowl mvp and a coach who is 9 and fucking 1. even the guy I've quoted here not one page ago mocked andy for being 0-1 against winning teams...but completely ignores chip being 0-2 minus 42 fucking points against winning teams. the fucking logic of some of you guys is fucking mind boggling. you guys make me laugh.
Huh?www.myspace.com0 -
Jearlpam0925 wrote:
I like that dude. He looks like Macklemore with that hairdo.Alright, alright, alright!
Tom O.
"I never had any friends later on like the ones I had when I was twelve. Jesus, does anyone?"
-The Writer0 -
JK_Livin wrote:Jearlpam0925 wrote:
I like that dude. He looks like Macklemore with that hairdo.
Me too. That was a good read.www.myspace.com0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help