Israeli army condemns publication of Gaza 'war criminals'
Options
Comments
-
i think that the frustration of nothing ever happening to these idf soldiers, no condemnation from the us, or the un, or nato, or any other body of significant power, that people are going to take matters into their own hands, go all wikileaks, and start sending information relating to crimes potentially committed by idf soldiers. normally i would be all about vigilante trials and such, but i think it is kind of a dirty move to out people who may or may not have been in gaza committing atrocities. those accusations are what made up the salem witch trials, and i think that as a society we would be good enough that we would not condemn innocent people. i can see how people might want ALL idf soldiers tried, but in this day and age you have to stick with what you can prove in a court of law, and if these assholes are found to be guilty, then i would hope that international law would prevail with adequate satisfaction..."You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
ذهب wrote:and as for so many conclusions being drawn just because i vehemently opposes the israeli occupation well yeah that's a valid point. i'm used to people jumping to the wrong conclusions and i'm tired of defending myself.
so yeah. carry on with your thread.
how can you accuse people of jumping to conclusions when they were just trying to understand where you were coming from?
and yes i know you oppose the occupation. so do 97% of all of the posters on the moving train."You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
gimmesometruth27 wrote:i think that the frustration of nothing ever happening to these idf soldiers, no condemnation from the us, or the un, or nato, or any other body of significant power, that people are going to take matters into their own hands, go all wikileaks, and start sending information relating to crimes potentially committed by idf soldiers. normally i would be all about vigilante trials and such, but i think it is kind of a dirty move to out people who may or may not have been in gaza committing atrocities. those accusations are what made up the salem witch trials, and i think that as a society we would be good enough that we would not condemn innocent people. i can see how people might want ALL idf soldiers tried, but in this day and age you have to stick with what you can prove in a court of law, and if these assholes are found to be guilty, then i would hope that international law would prevail with adequate satisfaction...
well when you wont even condemn the governments actions and policies how can you possibly condemn the soldiers who are doing the footwork?hear my name
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say0 -
gimmesometruth27 wrote:ذهب wrote:and as for so many conclusions being drawn just because i vehemently opposes the israeli occupation well yeah that's a valid point. i'm used to people jumping to the wrong conclusions and i'm tired of defending myself.
so yeah. carry on with your thread.
how can you accuse people of jumping to conclusions when they were just trying to understand where you were coming from?
and yes i know you oppose the occupation. so do 97% of all of the posters on the moving train.
i'm not talking about what the people on the moving train think. this is a pearl jam message board and how proactive i am and what people say to me here is insignificant in the scope of things. i'm talking about personally. i am tired of people jumping to conclusions GENERALLY. there has been plenty of occassions when i've had to defend myself. i've been called anti semetic, i've lost friends because of my committment to the Palestinian people and that's just the tip of the iceberg.
so get back to your thread. thanks.0 -
catefrances wrote:gimmesometruth27 wrote:i think that the frustration of nothing ever happening to these idf soldiers, no condemnation from the us, or the un, or nato, or any other body of significant power, that people are going to take matters into their own hands, go all wikileaks, and start sending information relating to crimes potentially committed by idf soldiers. normally i would be all about vigilante trials and such, but i think it is kind of a dirty move to out people who may or may not have been in gaza committing atrocities. those accusations are what made up the salem witch trials, and i think that as a society we would be good enough that we would not condemn innocent people. i can see how people might want ALL idf soldiers tried, but in this day and age you have to stick with what you can prove in a court of law, and if these assholes are found to be guilty, then i would hope that international law would prevail with adequate satisfaction...
well when you wont even condemn the governments actions and policies how can you possibly condemn the soldiers who are doing the footwork?"You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
ذهب wrote:i'm not talking about what the people on the moving train think. this is a pearl jam message board and how proactive i am and what people say to me here is insignificant in the scope of things. i'm talking about personally. i am tired of people jumping to conclusions GENERALLY. there has been plenty of occassions when i've had to defend myself. i've been called anti semetic, i've lost friends because of my committment to the Palestinian people and that's just the tip of the iceberg.
so get back to your thread. thanks."You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
gimmesometruth27 wrote:i condemn those giving the orders. i think those giving the orders should be tried at the hague. the thing that bothers me is no charges are ever pressed. in the US justice system you have to have enough evidence for an indictment. then you can get a trial. i am not sure what it takes internationally, but some of these accusations are not from official sources so they are not given credence. if we can have the un or nato investigate these accusations maybe we can get some indictments, trials and convictions. i would hate to see vigilante justice carried out, ever in cases where i think that it might be warranted....i believe in the rule of law.
you know about the vigilante thing... ive used this example twice recently and im gonna use it again here now.
when MLK was killed robert kennedy said in a speech that he can understand the blacks wanting to go after white folks. he said he could understand this because his brother was killed by a white man. but it wasnt ALL white men that murdered his brother he said, it was(for arguments sake) ONE white man. and i think in this case it is wrong and very dangerous to condemn all members of IDF for the actions of a few no matter how abhorrant we find the policies of those in charge.
now as for international law.. clearly its failing in the case of israel because nothing is being done. the plaestinians contnue to be oppressed and the israeli govt are being emboldened by the support it gets from the US govt. in turn and for whatever reasons the international community seems impotent to take the US to task on their support of this continuing atrocity. and until the international community without the US does decide to uphold international law, nothing is going to change. i think this is a clear case where we cant wait for the US to guide us. they are on the wrong side here and need to be brought to task.hear my name
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say0 -
catefrances wrote:gimmesometruth27 wrote:i condemn those giving the orders. i think those giving the orders should be tried at the hague. the thing that bothers me is no charges are ever pressed. in the US justice system you have to have enough evidence for an indictment. then you can get a trial. i am not sure what it takes internationally, but some of these accusations are not from official sources so they are not given credence. if we can have the un or nato investigate these accusations maybe we can get some indictments, trials and convictions. i would hate to see vigilante justice carried out, ever in cases where i think that it might be warranted....i believe in the rule of law.
you know about the vigilante thing... ive used this example twice recently and im gonna use it again here now.
when MLK was killed robert kennedy said in a speech that he can understand the blacks wanting to go after white folks. he said he could understand this because his brother was killed by a white man. but it wasnt ALL white men that murdered his brother he said, it was(for arguments sake) ONE white man. and i think in this case it is wrong and very dangerous to condemn all members of IDF for the actions of a few no matter how abhorrant we find the policies of those in charge.
now as for international law.. clearly its failing in the case of israel because nothing is being done. the plaestinians contnue to be oppressed and the israeli govt are being emboldened by the support it gets from the US govt. in turn and for whatever reasons the international community seems impotent to take the US to task on their support of this continuing atrocity. and until the international community without the US does decide to uphold international law, nothing is going to change. i think this is a clear case where we cant wait for the US to guide us. they are on the wrong side here and need to be brought to task."You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
gimmesometruth27 wrote:you know, i agree with you with the rfk thing. my parents wanted vengeance for mlk's death and they are white middle class midwesterners. they were in college when mlk died and they were furious. i can understand their frustration. rfk was completely correct in his speech, and if he had been wrong many more cities would have burned that night. on that same token, i do not give those in the idf the benefit of the doubt because they are occupying land that is not theirs. it was stolen and the international community does not recognize the current borders. i can completely understand the furstration of the palestinians, and i agree wit them completely. my gripe is with the international community who allows the current situation to continne from month to mont, from year to year, and seemingly from generation to generation. international law is international law. and it pisses me off how some countries are bound by international law and others are allowed to act above it. either there is law, or there is not, without law there is chaos, and chaos is ruling the day in the middle east. the us shoudl either lead, or get the fuck out of the way and yield to whatever entitiy will lead and enorce the law. unfortunately we are doing nothing other than allowing israel to act with impunity, it is up to the international community to act, because if it was left up to individual palestinians to act they would be crushed and labeled as terrorists, and in the court of public opinion does a "terrorist" ever win? no...
but thats the thing, the US isnt leading. it hasnt lead in this instance for a very long time, if at all. i want to know what the arab community is doing to help the palestinians. actually no.. what i want to know is why they arent doing anything? 9 years ago we had terrorists kill over 3000 people apparently because of the US foreign policy and yet what do they do to help the palestinians??? how about some sanctions against the US for their complicity in the continued oppression?hear my name
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say0 -
gimmesometruth27 wrote:ذهب wrote:i'm not talking about what the people on the moving train think. this is a pearl jam message board and how proactive i am and what people say to me here is insignificant in the scope of things. i'm talking about personally. i am tired of people jumping to conclusions GENERALLY. there has been plenty of occassions when i've had to defend myself. i've been called anti semetic, i've lost friends because of my committment to the Palestinian people and that's just the tip of the iceberg.
so get back to your thread. thanks.
i didn't get all hot or bothered when byrnzie asked me about my board name. i actually ignored it and posted another post after it and stayed on topic. the thread wasn't about me.
i got annoyed when you came along and said that my new name was quite interesting and byrnzie should google it. you never posted a google link initially. that's all you said. if you had posted your google link to start with rather than just the comment then things probably wouldn't have blown up like they did. i asked what the 'quite interesting' meant. i had no clue because you didn't post the link. you just made the "very interesting" comment to Byrnzie like it was something sinister.
i''m done with this. i'll take my name and fuck off.0 -
catefrances wrote:gimmesometruth27 wrote:you know, i agree with you with the rfk thing. my parents wanted vengeance for mlk's death and they are white middle class midwesterners. they were in college when mlk died and they were furious. i can understand their frustration. rfk was completely correct in his speech, and if he had been wrong many more cities would have burned that night. on that same token, i do not give those in the idf the benefit of the doubt because they are occupying land that is not theirs. it was stolen and the international community does not recognize the current borders. i can completely understand the furstration of the palestinians, and i agree wit them completely. my gripe is with the international community who allows the current situation to continne from month to mont, from year to year, and seemingly from generation to generation. international law is international law. and it pisses me off how some countries are bound by international law and others are allowed to act above it. either there is law, or there is not, without law there is chaos, and chaos is ruling the day in the middle east. the us shoudl either lead, or get the fuck out of the way and yield to whatever entitiy will lead and enorce the law. unfortunately we are doing nothing other than allowing israel to act with impunity, it is up to the international community to act, because if it was left up to individual palestinians to act they would be crushed and labeled as terrorists, and in the court of public opinion does a "terrorist" ever win? no...
but thats the thing, the US isnt leading. it hasnt lead in this instance for a very long time, if at all. i want to know what the arab community is doing to help the palestinians. actually no.. what i want to know is why they arent doing anything? 9 years ago we had terrorists kill over 3000 people apparently because of the US foreign policy and yet what do they do to help the palestinians??? how about some sanctions against the US for their complicity in the continued oppression?"You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
ذهب wrote:gimmesometruth27 wrote:ذهب wrote:i'm not talking about what the people on the moving train think. this is a pearl jam message board and how proactive i am and what people say to me here is insignificant in the scope of things. i'm talking about personally. i am tired of people jumping to conclusions GENERALLY. there has been plenty of occassions when i've had to defend myself. i've been called anti semetic, i've lost friends because of my committment to the Palestinian people and that's just the tip of the iceberg.
so get back to your thread. thanks.
i didn't get all hot or bothered when byrnzie asked me about my board name. i actually ignored it and posted another post after it and stayed on topic. the thread wasn't about me.
i got annoyed when you came along and said that my new name was quite interesting and byrnzie should google it. you never posted a google link initially. that's all you said. if you had posted your google link to start with rather than just the comment then things probably wouldn't have blown up like they did. i asked what the 'quite interesting' meant. i had no clue because you didn't post the link. you just made the "very interesting" comment to Byrnzie like it was something sinister.
i''m done with this. i'll take my name and fuck off."You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
There is a problem with people going off topic and making personal comments about another member and it will be addressed on Monday.
Anytime there is a thread about the Middle East for discussion, it's going to be up to everyone here to TRIPLE their vigilance and stay within the Posting Guidelines. Otherwise, we can always just ban this topic and/or the people who cannot debate in a reasonable way. That's where we are now...ready to ban this topic and I don't care if you want to scream bloody murder and free speech. It won't matter. There are places all over the internet to discuss the Middle East and the war is not going to be resolved in this little forum.
AdminFalling down,...not staying down0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 273 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.6K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help