2025-2026 NHL Offseason

lukin2006 · June 2013

polaris_x wrote:

polaris_x wrote:

i don't see how boston can beat pittsburgh ...

my prediction is LA in 7 and pittsbugh in 5

:fp:

Both series are a big surprise ... lets see if Chicago can win 1 in LA.

Pittsburgh is just imploding ... it shouldn't have happened, they have enough leaders on that team.

even flow - question mark · June 2013

CROJAM95 wrote:

It would be nuts if the Bruins win the cup.....being down 3 goals with 10 minutes left in Game 7 vs Toronto and to win in OT

Thats the stuff of Legends

That would be the best thing a Leaf fan could talk about in the off season. If the Bruins won the cup, so could have we if we won game seven. That will be the rally cry for next year. They would probably say that this team was better then the 92 squad, cause they lost to the Kings who didn't win the cup. :? Live in Toronto long enough and this is what it comes to.

On to the both series: WTF!

even flow - question mark · June 2013

[quote="even flow - question mark

Based on wins the Ottawa goalie wasn't better, but if you watched the games, he by far out played the Pitt net minder. When you are standing in front of the target for three quality lines shooting at you, you will fall apart in a seven game series. Hell even Alfie knew that after game four.

By far my friends and I favourite name to have fun with was from Ottawa....Turris. Then we would fall into Pres Georgie Bush's accent and talk about how we can't have a turris win the battle. You are either with the Turris or us.

Pitt in six and LA in five.[/quote]

He faced 50 shots once in 5 games ... all other shot totals were under 40. It wasn't like that were ripping 50 shots at him every game.

He was terrible in that series ... and a lot of that had to do with Pittsburgh, but still not good.[/quote]

Different series but I bet that Pitt wished they had the Ottawa goalie!

lukin2006 · June 2013

even flow - question mark wrote:

[quote="even flow - question mark

Based on wins the Ottawa goalie wasn't better, but if you watched the games, he by far out played the Pitt net minder. When you are standing in front of the target for three quality lines shooting at you, you will fall apart in a seven game series. Hell even Alfie knew that after game four.

By far my friends and I favourite name to have fun with was from Ottawa....Turris. Then we would fall into Pres Georgie Bush's accent and talk about how we can't have a turris win the battle. You are either with the Turris or us.

Pitt in six and LA in five.

He faced 50 shots once in 5 games ... all other shot totals were under 40. It wasn't like that were ripping 50 shots at him every game.

He was terrible in that series ... and a lot of that had to do with Pittsburgh, but still not good.[/quote]

Different series but I bet that Pitt wished they had the Ottawa goalie!

[/quote]

I do think goaltending is a big part of Pittsburgh's problem, but the B's have got into Pittsburgh head and scoring 1 goal at home in 2 games whether you have Roy, Brodeur or Anderson will not win you many games.

norm · June 2013

3 of the next 4 games at home? we got this!

norm · June 2013

http://www.cbssports.com/nhl/blog/eye-o ... ney-crosby

JOEJOEJOE · June 2013

norm wrote:

3 of the next 4 games at home? we got this!

we were down 2-0 in the first series, and we came back!

Nothing is over!

The Kings need to abandon defense, totally rely on Quick and just worry about scoring goals!

CROJAM95 · June 2013

JOEJOEJOE wrote:

norm wrote:

3 of the next 4 games at home? we got this!

we were down 2-0 in the first series, and we came back!

Nothing is over!

The Kings need to abandon defense, totally rely on Quick and just worry about scoring goals!

ask Pittsburgh how that strategy is working for them

Lotta odd man rushes

demetrios · June 2013

Puck Over Glass! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oa1vbymSLZU

even flow - question mark · June 2013

Note to Jeff Carter: I don't know how long you have played hockey for, but, if you do indeed try to injure somebody by slashing at their hand in which is not gloved, you will receive some sort of punishment. Thus a nice highstick to you mouth. Idiot. If Keith sits for a game so should Carter for intent to injure.

lukin2006 · June 2013

Duncan Keith’s slash of Jeff Carter in Kings’ playoff win over Blackhawks being reviewed by NHL

http://www.thestar.com/sports/hockey/20 ... y_nhl.html

He should have gotten 5 and a game. Hopefully the NHL gives him a game.

lukin2006 · June 2013

even flow - question mark wrote:

Note to Jeff Carter: I don't know how long you have played hockey for, but, if you do indeed try to injure somebody by slashing at their hand in which is not gloved, you will receive some sort of punishment. Thus a nice highstick to you mouth. Idiot. If Keith sits for a game so should Carter for intent to injure.

So how do justify a love tap to the hand (gloved or not), with a blatant slash to the face? If keith wanted to send a message he could have slashed his ankle. He should be suspended for at least a game.

lukin2006 · June 2013

Keith suspended 1 game ... I think the nhl got this one right

CROJAM95 · June 2013

Great game....Rask was great

eeriepadave · June 2013

Dozed off during the last period and the first OT. :oops: Luckily woke up in the 2nd OT to see the game winning goal.

even flow - question mark · June 2013

lukin2006 wrote:

even flow - question mark wrote:

Note to Jeff Carter: I don't know how long you have played hockey for, but, if you do indeed try to injure somebody by slashing at their hand in which is not gloved, you will receive some sort of punishment. Thus a nice highstick to you mouth. Idiot. If Keith sits for a game so should Carter for intent to injure.

So how do justify a love tap to the hand (gloved or not), with a blatant slash to the face? If keith wanted to send a message he could have slashed his ankle. He should be suspended for at least a game.

A love tap? When I played hockey any stick infraction was sure not a love tap. Especially one to a hand with no glove. Let you niece do to you bare hand what Carter did and tell me how you didn't think it hurt. I've broken somebody's wrist with a slash from somebody using their stick in the same, carefree, love tap style that Carter did. So in my eyes Carter is lucky he isn't missing an eye or some teeth. Twenty something stitches will make sure he will think about being a sneaky, dirty, fuckhead next time. TWO CENTS.

lukin2006 · June 2013

even flow - question mark wrote:

lukin2006 wrote:

even flow - question mark wrote:

Note to Jeff Carter: I don't know how long you have played hockey for, but, if you do indeed try to injure somebody by slashing at their hand in which is not gloved, you will receive some sort of punishment. Thus a nice highstick to you mouth. Idiot. If Keith sits for a game so should Carter for intent to injure.

So how do justify a love tap to the hand (gloved or not), with a blatant slash to the face? If keith wanted to send a message he could have slashed his ankle. He should be suspended for at least a game.

A love tap? When I played hockey any stick infraction was sure not a love tap. Especially one to a hand with no glove. Let you niece do to you bare hand what Carter did and tell me how you didn't think it hurt. I've broken somebody's wrist with a slash from somebody using their stick in the same, carefree, love tap style that Carter did. So in my eyes Carter is lucky he isn't missing an eye or some teeth. Twenty something stitches will make sure he will think about being a sneaky, dirty, fuckhead next time. TWO CENTS.

MayDay10 · June 2013

I hate the Bruins, but I love watching the Penguins down in flames 0-3. Especially since they loaded up so much for this run. I a lot of ways, they remind me of the Flyers of 08-12.

Dr. Delight · June 2013

MayDay10 wrote:

I hate the Bruins, but I love watching the Penguins down in flames 0-3. Especially since they loaded up so much for this run. I a lot of ways, they remind me of the Flyers of 08-12.

How did any Flyers team during that time period load up like this?

MayDay10 · June 2013

I dont mean in the sense of adding pieces at the deadline.

I just mean a scary, deep lineup. A bit cheap/chippy. However, no support from goaltending. Couldnt get over the hump as it would eventually do them in.

2025-2026 NHL Offseason

Comments

Categories