MLB 2025 Season
Comments
-
Phantom Pain wrote:Jearlpam0925 wrote:Phantom Pain wrote:There is no way of knowing who did or who didnt juice in those years
When a guy like Jason Grimsley was juicing all bets are off
The whole era is suspect
And that's why under the rules of the time, if they didn't violate any written rules against it, then they should be allowed in.
Baseball writers are asses. It's their only claim to power. Just put up a sign in Cooperstown along the lines of the performance-enhanced era and end it already.
I agree
Every decade in baseball has had its "cheating" phase if you will
Not sure any other sport has been so dirty with its cheating
Yeah, right. It's just that for some reason it's cared about more in baseball than in other sports. The problem is that the sport is looked at in a more sacred manner than all the other sports. And it's all because of the numbers.
If anyone actually thinks that NFL players are walking this Earth, and are not on something, have something wrong with them.0 -
Jearlpam0925 wrote:There is no
Yeah, right. It's just that for some reason it's cared about more in baseball than in other sports. The problem is that the sport is looked at in a more sacred manner than all the other sports. And it's all because of the numbers.
If anyone actually thinks that NFL players are walking this Earth, and are not on something, have something wrong with them.
No doubt the NFL/NHL Im sure have doping issues
I meant with all the other means of cheating..spit balls/corked bats/sand paper in gloves/nail files/sign stealing
So many ways in baseball to cheatMy drinking team has a hockey problem
The ONLY thing better than a glass of beer is tea with Miss McGill
A protuberance of flesh above the waistband of a tight pair of trousers0 -
Phantom Pain wrote:There is no way of knowing who did or who didnt juice in those years
When a guy like Jason Grimsley was juicing all bets are off
The whole era is suspectIf I had known then what I know now...
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14Philly I & II, 16Denver 22
Missoula 240 -
imalive wrote:Phantom Pain wrote:There is no way of knowing who did or who didnt juice in those years
When a guy like Jason Grimsley was juicing all bets are off
The whole era is suspect
asterisk on everyone from '93 - '04.
maybe a double asterisk next to everyone named in the mitchel report? :?www.myspace.com0 -
Phantom Pain wrote:Jearlpam0925 wrote:There is no
Yeah, right. It's just that for some reason it's cared about more in baseball than in other sports. The problem is that the sport is looked at in a more sacred manner than all the other sports. And it's all because of the numbers.
If anyone actually thinks that NFL players are walking this Earth, and are not on something, have something wrong with them.
No doubt the NFL/NHL Im sure have doping issues
I meant with all the other means of cheating..spit balls/corked bats/sand paper in gloves/nail files/sign stealing
So many ways in baseball to cheat
What about all the clutching & grabbing in the NHL in the 90s and early 00s that was never called. I'm talking to you, New Jersey Devils. (no I'm not bitter or anything :evil: )Spectrum 10/27/09; New Orleans JazzFest 5/1/10; Made in America 9/2/12; Phila, PA 10/21/13; Phila, PA 10/22/13; Baltimore Arena 10/27/13; Phila, PA 4/28/16; Phila, PA 4/29/16; Fenway Park 8/7/16; Fenway Park 9/2/18; Asbury Park 9/18/21; Camden 9/14/22; Las Vegas 5/16/24; Las Vegas 5/18/24; Phila, PA 9/7/24; Phila, PA 9/9/24; Baltimore Arena 9/12/24; Pittsburgh 5/16/25; Pittsburgh 5/18/25
Tres Mtns - TLA 3/23/11; EV - Tower Theatre 6/25/11; Temple of the Dog - Tower Theatre 11/5/160 -
The Jeagler wrote:imalive wrote:Phantom Pain wrote:There is no way of knowing who did or who didnt juice in those years
When a guy like Jason Grimsley was juicing all bets are off
The whole era is suspect
asterisk on everyone from '93 - '04.
maybe a double asterisk next to everyone named in the mitchel report? :?
And an asterisk on Babe Ruth and everyone before 1947 because they didn't play against black players
And Hank Aaron and Roger Maris need an asterisk because they played in longer seasons
And Gaylord Perry needs an asterisk because he was a cheater
And on and on.
Let them all in.0 -
another point is that numbers from the steroid era were inflated by things other than steroids. expansion, smaller new parks (and moving fences in at existing parks), balls wound tighter, etc.
steroids aren't the only reason for these numbers. also, there is still no factual evidence that roids help a player hit a baseball.
HOF resumes should be measured against peers that played in the same eras. I have no issue with deserving players from this era being voted in...ie bonds, clemens, mcgwire, bagwell, arod, etc0 -
Congrats Buckley, what you did takes guts...
http://www.bostonherald.com/sports/columnists/view/20110106welcome_to_my_coming-out_party/srvc=home&position=1
For those who don't read his stuff on a daily basis, he's one of the nicest and most knowledgeable baseball guys I've come across. Met him in Cooperstown a few years ago."FF, I've heard the droning about the Sawx being the baby dolls. Yeah, I get it, you guys invented baseball and suffered forever. I get it." -JearlPam09250 -
FenwayFaithful wrote:Congrats Buckley, what you did takes guts...
http://www.bostonherald.com/sports/columnists/view/20110106welcome_to_my_coming-out_party/srvc=home&position=1
For those who don't read his stuff on a daily basis, he's one of the nicest and most knowledgeable baseball guys I've come across. Met him in Cooperstown a few years ago.
Just read this. Very cool for him.0 -
could be wrong, but I think this would have been a good time for renteria to retire :?
who knows? maybe he'll tear it up...If I had known then what I know now...
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14Philly I & II, 16Denver 22
Missoula 240 -
sounds like garza to the cubs is back on and has a good chance of happening0
-
The Fixer wrote:sounds like garza to the cubs is back on and has a good chance of happening
Done deal according to mlbtraderumors!0 -
imalive wrote:could be wrong, but I think this would have been a good time for renteria to retire :?
who knows? maybe he'll tear it up...
I agree, he's just trying to get any last penny he can before he does retire. How many games did he play for the Giants last year? 62 or so?0 -
ucsbflipflop wrote:The Fixer wrote:sounds like garza to the cubs is back on and has a good chance of happening
Done deal according to mlbtraderumors!
If I was tampa I would have moved shields over garza since shields blows. I assume garza is owed more money for 2011 and beyond.
will be exciting to see what hellickson can do over a full season in that division0 -
81 Needing a ride to Forest Hills and a ounce of weed. Please inquire within. Thanks. Or not. Posts: 58,276garza is done deal pending physicals.
poor guy now has to play for the cubs. i would try and fail that physical if i were him.81 is now off the air0 -
81 wrote:garza is done deal pending physicals.
poor guy now has to play for the cubs. i would try and fail that physical if i were him.
This offseason cannot get any better for the Red Sox. First the duo of Crawford and Gonzalez, then the Yanks miss Lee, now Garza (the Red Sox killer) goes to the NL. I'm speechless. Garza's the only guy on Tampa's staff that always scared me."FF, I've heard the droning about the Sawx being the baby dolls. Yeah, I get it, you guys invented baseball and suffered forever. I get it." -JearlPam09250 -
81 wrote:garza is done deal pending physicals.
poor guy now has to play for the cubs. i would try and fail that physical if i were him.
Garza is good, not that good. Cubs are giving up a lot.0 -
Go find a part of Magnolia on youtube, and then try to stop after one 10 minute part. Can't happen. It's not humanly possible. You just keep watching the next one and the next one and the next one.0
-
Cliffy6745 wrote:81 wrote:garza is done deal pending physicals.
poor guy now has to play for the cubs. i would try and fail that physical if i were him.
Garza is good, not that good. Cubs are giving up a lot.
That was my reaction too. Archer is supposed to be a stud.
Decent trade for both squads. The cubs seem like one of those teams that never has a plan. They just spend irresponsibly0 -
ucsbflipflop wrote:imalive wrote:could be wrong, but I think this would have been a good time for renteria to retire :?
who knows? maybe he'll tear it up...
I agree, he's just trying to get any last penny he can before he does retire. How many games did he play for the Giants last year? 62 or so?81 wrote:garza is done deal pending physicals.
poor guy now has to play for the cubs. i would try and fail that physical if i were him.If I had known then what I know now...
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14Philly I & II, 16Denver 22
Missoula 240
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help