Israelis shrug at Netanyahu's urgent warnings on Iran

gimmesometruth27
St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,405
Bibi is trying to drum up fear in his own country. the people of israel are handling this much better than people of america would. we are fearful here. we believe that we are constantly under threat. bibi is telling his country to be scared and that there is an imminent threat to them. they are not having it. bibi is sabre rattling with iran and he is trying to draw the US into another war in the region. or he is wanting US to do his fighting for him.
to answer the post in the other thread about obama not talking to foreign leaders, i have this to say.
WHY WOULD HE? he is trying to win an election. if he talks to foreign leaders he might get sucked into some crappy situation where we would have to commit troops somewhere, bomb someone, or worse, launch an all out war. why would anyone in their right mind who is on the campaign trail risk pulling a romney and insulting those allies or inflaming tensions with other countries overseas?
it is easy for romney and right wingers to criticize obama because they are not in his situation. they are not the ones making real decisions. it is easy to throw hyperbole stones when you are not the one who has to deal with the fallout...
Israelis shrug at Netanyahu's urgent warnings on Iran
Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu has relentlessly warned that Iran poses an imminent nuclear threat, but most Israelis are sanguine, believing it won't happen or that Israel can handle it.
http://news.yahoo.com/israelis-shrug-ne ... 29186.html
Even as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu presses the US for “red lines” on Iran’s nuclear development and Iran ramps up its rhetoric, Israelis don’t seem to be expecting a war with Iran anytime soon – and are not frantically preparing for one.
Yes, Iran is a dangerous regime, most say. But even as some get new gas masks and repair their bomb shelters, more than half say they think Mr. Netanyahu's statements about launching an Israeli strike on Iran are a bluff intended to pressure the US to do the job instead.
And even if Netanyahu were serious about going it alone, Israelis express a high degree of confidence in Israel’s ability to defend itself.
“We have been following the Iran issue for quite a long time and … [Israelis] actually seem to be pretty relaxed about it and I suppose that, following their answers, this is because they don’t really think it’s going to happen,” says public opinion expert Tamar Hermann, who co-edits a monthly poll known as the Peace Index. “They see it as a chess game by which Netanyahu is trying to achieve certain advantages in the international arena.”
There are other theories about why Israelis seem relatively calm about the Iran threat: They’ve long since accepted that they live in a dangerous neighborhood; they have confidence in the state’s ability to defend itself and protect its civilians; they don’t think Iran will strike anyway; and, for the more religious, they are looking to the same God that delivered their people from enemies who sought their destruction in the past, from Goliath to Haman.
“First of all, I trust God. Secondly, we have very clever people, very good intelligence,” and a strong military, says Moshe Guy, a Tel Aviv resident visiting the Western Wall in Jerusalem’s Old City. “I’m not afraid – I’m much more afraid about the conflict between Jews in Israel – between religious and non-religious.… I see that Judaism is moving toward [being] fanatic, and fanatic is very bad.”
Indeed, other concerns seem to be more top of mind for Israelis, including the high cost of living, rising social tensions, and even a possible earthquake.
US SUPPORT STILL TRUMPS ALL
Earlier this year, a survey conducted by the Institute for National Security Studies (INSS) at Tel Aviv University found that only 18 percent of Israelis believed that Iran would attack Israel with nuclear weapons. Even if Iran were to launch a nuclear attack, almost 2 in 3 Israelis believe that Israel can handle such an strike, according to the survey, which will be published in December.
But Israelis were more confident in their country's ability to deal with all but one of the other threats posed by the survey – including war with Arab countries, sustained terrorism, and a chemical or biological weapons attack, according to INSS data shared with the Monitor.
The only thing Israelis are more worried about in terms of national security is a drop in US support of Israel.
“All the studies we’ve done over the past 25 years show that the Israeli public … puts great, great, great emphasis between Israel and US and views strong bonds … as a major factor in Israel’s national security,” says Yehuda Ben Meir, co-director of INSS’s National Security and Public Opinion Project. “Since it’s been made very clear that the US is more than strongly opposed to a unilateral Israeli independent attack at this time … [Israelis] don’t want it.”
To be sure, a substantial cohort – as high as 40 percent, according to some polls – still supports an Israeli strike. But a strong majority – 61 percent, according to the Peace Index – only want a joint US-Israel strike.
That said, Israelis don’t necessarily trust the US. Some 70 percent said they did not have full confidence in US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta’s promise this summer that the US will prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, according to the July edition of Professor Hermann’s Peace Index.
“We cannot trust America,” says Mr. Guy of Tel Aviv, criticizing Netanyahu for pressuring the US to support an Israeli strike or launch its own. “Why speak about it, [why] make so much noise? They will not do it. We must do it.”
IS AN EARTHQUAKE MORE LIKELY THAN A NUCLEAR ATTACK?
This weekend, the deputy commander of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards said that an Israeli strike would “provide a historic opportunity for the Islamic Revolution to wipe [Israel] off the face of the earth,” adding that an infantry battalion would be able to “break Israel’s back” within a day.
It’s sound bites like that which always spur a flurry of calls and website traffic for Dani Avram, the owner of an Israeli bomb shelter company called Ani Mugan (“I am protected”).
“Every time there’s the right news … you see a big increase of people that want to fix their home shelters,” says Mr. Avram, who says that usually such calls drop off after a few days. “But now, it’s many more people and a longer period of time.”
Traffic to his company website has increased at least sixfold, he estimates, and calls have risen from a few dozen a day to a few hundred. Even on weekends and recent holidays, traffic has been similar to a normal business day, he says.
Part of it may be an improved awareness among citizens about how to brace for attack, thanks in part to a more organized campaign by the government.
“It’s not the same as [before the 1991] Gulf War – now we feel more secure because now we feel better prepared,” says Dan, a Modiin resident visiting Jerusalem’s Old City who declined to give his last name.
DISTRIBUTING GAS MASKS
But his wife, Ilanit, says she is worried – though she admits she has yet to get a gas mask for their third child, an infant.
The Home Front Command, set up in the wake of the Gulf War, began a nationwide campaign in 2010 to distribute gas masks to protect citizens in the event of biological or chemical warfare. Since then, they have distributed more than 4 million of the so-called “protection kits,” but only about half of Israelis currently have one, according to the Israel Defense Forces (IDF).
The country has also helped prepare citizens by organizing nationwide civil defense drills every spring or early summer since the 2006 Lebanon war, when Hezbollah sent a flood of rockets over Israel’s northern border. But this year’s drill, which is set to include NATO and the United Nations, will be held in October and doesn’t have anything to do with missiles or other possible retaliatory attacks from Iran.
Normally, the drills include the sounding of a siren, the distribution of messages via SMS, and requests for civilians to go to a designated secure place as they would in an emergency. Local governments are also involved in emergency response simulations.
Instead, the focus this year will be preparing for an earthquake. The last destructive earthquake in Israel occurred in 1927, and with major quakes occurring every 80-90 years on average, some say the country is due for another.
“I know it’s much more sexy to talk about Iran, but an earthquake is much more likely statistically,” says Nissan Zehevi, spokesman for the Home Front Defense Minister. But, he adds, “We’re ready for any scenario.”
In the meantime, says Hermann, Israelis don’t seem to be batting an eye – noting among other things the recent uptick in home sales lately.
“Normally people do not invest in real estate when they think that their new homes are going to be destroyed by missiles from Iran,” she says.
to answer the post in the other thread about obama not talking to foreign leaders, i have this to say.
WHY WOULD HE? he is trying to win an election. if he talks to foreign leaders he might get sucked into some crappy situation where we would have to commit troops somewhere, bomb someone, or worse, launch an all out war. why would anyone in their right mind who is on the campaign trail risk pulling a romney and insulting those allies or inflaming tensions with other countries overseas?
it is easy for romney and right wingers to criticize obama because they are not in his situation. they are not the ones making real decisions. it is easy to throw hyperbole stones when you are not the one who has to deal with the fallout...
Israelis shrug at Netanyahu's urgent warnings on Iran
Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu has relentlessly warned that Iran poses an imminent nuclear threat, but most Israelis are sanguine, believing it won't happen or that Israel can handle it.
http://news.yahoo.com/israelis-shrug-ne ... 29186.html
Even as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu presses the US for “red lines” on Iran’s nuclear development and Iran ramps up its rhetoric, Israelis don’t seem to be expecting a war with Iran anytime soon – and are not frantically preparing for one.
Yes, Iran is a dangerous regime, most say. But even as some get new gas masks and repair their bomb shelters, more than half say they think Mr. Netanyahu's statements about launching an Israeli strike on Iran are a bluff intended to pressure the US to do the job instead.
And even if Netanyahu were serious about going it alone, Israelis express a high degree of confidence in Israel’s ability to defend itself.
“We have been following the Iran issue for quite a long time and … [Israelis] actually seem to be pretty relaxed about it and I suppose that, following their answers, this is because they don’t really think it’s going to happen,” says public opinion expert Tamar Hermann, who co-edits a monthly poll known as the Peace Index. “They see it as a chess game by which Netanyahu is trying to achieve certain advantages in the international arena.”
There are other theories about why Israelis seem relatively calm about the Iran threat: They’ve long since accepted that they live in a dangerous neighborhood; they have confidence in the state’s ability to defend itself and protect its civilians; they don’t think Iran will strike anyway; and, for the more religious, they are looking to the same God that delivered their people from enemies who sought their destruction in the past, from Goliath to Haman.
“First of all, I trust God. Secondly, we have very clever people, very good intelligence,” and a strong military, says Moshe Guy, a Tel Aviv resident visiting the Western Wall in Jerusalem’s Old City. “I’m not afraid – I’m much more afraid about the conflict between Jews in Israel – between religious and non-religious.… I see that Judaism is moving toward [being] fanatic, and fanatic is very bad.”
Indeed, other concerns seem to be more top of mind for Israelis, including the high cost of living, rising social tensions, and even a possible earthquake.
US SUPPORT STILL TRUMPS ALL
Earlier this year, a survey conducted by the Institute for National Security Studies (INSS) at Tel Aviv University found that only 18 percent of Israelis believed that Iran would attack Israel with nuclear weapons. Even if Iran were to launch a nuclear attack, almost 2 in 3 Israelis believe that Israel can handle such an strike, according to the survey, which will be published in December.
But Israelis were more confident in their country's ability to deal with all but one of the other threats posed by the survey – including war with Arab countries, sustained terrorism, and a chemical or biological weapons attack, according to INSS data shared with the Monitor.
The only thing Israelis are more worried about in terms of national security is a drop in US support of Israel.
“All the studies we’ve done over the past 25 years show that the Israeli public … puts great, great, great emphasis between Israel and US and views strong bonds … as a major factor in Israel’s national security,” says Yehuda Ben Meir, co-director of INSS’s National Security and Public Opinion Project. “Since it’s been made very clear that the US is more than strongly opposed to a unilateral Israeli independent attack at this time … [Israelis] don’t want it.”
To be sure, a substantial cohort – as high as 40 percent, according to some polls – still supports an Israeli strike. But a strong majority – 61 percent, according to the Peace Index – only want a joint US-Israel strike.
That said, Israelis don’t necessarily trust the US. Some 70 percent said they did not have full confidence in US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta’s promise this summer that the US will prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, according to the July edition of Professor Hermann’s Peace Index.
“We cannot trust America,” says Mr. Guy of Tel Aviv, criticizing Netanyahu for pressuring the US to support an Israeli strike or launch its own. “Why speak about it, [why] make so much noise? They will not do it. We must do it.”
IS AN EARTHQUAKE MORE LIKELY THAN A NUCLEAR ATTACK?
This weekend, the deputy commander of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards said that an Israeli strike would “provide a historic opportunity for the Islamic Revolution to wipe [Israel] off the face of the earth,” adding that an infantry battalion would be able to “break Israel’s back” within a day.
It’s sound bites like that which always spur a flurry of calls and website traffic for Dani Avram, the owner of an Israeli bomb shelter company called Ani Mugan (“I am protected”).
“Every time there’s the right news … you see a big increase of people that want to fix their home shelters,” says Mr. Avram, who says that usually such calls drop off after a few days. “But now, it’s many more people and a longer period of time.”
Traffic to his company website has increased at least sixfold, he estimates, and calls have risen from a few dozen a day to a few hundred. Even on weekends and recent holidays, traffic has been similar to a normal business day, he says.
Part of it may be an improved awareness among citizens about how to brace for attack, thanks in part to a more organized campaign by the government.
“It’s not the same as [before the 1991] Gulf War – now we feel more secure because now we feel better prepared,” says Dan, a Modiin resident visiting Jerusalem’s Old City who declined to give his last name.
DISTRIBUTING GAS MASKS
But his wife, Ilanit, says she is worried – though she admits she has yet to get a gas mask for their third child, an infant.
The Home Front Command, set up in the wake of the Gulf War, began a nationwide campaign in 2010 to distribute gas masks to protect citizens in the event of biological or chemical warfare. Since then, they have distributed more than 4 million of the so-called “protection kits,” but only about half of Israelis currently have one, according to the Israel Defense Forces (IDF).
The country has also helped prepare citizens by organizing nationwide civil defense drills every spring or early summer since the 2006 Lebanon war, when Hezbollah sent a flood of rockets over Israel’s northern border. But this year’s drill, which is set to include NATO and the United Nations, will be held in October and doesn’t have anything to do with missiles or other possible retaliatory attacks from Iran.
Normally, the drills include the sounding of a siren, the distribution of messages via SMS, and requests for civilians to go to a designated secure place as they would in an emergency. Local governments are also involved in emergency response simulations.
Instead, the focus this year will be preparing for an earthquake. The last destructive earthquake in Israel occurred in 1927, and with major quakes occurring every 80-90 years on average, some say the country is due for another.
“I know it’s much more sexy to talk about Iran, but an earthquake is much more likely statistically,” says Nissan Zehevi, spokesman for the Home Front Defense Minister. But, he adds, “We’re ready for any scenario.”
In the meantime, says Hermann, Israelis don’t seem to be batting an eye – noting among other things the recent uptick in home sales lately.
“Normally people do not invest in real estate when they think that their new homes are going to be destroyed by missiles from Iran,” she says.
"You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
-
This is very disturbing:
"Yes, Iran is a dangerous regime, most say. But even as some get new gas masks and repair their bomb shelters, more than half say they think Mr. Netanyahu's statements about launching an Israeli strike on Iran are a bluff intended to pressure the US to do the job instead."
This reminds me of the time when I got shoved in a locker freshman year. I got an older dude in the neighborhood to take care of the kid. I should have either taken it as hazing, or taken care of it on my own.
Everybody wants to U.S. to do their dirty work....AND, we've done it. Where has that gotten us?
Hmmm. This sounds familiar: “I’m not afraid – I’m much more afraid about the conflict between Jews in Israel – between religious and non-religious.… I see that Judaism is moving toward [being] fanatic, and fanatic is very bad.”0 -
A stable Palestinian state and a democratic Egypt is desperately needed.0
-
whygohome wrote:A stable Palestinian state and a democratic Egypt is desperately needed.
unfortunately it seems like we won't get there in my lifetime."You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
gimmesometruth27 wrote:
Not with Bibi around.0 -
whygohome wrote:A stable Palestinian state and a democratic Egypt is desperately needed.
Agreed. Iran should give a piece of land the the Palestinians, and the world would be a better place.Sorry. The world doesn't work the way you tell it to.0 -
whygohome wrote:This is very disturbing:
"Yes, Iran is a dangerous regime, most say. But even as some get new gas masks and repair their bomb shelters, more than half say they think Mr. Netanyahu's statements about launching an Israeli strike on Iran are a bluff intended to pressure the US to do the job instead."
That's an opinion. Who are the most? I love this stuff. Israel is the enemy. :roll:Sorry. The world doesn't work the way you tell it to.0 -
EdsonNascimento wrote:
That's an opinion. Who are the most? I love this stuff. Israel is the enemy. :roll:
Sorry, let me edit: "If this is true, then this is very disturbing." I was just citing a quote.
If you don't like the quote go to the source.
And, nobody said that Israel is the enemy. That is a gross overstatement. Many people feel that they are not holding up their end of the bargain. Very simple.Post edited by whygohome on0 -
EdsonNascimento wrote:
Agreed. Iran should give a piece of land the the Palestinians, and the world would be a better place.
how about the israeli govt give the palestinians the land that it theres by right... by international law and real history? how about the israeli govt stop with the land creeping, take responsibility for past wrongs(palestinians can do this too) and make the palestinians welcome in their own country??Post edited by catefrances onhear my name
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say0 -
I hope Iran takes these messages seriously.
Israel is our ally and we are back to back world war champs.
Do the math0 -
usamamasan1 wrote:I hope Iran takes these messages seriously.
Israel is our ally and we are back to back world war champs.
Do the math
i think iran knows washington isnt foolish enough to get drawn in by netanyahus sabre rattling.hear my name
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say0 -
usamamasan1 wrote:I hope Iran takes these messages seriously.
Israel is our ally and we are back to back world war champs.
Do the math
do the history..."You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
gimmesometruth27 wrote:
i think hes (deludedly)speaking of the US being back to back world war champs.hear my name
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say0 -
usamamasan1 wrote:I hope Iran takes these messages seriously.
Israel is our ally and we are back to back world war champs.
Do the mathBe Excellent To Each OtherParty On, Dudes!0 -
Jason P wrote:Are you in the 18 - 28 age draft range?
And we might be WW I and II champs, but we are unimpressive dawdlers of 2 much more recent wars.Pick up my debut novel here on amazon: Jonny Bails Floatin (in paperback) (also available on Kindle for $2.99)0 -
catefrances wrote:
how about the israeli govt give the palestinians the land that it theres by right... by international law and real history? how about the israeli govt stop with the land creeping, take responsibility for past wrongs(palestinians can do this too) and make the palestinians welcome in their own country??
This ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^jesus greets me looks just like me ....0 -
don't you guys see what is going on?
bibi is talking and selling a war to an israeli public who does not want it. he is trying to goad US into fighting with or for him. this is the exact same fucking thing that bush and the "coalition of the willing" did in the lead up to the iraq war.
have we learned nothing?
it is all being set up the same way. "a madman in the desert seeking weapons of mass destruction. he is a threat to everyone in the world. he tried to buy yellow cake uranium in niger. he tried to kill my dad. we have to take him out because sanctions are not working. we are going to be greeted as liberators!!"
anyone remember that?"You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
gimmesometruth27 wrote:don't you guys see what is going on?
bibi is talking and selling a war to an israeli public who does not want it. he is trying to goad US into fighting with or for him. this is the exact same fucking thing that bush and the "coalition of the willing" did in the lead up to the iraq war.
have we learned nothing?
it is all being set up the same way. "a madman in the desert seeking weapons of mass destruction. he is a threat to everyone in the world. he tried to buy yellow cake uranium in niger. he tried to kill my dad. we have to take him out because sanctions are not working. we are going to be greeted as liberators!!"
anyone remember that?Shows: 6.27.08 Hartford, CT/5.15.10 Hartford, CT/6.18.2011 Hartford, CT (EV Solo)/10.19.13 Brooklyn/10.25.13 Hartford
"Becoming a Bruce fan is like hitting puberty as a musical fan. It's inevitable." - dcfaithful0 -
Newch91 wrote:We never learn from history.
where the fuck is the press on this? again it is asleep at the switch. what sells more papers and generates more page clicks than the prospect of a new war??
the press is failing to inform your average citizen what is about to happen in their name, and how our military may be sucked into yet another conflict for no reason.
sometimes i think we do a better job of sharing information and news on this forum than most media outlets.
we can not let everyone forget what happened in 2003 and we can not allow it to happen again."You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
gimmesometruth27 wrote:no we don't. we never learn. we learn for a couple of years, but we forget and do the same things over and over again...
where the fuck is the press on this? again it is asleep at the switch. what sells more papers and generates more page clicks than the prospect of a new war??
the press is failing to inform your average citizen what is about to happen in their name, and how our military may be sucked into yet another conflict for no reason.
sometimes i think we do a better job of sharing information and news on this forum than most media outlets.
we can not let everyone forget what happened in 2003 and we can not allow it to happen again.Shows: 6.27.08 Hartford, CT/5.15.10 Hartford, CT/6.18.2011 Hartford, CT (EV Solo)/10.19.13 Brooklyn/10.25.13 Hartford
"Becoming a Bruce fan is like hitting puberty as a musical fan. It's inevitable." - dcfaithful0 -
in today's news....
this man is a threat to world peace and middle east stability... he may bring about the collapse of his own country if he starts a unilateral war.... of course we are going to get dragged into another multifront war...
someone stop this sabre-rattling idiot!!
Netanyahu to set "clear red line" for Iran in U.N. speech
http://news.yahoo.com/netanyahu-press-i ... 26532.html
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will set out, in his speech at the United Nations on Thursday, an ultimatum for Iran to halt its disputed nuclear drive or risk coming under military attack, an Israeli official said.
Netanyahu faces the world body after U.S. President Barack Obama disappointed some Israelis, in his own address to the annual assembly, by not calling for a deadline to be imposed on Tehran - though he did say time for diplomacy "is not unlimited".
Israel sees a mortal threat in a nuclear-armed Iran and has long threatened to strike its arch-foe pre-emptively, agitating war-wary world powers as they pursue sanctions and negotiations.
Complicating Netanyahu's strategy have been his testy relations with Obama as a U.S. election looms, and the reluctance of many Israelis to trigger a conflict with Iran, which denies that it is seeking to develop nuclear weapons and has pledged wide-ranging retaliation if attacked.
"The prime minister will set a clear red line in his speech that will not contradict Obama's remarks. Obama said Iran won't have nuclear weapons. The prime minister will clarify the way in which Iran won't have nuclear arms," a senior Israeli official said en route to New York, without elaborating.
Though he has not previously detailed when Israel might be willing to go to war, Netanyahu has said Iran could have enough low-enriched uranium by early 2013 to refine to a high level of fissile purity for a first nuclear device [ID:nL5E8KG2P5].
Israel worries that this final step, if taken, could happen too quickly or quietly to be prevented.
Iran has said it has no plans to enrich uranium beyond the 20 percent purity required to run a reactor producing medical isotopes. That level, however, brings raw uranium exponentially closer to the 90 percent enrichment required for bomb fuel.
Though reputed to have the Middle East's sole nuclear arsenal, Israel would be hard-put to deliver lasting damage to Iran's remote facilities using its conventional forces, or to handle a multi-front war.
WORK TOGETHER
Netanyahu's public calls for a U.S. ultimatum have deepened acrimony with Obama, a Democrat accused by his Republican rivals of being soft on the Jewish state's security. That has stirred American accusations of Israeli meddling in the November presidential elections - something denied by Netanyahu.
"The prime minister will say that Israel and the United States can work together to achieve their common goal," said the Israeli official on condition of anonymity.
Netanyahu, who heads a broad-based, conservative coalition government, departed for New York on Wednesday saying he would take the U.N. podium for an Israel "united in the goal of preventing Iran from achieving nuclear weaponry".
But surveys show that most Israelis - apparently swayed by the open dissent of several senior national-security figures - would oppose launching unilateral strikes on Iran, given the risk of alienating Washington and of provoking clashes with Tehran's Islamist militant allies in Lebanon and Gaza.
A poll published by the liberal Haaretz newspaper on Thursday found that 50 percent of Israelis feared for the survival of their country, should there be a conflict.
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, in his speech to the General Assembly on Wednesday, said Iran was under threat of military action from "uncivilized Zionists," a clear reference to Israel. Earlier this week, Ahmadinejad said that Israel would eventually be "eliminated."
Haaretz also ran excerpts from a leaked Foreign Ministry report that sanctions had caused greater damage to Iran's economy than anticipated by Israel.
The findings, confirmed to Reuters by an Israeli official, could undermine any attempt by Netanyahu to argue that the military alternative must be considered imminently.
Israeli opposition leader Shaul Mofaz criticized Netanyahu for sparring with Obama and voiced confidence in U.S. resolve.
"I am convinced that the United States, the president of the United States, is determined to prevent Iran going nuclear," Mofaz told Israel's Army Radio.
Even within Netanyahu's coalition there have been misgivings about the pitch of disagreement with the United States.
Danny Ayalon, deputy to Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, described Obama's Iran remarks at the United Nations as "important, albeit measured".
Speaking on Israel Radio, Ayalon said the Netanyahu government and Obama administration were in discreet contacts and approaching agreement on setting limits for Iran."You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 275 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help