Why isn't abortion considered murder?

1141517192023

Comments

  • JonnyPistachio
    JonnyPistachio Florida Posts: 10,219
    http://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/03/08/ ... tml?hpt=T2

    This is an interesting development in TX.
    Figures its Tx.
    Pick up my debut novel here on amazon: Jonny Bails Floatin (in paperback) (also available on Kindle for $2.99)
  • Blockhead
    Blockhead Posts: 1,538
    edited March 2011
    Byrnzie wrote:
    I'd like the OP to respond to this post if and when he gets back from his banning.
    ??? Banned for what???
    Why do you feel the need to lie on a message board???
    Post edited by Blockhead on
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,050
    http://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/03/08/texas.sonogram/index.html?hpt=T2

    This is an interesting development in TX.
    Figures its Tx.
    nothing like laying the guilt trip on before the potential mother makes one of the biggest decisions of her life.... this is manipulating the woman and stacking the deck against them in attempt to influence their decision instead of just "providing information". this should be illegal. but then again, it is texas, the same state where people held a rally in favor of seceding from the US just last week... :roll:

    http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/pol ... 58701.html
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • Blockhead
    Blockhead Posts: 1,538
    Byrnzie wrote:
    _ wrote:
    I was just telling an old friend about the guy I'm dating & realized it pertains to this subject.

    This guy has a 6-year-old daughter from his previous marriage, and he loves her more than anything in the world. When she was three, she started having severe neurological problems & was diagnosed with a rare genetic disease that has caused her to have multiple "brain tumors," which grow, multiply, and bleed. She has spent many, many months in the hospital & had multiple brain surgeries. Due to the tumors & surgeries, she is now wheelchair bound, cross-eyed, & tube fed. She has uncontrollable seizures, which have gotten so bad that the docs recently said they think it's best to operate again - but the surgery will severely affect her speech. He & his ex-wife now have to decide whether to take away the ability to speak from a little girl who has already lost her ability to walk, see (well), and eat, or leave her with increasingly frequent, out-of-control siezures & the knowledge that a severe brain hemorrhage is likely on the horizon.

    And here's the thing: She got this condition from him. Until she became symptomatic & they started running tests, he had no idea he had this illness & had never even heard of it. Now he watches the person he loves most in the world suffer every day with the knowledge that it's his "fault". He can't do anything to take it back & make his little girl better. All he can do is ensure that he never passes this on to another innocent child.

    We use multiple forms of birth control, and he plans to get a vasectomy some day when he can afford it. (His job doesn't offer health insurance & all his money goes to his daughter.) Of course, even vasectomies aren't 100% effective at preventing pregnancy. So he's told me that, in the unlikely event that I got pregnant, he would want me to have an abortion - so no other child of his will (possibly) have to suffer like his daughter does.

    Does that make him a horrible person? A person whose decision is a selfish one, not based on love? Would that make us murderers?

    I'd like the OP to respond to this post if and when he gets back from his banning.
    Thats an extremely sad situation...
    What are the stats on him passing that disease on again?
    I do unsterstand that there are grey areas. But lets not act as if this example is the reason that ALL people are getting abortions.
  • Blockhead
    Blockhead Posts: 1,538
    what can he really say? i think the points made by so many posters have been proven without a doubt. either he will grant that those of us that are pro-choice, for whatever reasons, have valid opinions and reasons for that position, or he can do like so many others and dismiss the situational factors and anecdotes and real life experiences shared here and still say that those who have had abortions are murderers. we do not exist in a vacuum and "pro-life at all costs" is the wrong position because there are no absolutes and there are shades of gray in all situations.
    I can acknowledge and understand the situational exceptions. I think either side that holds their position to the extreme is wrong. My point is that the embryo/fetus is a developing human being, so why is destroying it not considered murder.
  • markin ball
    markin ball Posts: 1,076
    HeidiJam wrote:
    what can he really say? i think the points made by so many posters have been proven without a doubt. either he will grant that those of us that are pro-choice, for whatever reasons, have valid opinions and reasons for that position, or he can do like so many others and dismiss the situational factors and anecdotes and real life experiences shared here and still say that those who have had abortions are murderers. we do not exist in a vacuum and "pro-life at all costs" is the wrong position because there are no absolutes and there are shades of gray in all situations.
    I can acknowledge and understand the situational exceptions. I think either side that holds their position to the extreme is wrong. My point is that the embryo/fetus is a developing human being, so why is destroying it not considered murder.

    If were talking legalese and technicalities, maybe it could be considered homicide, however justifiable in some cases, such as when the fetus/baby/embryo/developing human may be detrimental to the mother's health. I think there would be a self defense argument there.
    "First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win ."

    "With our thoughts we make the world"
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,050
    HeidiJam wrote:
    what can he really say? i think the points made by so many posters have been proven without a doubt. either he will grant that those of us that are pro-choice, for whatever reasons, have valid opinions and reasons for that position, or he can do like so many others and dismiss the situational factors and anecdotes and real life experiences shared here and still say that those who have had abortions are murderers. we do not exist in a vacuum and "pro-life at all costs" is the wrong position because there are no absolutes and there are shades of gray in all situations.
    I can acknowledge and understand the situational exceptions. I think either side that holds their position to the extreme is wrong. My point is that the embryo/fetus is a developing human being, so why is destroying it not considered murder.
    it is because of these gray areas that you can not strip the freedom to choose from women. your question has been answered to the extent that i am going to answer it. you like freedom right? why would you want your government denying the freedom of choice to women??? isn't that the definition of "big government" that you conservatives go on and on and on about?
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • Blockhead
    Blockhead Posts: 1,538
    HeidiJam wrote:
    what can he really say? i think the points made by so many posters have been proven without a doubt. either he will grant that those of us that are pro-choice, for whatever reasons, have valid opinions and reasons for that position, or he can do like so many others and dismiss the situational factors and anecdotes and real life experiences shared here and still say that those who have had abortions are murderers. we do not exist in a vacuum and "pro-life at all costs" is the wrong position because there are no absolutes and there are shades of gray in all situations.
    I can acknowledge and understand the situational exceptions. I think either side that holds their position to the extreme is wrong. My point is that the embryo/fetus is a developing human being, so why is destroying it not considered murder.
    it is because of these gray areas that you can not strip the freedom to choose from women. your question has been answered to the extent that i am going to answer it. you like freedom right? why would you want your government denying the freedom of choice to women??? isn't that the definition of "big government" that you conservatives go on and on and on about?
    Your swapping one freedom for another...
    With abortion your are deny that developing human life...
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,050
    HeidiJam wrote:
    Your swapping one freedom for another...
    With abortion your are deny that developing human life...
    you are never going to change my mind. especially with that circular argument...
    maybe it is true, most of the republican politicians care more about the fetus than those of us living outside of the womb, including the mother carrying that collection of cellular material. you can not claim to be for freedom, small government and keeping government out of your daily life if you support making abortion illegal. that goes against the foundation and the definition of he word...

    is it hurting you in any way if my girlfriend were to have an abortion?
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • haffajappa
    haffajappa British Columbia Posts: 5,955
    did anyone answer the no exceptions except if its capital punishment question?
    live pearl jam is best pearl jam
  • Blockhead
    Blockhead Posts: 1,538
    HeidiJam wrote:
    Your swapping one freedom for another...
    With abortion your are deny that developing human life...
    you are never going to change my mind. especially with that circular argument...
    maybe it is true, most of the republican politicians care more about the fetus than those of us living outside of the womb, including the mother carrying that collection of cellular material. you can not claim to be for freedom, small government and keeping government out of your daily life if you support making abortion illegal. that goes against the foundation and the definition of he word...

    is it hurting you in any way if my girlfriend were to have an abortion?
    Thats funny, why don't you check the stats on which party gives the most money to charities.
    You can not claim to be for choice if you are denying the baby the right to live...
  • cincybearcat
    cincybearcat Posts: 16,830
    is it hurting you in any way if my girlfriend were to have an abortion?


    Wouldn't hurt me if she off'd you either. Not a very good argument. :roll:
    hippiemom = goodness
  • brandon10
    brandon10 Posts: 1,114
    is it hurting you in any way if my girlfriend were to have an abortion?


    Wouldn't hurt me if she off'd you either. Not a very good argument. :roll:


    Well it would certainly hurt his family and his friends. Whereas with abortion it only hurts the mother and father who have to deal with their decision. So it may be a pretty damn good argument.
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,050
    is it hurting you in any way if my girlfriend were to have an abortion?


    Wouldn't hurt me if she off'd you either. Not a very good argument. :roll:
    well you are stuck with me cincy. :wave:

    care to add to the discussion or just throw insults?

    what is wrong with the argument. heidijam has no vested interest in whether or not my girlfriend has a baby or not. it does not affect him or you or anyone else. it is none of his affair. or yours, or anybody else's....
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,050
    HeidiJam wrote:
    HeidiJam wrote:
    Your swapping one freedom for another...
    With abortion your are deny that developing human life...
    you are never going to change my mind. especially with that circular argument...
    maybe it is true, most of the republican politicians care more about the fetus than those of us living outside of the womb, including the mother carrying that collection of cellular material. you can not claim to be for freedom, small government and keeping government out of your daily life if you support making abortion illegal. that goes against the foundation and the definition of he word...

    is it hurting you in any way if my girlfriend were to have an abortion?
    Thats funny, why don't you check the stats on which party gives the most money to charities.
    You can not claim to be for choice if you are denying the baby the right to live...
    nice dodge.

    answer my question.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • cincybearcat
    cincybearcat Posts: 16,830
    is it hurting you in any way if my girlfriend were to have an abortion?


    Wouldn't hurt me if she off'd you either. Not a very good argument. :roll:
    well you are stuck with me cincy. :wave:

    care to add to the discussion or just throw insults?

    what is wrong with the argument. heidijam has no vested interest in whether or not my girlfriend has a baby or not. it does not affect him or you or anyone else. it is none of his affair. or yours, or anybody else's....


    Didn't think it was an insult at all.

    My opinion is well documented. The point being is that while something may not affect us directly, it can affect the world we live in. There are lots of thing that you have no vested interest in personally, doesn't mean it is something that we as a society should accept.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • brandon10
    brandon10 Posts: 1,114
    brandon10 wrote:
    is it hurting you in any way if my girlfriend were to have an abortion?


    Wouldn't hurt me if she off'd you either. Not a very good argument. :roll:


    Well it would certainly hurt his family and his friends. Whereas with abortion it only hurts the mother and father who have to deal with their decision. So it may be a pretty damn good argument.


    Cincy, I thought you may have a reply to this? Are you not for Govt. staying out of our lives.
  • cincybearcat
    cincybearcat Posts: 16,830
    brandon10 wrote:

    Cincy, I thought you may have a reply to this? Are you not for Govt. staying out of our lives.


    I am. But not entirely. I want them to build roads, provide defense, etc. I also want them to help protect those that can't protect themselves.

    But I sure wish they'd stop caring what people do in the personal lives when it truly effects no one else. In the case of abortion, I believe it does affect someone else.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • brandon10
    brandon10 Posts: 1,114
    brandon10 wrote:

    Cincy, I thought you may have a reply to this? Are you not for Govt. staying out of our lives.


    I am. But not entirely. I want them to build roads, provide defense, etc. I also want them to help protect those that can't protect themselves.

    But I sure wish they'd stop caring what people do in the personal lives when it truly effects no one else. In the case of abortion, I believe it does affect someone else.

    Fair enough, I think it only effects those involved. That being the mother and father. ;)

    That being said, I sure am glad that my own mother chose to give birth to me. She was quite young, unmarried, lived in a small town, and I'm sure she weighed the decision heavily. But I'm also glad she had a choice.

    The fewer abortions the better. I know we can all agree on that. But there are way too many mitigating circumstances to make it illegal. And making it illegal as we all know, can be very destructive in it's own ways. (back alley abortions and such)

    Are you for making abortions illegal? What should be the punishment?
  • cincybearcat
    cincybearcat Posts: 16,830
    brandon10 wrote:
    brandon10 wrote:

    Cincy, I thought you may have a reply to this? Are you not for Govt. staying out of our lives.


    I am. But not entirely. I want them to build roads, provide defense, etc. I also want them to help protect those that can't protect themselves.

    But I sure wish they'd stop caring what people do in the personal lives when it truly effects no one else. In the case of abortion, I believe it does affect someone else.

    Fair enough, I think it only effects those involved. That being the mother and father. ;)

    That being said, I sure am glad that my own mother chose to give birth to me. She was quite young, unmarried, lived in a small town, and I'm sure she weighed the decision heavily. But I'm also glad she had a choice.

    The fewer abortions the better. I know we can all agree on that. But there are way too many mitigating circumstances to make it illegal. And making it illegal as we all know, can be very destructive in it's own ways. (back alley abortions and such)

    Are you for making abortions illegal? What should be the punishment?


    Not overnight. It's too much a part of our society to just make it illegal and think everything will be ok. But I think we should work towards making it illegal and charging people with murder. Would be an expensive and long plan to get there (maybe never get to that point) but I think we'd benefit greatly as a society.
    hippiemom = goodness