* * * * The National Football League - 2011 * * * *

1…106107109111112…140

Comments

  • The Waiting Trophy Man
    The Waiting Trophy Man Niagara region, Ontario, Canada Posts: 12,158
    ANybody get NFL magazine yet? I can't seem to find it anywhere. I thought it was supposed to hit the newsstands on Tuesday of this week?
    Another habit says it's in love with you
    Another habit says its long overdue
    Another habit like an unwanted friend
    I'm so happy with my righteous self
  • SatansFuton
    SatansFuton Posts: 5,399
    The Waiting Trophy Man wrote:
    ANybody get NFL magazine yet? I can't seem to find it anywhere. I thought it was supposed to hit the newsstands on Tuesday of this week?

    I was somewhat interested in checking it out until I heard they named Peyton Manning the 2011 MVP, on the basis of how bad the Colts stink without them. Clearly they just did it to create controversy and buzz about the magazine. But I thought you actually had to PLAY in order to be the Most Valuable PLAYER.
    "See a broad to get dat booty yak 'em, leg 'er down, a smack 'em yak 'em!"
  • The Waiting Trophy Man
    The Waiting Trophy Man Niagara region, Ontario, Canada Posts: 12,158
    SatansFuton wrote:
    The Waiting Trophy Man wrote:
    ANybody get NFL magazine yet? I can't seem to find it anywhere. I thought it was supposed to hit the newsstands on Tuesday of this week?

    I was somewhat interested in checking it out until I heard they named Peyton Manning the 2011 MVP, on the basis of how bad the Colts stink without them. Clearly they just did it to create controversy and buzz about the magazine. But I thought you actually had to PLAY in order to be the Most Valuable PLAYER.

    Yeah I don't agree with that at all. The
    Most Missed Player, maybe. Not by me though, lol.
    Another habit says it's in love with you
    Another habit says its long overdue
    Another habit like an unwanted friend
    I'm so happy with my righteous self
  • Jason P
    Jason P Posts: 19,420
    SatansFuton wrote:
    The Waiting Trophy Man wrote:
    ANybody get NFL magazine yet? I can't seem to find it anywhere. I thought it was supposed to hit the newsstands on Tuesday of this week?

    I was somewhat interested in checking it out until I heard they named Peyton Manning the 2011 MVP, on the basis of how bad the Colts stink without them. Clearly they just did it to create controversy and buzz about the magazine. But I thought you actually had to PLAY in order to be the Most Valuable PLAYER.
    As a Colt's fan, I won't make a serious claim for Manning for MVP, but holy crap, is there any way a team can instantly go from great to crap just based on the loss of one player? And to define crap, I mean as in not having a lead since week fucking five ... against a team that has already fired their head coach!!!

    :(

    For all the crap the haters give for him losing in the playoffs, it is fairly obvious now that he had been carrying a sub-.500 team to the playoffs on his shoulders for years.
    Be Excellent To Each Other
    Party On, Dudes!
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,599
    Jason P wrote:
    SatansFuton wrote:
    The Waiting Trophy Man wrote:
    ANybody get NFL magazine yet? I can't seem to find it anywhere. I thought it was supposed to hit the newsstands on Tuesday of this week?

    I was somewhat interested in checking it out until I heard they named Peyton Manning the 2011 MVP, on the basis of how bad the Colts stink without them. Clearly they just did it to create controversy and buzz about the magazine. But I thought you actually had to PLAY in order to be the Most Valuable PLAYER.
    As a Colt's fan, I won't make a serious claim for Manning for MVP, but holy crap, is there any way a team can instantly go from great to crap just based on the loss of one player? And to define crap, I mean as in not having a lead since week fucking five ... against a team that has already fired their head coach!!!

    :(

    For all the crap the haters give for him losing in the playoffs, it is fairly obvious now that he had been carrying a sub-.500 team to the playoffs on his shoulders for years.

    how many wins would they have with him this year though? 5? 6? there's a lot of holes on that team other than the quarterback...
    www.myspace.com
  • Jason P
    Jason P Posts: 19,420
    The Juggler wrote:

    how many wins would they have with him this year though? 5? 6? there's a lot of holes on that team other than the quarterback...
    The same holes were there last year and they made the playoffs. They were missing more offensive weapons last year. And their schedule is weaker this year.

    If Manning played this year, they would end up 10-6, give or take a game. Without Manning, 0-16.
    Be Excellent To Each Other
    Party On, Dudes!
  • Ledbetterman10
    Ledbetterman10 Posts: 17,018
    Jason P wrote:
    SatansFuton wrote:
    The Waiting Trophy Man wrote:
    ANybody get NFL magazine yet? I can't seem to find it anywhere. I thought it was supposed to hit the newsstands on Tuesday of this week?

    I was somewhat interested in checking it out until I heard they named Peyton Manning the 2011 MVP, on the basis of how bad the Colts stink without them. Clearly they just did it to create controversy and buzz about the magazine. But I thought you actually had to PLAY in order to be the Most Valuable PLAYER.
    As a Colt's fan, I won't make a serious claim for Manning for MVP, but holy crap, is there any way a team can instantly go from great to crap just based on the loss of one player? And to define crap, I mean as in not having a lead since week fucking five ... against a team that has already fired their head coach!!!

    :(

    For all the crap the haters give for him losing in the playoffs, it is fairly obvious now that he had been carrying a sub-.500 team to the playoffs on his shoulders for years.

    I think this proves the Colts crappiness as a franchise just as much as it proves how great Peyton is. I've been seeing a lot of this type of stuff around.....

    lol-manning-troll.jpg

    ....and I think that's way off the mark. I think the Pats going 11-5 without Brady in 2008 proved how good that team, coach, and owner really are and the Colts having no wins without Manning proves how bad their team, coach, and owner really are.
    2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024: Philly 2, 2025: Pittsburgh 1

    Pearl Jam bootlegs:
    http://wegotshit.blogspot.com
  • SatansFuton
    SatansFuton Posts: 5,399
    The Juggler wrote:
    how many wins would they have with him this year though? 5? 6? there's a lot of holes on that team other than the quarterback...

    Exactly, that team has problems other than just Manning being absent. We can theorize on how well they would be playing, but it's hypothetical. I don't think we can sit here and say that the Colts would be in the hunt with Manning, because we just don't know. NFL Magazine doesn't know. If Peyton has that much of an effect on the team, then they need to do some serious revamping. If losing 1 player fucks your team up THIS much, then you don't have much of a team.
    "See a broad to get dat booty yak 'em, leg 'er down, a smack 'em yak 'em!"
  • Newch91
    Newch91 Posts: 17,560
    edited December 2011
    Good job Sam Hurd

    http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/blog/shutdo ... fl-wp13964
    Post edited by Newch91 on
    Shows: 6.27.08 Hartford, CT/5.15.10 Hartford, CT/6.18.2011 Hartford, CT (EV Solo)/10.19.13 Brooklyn/10.25.13 Hartford
    "Becoming a Bruce fan is like hitting puberty as a musical fan. It's inevitable." - dcfaithful
  • Jason P
    Jason P Posts: 19,420
    Problem #1 - The GM

    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQjsR51AHiKSq0BVz6G2c7gsSsddLhKWbS54R23Q9eqsUwoa0Eh

    Problem #2 - The head coach

    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTzF5tdsggAp5jfWjWjK5oudc57SjOFUlfcXomDi5K2K2m2X2Tg

    Although I fell Caldwell is less to blame. He is to Bill Polian what Dell Demps is to David Stern.
    Be Excellent To Each Other
    Party On, Dudes!
  • Jearlpam0925
    Jearlpam0925 Deep South Philly Posts: 17,634
    Sam Hurd is a fucking moron.
  • norm
    norm Posts: 31,146
    :lol::lol::lol:
    Sam Hurd Was A "Top Drug Dealer" In City And Dealt To Fellow Players, Reports Chicago Radio Station

    We figured that the case against Sam Hurd, who was arrested yesterday after allegedly attempting to purchase a large amount of cocaine from a federal agent, could get a whole lot messier as the details unfolded, but we didn't expect this: Chicago's 670 The Score reports that the police actually have a list "in the double-digits" of NFL players who were supplied drugs by the Bears wide receiver.

    The source also told the radio station that Hurd was considered "a top drug dealer in Chicago":

    According to the criminal complaint, Hurd told an undercover Homeland Security agent Wednesday night that he and another co-conspirator were already distributing four kilograms of cocaine a week in the Chicago area, but he needed more. He was seeking five to ten kilograms of cocaine and 1,000 pounds of marijuana a week to distribute and was willing to pay $25,000 per kilo of cocaine and $450 per pound of marijuana. That adds up to as much as $700,000 of drugs each week.
    http://deadspin.com/5868547/

    double-digits huh? this could get interesting
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,599
    3 weeks to go...
    www.myspace.com
  • Ledbetterman10
    Ledbetterman10 Posts: 17,018
    Anyone catch the tremendous Tebow skit from SNL last night?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... l2dhNaQgxM
    2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024: Philly 2, 2025: Pittsburgh 1

    Pearl Jam bootlegs:
    http://wegotshit.blogspot.com
  • Wobbie
    Wobbie Posts: 31,673
    just heard a pretty long snippet of "Evolution" on the red zone channel :mrgreen:
    If I had known then what I know now...

    Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
    VIC 07
    EV LA1 08
    Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
    Columbus 10
    EV LA 11
    Vancouver 11
    Missoula 12
    Portland 13, Spokane 13
    St. Paul 14, Denver 14
    Philly I & II, 16
    Denver 22
    Missoula 24
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,599
    imalive wrote:
    just heard a pretty long snippet of "Evolution" on the red zone channel :mrgreen:


    damn, how could i have missed that?


    something just seems right about snowflakes falling during a bills game in buffalo...
    www.myspace.com
  • norm
    norm Posts: 31,146
    this is ugly

    http://youtu.be/qPAyfwB53lw
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,599
    get 'em colts.
    www.myspace.com
  • 88keys
    88keys Posts: 151
    SatansFuton wrote:
    Exactly, that team has problems other than just Manning being absent. We can theorize on how well they would be playing, but it's hypothetical. I don't think we can sit here and say that the Colts would be in the hunt with Manning, because we just don't know. NFL Magazine doesn't know. If Peyton has that much of an effect on the team, then they need to do some serious revamping. If losing 1 player fucks your team up THIS much, then you don't have much of a team.

    The Colts problem is that, for all intents and purposes, Peyton is pretty much their offensive coordinator. No one reads a defense better than him and he know exactly what play change to make (if he's not faking an audible... which he is the best at as well). I would say that Manning runs about 35% of the plays that are called from the sideline and the other 65% are his audibles. Without Peyton, that offense is inept and their defense raises a whole other question.
    Camden 8/28/1998; Jones Beach 8/24/2000; Camden 9/1/2000; Camden 9/2/2000; Albany 4/29/2003; New York 7/8/2003; Vancouver 9/2/2005; Atlantic City 10/1/2005; Albany 5/12/2006; E. Rutherford 6/1/2006; E. Rutherford 6/3/2006; New York 6/24/2008; New York 6/25/2008; New York 5/20/2010
  • Wobbie
    Wobbie Posts: 31,673
    The Juggler wrote:
    imalive wrote:
    just heard a pretty long snippet of "Evolution" on the red zone channel :mrgreen:


    damn, how could i have missed that?


    something just seems right about snowflakes falling during a bills game in buffalo...
    I'm not sure you and I get the same RZC :?

    you always mention some guy I've never heard of....I get andrew sciciliano (LA puke :lol: )
    If I had known then what I know now...

    Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
    VIC 07
    EV LA1 08
    Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
    Columbus 10
    EV LA 11
    Vancouver 11
    Missoula 12
    Portland 13, Spokane 13
    St. Paul 14, Denver 14
    Philly I & II, 16
    Denver 22
    Missoula 24
This discussion has been closed.

Categories