Europe: anti-Semitism?

13

Comments

  • Israel Can’t Win a War against Itself

    by Greg Felton / August 19th, 2010

    If the sign of a healthy, living organism is its ability to develop and mature in harmony with its surroundings, then Israel must be declared dead, or at least terminally moribund.

    Its politicians, generals and armies of hasbarats regurgitate the same tired boilerplate to justify Israel’s strangulation of Palestine, and are still obsessed with sabotaging discussion of the Holocaust and the dispossession of Palestinians in 1947–1948 that led to the creation of the Zionist entity.

    In 1997, I wrote a column called “Israel can’t hide from its history forever,” http://www.gregfelton.com/middle/1997_05_11.htm
    and in the intervening 13 years Israel has shown no signs of moral or political growth, much less the ability to outrun its past. In fact, it is plumbing ever-greater depths of depravity to prevent the world from discussing why Israel continues to deprive Palestinians of the basic necessities of life, humiliate them, murder their children, and steal their land.

    Like the grotesque picture of Dorian Gray locked away in the attic, Israel gets uglier with each act of cruelty, and no amount of canned hasbara or phony “anti-Semitism” conferences can make it look pretty. What Israel was and what it did in 1948 is being revealed in what Israel is and is now doing. The reason Israel can’t hide from its history is that it has stagnated and history has caught up with it.

    The murderous excesses of Cast Lead and the piratical assault on the international aid flotilla have rightly appalled the civilized world, even alienating growing numbers of Jews and Jewish groups. Inside and outside Israel, Jews are taking the lead in condemning Israel’s brutality, and joining the Boycott Divestment Sanctions movement. The delicious irony now is the greatest existential threat to Israel comes not from Hamas, Hizbullah, Iran or the mythical “al-Qa‘ida,” but from Jews.

    As welcome as this development is, it is rather slow in coming since Israel has been committing war crimes against Arabs over its entire history, and for the most part the world has let Israel get away with murder. Dr. Ilan Pappé, a Jewish professor at Tel Aviv university who fled to England after receiving death threats for his defence of Palestinians, said that although some Zionists are willing to criticize Israel’s post-1967 expansionism, the period 1882-1967 is still off limits.

    As Israel persecutes these honourable Jews, especially academics like Drs. Pappé and Norman Finkelstein, the very concept of Israel as a “Jewish State” becomes exposed as a moral and political absurdity, and this invites further questioning of the image of Israel as the po’ l’il Jewish state as the perpetual victim of aggression.

    2010_08_17_zionist%20whine.gif

    As history catches up with Israel, its “self-defence” propaganda also becomes risible and disgusting. The most recent act of fraud involves the complicity of hasbarats at the BBC, whose show Panorama glorified the Israeli military and spread disinformation that the aid ship Mavi Marmara represented a military threat. The fact that this odious fraud comes out so long after the event destroys any pretense to credibility and betrays a pathetic desperation.

    Similarly desperate is the president of Tel Aviv University’s craven decision to review the syllabi for several sociology courses. According to Ha’aretz, The Institute for Zionist Strategies (!?) alleged that a “post-Zionist” bias was creeping into the departments. The institute defines post-Zionism as “the pretense to undermine the foundations of the Zionist ethos and an affinity with the radical leftist stream,” but since Zionism has no ethos, and since “radical leftist stream” is gratuitous name-calling, this must be seen as yet another attempt to keep Israel’s real history hidden.

    Hasbara is fundamentally non-cognitive because it is not meant to communicate meaningful information or relate to any specific event. Hasbara is analogous to a cant that is intoned by religious mystics. Hasbarats and government hasbaratchiks chant the same generic slogans, invoke the same generic stereotypes, and recite the same generic falsifications all in the name of buttressing a pseudo-reality of their own making. Hasbarats do not expect understanding; they demand belief, and so what they regurgitate for public consumption does not qualify as language in any meaningful sense of the word.

    A good example of this is the thoroughly stupid behaviour of Israel’s president Shimon Peres during his recent visit to London. In an obvious response to British Prime Minister David Cameron’s July 27 equation of the experience of Palestinians in the blockaded Gaza Strip to that of a prison camp, Peres uttered this fusillade of folly:

    “[The British] abstained in the [pro-Zionist] 1947 UN partition resolution… They maintained an arms embargo against us in the 1950s… They had a defense treaty with Jordan, they always worked against us…They think the Palestinians are the underdog… Even though this is irrational.” (Note that Peres makes no direct reference to Cameron’s comment.)

    The definition of “irrational” is an Israeli president whinging about events 60 to 70 years old like a paranoid Don Quixote. What did he hope to accomplish? In the end, even Rabbi Dr. Jonathan Romain, spiritual leader of Maidenhead Synagogue, had to speak out against Peres’s stupidity: “It is a sweeping statement that is far too one-sided… The tolerance and pluralism here make Britain one of the best countries in the world in which to live.”

    The more Israel fights the same war against the same invisible enemy, the more its history catches up to it. In my 1997 article I wrote that if myths are used to prop up ideologies and false histories, they will sooner or later tear a country apart. It seems I have been proven right.

    Greg Felton is an investigative journalist specializing in the Middle East,
  • FiveB247x
    FiveB247x Posts: 2,330
    Basically zionism nowadays isn't the simple creation of a jewish state, it is the growth of a jewish state, not just maintenance of the current one. Whether it's through continued growth or holding of certain lands or that ever growing notion of "defending yourself" stance which has many detrimental aspects to say the least. The basic notion which you and many others point to about those who don't want Israel as a nation to exist is outdated beyond belief. Yes there are a few extreme terrorist groups, but certainly not on a national level as it once was. That type of mentality is merely used as a scapegoat to excuse Israel's terrible policies and actions in recent times rather than a clear and defined view on the Middle East wanting to push the jews to the sea. There's been countless peace talks all aimed and discussed with a duel state plan and even non-nuclear Middle East talks, and it has stalled as a result of Israel and US intervention. In my opinion, in today's time frame, we're well beyond the point of saying one side is more responsible for wrong-doing than the other and in order to create a long term peace, both sides need to do lots. To say otherwise just simply is biased beyond fact.
    FiveB247x wrote:
    At some point, zionism (in todays form - not mere existence as you claim it, but growth of it) enables anti-semitism .. it fuels the fire, so basically it all goes hand and hand. It's easy to overlook this fact cause you don't believe it, but it doesn't make it any less true.
    CONservative governMENt

    Our government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a law-breaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. - Louis Brandeis
  • Commy
    Commy Posts: 4,984
    "Hasbarat", never heard that before. its fitting, especially for the author of the op article.
  • yosi
    yosi NYC Posts: 3,177
    Five, I agree that both sides are at fault, and that both sides will need to do a lot differently for peace. I don't think I've ever said otherwise. If it seems that I am unflinchingly supportive of everything Israel does, let me assure you that I am not. Perhaps I come off that way on this board, but that is probably because I feel that I serve in some small way as a counterweight to the opposite imbalance in perspective. I'm still not sure, though, what you mean by zionism contributing to antisemitism. My definition of zionism is the simplest possible; that Jews, as a nation, have a right to self-determination in our homeland. Nothing beyond that. I'm not sure how that principle alone could contribute to antisemitism, except to that of someone who is already antisemitic. And if you are speaking about Israeli actions, well then I think you need to distinguish Israel's actions from zionism as a principle. The two are not the same.
    you couldn't swing if you were hangin' from a palm tree in a hurricane

  • yosi
    yosi NYC Posts: 3,177
    B, I don't mention it because to do so would be redundant here. It isn't as if the Train is lacking for people denouncing such racism. But since you ask, yes, racism against Palestinians, as against any group, is deplorable, and should never be tolerated. Now that I've answered your question to me could you please answer my question to you?
    you couldn't swing if you were hangin' from a palm tree in a hurricane

  • Byrnzie
    Byrnzie Posts: 21,037
    yosi wrote:
    Why is it that you are so uncritically sure that all accusations of antisemitism are always made in bad faith?

    Not all accusations, but most of them. It's pretty hard to take such accusations seriously when an anti-semitic incident is defined by the ADL as 'any occasion "perceived" to be anti-Semitic by the "Jewish community", and which include 'not just violent acts and incendiary speech but "conversations, discussions, or pronouncements made in public or private, which cross the line of acceptability," as well as "the mood and tone when Jews are discussed."

    I've read 'Beyond Chutzpah', and it pretty conclusively demolishes these claims of a world-wide wave of anti-semitism and exposes them for what they are: a red herring, and an attempt to divert attention from Israel's ongoing crimes against the Palestinians.
  • yosi
    yosi NYC Posts: 3,177
    I could just as easily argue that your claim that most claims of antisemitism are attempts to silence criticism of Israel is itself a red herring meant to deflect attention away from real antisemitism while simultaneously impugning the credibility of Israel's defenders.

    Why not admit that antisemitism is real, and that sometimes arguments against Israel cross a very ugly line. We don't have to agree on how often that happens, but at least don't dismiss it out of hand. Keep an open mind and take each case as it comes.
    you couldn't swing if you were hangin' from a palm tree in a hurricane

  • Commy
    Commy Posts: 4,984
    i don't dismiss anti semitism, it is real, it happens. human beings prejudice, its in the nature of the ignorant.


    but the original post said this....

    Here, then, was a case not of "criticism of Israel" or "anti-Zionism," the usual sheets under which this sort of mentality hides...


    that is using anti semitism as an excuse to silent dissent, to end debate.


    its what many in this thread are saying could happen when you are so ready to throw the anti semitism label out, and they are absolutely right.
  • FiveB247x
    FiveB247x Posts: 2,330
    Game - Set - Match!
    Commy wrote:
    i don't dismiss anti semitism, it is real, it happens. human beings prejudice, its in the nature of the ignorant.


    but the original post said this....

    Here, then, was a case not of "criticism of Israel" or "anti-Zionism," the usual sheets under which this sort of mentality hides...


    that is using anti semitism as an excuse to silent dissent, to end debate.


    its what many in this thread are saying could happen when you are so ready to throw the anti semitism label out, and they are absolutely right.
    CONservative governMENt

    Our government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a law-breaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. - Louis Brandeis
  • Byrnzie
    Byrnzie Posts: 21,037
    edited September 2010
    yosi wrote:
    Keep an open mind and take each case as it comes.

    Do you regard the following as an example of Anti-semitism? Because as far as I'm concerned there's nothing Anti-semitic, or even controversial, about this statement at all.

    "Do not underestimate the Jewish lobby on Capitol Hill. This is the best organized lobby, you shouldn't underestimate the grip it has on American politics—no matter whether it's Republicans or Democrats.

    There is indeed a belief—it's difficult to describe it otherwise—among most Jews that they are right. And it's not so much whether these are religious Jews or not. Lay Jews also share the same belief that they are right. So it is not easy to have, even with moderate Jews, a rational discussion about what is actually happening in the Middle East."



    Edit: But then under the self-serving definition of anti-semitism as used by apologists of Israel, which defines anti-Semitism as 'any occasion "perceived" to be anti-Semitic by the "Jewish community" I suppose that any comment critical of Israel, or the Israel lobby in the U.S, can be described as antiSemitic. In fact, any comment that defends the rights of the Palestinians can be judged anti-Semitic, which is probably why the ADL regards the U.N as anti-Semitic, along with Amnesty international, and Human Rights Watch.
    Post edited by Byrnzie on
  • Byrnzie
    Byrnzie Posts: 21,037
    From 'Beyond Chutzpah' - Norman Finkesltein p.76

    '...the Pew Research Center published the findings of it's latest international survey, conducted from late February to early March 2004 in the United States and eight other countries. "Despite concerns about rising anti-Semitism in Europe," it found, "there are no indications that anti-Jewish sentiment has increased over the past decade. Favourable ratings of Jews are actaully higher now in France, Germany and Russia than they were in 1991." Put simply, the claims of a rampant new anti-Semitism are a sham. A non-ideologically driven political agenda would rank animus directed at Muslims as the priority concern given that "Europeans hold much more negative views of Muslims than of Jews." But the hysteria over a new anti-Semitism hasn't anything to do with fighting bigotry - and everything to do with stifling criticism of Israel.'
  • Commy
    Commy Posts: 4,984
    edited September 2010
    Byrnzie wrote:
    yosi wrote:
    Keep an open mind and take each case as it comes.

    Do you regard the following as an example of Anti-semitism? Because as far as I'm concerned there's nothing Anti-semitic, or even controversial, about this statement at all.

    "Do not underestimate the Jewish lobby on Capitol Hill. This is the best organized lobby, you shouldn't underestimate the grip it has on American politics—no matter whether it's Republicans or Democrats.

    There is indeed a belief—it's difficult to describe it otherwise—among most Jews that they are right. And it's not so much whether these are religious Jews or not. Lay Jews also share the same belief that they are right. So it is not easy to have, even with moderate Jews, a rational discussion about what is actually happening in the Middle East."



    Edit: But then under the self-serving definition of anti-semitism as used by apologists of Israel, which defines anti-Semitism as 'any occasion "perceived" to be anti-Semitic by the "Jewish community" I suppose that any comment critical of Israel, or the Israel lobby in the U.S, can be described as antiSemitic. In fact, any comment that defends the rights of the Palestinians can be judged anti-Semitic, which is probably why the ADL regards the U.N as anti-Semitic, along with Amnesty international, and Human Rights Watch.


    if they consider amnesty international anti-semitic they are fucked.

    AI frees political prisoners...and after having written letters to political prisoners in asia, and after having heard their responses, directly, i can say that that endeavor was just, it was positive, it was worthwhile, for everyone involved.

    i've never read a more powerful piece of writing as that response to our letters after an individual was freed....

    to attack amnesty international as anti semitic is absurd.
    Post edited by Commy on
  • Byrnzie
    Byrnzie Posts: 21,037
    http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archive ... nt/?page=2

    The Failure of the American Jewish Establishment
    June 10, 2010
    Peter Beinart


    '...Not only does the organized American Jewish community mostly avoid public criticism of the Israeli government, it tries to prevent others from leveling such criticism as well. In recent years, American Jewish organizations have waged a campaign to discredit the world’s most respected international human rights groups. In 2006, Foxman called an Amnesty International report on Israeli killing of Lebanese civilians “bigoted, biased, and borderline anti-Semitic.” The Conference of Presidents has announced that “biased NGOs include Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Christian Aid, [and] Save the Children.” Last summer, an AIPAC spokesman declared that Human Rights Watch “has repeatedly demonstrated its anti-Israel bias.” When the Obama administration awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom to Mary Robinson, former UN high commissioner for human rights, the ADL and AIPAC both protested, citing the fact that she had presided over the 2001 World Conference Against Racism in Durban, South Africa. (Early drafts of the conference report implicitly accused Israel of racism. Robinson helped expunge that defamatory charge, angering Syria and Iran.)

    Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International are not infallible. But when groups like AIPAC and the Presidents’ Conference avoid virtually all public criticism of Israeli actions—directing their outrage solely at Israel’s neighbors—they leave themselves in a poor position to charge bias. Moreover, while American Jewish groups claim that they are simply defending Israel from its foes, they are actually taking sides in a struggle within Israel between radically different Zionist visions. At the very moment the Anti-Defamation League claimed that Robinson harbored an “animus toward Israel,” an alliance of seven Israeli human rights groups publicly congratulated her on her award. Many of those groups, like B’Tselem, which monitors Israeli actions in the Occupied Territories, and the Israeli branch of Physicians for Human Rights, have been at least as critical of Israel’s actions in Lebanon, Gaza, and the West Bank as have Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch.

    All of which raises an uncomfortable question. If American Jewish groups claim that Israel’s overseas human rights critics are motivated by anti- Israeli, if not anti-Semitic, bias, what does that say about Israel’s domestic human rights critics? The implication is clear: they must be guilty of self-hatred, if not treason. American Jewish leaders don’t generally say that, of course, but their allies in the Netanyahu government do. Last summer, Israel’s vice prime minister, Moshe Ya’alon, called the anti-occupation group Peace Now a “virus.” This January, a right-wing group called Im Tirtzu accused Israeli human rights organizations of having fed information to the Goldstone Commission that investigated Israel’s Gaza war. A Knesset member from Netanyahu’s Likud promptly charged Naomi Chazan, head of the New Israel Fund, which supports some of those human rights groups, with treason, and a member of Lieberman’s party launched an investigation aimed at curbing foreign funding of Israeli NGOs.

    To their credit, Foxman and other American Jewish leaders opposed the move, which might have impaired their own work. But they are reaping what they sowed. If you suggest that mainstream human rights criticism of Israel’s government is motivated by animus toward the state, or toward Jews in general, you give aid and comfort to those in Israel who make the same charges against the human rights critics in their midst...'
  • Byrnzie
    Byrnzie Posts: 21,037
    yosi wrote:
    I could just as easily argue that your claim that most claims of antisemitism are attempts to silence criticism of Israel is itself a red herring meant to deflect attention away from real antisemitism while simultaneously impugning the credibility of Israel's defenders.

    Why not admit that antisemitism is real, and that sometimes arguments against Israel cross a very ugly line. We don't have to agree on how often that happens, but at least don't dismiss it out of hand. Keep an open mind and take each case as it comes.

    Talking of racism, why are illegal Jewish-only settlements still being built?
  • Byrnzie
    Byrnzie Posts: 21,037
    edited September 2010
    Israel: Anti-Arabism

    'The Israeli Declaration of Independence states that the State of Israel would ensure complete equality of social and political rights to all its inhabitants irrespective of religion, race or sex, and guaranteed freedom of religion, conscience, language, education and culture[48]. While formally equal according to Israeli law, Irish writer and politician Conor Cruise O'Brien claims that anti-Arabism is widespread in Israel.[49]

    During the Arab riots in October 2000 events, Israelis counter-rioted in Nazareth and Tel Aviv, throwing stones at Arabs, destroying Arab property, and chanting "death to Arabs".[50] The Israeli political party Yisrael Beiteinu, whose platform includes the redrawing of Israel's borders so that 500,000 Israeli Arabs would be part of a future Palestinian State, won 15 seats in the 2009 Israeli elections, increasing its seats by 4 compared to the 2006 Israeli elections. This policy, also known as the Lieberman Plan, was described as "anti-Arab" by The Guardian.[51] Avigdor Lieberman, leader of Yisrael Beiteinu, was appointed Minister of Strategic Threats by Ehud Olmert. Arab MK Ahmad Tibi described Lieberman as "a very dangerous and sophisticated politician who has won his support through race hatred".[52] Tibi was refuted in Haaretz by Y. Ben-Meir[53] In 2004, Yehiel Hazan, a member of the Knesset, described the Arabs as worms: "You find them everywhere like worms, underground as well as above." [54][55] Rafael Eitan, former Chief of Staff of the Israel Defense Forces, said that Palestinians who endanger cars on the road should be treated aggressively and their freedom of movement narrowed until they will be like "drugged cockroaches in a bottle". In 2004, then Deputy Defense Minister Ze'ev Boim asked "What is it about Islam as a whole and the Palestinians in particular? Is it some form of cultural deprivation? Is it some genetic defect? There is something that defies explanation in this continued murderousness."[56]

    In Hebron, the slogans "Arabs to the crematoria" and "Arabs - sub-humans" were once spray-painted on a wall by an unknown, and anti-Arab graffiti has been spray-painted in Jerusalem.[57] Leftists noted that this graffiti remains for long periods of time compared to others, and painted swastikas beside the graffiti in order to hasten the city to take action.[58]

    In the 1980s and 1990s "Geography books for the elementary and junior high schools stereotype Arabs negatively, as primitive, dirty, agitated, aggressive, and hostile to Jews … history books in the elementary schools hardly mention Arabs … history textbooks of the high schools, the majority of which cover the Arab-Jewish conflict, stereotype the Arabs negatively. Arabs are presented as intransigent and uncompromising."[59][60]

    The Bedouin submitted a report to the United Nations that disputes the Israeli Government's official state report claiming that they are not treated as equal citizens and Bedouin towns are not provided the same level of services, land and water as Jewish towns of the same size are. The city of Be'er Sheva refused to recognize a Bedouin holy site despite a High Court recommendation.[61]

    Israeli Arabs said they would draw up a list of grievances after the terrorist attack of Eden Natan-Zada. "This was a planned terror attack and we find it extremely difficult to treat it as an individual action," Abed Inbitawi, an Israeli-Arab spokesman, told The Jerusalem Post. "It marks a certain trend that reflects a growing tendency of fascism and racism in Israeli society generally as well as the establishment towards the minority Arab community," he said.[62]

    Often Israeli-Arab soccer players face chants from the crowd when they play such as "no Arabs, no terrorism".[63]

    Abbas Zakour, an Arab Member of the Knesset, was stabbed and lightly wounded by Russian immigrants who shouted anti-Arab chants. The attack was described as a "hate crime".[64]

    In 2006, a research institute poll reported that 41% of Israelis support Arab-Israeli segregation, 40% believed "the state needs to support the emigration of Arab citizens", and 63% believed Arabs to be a "security and demographic threat" to Israel. the poll found that more than two thirds would not want to live in the same building as an Arab, 36% believed Arab culture to be inferior, and 18% felt hatred when they heard Arabic spoken.[51]

    In 2007, the Association for Civil Rights in Israel reported that anti-Arab views had doubled, and anti-Arab racist incidents had increased by 26%.[65] The report quoted polls that suggested 50% of Jewish Israelis do not believe Arab citizens of Israel should have equal rights, 50% said they wanted the government to encourage Arab emigration from Israel, and 75% of Jewish youths said Arabs were less intelligent and less clean than Jews.


    The Arab Association for Human Rights reported in 2008 that several parents removed their children from a daycare centre in Israel after they found out that a 16 month old boy was an Arab.[66]

    The Mossawa Advocacy Center for Arab Citizens in Israel reported a tenfold increase in racist incidents against Arabs in 2008. Jerusalem reported the highest number of incidents. The report blamed Israeli leaders for the violence, saying "These attacks are not the hand of fate, but a direct result of incitement against the Arab citizens of this country by religious, public, and elected officials."[67]

    In March 2009, following the Gaza War, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) drew criticism when several young soldiers had T-shirts printed up privately with slogans and caricatures that were deemed offensive to Palestinians.[68][69][69][70]

    In March 2009, a series of Arab cultural events titled "Jerusalem, the capital of Arab culture", which were scheduled to be held in Jerusalem, Nazareth, and other parts of the country, was banned by Avi Dichter the Internal Security Minister of Israel. Nazareth Mayor Ramiz Jeraisi criticized the move as "anti-Arab." According to Dichter, the events were a violation of the interim agreement between Israel and the Palestinians.[71]

    In June 2009, Haaretz reported on the phenomenon of Israeli Border Police forcing Palestinians to humiliate themselves on camera and then publishing the video on YouTube. Palestinians were made to sing songs with lyrics such as "Let every Arab mother know that the fate of her children is in the hands of the Company". [72]

    In June 2009, Haaretz reported that Israel's Public Security Minister, Yitzhak Aharonovich, called an undercover police officer a "dirty Arab" whilst touring Tel Aviv. [73]
    Post edited by Byrnzie on
  • catefrances
    catefrances Posts: 29,003
    what annoys me about the antisemitic slur is that it has come to be attached to bigotry against jews only.
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • redrock
    redrock Posts: 18,341
    what annoys me about the antisemitic slur is that it has come to be attached to bigotry against jews only.

    Just the way the language evolved, I guess. I guess if one is anti-semitic but against the arabs, they would just shove it in the anti-arab group. Most won't know or bother with other semetic language groups such as the Assyrians.
  • catefrances
    catefrances Posts: 29,003
    redrock wrote:
    what annoys me about the antisemitic slur is that it has come to be attached to bigotry against jews only.

    Just the way the language evolved, I guess. I guess if one is anti-semitic but against the arabs, they would just shove it in the anti-arab group. Most won't know or bother with other semetic language groups such as the Assyrians.

    yeah i know but it has conveniently excluded the other major ethnic group in the region who is invariably seen as 'the enemy'.
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 45,065
    Sem·ite   /ˈsɛmaɪt or, especially Brit., ˈsimaɪt/ Show Spelled[sem-ahyt or, especially Brit., see-mahyt] Show IPA
    –noun
    1. a member of any of various ancient and modern peoples originating in southwestern Asia, including the Akkadians, Canaanites, Phoenicians, Hebrews, and Arabs.
    2. a Jew.
    3. a member of any of the peoples descended from Shem, the eldest son of Noah.
    Use semite in a Sentence
    See images of semite
    Search semite on the Web


    Origin:
    1870–75; < NL sēmīta < LL Sēm (< Gk Sḗm < Heb Shēm Shem) + -īta -ite1

    —Related forms
    non-Semite, noun Dictionary.com Unabridged
    Based on the Random House Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2010.
    Cite This Source | Link To semite
    World English Dictionary
    Semite or ( less commonly ) Shemite (ˈsiːmaɪt)

    — n
    1. a member of the group of Caucasoid peoples who speak a Semitic language, including the Jews and Arabs as well as the ancient Babylonians, Assyrians, and Phoenicians
    2. another word for a Jew

    [C19: from New Latin sēmīta descendant of Shem, via Greek Sēm, from Hebrew Shem ]

    Shemite or ( less commonly ) Shemite

    — n

    [C19: from New Latin sēmīta descendant of Shem, via Greek Sēm, from Hebrew Shem ]

    Collins English Dictionary - Complete & Unabridged 10th Edition
    2009 © William Collins Sons & Co. Ltd. 1979, 1986 © HarperCollins
    Publishers 1998, 2000, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009
    Cite This Source

    Word Origin & History

    Semite

    1847, "Jew, Arab, Assyrian, Aramæan," from Mod.L. Semita, from L.L. Sem "Shem," one of the three sons of Noah (Gen. x:21-30), regarded as the ancestor of the Semites (in the days when anthropology was still bound by the Bible), from Heb. Shem. Semitic (1813 of languages, 1826 of persons) is probably from Ger. semitisch (first used by Ger. historian August Schlözer, 1781), denoting the language group that includes Hebrew, Arabic, Aramaic, Assyrian, etc. In recent use often with the specific sense "Jewish," but not historically so limited. Online Etymology Dictionary, © 2010 Douglas Harper
    Cite This Source
    Cultural Dictionary
    Semite [( sem -eyet)]


    Someone who belongs to the Semitic peoples. The Semites are supposedly descended from the biblical Shem, the eldest son of Noah.
    The American Heritage® New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third Edition
    Copyright © 2005 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
    Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
    Cite This Source
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 45,065
    Ancient Semitic peoples

    Approximate distribution of Semitic language around 1 A.D.The following is a list of ancient Semitic peoples.

    Akkadians — migrated into Mesopotamia in the late 4th millennium BC and amalgamate with non-Semitic Mesopotamian (Sumerian) populations into the Assyrians and Babylonians of the Late Bronze Age.[4][5]
    Eblaites — 23rd century BC
    Aramaeans or Chaldea — 16th to 8th century BC[6] / Akhlames (Ahlamu) 14th century BC[7]
    Ugarites, 14th to 12th centuries BC
    Canaanite language speaking nations of the early Iron Age:
    Amorites
    Ammonites
    Edomites
    Hebrews/Israelites — founded the nation of Israel which later split into the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah. The remnants of these people became the Samaritans and Jews.
    Moabites
    Phoenicians — founded Mediterranean colonies including Carthage
    Old South Arabian speaking peoples
    Sabaeans of Yemen — 9th to 1st c. BC
    Ethio-Semitic speaking peoples
    Aksumites — 4th c. BC to 7th c. AD
    Arabs, Old North Arabian speaking Bedouins
    Gindibu's Arabs 9th c. BC
    Lihyanites — 6th to 1st c. BC
    Thamud people — 2nd to 5th c. AD
    Ghassanids — 3rd to 7th c. AD
    Nabataeans — adopted Arabic in the 4th century AD
    [edit] Languages
    Main article: Semitic languages

    The Harvard Semitic Museum at Harvard UniversityThe modern linguistic meaning of "Semitic" is therefore derived from (though not identical to) Biblical usage. In a linguistic context the Semitic languages are a subgroup of the larger Afroasiatic language family (according to Joseph Greenberg's widely accepted classification) and include, among others: Akkadian, the ancient language of Babylon; Amharic, the official language of Ethiopia; Tigrinya, a language spoken in Eritrea and in northern Ethiopia; Arabic; Aramaic; Canaanite; Ge'ez, the ancient language of the Eritrean and Ethiopian Orthodox scriptures; Hebrew; Maltese; Phoenician or Punic; Syriac; and South Arabian, the ancient language of Sheba/Saba, which today includes Mehri, spoken by only tiny minorities on the southern part of the Arabian Peninsula.

    Wildly successful as second languages far beyond their numbers of contemporary first-language speakers, a few Semitic languages today are the base of the sacred literature of some of the world's great religions, including Islam (Arabic), Judaism (Hebrew and Aramaic), and Orthodox Christianity (Aramaic and Ge'ez). Millions learn these as a second language (or an archaic version of their modern tongues): many Muslims learn to read and recite Classical Arabic, the language of the Qur'an, and many Jews all over the world outside of Israel with other first languages speak and study Hebrew, the language of the Torah, Midrash, and other Jewish scriptures.

    It should be noted that Berber, Egyptian (including Coptic), Hausa, Somali, and many other related languages within the wider area of Northern Africa and the Middle East do not belong to the Semitic group, but to the larger Afroasiatic language family of which the Semitic languages are also a subgroup.[8] Other ancient and modern Middle Eastern languages — Azerbaijani, Kurdish, Persian, Gilaki, Turkish, ancient Sumerian, and Nubian — do not belong to the larger Afroasiatic language family.

    For a complete list of Semitic languages arranged by subfamily, see list from SIL's Ethnologue.

    [edit] Geography
    Semitic peoples and their languages, in both modern and ancient historic times, have covered a broad area bridging Africa, Western Asia and the Arabian Peninsula. The earliest historic (written) evidences of them are found in the Fertile Crescent, an area encompassing the Babylonian and Assyrian civilizations along the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, extending northwest into southern Asia Minor (modern Turkey) and the Levant along the eastern Mediterranean. Early traces of Semitic speakers are found, too, in South Arabian inscriptions in Yemen, Eritrea, Northern Ethiopia and later, in Roman times, in Nabataean inscriptions from Petra (modern Jordan) south into Arabia.

    Later historical Semitic languages also spread into North Africa in two widely separated periods. The first expansion occurred with the ancient Phoenicians, along the southern Mediterranean Sea all the way to the Atlantic Ocean (colonies which included ancient Rome's nemesis Carthage). The second, a millennium later, was the expansion of the Muslim armies and Arabic in the 7th-8th centuries AD, which, at their height, controlled the Iberian Peninsula (until 1492) and Sicily. Arab Muslim expansion is also responsible for modern Arabic's presence from Mauritania, on the Atlantic coast of West Africa, to the Red Sea in the northeastern corner of Africa, and its reach south along the Nile River through traditionally non-Semitic territory, as far as the northern half of Sudan, where, as the national language, non-Arab Sudanese even farther south must learn it.

    Modern Hebrew was reintroduced in the 20th century, and together with Arabic, is a national language in Israel. Western Aramaic dialects remain spoken in Malula near Damascus. Eastern Neo-Aramaic is spoken along the northern border of Syria and Iraq, Southeast-Turkey (Turabdin) and in far northwestern Iran. These speakers are often called Chaldean or Neo-Assyrian. Mandean is still spoken in parts of southern Iraq. Semitic languages and peoples are also found in the Horn of Africa, especially Eritrea and Ethiopia. Tigrinya, a North Ethiopic dialect, has around six million speakers in Eritrea and Tigray. In Eritrea, Tigre is the language of around 800,000 Muslims. Amharic is the national language of Ethiopia and is spoken by at least 10 million Ethiopian Orthodox Christians. Semitic languages today are also spoken in Malta (where an Italian-influenced language derived from Siculo-Arabic is spoken) and on the island of Socotra in the Indian Ocean between Yemen and Somalia, where a dying vestige of South Arabian is spoken in the form of Soqotri. The Maltese language is the only officially recognized Semitic language of the European Union.

    [edit] Religion
    In a religious context, the term 'Semitic' can refer to the religions associated with the speakers of these languages: thus Judaism, Christianity and Islam are often described as "Semitic religions" (irrespective of language family spoken by their adherents).

    The term Abrahamic religions is more commonly used today. A truly comprehensive account of "Semitic" religions would include the Ancient Semitic religions (such as the religions of Adad, Hadad) that flourished in the Middle East before the Abrahamic religions.

    [edit] Ethnicity and race
    Further information: Caucasian race, Hamitic race, and Scientific racism

    A stylised T and O map, depicting Asia as the home of the descendents of Shem (Sem). Africa is ascribed to Ham and Europe to JaphethIn Medieval Europe, all Asian peoples were thought of as descendants of Shem. By the nineteenth century, the term Semitic was confined to the ethnic groups who have historically spoken Semitic languages. These peoples were often considered to be a distinct race. However, some anti-Semitic racial theorists of the time argued that the Semitic peoples arose from the blurring of distinctions between previously separate races. This supposed process was referred to as Semiticization by the race-theorist Arthur de Gobineau. The notion that Semitic identity was a product of racial "confusion" was later taken up by the Nazi ideologue Alfred Rosenberg.[citation needed]

    In contrast, some recent genetic studies found that analysis of the DNA of Semitic-speaking peoples suggests that they have some common ancestry. Though no significant common mitochondrial results have been yielded, Y-chromosomal links between Semitic-speaking Near-Eastern peoples like Arabs and Hebrews have proved fruitful, despite differences contributed from other groups (see Y-chromosomal Aaron). The studies attribute this correlation to a common Near Eastern origin, since Semitic-speaking Near Easterners from the Fertile Crescent (including Jews) were found to be more closely related to non-Semitic speaking Near Easterners (such as Iranians, Anatolians, and Caucasians) than to other Semitic-speakers (such as Gulf Arabs, Ethiopian Semites, and North African Arabs).[9][10]

    Semiticization is a concept found in the writings of some racial theorists in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.[1] The term was first used by Arthur de Gobineau to label the blurring of racial distinctions that, in his view, had occurred in the Middle-East. Gobineau had an essentialist model of race according to which there were three distinct racial groups: "black", "white" and "yellow" peoples, though he had no clear account of how this division arose. When these races mixed this caused "degeneration". Since the point at which these three supposed races met was in the middle-east, Gobineau argued that the process of mixing and diluting races occurred there, and that Semitic peoples embodied this "confused" racial identity.

    This concept suited the interests of antisemites, since it provided a theoretical model to rationalise racialised antisemitism. Variations of the theory are to be found in the writings of many antisemites in the late nineteenth century. The Nazi ideologue Alfred Rosenberg developed a variant of the theory in his writings, arguing that Jewish people were not a "real" race. According to Rosenberg, their evolution came about from the mixing of pre-existing races rather than from natural selection. The theory of Semiticization was typically associated with other longstanding racist fears about the dilution of racial difference, manifested in negative images of mulattos and other mixed groups.
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14