Something to ponder: The Ideal Woman's Body
Comments
-
That many women and girls see the need to starve themselves and set an utopian ideal truly sucks.
However, to lay that at the feet of men generally, I see as unfair at best. I always wondered about why "man-magazines" have these half-naked models etc on the cover, and the women's magazines have the same women on theirs. The rationale seems to be to show men some eye-candy, but women focus on how to become the eye-candy, instead of getting some for themselves. I mean in all fairness, women' magazines should have half-naked, oiled, muscle-bulging hunks on the cover.
As for what men wants, I sure as hell dont want sickly thin with silicon breasts for my own. (I dont even like much looking at them either, but that's me) I like mine with a little meat on them, as you wont get any nice soft curves without them. And a happy woman comfortable in her body is 100x more sexy than a super-skinny one who clearly isn't comfortable with her body, and whose sole focus is keeping pounds off her.
Anywho, in this, I'm afraid women are their own worst enemies. It's women that fuss over details in clothing/make-up etc which I can guarantee that most males don't really even see or care about. Most of those women's magazines have women editors, you know?
Peace
Dan"YOU [humans] NEED TO BELIEVE IN THINGS THAT AREN'T TRUE. HOW ELSE CAN THEY BECOME?" - Death
"Every judgment teeters on the brink of error. To claim absolute knowledge is to become monstrous. Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty." - Frank Herbert, Dune, 19650 -
blackredyellow wrote:I'm gonna stir up the hornets nest here, but I disagree that it's "mostly men" who ruined the female body image... Us guys will take what we can get... if no women looked like that blonde above, we wouldn't really care...
Here's an analogy for you... we like sports cars... we'll look at pictures of Ferrari's all day, but are perfectly happy driving our Toyota sedan or whatever we have. Just because we like to look at something, doesn't mean that only want that. I'd love to have a big house with 50 acres of land, but I'm happy with our 1500 sq/ft house and small lot in a decent neighborhood.
It's women who buy Cosmo and magazines like that who constantly compare themselves to the sick-thin models... it's mostly women who watch the E! Channel and the TMZ, People, celebrity gossip shows/magazines where these celebrities are shown and criticized (by other women) if they gained 1 pound or didn't get back to heroin-thin 3 weeks after having a baby.
When women get all dressed up and all made up, a lot of the time it's to impress their girlfriends.
Do some men do it? absolutely, but besides the small amount of completely shallow douchebags out there who women probably don't want to be with anyway (but oddly enough some women are attracted to), the rest of us really don't expect a 105 lb model or whatever.0 -
blackredyellow wrote:the rest of us really don't expect a 105 lb model or whatever.
Yeah, who wants a fat model?hippiemom = goodness0 -
Is there an emoticon for shaking one's head in disgust and disdain?
For one thing, the body image presented in the picture above is NOT healthy.
A. The height/weight ratio is not within a healthy range. This woman is 5'8" and weighs 110 pounds. She would have to gain about 15 pounds to even be on the skinny side of a healthy weight. This is according to BMI and also personal experience. Up until a few years ago, I was the exact same height and weight - and, even though I was in no way anorexic, my doctor always told me I needed to gain weight to be healthier. And when I was just a few pounds lighter and still a minor, my parents were threatened with child neglect charges if I didn't gain weight. So, yeah, REAL healthy! :roll:
B. Her tan, as a body image ideal, is unhealthy. Setting this as the goal that girls should strive to achieve tells them that appearance is more important than physical health, and that they should purposefully do something that will harm their physical health (tan) solely to fit a socially contructed ideal of beauty. And, before anyone suggests that women should achieve this ideal with fake tans, let's remember that setting up a standard that cannot be naturally achieved is not healthy either.
C. The same thing goes for the fake breasts. (I'm not going to say that I know for sure that the woman in this picture has fake breasts, but I do know that that size breasts are rarely naturally-occuring on that size frame.) Since it is extremely unlikely that a woman will have a waist that small and breasts that large, that leaves surgery as the only means by which to achieve this standard. There is absolutely no argument to be made that undergoing unnecessary surgical procedures is healthy.
So let's get real here. This is not in any way about being healthy. If it were, everyone would be saying that women with healthy habits are most attractive, or at least that the ideal body is one that is more representative of what the average healthy woman looks like. Instead, this arbitrary ideal for women's bodies is totally socially constructed based on men's perceived desires. (And before anyone says this doesn't represent their desires, let's remember that most of the discussion in this thread is a response to the desires expressed by the first 3 men to post on here - so that image is what we're talking about.) Not only is this "ideal" not healthy, but it blatantly promotes UNhealthy behaviors in women and girls.
(I know I started by saying "for one thing," but I'll have to get to the other things later.)0 -
to each their own and the grass is never greener on the other side, if you love somebody then they will have the ideal body you want.
Godfather.0 -
scb wrote:Is there an emoticon for shaking one's head in disgust and disdain?
For one thing, the body image presented in the picture above is NOT healthy.
A. The height/weight ratio is not within a healthy range. This woman is 5'8" and weighs 110 pounds. She would have to gain about 15 pounds to even be on the skinny side of a healthy weight. This is according to BMI and also personal experience. Up until a few years ago, I was the exact same height and weight - and, even though I was in no way anorexic, my doctor always told me I needed to gain weight to be healthier. And when I was just a few pounds lighter and still a minor, my parents were threatened with child neglect charges if I didn't gain weight. So, yeah, REAL healthy! :roll:
B. Her tan, as a body image ideal, is unhealthy. Setting this as the goal that girls should strive to achieve tells them that appearance is more important than physical health, and that they should purposefully do something that will harm their physical health (tan) solely to fit a socially contructed ideal of beauty. And, before anyone suggests that women should achieve this ideal with fake tans, let's remember that setting up a standard that cannot be naturally achieved is not healthy either.
C. The same thing goes for the fake breasts. (I'm not going to say that I know for sure that the woman in this picture has fake breasts, but I do know that that size breasts are rarely naturally-occuring on that size frame.) Since it is extremely unlikely that a woman will have a waist that small and breasts that large, that leaves surgery as the only means by which to achieve this standard. There is absolutely no argument to be made that undergoing unnecessary surgical procedures is healthy.
So let's get real here. This is not in any way about being healthy. If it were, everyone would be saying that women with healthy habits are most attractive, or at least that the ideal body is one that is more representative of what the average healthy woman looks like. Instead, this arbitrary ideal for women's bodies is totally socially constructed based on men's perceived desires. (And before anyone says this doesn't represent their desires, let's remember that most of the discussion in this thread is a response to the desires expressed by the first 3 men to post on here - so that image is what we're talking about.) Not only is this "ideal" not healthy, but it blatantly promotes UNhealthy behaviors in women and girls.
(I know I started by saying "for one thing," but I'll have to get to the other things later.)
Hmm well she has good muscle mass which requires good eating habits... without taking in enough calories she would lose that muscle fast. And weight is not always the best indicator of health. For example, I am 6 foot and 200 lbs and by that measure not only am I overweight but I am borderline OBESE... I won't be too egotistical here and post a picture of myself but I guarantee you I am not overweight. For Marisa Miller, 110 lbs may be about right because she has a small frame. Also, she is an avid surfer! You can't be a good athlete without eating right and being HEALTHY.
As for the fake boobs, yeah I HATE fake boobs! Seriously, they feel weird and I am all for a "natural" look. As for the tan... as long as it is done in moderation and with sun block it is okay. I read a report recently that said that people are now not getting enough sun! Granted, too much can lead to skin cancer so it is a fine line.
The bottom line is that anorexia and body issues are a horrible problem, I honestly feel for women who don't like the way they look, but I'm sticking to my point that Miller is HEALTHY and there is no problem with the way she looks. The problem MAY BE that the media bombards women with images of her and tells women they should look like her... which is unrealistic. So women, stop worring about what you look like... and worry about living a healthy lifestyle. The byproduct may be that you like the way you look.Everything not forbidden is compulsory and eveything not compulsory is forbidden. You are free... free to do what the government says you can do.0 -
Historically, "thicker" women have always been the preference. Look at any artwork / paintings / photographs of beautiful women prior to the 1960s. Marilyn Monroe was no twig, and she is considered to be one of the most classically beautiful women of all time.
This could just be a trend / phase / fad in the grand scheme of things.0 -
scb wrote:So let's get real here. This is not in any way about being healthy. If it were, everyone would be saying that women with healthy habits are most attractive, or at least that the ideal body is one that is more representative of what the average healthy woman looks like. Instead, this arbitrary ideal for women's bodies is totally socially constructed based on men's perceived desires. (And before anyone says this doesn't represent their desires, let's remember that most of the discussion in this thread is a response to the desires expressed by the first 3 men to post on here - so that image is what we're talking about.) Not only is this "ideal" not healthy, but it blatantly promotes UNhealthy behaviors in women and girls.
(I know I started by saying "for one thing," but I'll have to get to the other things later.)
Actually I disagree...it has everything to do with being healthy.
You make a good point though about the arbitrarty ideal for womens bodies, exactly -- socially constructed based on men's PERCEIVED desires. Women need to stop perceiving and do what is healthy - that should give them a desirable body to someone.
Another problem is definitely cultural/social... I was in CVS the other day and there are walls and walls and racks of candy. So much fucking candy everywhere. Then right next to it is the magazine stand telling women the 15 reasons they need to eat light and pluck things to get a man. the irony is sickening. Fast food, preservatives, sugar... all the marketing... it has sucked too many people in. If we learned to think for ourselves and eat right so that we can enjoy life to the fullest, our bodies would be fine and ideal.
I have dated women of all body types, and i found all of them attractive in some way, but i didnt learn about a real attraction until I met my current g/f who is a vegetarian and doesnt eat ANY junk food. THAT is very attractive and it results in a very health body. She has rubbed off on me, and i hardly eat junky food and i have never felt better in my whole life.Pick up my debut novel here on amazon: Jonny Bails Floatin (in paperback) (also available on Kindle for $2.99)0 -
Read Ishmael and put down the playboy.Post edited by BhagavadGita on0
-
Just like the best beer is the one in front of me....
I certainly see what is meant by the OP, not sure your skills of persuasion are really working out for ya though.
It's important for fathers & mothers to be the great equalizer to ensure that their daughters grow up with higher self-esteem based upon the things that truly count such as kindness, integrity, etc and not how you look in a bathing suit.
IMO the truth is it isn't all what the media tells us we like. Some of it is human nature and uncontrolled urges for certain things.hippiemom = goodness0 -
blackredyellow wrote:Here's an analogy for you... we like sports cars... we'll look at pictures of Ferrari's all day, but are perfectly happy driving our Toyota sedan or whatever we have. Just because we like to look at something, doesn't mean that only want that. I'd love to have a big house with 50 acres of land, but I'm happy with our 1500 sq/ft house and small lot in a decent neighborhood.
The difference between women and cars or women and houses is that women are not objects. We are not here to be acquired, possessed, or traded up. We are not here to serve your purpose or be merely a means to an end. We are not here to be your status symbol or stroke your egos. We are not here to be settled for because you can't afford a flashier model or a until you can afford a better neighborhood.
And the difference in what you are saying here and the message you seem to be defending in the second post is that, although people may be perfectly content settling for a Toyota sedan or a small house in a decent neighborhood and a woman with a normal healthy body, these are not the ideal, the goal, the standard by which cars and homes and bodies should be measured. And your post reaffirms that, while these may be good enough to settle for, the other ideal is BETTER.0 -
JonnyPistachio wrote:Yeah, "most men"!?
wtf is that?
I completely agree with you blackredyellow...
anorexia/bulimia is a terrible thing, but it is in the mind of the person who is suffering.
The only fix i see to the problem would be if everyone stopped buying the fashion magazines, stupid gossip shows, ect...
I'm sorry, but who said "most men"? The post I read referred to the media, and said the media is comprised of "mostly" men. That's totally different. Geez... why all the defensiveness around here?
The pressure in this society to "achieve" a random, socially constructed body image set forth in the media and on rock band forums is not unique to women with anorexia and bulimia or women who read fashion magazines and watch gossip shows. And this pressure is not just in the mind of the person who is suffering. It is very real and is expressed in very real ways in this society.
Really, you think the ONLY thing we can do about this problem is to stop buying fashion magazines and watching gossip shows? You don't think ANOTHER thing we can do about it would be to stop making comments like the first three male posts in this thread?0 -
scb wrote:JonnyPistachio wrote:Yeah, "most men"!?
wtf is that?
I completely agree with you blackredyellow...
anorexia/bulimia is a terrible thing, but it is in the mind of the person who is suffering.
The only fix i see to the problem would be if everyone stopped buying the fashion magazines, stupid gossip shows, ect...
I'm sorry, but who said "most men"? The post I read referred to the media, and said the media is comprised of "mostly" men. That's totally different. Geez... why all the defensiveness around here?
The pressure in this society to "achieve" a random, socially constructed body image set forth in the media and on rock band forums is not unique to women with anorexia and bulimia or women who read fashion magazines and watch gossip shows. And this pressure is not just in the mind of the person who is suffering. It is very real and is expressed in very real ways in this society.
Really, you think the ONLY thing we can do about this problem is to stop buying fashion magazines and watching gossip shows? You don't think ANOTHER thing we can do about it would be to stop making comments like the first three male posts in this thread?
So what was so bad about what I said?
Somewhere in Between Obese and "Coked" out skinny IS and ideal weight for most people.NERDS!0 -
South of Seattle wrote:So what was so bad about what I said?
Somewhere in Between Obese and "Coked" out skinny IS and ideal weight for most people.
Maybe I misunderstood your post, but when Lay down your arms posted a picture of an unnaturally thin, tan, large-breasted, blonde woman looking like she's trying to take off her bikini and said, "Marisa Miller has THE perfect body," and then you replied and said, "Actually that is pretty close to the perfect body," I thought you were agreeing with him.0 -
-
scb wrote:
I was kind of agreeing with Lay down your arms, she is "closer" to the ideal body than the skinny anorexic girl in the video and the larger one that ended up shooting herself.
I think alot of the problem is with the BMI index. That thing is so far off. By that scale I'm considered obese. I would think anyone who has met or seen a picture would not consider me "obese"NERDS!0 -
scb wrote:blackredyellow wrote:Here's an analogy for you... we like sports cars... we'll look at pictures of Ferrari's all day, but are perfectly happy driving our Toyota sedan or whatever we have. Just because we like to look at something, doesn't mean that only want that. I'd love to have a big house with 50 acres of land, but I'm happy with our 1500 sq/ft house and small lot in a decent neighborhood.
The difference between women and cars or women and houses is that women are not objects. We are not here to be acquired, possessed, or traded up. We are not here to serve your purpose or be merely a means to an end. We are not here to be your status symbol or stroke your egos. We are not here to be settled for because you can't afford a flashier model or a until you can afford a better neighborhood.
ummm... it was an analogy to try to make a point (apparently poorly made)... no one is saying that women are property or objects here to serve men's purpose, just like men are not here to serve womens' purpose (well, deep down the main reason for two different sexes is to reproduce, so I guess we are here to serve each other for a "purpose"). You seem way too defensive about subjects like this.
And people "settle" all of the time... It doesn't have to have a negative connotation. I'd like to be a lead guitarist of a world famous rock band, but have settled on being a mediocre guitar player jamming in my basement... I'd love to be the GM of an NHL team, but right now I am content being a box office manager at an arena. I'd like to be married to Salma Hayek, but I love my wife is the most beautiful women in my world and she is perfect. That all could be considered "settling". I'm sure most of the women on here would love to be married to Eddie Vedder, but "settle" for their great husbands that they have.My whole life
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln0 -
hmmmm.....
... now im glad that the pictures above my 11 yr olds bed are of justin beiber.hear my name
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say0 -
South of Seattle wrote:scb wrote:
I was kind of agreeing with Lay down your arms, she is "closer" to the ideal body than the skinny anorexic girl in the video and the larger one that ended up shooting herself.
I think alot of the problem is with the BMI index. That thing is so far off. By that scale I'm considered obese. I would think anyone who has met or seen a picture would not consider me "obese"
I think the first video was just meant to demonstrate that the images we are constantly bombarded with are not accurate portrayals of reality. Maybe it was intended for a different audience.0 -
Yeah this thread kind of went all over the place.
I think something we all can agree on is the media force feeds us their agenda no matter what it is "Political views, body image, Social class differences, race, etc . . " and we have to be careful on how we interpret these things.
And I think everyone is aware how bad this disease is in reality. But is this disease really caused by the pressures of media and society or is it just something inherent that these people have?NERDS!0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help