No ma'am, I won't register my guns

1161719212251

Comments

  • davidtrios
    davidtrios Posts: 9,732
    another school shooting..

    more guns more guns!

    thank the nra!
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,759
    USARAY wrote:
    USARAY wrote:
    :lol: exactly million $question jus take careof your own

    so I guess you don't support all the wars in the name of "democracy" that the US has waged then?
    do you
    just
    sayingI don't give a ratsass about canada and what you decide to up there
    none of my
    business dude not saying you shouldn't have an opinion just thecare part
    what's up
    sounds like be like me do like us we are notCanada or Europe
    don't want to be.We'llbe the leaderrebels like my great greats they fought and diedfor our rights
    I honor them.
    That was almost unintelligible.

    If Canada was making decisions that impacted you you would give a rat's ass. US politics and laws impact us. So we care. Also, Canadians tend to give a shit about the rest of the world and what happens in it, especially as the world is more and more a global community and economy. I know that is not a sentiment generally felt by a lot of Americans.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • USARAY wrote:


    do you
    just
    sayingI don't give a ratsass about canada and what you decide to up there
    none of my
    business dude not saying you shouldn't have an opinion just thecare part
    what's up
    sounds like be like me do like us we are notCanada or Europe
    don't want to be.We'llbe the leaderrebels like my great greats they fought and diedfor our rights
    I honor them.

    good lord. this is barely understandable. I already said I care because I have close relatives in the US whom I care for. most people in the world care about slaughter in other nations. maybe you don't, but others do.
    Gimli 1993
    Fargo 2003
    Winnipeg 2005
    Winnipeg 2011
    St. Paul 2014
  • 81 wrote:
    why do non US citizens care so much about OUR gun laws
    personaly ,cos innocent people dies and for me it doesnt matter where the come from ,whats their color,their beliefs..
    its sad to see all this violence,all this blood and nothing change...
    "...Dimitri...He talks to me...'.."The Ghost of Greece..".
    "..That's One Happy Fuckin Ghost.."
    “..That came up on the Pillow Case...This is for the Greek, With Our Apologies.....”
  • chadwick
    chadwick up my ass Posts: 21,157
    81 wrote:
    why do non US citizens care so much about OUR gun laws
    personaly ,cos innocent people dies and for me it doesnt matter where the come from ,whats their color,their beliefs..
    its sad to see all this violence,all this blood and nothing change...
    middle east shoot and blow each other up just about on a daily basis.
    for poetry through the ceiling. ISBN: 1 4241 8840 7

    "Hear me, my chiefs!
    I am tired; my heart is
    sick and sad. From where
    the sun stands I will fight
    no more forever."

    Chief Joseph - Nez Perce
  • USARAY
    USARAY Posts: 517
    davidtrios wrote:
    another school shooting..

    more guns more guns!

    thank the nra!
    yeasome depressed suicidal kid takes out the finance guy at school thats all my fault as a gunowner and a member of the NRA
    we need guns and
    we sure as hell need the NRA from fools who will takeaway freedoms and theright to protect our own lives
    based onthe actions of the extreme extreme extreme few :fp:
  • everyone that buys a gun should have to register it and get finger printed and sign a waiver of responsibility should that gun ever be involved in shooting another human being, they would be held directly responsible along with the shooter. don't like it? all "responsible gun owners" should be ok with that.

    buy your guns. have some fun. but pay the ultimate price if you fuck up.

    or don't buy one. your choice.
    Gimli 1993
    Fargo 2003
    Winnipeg 2005
    Winnipeg 2011
    St. Paul 2014
  • hedonist
    hedonist Posts: 24,524
    USARAY wrote:
    do you
    just
    sayingI don't give a ratsass about canada and what you decide to up there
    none of my
    business dude not saying you shouldn't have an opinion just thecare part
    what's up
    sounds like be like me do like us we are notCanada or Europe
    don't want to be.We'llbe the leaderrebels like my great greats they fought and diedfor our rights
    I honor them.
    I am so sorry, but I read part of this in William Shatner's voice :mrgreen:

    Also, it's no one's place to decide what anyone should or shouldn't care about. You don't care about some issues - fine, but who is anyone to dictate that to another?
  • USARAY wrote:
    do you
    just
    sayingI don't give a ratsass about canada and what you decide to up there
    none of my
    business dude not saying you shouldn't have an opinion just thecare part
    what's up
    sounds like be like me do like us we are notCanada or Europe
    don't want to be.We'llbe the leaderrebels like my great greats they fought and diedfor our rights
    I honor them.

    Ray... come on... this is hilarious. I have read it several times and even though I get the general idea of it... you really need to put a little more effort into you passages so that one can take you seriously.

    If your space bar is broke, please disregard what I have said.

    * What is a ratsass?
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • [

    * What is a ratsass?
    a rat ass
    "...Dimitri...He talks to me...'.."The Ghost of Greece..".
    "..That's One Happy Fuckin Ghost.."
    “..That came up on the Pillow Case...This is for the Greek, With Our Apologies.....”
  • comebackgirl
    comebackgirl Posts: 9,885
    I can't seem to make any sense if your comment comeback girl.
    If someone breaks into her home to do her harm, why does it matter if she knows them or not?
    That should not change your course of action. Furthermore, to suggest that if a woman owns a firearm she is likely to have that used against her seems to give little credit to woman.
    Seems like an attack on women actually, like the article I just posted says.
    Your comments are mind bottling.
    If you are genuinely concerned about the "War on Women" and don't want to just use it as a a buzzword to push forward a political agenda, then it's important to understand and present accurate information about the true risks to women's safety. We've seen this used as a bargaining chip during the election (with very damaging misinformation about rape being presented), with the delay in re-upping the VAWA grant, and now with the issue of gun control. Pushing forward mistruths that provide a false sense of security does nothing to help women. We've known for a long time now that women are a lot more likely to be harmed by someone they know (often an intimate partner) then by a stranger. Because of the dynamics inherent in an abusive relationship, she is much less likely to use a gun against a partner and instead have it used against her. That's not "giving little credit to women." It's about understand the dynamics at play in those relationships. PJ_Soul did a good job of outlining some of the reasons why. I respect that we have different ideas about gun control, and as I've said on a few threads I think we really need to look at the underlying causes for violence in general to properly address the issue in the long-term (ie. socialization, culture, access to opportunities and resources). I'm a little sick of having women's safety and rights used as political bargaining chip (by both sides) instead of having it addressed as a public health issue with accurate information and a genuine desire to make real changes in those areas.
    tumblr_mg4nc33pIX1s1mie8o1_400.gif

    "I need your strength for me to be strong...I need your love to feel loved"
  • USARAY
    USARAY Posts: 517
    yoududes must be great at whereswaldo :lol:gun owners are
    standing ground
    let's talkabortion rights to life new laws to remove the slaughter to stop murderthe defenseless one surgical medical abortionever 26 seconds not counting abortifacients fuckingsick that is
    an abomination
    26
    children at sandy hook its all life even theunwanted the unborn just as valuable
    protect innocent life all ofit
    no the liberals saythat would be removing someones rights evento save lives wtf
    that is worse than the gunowners who break no laws and want to protect their own
    children.
  • JonnyPistachio
    JonnyPistachio Florida Posts: 10,219
    hedonist wrote:
    USARAY wrote:
    do you
    just
    sayingI don't give a ratsass about canada and what you decide to up there
    none of my
    business dude not saying you shouldn't have an opinion just thecare part
    what's up
    sounds like be like me do like us we are notCanada or Europe
    don't want to be.We'llbe the leaderrebels like my great greats they fought and diedfor our rights
    I honor them.
    I am so sorry, but I read part of this in William Shatner's voice :mrgreen:

    Also, it's no one's place to decide what anyone should or shouldn't care about. You don't care about some issues - fine, but who is anyone to dictate that to another?

    :lol::lol: :wave: me too!
    Pick up my debut novel here on amazon: Jonny Bails Floatin (in paperback) (also available on Kindle for $2.99)
  • Moonpig
    Moonpig Posts: 659
    USARAY wrote:
    yoududes must be great at whereswaldo :lol:gun owners are
    standing ground
    let's talkabortion rights to life new laws to remove the slaughter to stop murderthe defenseless one surgical medical abortionever 26 seconds not counting abortifacients fuckingsick that is
    an abomination
    26
    children at sandy hook its all life even theunwanted the unborn just as valuable
    protect innocent life all ofit
    no the liberals saythat would be removing someones rights evento save lives wtf
    that is worse than the gunowners who break no laws and want to protect their own
    children.

    So set up a thread on abortion and talk about it there. What we are discussing in this is the merits of gun control over allowing the current state of affairs to continue. I see there have been a few more shootings this week, and still some of you think there are no issues to discuss.

    Amazing
  • davidtrios
    davidtrios Posts: 9,732
    let me ask- why do some people oppose abortion but are pro guns? it makes no sense..why do they care about something not even born yet more than people that exist?

    on 1/19, the first ever gun appreciation day happens. two days before mlk day and we all know how he died.

    also, If Rosa Parks had a gun, she wouldn't have taken a seat at the back of the bus, she would've car-jacked it! - S. Colbert. More guns! More Guns!
  • Moonpig
    Moonpig Posts: 659
    http://blogs.channel4.com/factcheck/gun ... tain/12466

    For anybody looking for objective reasoned debate, good thought provoking article.
  • I'm curious as to the 'cooling down period' that is in existence. Worded as is... isn't this a concession on the part of legislation that someone's intent to purchase the gun legally could be out of anger with malice intended? Hence, the need to 'cool down' before getting the gun in your mad hands? It's kind of like somebody saying, "Count to 10 and breathe! Feel better? Okay... now you can have your gun."

    So, somebody 'cools down'... and then they can have a gun. But what about the next time they get mad? They now have the gun.

    The 'cool down period' worked in this situation, but I think it's telling that the law acknowledges weapons are not good in people's hands when they are angry:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIpLd0WQKCY
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • Moonpig
    Moonpig Posts: 659
    Moonpig wrote:
    :fp:
    Wow, never takes long for the racism to show itself.

    Side note, was thinking of it earlier, if some of you gun nuts refuse to abide by any new regulations that are put into place, does this not by right, mean you are breaking the law, i.e. make you a "bad guy" as some like to so eloquently put it.

    And haven't those same people mentioned that it should be the goal of everyone to ensure the bad guys don't get their hands on said weapons. Does this mean that it is okay for law enforecement to take your weapons from you are you are not now classed as a law abiding/responsible gun owner?

    Anyone want to try their hand at this one?? Anyone
  • 81
    81 Needing a ride to Forest Hills and a ounce of weed. Please inquire within. Thanks. Or not. Posts: 58,276
    Moonpig wrote:
    Moonpig wrote:
    :fp:
    Wow, never takes long for the racism to show itself.

    Side note, was thinking of it earlier, if some of you gun nuts refuse to abide by any new regulations that are put into place, does this not by right, mean you are breaking the law, i.e. make you a "bad guy" as some like to so eloquently put it.

    And haven't those same people mentioned that it should be the goal of everyone to ensure the bad guys don't get their hands on said weapons. Does this mean that it is okay for law enforecement to take your weapons from you are you are not now classed as a law abiding/responsible gun owner?

    Anyone want to try their hand at this one?? Anyone

    is this about the NY law? the guns already out there wer grandfathered in.
    81 is now off the air

    Off_Air.jpg
  • Moonpig
    Moonpig Posts: 659
    81 wrote:
    Moonpig wrote:
    Moonpig wrote:
    :fp:
    Wow, never takes long for the racism to show itself.

    Side note, was thinking of it earlier, if some of you gun nuts refuse to abide by any new regulations that are put into place, does this not by right, mean you are breaking the law, i.e. make you a "bad guy" as some like to so eloquently put it.

    And haven't those same people mentioned that it should be the goal of everyone to ensure the bad guys don't get their hands on said weapons. Does this mean that it is okay for law enforecement to take your weapons from you are you are not now classed as a law abiding/responsible gun owner?

    Anyone want to try their hand at this one?? Anyone

    is this about the NY law? the guns already out there wer grandfathered in.

    I guess I'm posing it in the context of the overall gun debate