No ma'am, I won't register my guns

1…1213151718…51

Comments

  • DS1119
    DS1119 Posts: 33,497
    peacefrompaul wrote:
    dimitrispearljam wrote:
    ofcourse its the government's right to know what you own..
    you need to pay taxis for what you own

    Is this gun related or more broad than that?

    Why the hell does the government need to know everything I own?


    Also, just because you pay tax on something doesn't mean the government is monitoring your purchases or knows what you own. I bought a case of beer tonight. Paid tax too. Is that being monitored?
  • peacefrompaul
    peacefrompaul Posts: 25,293
    dimitrispearljam wrote:
    now i understand why u want the guns...
    you gonna do a revolution!!!anarchy!!against the tyranny!!
    give the power to the people!!!!!

    3 woots for that!!!

    People having more power and freedom is a frightening thing for some people.
  • push me and i will resist
    push me and i will resist Posts: 958
    peacefrompaul wrote:
    dimitrispearljam wrote:
    ofcourse its the government's right to know what you own..
    you need to pay taxis for what you own

    Is this gun related or more broad than that?

    Why the hell does the government need to know everything I own?
    They don't. I'm against all guns, common sense tells me that more guns equals more bullets. More bullets makes for bad news, regardless of the laws, the American constitution, or any other rule makers rules, people that have guns shoot to kill other people.

    When does common sense prevail? Seriously the NRA/Biden thing yesterday, their was a school shooting during it.

    Guns are bad, they aren't a piece of metal as I've read somewhere around here, they have 1 purpose and that is too shoot a bullet.

    As far as the armed security at the school, the potential for teachers to carry guns, that's just more bullets to shoot. Although, as I read above, there is no proof that more bullets would be fired, odds are the more people that have guns to shoot during a shooting crisis like newtown, more people would have died
  • DS1119
    DS1119 Posts: 33,497
    push me and i will resist wrote:
    They don't. I'm against all guns, common sense tells me that more guns equals more bullets. More bullets makes for bad news, regardless of the laws, the American constitution, or any other rule makers rules, people that have guns shoot to kill other people.

    When does common sense prevail? Seriously the NRA/Biden thing yesterday, their was a school shooting during it.

    Guns are bad, they aren't a piece of metal as I've read somewhere around here, they have 1 purpose and that is too shoot a bullet.

    As far as the armed security at the school, the potential for teachers to carry guns, that's just more bullets to shoot. Although, as I read above, there is no proof that more bullets would be fired, odds are the more people that have guns to shoot during a shooting crisis like newtown, more people would have died


    Concentration needs to be on the illegal gun activity...not the legal.


    BTW...none of the few tragedies the US suffered this past year would have been stopped by the legislation proposed by Oblahblah.
  • push me and i will resist
    push me and i will resist Posts: 958
    DS1119 wrote:
    push me and i will resist wrote:
    They don't. I'm against all guns, common sense tells me that more guns equals more bullets. More bullets makes for bad news, regardless of the laws, the American constitution, or any other rule makers rules, people that have guns shoot to kill other people.

    When does common sense prevail? Seriously the NRA/Biden thing yesterday, their was a school shooting during it.

    Guns are bad, they aren't a piece of metal as I've read somewhere around here, they have 1 purpose and that is too shoot a bullet.

    As far as the armed security at the school, the potential for teachers to carry guns, that's just more bullets to shoot. Although, as I read above, there is no proof that more bullets would be fired, odds are the more people that have guns to shoot during a shooting crisis like newtown, more people would have died


    Concentration needs to be on the illegal gun activity...not the legal.


    BTW...none of the few tragedies the US suffered this past year would have been stopped by the legislation proposed by Oblahblah.

    I'm not arguing legal/illegal guns and I'm not talking about Obama. I'm just saying common sense needs to prevail at some point. A gun legal or illegal, shoots a bullet and people die.
  • DS1119
    DS1119 Posts: 33,497
    push me and i will resist wrote:

    I'm not arguing legal/illegal guns and I'm not talking about Obama. I'm just saying common sense needs to prevail at some point. A gun legal or illegal, shoots a bullet and people die.


    Illegal guns and illegal ammunition causes crime. Legal guns and ammunition provides protection, sport, and food.
  • push me and i will resist
    push me and i will resist Posts: 958
    DS1119 wrote:
    push me and i will resist wrote:

    I'm not arguing legal/illegal guns and I'm not talking about Obama. I'm just saying common sense needs to prevail at some point. A gun legal or illegal, shoots a bullet and people die.


    Illegal guns and illegal ammunition causes crime. Legal guns and ammunition provides protection, sport, and food.

    Ok, so if person 'A' has a legal gun, legal ammunition and proper paperwork and registration and all that, stores it legally, safely, unloaded and locked......100%legally done...... Person 'A' gets pissed off at the world one day, or his wife, neighbor,whatever/whoever....... He goes on a shooting spree and kills people. Would that not cause crime?

    I'm just saying guns kill people......quit making them, quit selling them and quit shipping them into our countries..... There's enough of them
  • push me and i will resist
    push me and i will resist Posts: 958
    Fucking wal mart is the leading seller of guns in the USA, nothing like going and buying some milk, bread and cheese and a handgun. Fucking shoot some shit and make a sandwich, that's a nice morning....fuck
  • Thirty Bills Unpaid
    Thirty Bills Unpaid Posts: 16,881
    DS1119 wrote:
    Thirty Bills Unpaid wrote:
    otter wrote:
    Dance around this one...

    Sandy Hook School has armed guards at the school and will have them indefinitely.

    Can you blame them given their reality?

    Let's make a different reality for them so this doesn't have to be.


    SO outlawing legally obtained weapons changes the reality of the situation? :lol:

    Geez you are simple.

    Do you understand the overwhelming majority of gun deaths are the result of legally attained weapons?

    You use the laughing icon. If there was a drooling fool icon I would use it right now.
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,128
    DS1119 wrote:
    push me and i will resist wrote:

    I'm not arguing legal/illegal guns and I'm not talking about Obama. I'm just saying common sense needs to prevail at some point. A gun legal or illegal, shoots a bullet and people die.


    Illegal guns and illegal ammunition causes crime. Legal guns and ammunition provides protection, sport, and food.
    so are you saying the legal guns in sandy hook are not responsible in any way for what happened? those were legal.

    the guns and ammo in aurora were legal.

    the guns and ammo that shot giffords were legal.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • JimmyV
    JimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 19,600
    DS1119 wrote:
    JimmyV wrote:
    otter wrote:
    Dance around this one...

    Sandy Hook School has armed guards at the school and will have them indefinitely.

    A comfort to the parents whose surviving children still attend. There remains no proof an armed guard would have been able to stop that or any other tragedy. It is just as likely a crossfire between guard and assailant would have taken even more lives.


    ...and again there is no proof a deadly crossfire fight would have happened. :?

    Of course, but at every turn the presence of an armed guard is being touted as a guarantee that these tragedies would be preventable. There is no proof that is indeed the case, and the presence of a second gun firing shots may very well raise the victim count.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • dudeman
    dudeman Posts: 3,160
    I think he's saying that the guns are not responsible at all. The criminals that got their hands on them were responsible.

    I understand the points you guys are trying to make, they are just incredibly naive and near-sighted. If you hang a "No Weapons Allowed" sign outside any establishment, anyone can assume that they won't be countered with deadly force if they decide to go in and shoot the place up. Hang up some "We will Shoot to Kill any Crazy Motherfucker that Comes to Harm our Children" signs. That is deterrent.
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    DS1119 wrote:
    push me and i will resist wrote:

    I'm not arguing legal/illegal guns and I'm not talking about Obama. I'm just saying common sense needs to prevail at some point. A gun legal or illegal, shoots a bullet and people die.


    Illegal guns and illegal ammunition causes crime. Legal guns and ammunition provides protection, sport, and food.
    so are you saying the legal guns in sandy hook are not responsible in any way for what happened? those were legal.

    the guns and ammo in aurora were legal.

    the guns and ammo that shot giffords were legal.
    If hope can grow from dirt like me, it can be done. - EV
  • otter
    otter Posts: 772
    yep...common sense

    dudeman wrote:
    I think he's saying that the guns are not responsible at all. The criminals that got their hands on them were responsible.

    I understand the points you guys are trying to make, they are just incredibly naive and near-sighted. If you hang a "No Weapons Allowed" sign outside any establishment, anyone can assume that they won't be countered with deadly force if they decide to go in and shoot the place up. Hang up some "We will Shoot to Kill any Crazy Motherfucker that Comes to Harm our Children" signs. That is deterrent.
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    DS1119 wrote:


    Illegal guns and illegal ammunition causes crime. Legal guns and ammunition provides protection, sport, and food.
    so are you saying the legal guns in sandy hook are not responsible in any way for what happened? those were legal.

    the guns and ammo in aurora were legal.

    the guns and ammo that shot giffords were legal.
    I found my place......and it's alright
  • usamamasan1
    usamamasan1 Posts: 4,695
    http://expressobeans.com/public/detail.php/155455

    "Hollywood" shares responsibility. Glorifying violence in music, film, video games.

    It's a shame.
  • Zoso
    Zoso Posts: 6,425
    usamamasan1 wrote:
    http://expressobeans.com/public/detail.php/155455

    "Hollywood" shares responsibility. Glorifying violence in music, film, video games.

    It's a shame.

    If mass murders with guns was a world wide issue then yes I'd say Hollywood was a big contributor... But it's just Americans doing this..
    I'm just flying around the other side of the world to say I love you

    Sha la la la i'm in love with a jersey girl

    I love you forever and forever :)

    Adel 03 Melb 1 03 LA 2 06 Santa Barbara 06 Gorge 1 06 Gorge 2 06 Adel 1 06 Adel 2 06 Camden 1 08 Camden 2 08 Washington DC 08 Hartford 08
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,128
    dudeman wrote:
    I think he's saying that the guns are not responsible at all. The criminals that got their hands on them were responsible.

    I understand the points you guys are trying to make, they are just incredibly naive and near-sighted. If you hang a "No Weapons Allowed" sign outside any establishment, anyone can assume that they won't be countered with deadly force if they decide to go in and shoot the place up. Hang up some "We will Shoot to Kill any Crazy Motherfucker that Comes to Harm our Children" signs. That is deterrent.
    sorry bud, that is not a deterrent. that is a challenge to the bad guys.

    and if this becomes law, you will register your weapons or you will be a criminal.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • JimmyV
    JimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 19,600
    No ma'am, if you pass laws I do not like I will not follow them.

    LIBERTY!
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • dimitrispearljam
    dimitrispearljam Posts: 139,725
    JimmyV wrote:
    No ma'am, if you pass laws I do not like I will not follow them.

    LIBERTY!
    :lol:
    "...Dimitri...He talks to me...'.."The Ghost of Greece..".
    "..That's One Happy Fuckin Ghost.."
    “..That came up on the Pillow Case...This is for the Greek, With Our Apologies.....”
  • dudeman
    dudeman Posts: 3,160
    Look. We have laws against gun violence, background checks, limits on types of weapons we can get and people still target places likely to be unprotected.

    You can't legally have a gun at school, in a movie theater, bars, government buildings..........and these are exactly the types of places shooting sprees occur. Think there might be a reason?

    We've tried tighter restrictions on law-abiding gun owners. It doesn't work. Violent crime increases when criminals know they are targeting unarmed victims.

    It's time we get to the root cause of criminal activity in our homes, schools and within ourselves. Let's prevent people from being victimized and stop them from becoming criminals in the first place.

    We have tried everything else. Why not place armed guards in schools and other vulnerable locations for mass-killings. Do it like the previous (failed) assault weapons ban, in that it will expire if deemed a failure and let the legislation dissolve. At the same time, talk to your kids. Educate them about the evils of the world. Instill the value of life in them and teach them that their actions carry consequences. Lead by example and be aware of the influence your actions have on others.
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    dudeman wrote:
    I think he's saying that the guns are not responsible at all. The criminals that got their hands on them were responsible.

    I understand the points you guys are trying to make, they are just incredibly naive and near-sighted. If you hang a "No Weapons Allowed" sign outside any establishment, anyone can assume that they won't be countered with deadly force if they decide to go in and shoot the place up. Hang up some "We will Shoot to Kill any Crazy Motherfucker that Comes to Harm our Children" signs. That is deterrent.
    sorry bud, that is not a deterrent. that is a challenge to the bad guys.

    and if this becomes law, you will register your weapons or you will be a criminal.
    If hope can grow from dirt like me, it can be done. - EV
  • chadwick
    chadwick up my ass Posts: 21,157
    JimmyV wrote:
    No ma'am, if you pass laws I do not like I will not follow them.

    LIBERTY!
    then stop smoking reefer @ 13 billion people. the laws have been passed by big government. no growing or using this green sticky ichy flowering plant. now frickin stop...its the law, man!
    for poetry through the ceiling. ISBN: 1 4241 8840 7

    "Hear me, my chiefs!
    I am tired; my heart is
    sick and sad. From where
    the sun stands I will fight
    no more forever."
    Chief Joseph - Nez Perce

Categories