MLB 2025 Season
Comments
-
Cliffy6745 wrote:Man, Verducci can be such a great writer and then he goes and says things like this. This is just outrageous.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/w ... lot/1.html
Jeff Bagwell: He should eventually get in, but his first-year support will be interesting to watch. Bagwell's numbers look worthy of Cooperstown, but he has been tied to steroid speculation enough that he "defended" himself in an ESPN.com interview last month. His defense? "I have no problem" with a guy juicing up, he said. To take such a position today is wildly irresponsible. It also invites the very talk that Bagwell claimed to be "sick and tired of."
Bagwell was an admitted Andro user who hired a competitive bodybuilder to make him as big as he could be, who claimed, McGwire-like, that Andro "doesn't help you hit home runs," who went from a prospect with "no pop" to massively changing his body and outhomering all but six big leaguers in the 13 seasons before steroid penalties (Ken Griffey Jr. and five connected to steroids: Bonds, Sosa, Rafael Palmeiro, Mark McGwire and Juan Gonzalez), and who condones the use of steroids -- but said, "I never used."
This HOF stuff can get real annoying. Last week alone on espn.com there were 3 pro-HOF article cases made for bagwell, larry walker, and blyleven. According to them everyone should be in the HOF0 -
imalive wrote:Cliffy6745 wrote:Man, Verducci can be such a great writer and then he goes and says things like this. This is just outrageous.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/w ... lot/1.html
I didn't read the link, but what's "outrageous"? I'm 99% sure bagwell was a juicer but he, and others, probably will make the HOF while other "poster boys" (i.e. bonds) will be held out by sanctimonious hypocritical voters.
yeah, bonds, mcgwire, and clemens should all be first ballot guys0 -
imalive wrote:Cliffy6745 wrote:Man, Verducci can be such a great writer and then he goes and says things like this. This is just outrageous.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/w ... lot/1.html
I didn't read the link, but what's "outrageous"? I'm 99% sure bagwell was a juicer but he, and others, probably will make the HOF while other "poster boys" (i.e. bonds) will be held out by sanctimonious hypocritical voters.
It's outrageous because the guy was never tied to steroids in any way. He is as guilty as Jeter except he hit homeruns. Why are you so positive?
Edit: And Verducci is condeming Bagwell because he was "tied to speculation". So writers said "i wonder if this guy took steroids" and that ties him to speculation....come on.0 -
The Fixer wrote:Cliffy6745 wrote:Man, Verducci can be such a great writer and then he goes and says things like this. This is just outrageous.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/w ... lot/1.html
Jeff Bagwell: He should eventually get in, but his first-year support will be interesting to watch. Bagwell's numbers look worthy of Cooperstown, but he has been tied to steroid speculation enough that he "defended" himself in an ESPN.com interview last month. His defense? "I have no problem" with a guy juicing up, he said. To take such a position today is wildly irresponsible. It also invites the very talk that Bagwell claimed to be "sick and tired of."
Bagwell was an admitted Andro user who hired a competitive bodybuilder to make him as big as he could be, who claimed, McGwire-like, that Andro "doesn't help you hit home runs," who went from a prospect with "no pop" to massively changing his body and outhomering all but six big leaguers in the 13 seasons before steroid penalties (Ken Griffey Jr. and five connected to steroids: Bonds, Sosa, Rafael Palmeiro, Mark McGwire and Juan Gonzalez), and who condones the use of steroids -- but said, "I never used."
This HOF stuff can get real annoying. Last week alone on espn.com there were 3 pro-HOF article cases made for bagwell, larry walker, and blyleven. According to them everyone should be in the HOF
Yeah, there has been a lot in the last week. Hardball Talk posted this ESPN ballot yesterday:
Jack Morris, Edgar Martinez, Don Mattingly, Tino Martinez, and BJ Surhoff.
And get this, ESPN, basically the TMZ of sports has 18, yes 18 Hall of Fame voters.0 -
Cliffy6745 wrote:The Fixer wrote:Cliffy6745 wrote:Man, Verducci can be such a great writer and then he goes and says things like this. This is just outrageous.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/w ... lot/1.html
Jeff Bagwell: He should eventually get in, but his first-year support will be interesting to watch. Bagwell's numbers look worthy of Cooperstown, but he has been tied to steroid speculation enough that he "defended" himself in an ESPN.com interview last month. His defense? "I have no problem" with a guy juicing up, he said. To take such a position today is wildly irresponsible. It also invites the very talk that Bagwell claimed to be "sick and tired of."
Bagwell was an admitted Andro user who hired a competitive bodybuilder to make him as big as he could be, who claimed, McGwire-like, that Andro "doesn't help you hit home runs," who went from a prospect with "no pop" to massively changing his body and outhomering all but six big leaguers in the 13 seasons before steroid penalties (Ken Griffey Jr. and five connected to steroids: Bonds, Sosa, Rafael Palmeiro, Mark McGwire and Juan Gonzalez), and who condones the use of steroids -- but said, "I never used."
This HOF stuff can get real annoying. Last week alone on espn.com there were 3 pro-HOF article cases made for bagwell, larry walker, and blyleven. According to them everyone should be in the HOF
Yeah, there has been a lot in the last week. Hardball Talk posted this ESPN ballot yesterday:
Jack Morris, Edgar Martinez, Don Mattingly, Tino Martinez, and BJ Surhoff.
And get this, ESPN, basically the TMZ of sports has 18, yes 18 Hall of Fame voters.
jayson stark's rationale for his votes is always one of the worst articles of the year0 -
Alomar and Byleven it is. I can live with that.0
-
The Fixer wrote:jayson stark's rationale for his votes is always one of the worst articles of the year
Yeah, I actually heard me made some good points this year but I have not read it yet. Will have to check it out.0 -
Cliffy6745 wrote:Alomar and Byleven it is. I can live with that.
yeah, I think they are both deserving. Raines and Larkin are the two others that stand out for me. And I think those that don't vote for mcgwire are wrong...he should be a no brainer0 -
The Fixer wrote:Cliffy6745 wrote:Alomar and Byleven it is. I can live with that.
yeah, I think they are both deserving. Raines and Larkin are the two others that stand out for me. And I think those that don't vote for mcgwire are wrong...he should be a no brainer
Agreed, Larkin was close (he'll get in) and I can go either way with Raines. The only thing that gets me about McGwire is his career BA of .263. Just seems really low to me. His OBP and Slugging are outstanding though so I guess that makes up for it.0 -
Cliffy6745 wrote:
It's outrageous because the guy was never tied to steroids in any way. He is as guilty as Jeter except he hit homeruns. Why are you so positive?
I'm not "positive" JB was on the juice. But I'm pretty damn close. He played on a team which, in my mind, had nearly the "steroid culture" as their neighbors in arlington. teammates included caminiti, incaviglia, luis gonzales, clemens and others. of those, only gonzales is a "maybe," to me. JB went from skinny to huge and back to skinny right after they began testing. kinda like pudge. I could link to to all kinds of "bagwell was a user" conspiracy theory blogs, but I won't - those blogs present compelling evidence but don't prove anything.
my beef has always been that the guys we were told (by the media) were doing it the "right way" (arod, palmerio, etc.) turned out to be juicers. I just say, FORGET STEROIDS and let the numbers speak for themselves. guys will NEVER admit to being users, so quit guessing (as Verducci did) and let the numbers decide. all I know is, my guy bonds was the BEST steroid user everand should be in the HOF.... because there is not doubt in my mind other users will slip in. if they haven't already. Ricky???
If I had known then what I know now...
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14Philly I & II, 16Denver 22
Missoula 240 -
since the majority were juicing, roids shouldn't be a factor in getting into the hall...bonds was already a hof hitter before he roided...he should be in0
-
imalive wrote:Cliffy6745 wrote:
It's outrageous because the guy was never tied to steroids in any way. He is as guilty as Jeter except he hit homeruns. Why are you so positive?
I'm not "positive" JB was on the juice. But I'm pretty damn close. He played on a team which, in my mind, had nearly the "steroid culture" as their neighbors in arlington. teammates included caminiti, incaviglia, luis gonzales, clemens and others. of those, only gonzales is a "maybe," to me. JB went from skinny to huge and back to skinny right after they began testing. kinda like pudge. I could link to to all kinds of "bagwell was a user" conspiracy theory blogs, but I won't - those blogs present compelling evidence but don't prove anything.
my beef has always been that the guys we were told (by the media) were doing it the "right way" (arod, palmerio, etc.) turned out to be juicers. I just say, FORGET STEROIDS and let the numbers speak for themselves. guys will NEVER admit to being users, so quit guessing (as Verducci did) and let the numbers decide. all I know is, my guy bonds was the BEST steroid user everand should be in the HOF.... because there is not doubt in my mind other users will slip in. if they haven't already. Ricky???
Dude, I agree with all of this completely. My point was, you can't keep a guy out of the hall that you assume took steroids because of a bunch of theories and no real evidence.
I have always said I could give a fuck about steroids and everyone should get in based on their stats. I am with you on all of this. My point just was, it's not fair and absurd to keep Bagwell out because of assumptions.0 -
Cliffy6745 wrote:The Fixer wrote:Cliffy6745 wrote:Alomar and Byleven it is. I can live with that.
yeah, I think they are both deserving. Raines and Larkin are the two others that stand out for me. And I think those that don't vote for mcgwire are wrong...he should be a no brainer
Agreed, Larkin was close (he'll get in) and I can go either way with Raines. The only thing that gets me about McGwire is his career BA of .263. Just seems really low to me. His OBP and Slugging are outstanding though so I guess that makes up for it.
mcgwire's career BA definitely doesn't help his case. didn't he have a couple of years in oakland where he hit something like .210 for the season?
I hope palmeiro never gets in. not only is he a smug jerk off, but I don't think he is deserving. he is the classic 'compiler'. he was never one of the best players at his position during his career. I'd vote for bagwell before I voted for palmeiro0 -
Cliffy6745 wrote:imalive wrote:Cliffy6745 wrote:
It's outrageous because the guy was never tied to steroids in any way. He is as guilty as Jeter except he hit homeruns. Why are you so positive?
I'm not "positive" JB was on the juice. But I'm pretty damn close. He played on a team which, in my mind, had nearly the "steroid culture" as their neighbors in arlington. teammates included caminiti, incaviglia, luis gonzales, clemens and others. of those, only gonzales is a "maybe," to me. JB went from skinny to huge and back to skinny right after they began testing. kinda like pudge. I could link to to all kinds of "bagwell was a user" conspiracy theory blogs, but I won't - those blogs present compelling evidence but don't prove anything.
my beef has always been that the guys we were told (by the media) were doing it the "right way" (arod, palmerio, etc.) turned out to be juicers. I just say, FORGET STEROIDS and let the numbers speak for themselves. guys will NEVER admit to being users, so quit guessing (as Verducci did) and let the numbers decide. all I know is, my guy bonds was the BEST steroid user everand should be in the HOF.... because there is not doubt in my mind other users will slip in. if they haven't already. Ricky???
Dude, I agree with all of this completely. My point was, you can't keep a guy out of the hall that you assume took steroids because of a bunch of theories and no real evidence.
I have always said I could give a fuck about steroids and everyone should get in based on their stats. I am with you on all of this. My point just was, it's not fair and absurd to keep Bagwell out because of assumptions.
it's convoluted....I'm with you...let 'em in.If I had known then what I know now...
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14Philly I & II, 16Denver 22
Missoula 240 -
imalive wrote:
true....I guess in a nutshell my feeling is it's no more fair to say (of anyone) "we know he took steroids" than it is to say "we know he didn't take steroids" (griffey). everyone labels sosa as a user (me, included) but I'm not really sure what we're seeing as "proof." :?
it's convoluted....I'm with you...let 'em in.
I'm pretty sure that sosa is one of the few guys that was actually caught with roids. And of course he got caught with a corked bat. he's the ultimate scumbag0 -
The Fixer wrote:imalive wrote:
true....I guess in a nutshell my feeling is it's no more fair to say (of anyone) "we know he took steroids" than it is to say "we know he didn't take steroids" (griffey). everyone labels sosa as a user (me, included) but I'm not really sure what we're seeing as "proof." :?
it's convoluted....I'm with you...let 'em in.
I'm pretty sure that sosa is one of the few guys that was actually caught with roids. And of course he got caught with a corked bat. he's the ultimate scumbag
And he's white now.0 -
Cliffy6745 wrote:Looks like the Rangers are getting Beltre. Damn, the Angels had a pretty rough offseason. I thought the Yanks had a bad go of it,
Happy with this move because it significantly upgrades the defense at 3rd. Michael Young will now serve as the DH and sort of an infield back up.
This means good-bye to Vlad Guerrero and while he had a monster season and helped tremendously, he fell off as the season went on. Young doesn't hit for those kind of numbers, but he is more consistent.
And yes, the Angels didn't do so hot this season, and for that, I am thrilled.DAL-7/5/98,10/17/00,6/9/03,11/15/13
BOS-9/28/04,9/29/04,6/28/08,6/30/08, 9/5/16, 9/7/16, 9/2/18
MTL-9/15/05, OTT-9/16/05
PHL-5/27/06,5/28/06,10/30/09,10/31/09
CHI-8/2/07,8/5/07,8/23/09,8/24/09
HTFD-6/27/08
ATX-10/4/09, 10/12/14
KC-5/3/2010,STL-5/4/2010
Bridge School-10/23/2010,10/24/2010
PJ20-9/3/2011,9/4/2011
OKC-11/16/13
SEA-12/6/13
TUL-10/8/140 -
Anybody planning on going to the induction in Cooperstown this year? We're undecided at this point."FF, I've heard the droning about the Sawx being the baby dolls. Yeah, I get it, you guys invented baseball and suffered forever. I get it." -JearlPam09250
-
Jearlpam0925 wrote:The Fixer wrote:imalive wrote:
true....I guess in a nutshell my feeling is it's no more fair to say (of anyone) "we know he took steroids" than it is to say "we know he didn't take steroids" (griffey). everyone labels sosa as a user (me, included) but I'm not really sure what we're seeing as "proof." :?
it's convoluted....I'm with you...let 'em in.
I'm pretty sure that sosa is one of the few guys that was actually caught with roids. And of course he got caught with a corked bat. he's the ultimate scumbag
And he's white now.
and, I could be wrong, but I don't think he was ever caught red (or white) handed.If I had known then what I know now...
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14Philly I & II, 16Denver 22
Missoula 240 -
asterisk.www.myspace.com0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help