***Petition for 10c to re-stock PJ20 Blu Ray***

It would be really cool to see this come back!

dirtybob wrote:

skanji32 wrote:

For what it's worth, when the reissue happens, it won't be re-encoded, or anything like that. :nono:

skanji32 wrote:

It's not on CC anymore...it's on 10c. Out of the hands of CC. Not sure what the hang up is with 10c, but it's 100% on 10c to move on this.

You keep making these cryptic comments as though you have definite, concrete evidence from some secret source. If you know something, then just say what you know and how so all the people waiting here will have some solid info. Stop being so coy. Do you just enjoy the attention or something? You're not Jason Bourne here.

:roll:
db

Yes I do have a source (who has requested to be anonymous) and am telling you all I know...not being coy at all. Not sure why 10c is holding this up. That part I have no idea. I don't have any other information other than what I have said:
- re-release in some form is coming
- everyone wants to be respectful of LE buyers
- nothing will be added (ie. PJ20 concert)
- ball is in 10c court and has been for several months
- this will get done at some point
- I am NOT holding onto to any additional information.

Don't like what I am saying? Ignore my posts...easy. I may not be Jason Bourne, but you sure are doing a great Inspector Gadget impression! :geek:

I can understand people being bitter. I'm one of them. I've been on this post since day one. I've contacted several people that I feel are in the know. I've shared info here with everyone as soon as I find out info.

A wise man once said, "My issue is with the attitudes of many of the posters, turning on other members."

Be frustrated. I get it. Be frustrated at me? Wrong target. :nono:

skanji32 wrote:

dirtybob wrote:

skanji32 wrote:

For what it's worth, when the reissue happens, it won't be re-encoded, or anything like that. :nono:

skanji32 wrote:

It's not on CC anymore...it's on 10c. Out of the hands of CC. Not sure what the hang up is with 10c, but it's 100% on 10c to move on this.

You keep making these cryptic comments as though you have definite, concrete evidence from some secret source. If you know something, then just say what you know and how so all the people waiting here will have some solid info. Stop being so coy. Do you just enjoy the attention or something? You're not Jason Bourne here.

:roll:
db

Yes I do have a source (who has requested to be anonymous) and am telling you all I know...not being coy at all. Not sure why 10c is holding this up. That part I have no idea. I don't have any other information other than what I have said:
- re-release in some form is coming
- everyone wants to be respectful of LE buyers
- nothing will be added (ie. PJ20 concert)
- ball is in 10c court and has been for several months
- this will get done at some point
- I am NOT holding onto to any additional information.

Don't like what I am saying? Ignore my posts...easy. I may not be Jason Bourne, but you sure are doing a great Inspector Gadget impression! :geek:

I can understand people being bitter. I'm one of them. I've been on this post since day one. I've contacted several people that I feel are in the know. I've shared info here with everyone as soon as I find out info.

A wise man once said, "My issue is with the attitudes of many of the posters, turning on other members."

Be frustrated. I get it. Be frustrated at me? Wrong target. :nono:

Thanks, skanji! No re-encode though? :(

PJ_Soul wrote:

:nono:
I guess I like to feel superior too! :nono:

(Thanks Skanji)

It's a common affliction, don't worry about it!

db

skanji32 wrote:

benjs wrote:

Thanks, skanji! No re-encode though? :(

nope, not that I am aware of.

dirtybob wrote:

This was all I was asking for. Be forthcoming and lay your cards out, instead of dropping breadcrumbs and coy hints. It only frustrates people trying to get solid info, as evidenced by the last person who asked you to simply say what you knew when you were playing coy again a few pages back.

I can tell by the way you wag your finger at me that you like to feel a little superior though, so I guess it's a trait you come by honestly...

Thanks for finally coming clean.
db

Not sure how this got ugly, but....There isn't one piece of information that I summarized above that is new information. It's all in this post either from me or others.

"My issue is with the attitudes of many of the posters, turning on other members." - Dirty Bob

"If you hate something, don't ya do it to..." - PJ

I didn't see it as getting ugly, other than you feeling the need to try and throw my words back in my face... Twice. And waggle your finger at me. Twice. And try to use a PJ quote to attempt to shame me. I guess yes, that could be considered ugly.

As I explained, it struck me that you were dropping small tidbits of partial information that seemed to do more for making you appear as though you were in the know and less to give useful information to people who are obviously desperately looking for it. Saying "it's out of CC's hands now, it's all on 10c" doesn't do anything other than make people wonder what that means, and how you know this, and how reliable the info is, etc etc. you could have given more info to clarify, rather than appear mysterious and cryptic. That is my opinion, that was my feeling on it, and I felt it was unjust and slightly inconsiderate, and a bit peacock-y, and so I spoke up.

I understand if that bothered you enough to try to shame me, but I stand by my impression and by my posts. It may not have been your intention, but the effect was there nonetheless. Maybe others know you better to the extent that they knew you weren't showboating; that's not how it appeared to me.

If that's not who you are and was in no way what was behind your posts, then we can chalk it up to miscommunication and say we could have both been a little more diplomatic.

db

Thanks, but I wasn't actually looking for any clarification. I stand by my last post and I think it explains my stance pretty thoroughly. I don't like coy or superior airs or finger wagging, and I respond accordingly. Like I said, both parties could have been more diplomatic.

We can leave it there and move on, or we can keep picking at scabs and see what comes up.

db

PJ_Soul wrote:

fcbittenca wrote:

dirtybob wrote:

Thanks, but I wasn't actually looking for any clarification. I stand by my last post and I think it explains my stance pretty thoroughly. I don't like coy or superior airs or finger wagging, and I respond accordingly. Like I said, both parties could have been more diplomatic.

We can leave it there and move on, or we can keep picking at scabs and see what comes up.

db

I am with you Dirtybob... I don't like the "in the know" thing. It's childish. Sounds like : "I know and you don't... so please give me attention and I might tell you something that nobody else knows"

I have been an internet forum member (not only PJ) for over 17 years. GENERALLY... Secret Source means No Source Whatsoever. She knows someone "in the know" it can be a Monkeywrench door man that overheard something over coffee and she know him because he is the brother of friend who is the uncle of the guy that works in with a guy that I know" or she can be Mike McCready's next door neighbor.

I just wanted to show my support to your statement. I gave up on playing these foolish games on elementary school. Leave she to her big secret.

While I am here. BUMP.

Wow, I don't think it sounds like that at all - don't know what's making you folks so defensive. I think he/she is simply trying to convey info that he/she has so that we also have the info. The only info she seems to leaving out is who told her about it, which is completely fair if that person asked her not to say (obviously someone from 10C or someone who is close to someone from 10C). Good intentions as far as I can tell. This idea that he/she has some kind of ego issue about it seems really weird to me. I don't understand what got your backs up. Sure it might not be reliable info, or maybe it is.... whatever. But this ego thing is what's striking me as odd.

Yes it's completely mystifying to think that anyone might perceive things differently than you. Therefore we must be wrong and you should perseverate on that until we stop voicing our opinions.

Or maybe we can try once again to agree to disagree and let this drop? Seriously. Can we do that?

db

PJ_Soul wrote:

dirtybob wrote:

PJ_Soul wrote:

Wow, I don't think it sounds like that at all - don't know what's making you folks so defensive. I think he/she is simply trying to convey info that he/she has so that we also have the info. The only info she seems to leaving out is who told her about it, which is completely fair if that person asked her not to say (obviously someone from 10C or someone who is close to someone from 10C). Good intentions as far as I can tell. This idea that he/she has some kind of ego issue about it seems really weird to me. I don't understand what got your backs up. Sure it might not be reliable info, or maybe it is.... whatever. But this ego thing is what's striking me as odd.

Yes it's completely mystifying to think that anyone might perceive things differently than you. Therefore we must be wrong and you should perseverate on that until we stop voicing our opinions.

Or maybe we can try once again to agree to disagree and let this drop? Seriously. Can we do that?

db

:? ... Irony.

So that's a "No" on the letting it go then? That's not satisfying enough for you?

db